$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
VAT plays a crucial role in metabolic regulation and inflammation. Increasing interest in the role of adipocytes and immune cells in the chronic inflammation associated with obesity has led to the development of different techniques to separate the SVF and fat cells present in AT. However, most techniques do not allow to obtain these two different sets of cells viable for downstream applications from the same VAT biopsy in a single procedure, which could be crucial for studies regarding interactions between adipocytes and SVF cells. Therefore, we implemented this protocol that provides a detailed description to isolate viable mature adipocytes and SVF cells present in a VAT biopsy. It differs from previous reports in the time of tissue digestion and collagenase concentration, as well as time and speed of centrifugation for cell separation, enabling adequate adipocyte RNA yields and detailed macrophage subset characterization.
A large amount of enzymatic and non-enzymatic isolation techniques for AT-derived cells have been proposed, with different effects on the biological characteristics and functional properties of isolated cells17,21,22,23,24, so it is necessary to choose the most appropriate strategy according to the goal pursued. Frequently, mature adipocytes and SVF isolation from adipose tissue is achieved using tissue dissociation enzymes25,26,27. Although different enzymes can be used to dissociate AT, the enzymatic digestion with collagenase remains as the gold standard to digest this tissue27,28. Since VAT is composed of a soft matrix, it can be easily digested with Collagenase Type II. This procedure avoids improper tissue dissociation because this enzyme disrupts the extracellular matrix native collagen, releasing many more cells from the fibrous stroma, with a negligible impact on cell viability, cell yield, and cluster differentiation expression19,27,28,29.
In terms of enzymatic digestion, it is also essential to consider the enzyme concentration, the digestion period as well as the centrifugation parameters to design a proper protocol for mature adipocyte and SVF cell isolation from VAT because these factors may impact cell phenotype, recovery, and viability in the final cell suspension27,29. The use of collagenase as a proteolytic enzyme is ideal at low concentration [range 0.075% a 0.3% (w/v)], with an incubation period of less than 2 h, so the phenotypic and functional SVF characteristics such as proliferation rate, differentiation capacity, and frequency of specific cellular lineages, remain unaltered30,31. We use a maximum digestion period of 60 min and 0.25% collagenase, reducing the concentration and length of collagenase exposure to obtain a negligible impact on cellular viability and SVF cells surface markers expression, avoiding skewed results in the flow cytometry analysis. We also include gentle centrifugation steps and shorter centrifugation times of 200 g/5 min to improve cell recovery during fat cell separation, representing an advantage for the protocol, since long and intense centrifugation periods [above 400 g/1 min] increase the death of adipocytes, limiting the cellular yield32,33,34. The SVF cellular recovery achieved through the collagenase-based digestion protocol is similar to the typical yields of 2–6 x 106 cells/g AT reported in the literature, whereas the SVF viability of 63.9 ± 2.0 is moderately lower than the minimum proposed threshold of 70%–80% for these type of cells35,36,37,38. This is likely because we do not use culture media to resuspend the SVF cells as standard protocols, since we characterize the macrophage population through their surface markers, and it has been reported that these cells exhibit remarkable plasticity in response to environmental conditions, even changing their phenotype39,40,41.
Additionally, it is also important to mention that the pregnant women included in this protocol as VAT donors were healthy, with no clinical evidence of metabolic comorbidities, normal weight gain during pregnancy, average age 20–25 years, and normal pregestational Body Mass Index (BMI 18.5–24.9 kg/m2; n = 7), because some authors have described that different donors, age, BMI and gender or ethnicity have an influence on the cell number, and the expression of SFV surface markers42,43,44.
On the other hand, gene expression profile analysis requires reasonable amounts of intact RNA, but its isolation from mature adipocytes is particularly difficult because these cells have a higher lipid content and in some instances, the cell number is low45,46,47,48. We optimized an RNA isolation procedure from mature adipocytes based on a standard guanidine isothiocyanate/phenol method49,50, implementing easy steps that enable eliminate lipids and cellular debris. After sample preparation, column-based RNA extraction allows us to obtain a high-quality DNA-free RNA, including microRNAs, which is quite unusual for AT samples. The purity and integrity verification of these RNAs through a microfluidics-based RNA quality control analyzer ensures that isolated RNA quality is appropriate for downstream applications such as RT-qPCR assays and expression microarrays.
Besides the advantages mentioned before, AT digestion using collagenase allows liberating adipocytes and resident immune cells simultaneously, maintaining the integrity of cell surface receptors; this is an important fact during SVF cell isolation to get reliable and interpretable flow cytometry data27. Additionally, cells isolated from lipid-laden tissues such as VAT tend to be more prone to aggregation, reducing the sorted cell yield, and increasing autofluorescence51. In the protocol, the elimination of these cell aggregates by filtration through three layers of gauze before sorting and their exclusion with the described gating strategy, minimize background fluorescence, improving sample quality for cell sorting.
Previous studies have been conducted to identify the cells present in the SVF using a single set of CD markers characteristic for these cells52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59. For more in-deep characterization of macrophage subtypes in VAT SVF, we categorized these cells by expression of specific cell surface markers. According to CD45 and CD14 markers expression used to identify monocyte/macrophage linage cells in VAT60, we found that this tissue is composed of a typical CD45+CD14+ macrophage population from hematopoietic origin. Using the same protocol, in a previous study we were able to characterize M1 (CD11c) and M2 (CD163 and CD206) macrophage populations20.
The macrophage phenotyping within AT has been categorized as a spectrum from pro-inflammatory macrophages (classically activated-M1) to anti-inflammatory macrophages (alternatively activated-M2) according to the presence of different activation markers on its surface61,62. HLA-DR macrophage marker reflects the macrophage activation degree63,64, and was incorporated in the protocol to establish the M1 or M2 phenotype: macrophage populations expressing HLA-DR+ are inflammatory and HLA-DR- represent non-inflammatory macrophages. So, based on HLA-DR marker expression, two subsets of macrophages were defined: CD45+CD14+HLA-DR- and CD45+CD14+HLA-DR+, which originate from circulating monocytes and better known as monocyte-derived macrophages within the adipose tissue65,66.
Additionally, we quantified CD11c (M1 marker), as well as CD163 and CD206 (M2 marker) on each macrophages subtype, determining that AT macrophages display all evaluated activation markers on their membrane surface, demonstrating that macrophages present in VAT from pregnant women have more complex characteristics than those described for the overly simplified classifications of M1 and M2 macrophage populations. So, applying basic flow cytometry with multicolor antibody panel and stringent cell gating makes it possible to identify and characterize the macrophages from the heterogeneous pool of cells in the SVF. The refined macrophage phenotyping obtained with the protocol can be useful in studies conducted to elucidate the dynamic changes of macrophage populations in the AT that lead to disturbance in AT homeostasis.
Although this protocol was designed to characterize VAT macrophages, adjustments made in the antibody panel could expand its applications to facilitate sorting of other immune cells residing in the AT, since numerous fluorescent antibodies are available to identify specific markers of different lineage. Moreover, the method allows that cell populations purified by cell sorting can be used for post-sort analyses such as DNA/RNA/protein extraction or ex vivo treatments, obtaining the cells directly into an appropriate media with sterility techniques.
In summary, we consider that the protocol detailed herein represents the most efficient tradeoff between time, resources, cellular yield, and cell viability, besides being highly efficient for RNA and miRNA extraction from fat cells, and for characterization of macrophage population in AT.