$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The microfluidic chip described here was designed to enable easy setup of crystallization assays and crystal analysis at room temperature. The procedure described above and in the video was applied in the frame of the structural characterization of the CCA-adding enzyme from the cold-adapted bacterium Planococcus halocryophilus. This enzyme belongs to an essential polymerase family that catalyses the sequential addition of the 3' CCA sequence on tRNAs using CTP and ATP9,10.
The chip was first used to prepare crystals of the enzyme for structural analysis by the method of counter-diffusion. To this end, the enzyme solution was loaded in the eight microfluidic channels (crystallization chambers) by a single injection in the sample inlet of the chip (see Figure 1). The enzyme was used at 5.5 mg/mL in its storage buffer containing 20 mM Tris/HCl pH 7.5, 200 mM NaCl and 5 mM MgCl2. This step was performed manually with a standard 10 µL micropipet. Crystallization solutions (100 mM sodium acetate pH 4.5,1 M diammonium hydrogen phosphate) were then deposited in the reservoirs at the other extremity of the channels.
The loading procedure is straightforward and does not take longer than five minutes (Figure 2). The crystallant then diffuses into the channels, creates a gradient of concentration that triggers crystal nucleation and growth. This gradient evolves dynamically and explores a continuum of supersaturation states5,6 until reaching an equilibrium of crystallant concentration between the channels and the reservoir. Crystallization assays are typically checked under the micoscope over a period of 2 - 4 weeks to track the growth of crystals. Bipyramidal crystals of CCA-adding enzyme appeared throughout the channels after a few days of incubation at 20 °C (Figure 3). The optional fluorescent labeling7 of the protein greatly facilitates the identification of protein crystals and their discrimination from salt crystals (Figure 4).
We exploited the diffusive environment in chip channels to deliver a substrate to the enzyme that builds up the crystals. In the present case, CMPcPP, a CTP analog, was added to the reservoir solutions at a final concentration of 3.75 mM (Figure 5). This addition was performed two days before the crystallographic analysis to allow CMPcPP to reach and occupy the catalytic site of the enzyme, as later confirmed by the crystal structure (see below).
We manufactured a chip holder (Figure 6) in polylactic acid using a 3D printer. The holder enables chip mounting on goniometers using standard magnetic heads. Hence the chip can be easily positioned and translated in the X-ray beam to bring the crystals in diffraction position. The data collection strategy needs to be adapted depending on beamline characteristics and on crystal properties. In the case of the CCA-adding enzyme, data were collected at X06DA and X10SA beamlines, Swiss Light Source (SLS), with an X-ray wavelength of 1.0 Å and Pilatus 2M-F and 6M pixel detectors, respectively. 30-60° of rotation were collected on each crystal at room temperature with images of 0.1° or 0.2° and 0.1 s exposure (see Table 1). Partial datasets were processed individually and cut when the resolution of diffraction patterns started to decay due to radiation damage (detected by the decrease of signal-to-noise ratio
and CC1/2, and an increase of Rmeas in the high resolution shell). Full datasets were reconstituted by merging data from 5 crystals (Table 1). Crystal structures were derived by molecular replacement using standard crystallographic packages and procedures for data processing11 and refinement12. The comparison of the structures of the enzyme and of its complex with CMPcPP reveals the local conformational adaptation that accompanies substrate binding in the active site of the CCA-adding enzyme (Figure 7).

Figure 1: ChipX design. The chip consists of a top layer made of COC (thickness: 1 mm) in which eight microfluidic channels and reservoirs are imprinted. The entire chip is sealed with a layer of COC (thickness: 0.1 mm). All channels are connected to a single inlet on the left hand side for simultaneous sample injection and to individual reservoirs on the right hand side in which crystallization solutions are deposited. The channels, which constitute the actual crystallization chambers of the chip, are 4 cm long and have a cross section of 80 µm x 80 µm. Labels (A1, A2, A3, etc.) embossed along the channels facilitate crystal positioning under the microscope and the preparation of a sample list for data collection. ChipX has the size of a standard microscope slide (7.5 cm x 2.5 cm). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Setting up crystallization assays in ChipX. 1) Deposit 5-6 µL of enzyme solutions using standard 10 µL pipet and tip. 2) Introduce the tip vertically in the sample inlet and inject the solution in the eight channels. 3) Pipet 1 µL of paraffin oil. 4) Introduce the tip vertically in the sample inlet and inject the oil in order to disconnect the channels from each other. 5) Seal the inlet with a piece of tape. 6) Pipet 5 µL of crystallization solution using standard 10 µL pipet and tip. Solutions can be different in every reservoir (e.g., from a screening kit). 7) Orient the pipet tip towards the entry of the channel in the funnel shaped part of the reservoir (to avoid the formation of an air bubble upon solution deposition) and inject the crystallant solution in the reservoir. 8) Seal the reservoirs with a piece of tape and incubate the chip at controlled temperature. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Crystals of CCA-adding enzyme grown by counter-diffusion in the microfluidic channels of ChipX. Scale bar is 0.1 mm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Crystal soaking procedure. 1) Gently remove the tape from the reservoirs. 2) Deposit up to 5 µL of ligand solution using a 10 µL micropipet. 3) Add the ligand to one or several reservoirs. 4) Seal again the reservoirs with a piece of tape and incubate the chip under controlled temperature for 24-48 h before data collection. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Trace fluorescent labeling discriminates protein (left) from salt (right) crystals. The CCA-adding enzyme solution contained 0.4 % (w/w) of protein labeled with carboxyrhodamine. On the right, crystals are illuminated with a 520 nm wavelength light source and the image is taken with a low pass filter at 550 nm (LP550); (inset) structure of carboxyrhodamine-succinimidyl ester. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: (Left) Drawing of the ChipX holder and (Right) ChipX mounted on the goniometer of beamline X06DA at SLS (Villigen, Switzerland) for serial crystal analysis. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7: Comparison of CCA-adding enzyme active site in the apo form (in pink) and in the complex with a CTP analog (in green). Although the overall conformation of the enzyme is not affected, the binding of the CMPcPP ligand is accompanied by a slight reorganization of side chains in the active site. The 2Fo-Fc electron density map (in blue) is contoured at 1.2 sigma. The difference electron density map contoured at 4 sigma (in green) confirms the presence of the ligand in the active site. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Crystallized sample | CCA-adding enzyme | CCA-adding enzyme + CMPcPP |
| Crystal analysis | | |
| X-ray beamline | SLS – X06DA | SLS – X10SA |
| Wavelength (Å) | 1.000 | 1.000 |
| Temperature (K) | 293 | 293 |
| Detector | Pilatus 2M-F | Pilatus 6M |
| Crystal-detector distance (mm) | 300 | 400 |
| Crystals collected | 6 | 14 |
| Crystals selected | 5 | 5 |
| Rotation range per image (°) | 0.1 | 0.2 |
| Exposure time per image (s) | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| No. of images selected | 1000 | 540 |
| Total rotation range (°) | 100 | 108 |
| Space group | P43212 | P43212 |
| a, c (Å) | 71.5, 293.8 | 71.4, 293.6 |
| Mean mosaicity (°) | 0.04 | 0.04 |
| Resolution range (Å) | 46 – 2.54 (2.6 – 2.54) | 48 – 2.3 (2.4 – 2.3) |
| Total No. of reflections | 176105 (9374) | 232642 (32937) |
| No. of unique reflections | 23922 (1598) | 34862 (4066) |
| Completeness (%) | 90.6 (84.6) | 99.5 (100.0) |
| Redundancy | 7.5 (6.0) | 6.7 (8.1) |
 | 8.1 (1.3) | 6.9 (0.7) |
| Rmeas (%) § | 18.6 (126.0) | 18.0 (231.2) |
| CC1/2 (%) £ | 98.7 (55.0) | 98.7 (46.9) |
| Overall B factor from Wilson plot (Å2) | 57.4 | 60.6 |
| Crystallographic refinement | | |
| No. of reflections, working set / test set | 23583 / 1180 | 34840 / 3405 |
| Final Rcryst (%) / Rfree (%) | 18.8 / 21.4 | 20.0 / 22.9 |
| No. of non-H atoms: overall / protein / ligand / solvent | 2998 / 2989 / 0 / 9 | 3057 / 2989 / 29 / 10 |
| R.m.s. deviations for bonds (Å) / angles (°) | 0.009 / 1.23 | 0.010 / 1.22 |
| Average B factors (Å2): overall / protein / ligand / solvent | 60.1 / 60.1 / 0 / 52.7 | 62.5 / 62.6 / 60.1 / 55.5 |
| Ramachandran plot: most favored (%) / allowed (%) | 98.1 / 1.9 | 97.2 / 2.8 |
| PDB id | 6IBP | 6Q52 |
Table 1: Data collection and refinement statistics
§ Redundancy-independent Rmeas = Σhkl(N/N-1)1/2Σi | Ii(hkl)- (hkl)>| / ΣhklΣi Ii(hkl), where N is the data multiplicity 17.
£ Data with low in outer shell (<2.0) were included based on CC1/2 criterion (correlation between two random halves of the dataset > 50%) as proposed by Karplus & Diederichs 18.