The main goal of this method is to produce high-quality, assembly-competent tubulin in quantities sufficient to perform repeated in vitro experiments with the purified components. Microtubules assembled from this tubulin can be used in reconstitution assays based on the total internal reflection fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy technique with either dynamic or stable microtubules, in experiments testing microtubule dynamics, interactions with MAPs or molecular motors, and force generation by the motors25. They can also be used in microtubule-MAP co-pelleting assays and solid-state NMR spectroscopy28.
The enrichment and purity of tubulin throughout the purification process can be monitored by using a Coomassie-stained SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (PAGE) gel, preferably the ‘TUB’ SDS-PAGE gels, that allow for the separation of α- and β-tubulins, which co-migrate as a single band in classical gels32. Lysates collected at different steps (except for the very last depolymerization, see protocol) are loaded onto the gel in comparable amounts for assessing the success of tubulin purification (Figure 2A)24. The final tubulin sample, which is very precious, is only loaded on the gel for the determination of tubulin concentration. It is normal to lose some tubulin in the process of repeated cycles of polymerization and depolymerization. A lower-than-expected yield of the final purified tubulin can be due to either (i) incomplete depolymerization of microtubules, visualized by the presence of an important amount of tubulin in fractions P3, P5, and P7, or (ii) an inefficient tubulin polymerization into microtubules, in which case a lower amount of tubulin is present in fractions P2, P4, and P6 and higher in fractions SN2, SN4, and SN6 (Figure 2B). If the tubulin is lost during polymerization steps (lower amounts of P2 and P4) (i) ensure sufficient tubulin concentration during polymerization (ii) use a fresh aliquot of GTP, and/or (iii) reconfirm the temperature of the polymerization reaction. If the tubulin is lost during depolymerization steps (lower amounts of SN3 and SN5), increase the time as well as pipetting of the mix on ice.
For the quantification of purified tubulin, run the samples along with the known quantities of bovine serum albumin (BSA, 0.5 µg – 1 µg – 2 µg – 4 µg) (Figure 3A) on SDS-PAGE. Gels are stained with Coomassie brilliant blue, scanned, and the intensities of BSA and tubulin bands are measured by quantitative densitometry (Figure 3B) as described at https://openwetware.org/wiki/Protein_Quantification_Using_ImageJ. Please note that the same analysis can be done in Fiji, an upgraded version of ImageJ33. Values from the BSA bands were used to determine the linear regression equation, which was used to calculate the amount of protein in the tubulin bands. Only tubulin band intensities within the range of the BSA curve are used to determine tubulin concentration. Based on the calculated tubulin concentration, aliquots of desired volumes of tubulin are prepared, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at -80 °C. We usually obtain about ~2 mg of tubulin from four spinner bottles of HeLa S3 suspension cultures (~15 g of cells), ~250 µg of tubulin from ten 15-cm diameter dishes (~1.2 g of cells), and ~1 mg of tubulin from 1 g of mouse brain tissue.
To confirm the enrichment of a particular tubulin isotype or modification, ~0.1 µg of the purified tubulin can be immunoblotted using respective antibodies34,35. The control tubulin will vary depending on the tubulin of interest. For tubulin modified in vitro with a modifying enzyme, use non-treated tubulin as control. For tubulin modified in cellulo by the overexpression of a modifying enzyme, use tubulin purified from cells that do not express the enzyme as control (Figure 4A). Control tubulin for tubulin purified from knockout-mouse brains will be tubulin from wild type mice (Figure 4B). In all immunoblot analyses, an equal load of tubulin is verified by using a PTM-independent anti-α-tubulin antibody (12G10).

Figure 1: Tubulin purification from different sources using polymerization-depolymerization cycles. (A) Different sources of tubulin are lysed using specific strategies. HeLa S3 cells cultured in suspension are lysed using a French press; HEK-293 cells are lysed by repetitive pipetting. Adherent cells were lysed using short pulses of sonication and mouse brain tissue using a tissue homogenizer. (B) Schematic representation of the successive steps of the tubulin purification protocol using cycles of cold-depolymerization and warm-polymerization. After lysis and lysate clarification, microtubules are polymerized and pelleted. Microtubules are then depolymerized and subsequently allowed to polymerize in a high-molarity buffer, preventing microtubule-associated protein (MAP) co-sedimentation with the microtubules. MAP-free microtubules are then depolymerized and can be further subjected to a third cycle of polymerization-depolymerization to remove trace amounts of the high-molarity buffer. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Evaluating the success of the tubulin purification. Samples collected at different steps of the tubulin purification protocol were run on a ‘TUB’ sodium dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel (see protocol for details) and stained with Coomassie brilliant blue. (A) In a successful tubulin purification, α- and β-tubulins are progressively enriched throughout the process. After the second polymerization, the microtubule pellet (P4) is virtually free of contamination from other proteins or microtubule-associated proteins (MAPs). Note that it is normal to lose some tubulin during the procedure. (B) In an unsuccessful tubulin purification, the final tubulin yield is low, and tubulin remains either in the pellet after depolymerization or in the supernatant after polymerization (red boxes). In the example shown here, tubulin did not polymerize efficiently in both polymerization steps. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Quantification of the purified tubulin using Coomassie-stained sodium dodecylsulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gels and densitometry. (A) Coomassie-stained SDS-PAGE gel with known quantities of bovine serum albumin (BSA; 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 µg, gray gradient line) and different volumes (0.5 and 1 µL, light and dark colors, respectively) of purified tubulin. In the example shown, tyrosinated tubulin (HeLa S3 tubulin, light and dark orange) and detyrosinated tubulin (HeLa S3 tubulin treated with carboxypeptidase A, light and dark blue) were loaded on the gel. (B) BSA bands from (A) were quantified using ImageJ (in arbitrary units, AU) and plotted against the amount of protein loaded (gray to black points). Those points were used to calculate the linear regression line (the gray gradient line) and equation, which were used to calculate the amounts of protein in the tubulin samples (light and dark orange and blue points) loaded on the gel. This facilitated the calculation of the concentration of the tubulin samples. Note that the points that lie beyond the BSA standard curve should not be used to determine concentration (dark orange and blue points). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Immunoblot analysis of purified tubulin with different PTMs. (A) Tubulins purified from HEK-293 cells: wild type, or cells overexpressing TTLL5 or TTLL7 were analyzed for the specific enrichment of polyglutamylation using the GT335 antibody. While TTLL5 overexpression increases polyglutamylation on α- and β-tubulin, TTLL7 overexpression specifically enriches β-tubulin glutamylation. (B) Tubulin purified from brain tissues of wild type and ttll1-/- mice were analyzed for patterns of glutamylation. Note the strong reduction of polyglutamylation of tubulin from ttll1-/- mice, which lack the major brain glutamylase TTLL136. ‘TUB’ gels were used to separate α- and β-tubulin. An equal amount of tubulin load was confirmed by 12G10, an anti-α-tubulin antibody. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.