$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The aim of using a bioreactor for in-cell NMR experiment is to keep cells alive and metabolically active for a prolonged period of time. A number of critical aspects must be taken into consideration to achieve this aim. First, it is paramount to avoid bacterial contamination when preparing the cell sample and during the NMR data acquisition. If strains of E. coli or other bacteria commonly used for gene cloning and recombinant protein expression are used in the laboratory, they may contaminate the cells during sample preparation. Once in the bioreactor, the bacteria will grow quickly exploiting the fresh growth medium and will cause cell death due to the production of endotoxins. Bacterial contamination is only spotted at an advanced stage, when it turns the growth medium yellow and turbid. Furthermore, incomplete cleaning of the bioreactor could cause contamination of the pump or the tubing with bacteria, yeasts, or common molds.
A requirement for the success of the experiment is the avoidance of gas bubble formation. Gas bubbles trapped between the agarose threads in the active volume of the NMR coil would introduce large magnetic field inhomogeneities, causing incomplete suppression of the H2O signal and severe loss of spectral quality (Figure 2d). Bubbles may be caused by air trapped in the system or by the formation of gaseous CO2. The former can be easily avoided by flushing the system with medium prior to inserting the cell sample, while to avoid the latter it is recommended to decrease the concentration of NaHCO3 in the growth medium, and to keep all parts of the system at a constant temperature to minimize differences in the CO2 solubility. Cellular aerobic metabolism may also cause the formation of gaseous CO2, which can be prevented by increasing the flow rate.
Cell viability should be checked after each run by Trypan Blue Test. However, that does not provide insights on the metabolic activity. To obtain a more complete picture of the metabolic state of the cells during the bioreactor operation, 31P NMR spectra can be performed to assess the production of ATP as a function of time23,25. However, a dedicated probe is often necessary for this measurement, which may allow simultaneous recording with 1H NMR.
In the case of CA II, the presence of well-resolved reporter signals in an unusual region of the 1H spectrum facilitates the analysis from simple 1D NMR spectra and does not require isotope enrichment during protein expression. In general, other proteins could give rise to 1H signals useful for monitoring spectral changes in other regions, such as that typical of the protein hydrophobic core between 0 and -1 ppm11; however, these regions tend to be crowded for folded proteins larger than ~10 kDa. In this case, as shown for SOD1, it is preferable to enrich the protein with 15N, by providing uniformly 15N-enriched growth medium during protein expression, and to monitor real-time changes in 2D 1H-15N NMR spectra. 2D spectra are imported as a 2D arrays in MATLAB, rearranged to 1D arrays and stacked prior to MCR-ALS analysis. The latter approach is generally applicable to any intracellular protein that gives rise to detectable signals, and provides information on protein conformational changes at the single residue level. In principle, the latter approach can be generalized to nD spectra and to other isotope-labeling schemes.
Concerning the application to different types of cells, the protocol should be easily adapted to different cell lines and does not require that the protein of interest is directly expressed in the cells. Therefore, other approaches to in-cell NMR can be combined with this protocol, in which the macromolecule of interest is produced recombinantly, or synthesized, and subsequently inserted into the cells by electroporation or by other delivery methods1,9,38. When working with different cell lines or sample preparation protocols, parameters such as the agarose concentration, the thread thickness, and the final cell density in the agarose threads may need to be optimized empirically. Furthermore, the applicability of the protocol described here is limited to cells that tolerate agarose encapsulation. Other cell types may require different hydrogel formulations, whereas a different setup is recommended when analyzing cells that natively grow in suspension, for example, making use of a coaxial microdialysis membrane to ensure nutrient diffusion while keeping suspended cells confined in the NMR tube23.
Compared to other NMR bioreactor designs19,20,21,22, the device described here relies on a commercially available flow-unit, adapted with minor modifications. Therefore, the device can be easily replicated in different laboratories with high reproducibility. Furthermore, it allows standardized operation and full compliance with strict laboratory safety regulations, if needed. Overall, the flexibility and ease of operation of the bioreactor should allow many other applications of solution NMR, both in cells and in vitro, in addition to those as already reported23,25. Eventually, the same bioreactor design could be applied to samples that resemble more of the physiological environment of a tissue, such as spheroids or organoids, provided that appropriate scaffolds are found for keeping such samples alive-or even sustaining their growth-in the NMR spectrometer.