$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Hydrocephalus, a common neurological disorder affecting approximately 175 per 100,000 adults worldwide1 is characterized by the accumulation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) within the cerebral ventricles due to an imbalance between CSF production and uptake processes in the brain2. As various non-surgical therapies have been unsuccessful3, the only viable treatment of hydrocephalus is the surgical diversion of the CSF from the cerebral ventricles. The most common approach utilized in adults is the placement of a shunt that drains the ventricular CSF into the peritoneal cavity (ventriculoperitoneal [VP] shunt)4,5.
A VP shunt has three subcutaneously located components: a proximal ventricular catheter inserted into a CSF ventricle through a skull burr hole, a valve to regulate the flow, and a distal catheter to connect the valve to the peritoneal cavity where the CSF is deposited and reabsorbed (Figure 1). Alternatively, a shunt can drain into the venous system at the level of the right atrium (ventriculoatrial [VA] shunt)6,7 or divert the spinal CSF from the spine into the peritoneal cavity (lumboperitoneal [LP] shunt)8. There is currently no evidence to support the superiority of VP versus VA versus LP shunt systems. In adults, 15%-25%9,10,11,12 of new VP shunts fail, typically within the first 6 months, and upward of 50% fail in high-risk populations13.VP shunt failure may be secondary to a shunt infection, valve malfunction, or catheter failure at the proximal or distal sites12,14,15,16,17. Each shunt failure requires repeat surgery, which is associated with a cumulative risk for perioperative complications18,19 and stress for patients and families, in addition to increased healthcare infrastructure costs20,21,22,23,24.
The "traditional" VP shunt insertion technique involves freehand insertion of the proximal catheter using surface anatomical landmarks and placement of the distal catheter either via a mini-laparotomy or a trocar conduit25,26,27. These techniques do not allow for real-time tracking or direct visualization of the final location during or after catheter insertion. Failure to achieve an ideal position for these catheters can lead to shunt failure, which is the most frequent long-term complication associated with VP shunt treatment of hydrocephalus10,28. Proximal catheters typically fail due to malposition and/or subsequent occlusion by the choroid plexus tissues or intraventricular debris. The leading causes of distal catheter failure in adults include catheter mispositioning, migration, and/or occlusion by omental tissues, bowel, and intrabdominal debris or adhesions11, 28,29,30,31.
There is recent evidence to suggest that the modification of VP shunt insertion techniques by placing the proximal and distal catheters under neuronavigation and laparoscopic guidance respectively, are associated with reduced risks of shunt failures26,32,33. In addition, compliance with shunt infection reduction protocols has been shown to reduce the risks of shunt failure secondary to infections34. Furthermore, Svoboda et al. described a "falciform technique" where the distal catheter was anchored to the falciform ligament and placed in the perihepatic space away from the omentum, which helped reduce the risk of catheter migration and obstruction by the omentum35. To our knowledge, while the use of neuronavigation and laparoscopy have been independently assessed, their combined benefits have not been reported, and the surgical techniques have not been adequately described in the literature.
We recently completed a 7 year prospective quality improvement study that combined neuronavigation, laparoscopy, the falciform technique and a shunt infection reduction protocol in adult hydrocephalus patients36. With our combined approach, the overall risk of shunt failure was reduced by 44%36. The objective of this paper is to present a surgical video accompanied by a step-by-step guide of the operative techniques to promote a paradigm shift toward the use of these adjuncts to reduce the risks of shunt failures in adults.
The surgical approach presented here can be performed for any VP shunt insertion surgery. We describe the case of a 72-year-old male who was diagnosed with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (iNPH) and met the criteria for a VP shunt insertion37. The patient presented with a 1 year history of progressive gait and cognitive impairment, with intermittent urinary incontinence. His past medical history was significant for hypertension and the surgical treatment of bladder cancer. A magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) brain evaluation of the patient showed ventriculomegaly with an Evan's index of 0.41. An MRI evaluation completed 4 years earlier did not demonstrate ventriculomegaly with an Evan's index of 0.29 (Figure 2). His neurological examination confirmed that he had a wide-based shuffling gait with low steppage and an abnormally slow gait velocity of 0.83 m/s. He had no signs of myelopathy. His Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) version 7.1 score was 22/30, which confirmed his mild-moderate cognitive impairment. After a 3 day external lumbar drain (ELD) trial with hourly CSF removal to test CSF removal symptom responsiveness, his gait velocity improved to 1.2 m/s and his MoCA score increased by 3 points.