Method Article

Software-Assisted Quantitative Measurement of Osteoarthritic Subchondral Bone Thickness

2.8K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/62973

⸱

March 18th, 2022

 ,  ,  ,  ,  , 
1Harrington Laboratory for Molecular Orthopedics, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, 2Division of Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, 3Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center

* These authors contributed equally

In This Article

Summary

This methodology article presents a software-assisted quantitative measurement protocol to quantify histologic subchondral bone thickness in murine osteoarthritic knee joints and normal knee joints as controls. This protocol is highly sensitive to subtle thickening and is suitable for detecting early osteoarthritic subchondral bone changes.

Abstract

Subchondral bone thickening and sclerosis are the major hallmarks of osteoarthritis (OA), both in animal models and in humans. Currently, the severity of the histologic subchondral bone thickening is mostly determined by visual estimation based semi-quantitative grading systems. This article presents a reproducible and easily executed protocol to quantitatively measure subchondral bone thickness in a mouse model of knee OA induced by destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM). This protocol utilized ImageJ software to quantify subchondral bone thickness on histologic images after defining a region of interest in the medial femoral condyle and the medical tibial plateau where subchondral bone thickening usually occurs in DMM-induced knee OA. Histologic images from knee joints with a sham procedure were used as controls. Statistical analysis indicated that the newly developed quantitative subchondral bone measurement system was highly reproducible with low intra- and inter-observer variabilities. The results suggest that the new protocol is more sensitive to subtle or mild subchondral bone thickening than the widely used visual grading systems. This protocol is suitable for detecting both early and progressing osteoarthritic subchondral bone changes and for assessing in vivo efficacy of OA treatments in concert with OA cartilage grading.

Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA), characterized radiographically by joint space narrowing due to the loss of articular cartilage, osteophytes, and subchondral bone (SCB) sclerosis, is the most common form of arthritis1,2. Although the role of peri-articular bone in the etiology of OA is not fully understood, osteophyte formation and SCB sclerosis are generally thought to be the results of the disease process rather than causative factors, but changes in peri-articular bone architecture/shape and biology may contribute to the development and progression of OA3,4. The development of an accurate and easily executed OA grading system, including SCB measurement, is critical for comparative studies among research laboratories and in evaluating the efficacy of therapeutic agents designed to prevent or attenuate OA progression.

SCB is built with a thin dome-like bone plate and an underlying layer of trabecular bone. The SCB plate is the cortical lamella, lying parallel to and immediately under the calcified cartilage. Small branches of arterial and venous vessels, as well as nerves, penetrate through the channels in the SCB plate, communicating between the calcified cartilage and the trabecular bone. The subchondral trabecular bone contains blood vessels, sensory nerves, bone marrow and is more porous and metabolically active than the SCB plate. Therefore, SCB exerts shock-absorbing and supportive functions and is also important for cartilage nutrient supply and metabolism in normal joints5,6,7,8.

SCB thickening (in histology) and sclerosis (in radiography) are the major hallmarks of OA and key research areas of OA pathophysiology. Measuring SCB thickening is an important component of histologic assessments of OA severity. Previously reported digital microradiography for measuring rodent SCB mineral density9 as well as micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) based quantitative SCB measurement in rodent models of OA10,11,12,13 have improved our understanding of SCB structure and the role of SCB changes in OA pathophysiology. SCB area and thickness has also been quantified with histological slides using a sophisticated computer system with specific and expensive bone histomorphometry software14. Nevertheless, visual estimate-based semi-quantitative OA grading systems, including SCB thickening grading, are more widely used than micro-CT at the present time because the grading systems are easy to use, particularly for screening numerous histologic images. However, most existing OA grading systems focus mainly on cartilage changes15,16,17. A widely used osteoarthritic SCB thickness grading method that categorizes SCB thickening as mild, moderate, and severe is largely subjective, and its reliability has not been fully validated15. A reliable and easily executed step-by-step osteoarthritic SCB thickness measurement protocol is either not fully developed or un-standardized.

This study aimed to develop a reproducible, sensitive, and easily executed protocol to quantitatively measure the SCB thickness in a mouse model of OA. Our rigorous measurement tests and statistical analysis demonstrated that this ImageJ software-assisted quantitative measurement protocol could quantify the SCB thickness in both normal and osteoarthritic knee joints. The newly developed protocol is reproducible and more sensitive to mild SCB changes than the widely used visual grading systems. It can be used for detecting early osteoarthritic SCB changes and for assessing in vivo efficacy of OA treatments in concert with OA cartilage grading.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

All animal procedures included in this protocol were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) at the University of Kansas Medical Center, in compliance with all federal and state laws and regulations.

1. Creation of knee OA in mice

  1. Create a mouse model of knee OA by surgical destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) as described by Glasson et al.18 in 22 wild-type BALB/c mice at 10-11 weeks of age. Perform sham surgery as a control procedure on eight mice with the same background and age.
    NOTE: Both sexes were used for the original project to meet the NIH requirement for consideration of sex as a biological variable, though examination of sex difference is not the scope of this protocol.
  2. Anesthetize animals by inhalation of Isoflurane. Check the depth of anesthesia by monitoring their respiratory rate/effort and lack of response to toe/tail pinch. Put animals in a supine position.
  3. Shave the skin in the knee area and clean the skin with Povidone-Iodine + alcohol skin scrub; three alternating cycles.
  4. Perform the DMM procedure on the right knee under a surgical microscope. Expose the knee joint through a medial parapatellar incision (1.2-1.5 cm in length) and incise the joint capsule. Keep the patella and the patellar tendon intact. After careful exposure of the medial meniscotibial ligament (MML) which anchors the medial meniscus to the tibial plateau, transect it with micro-surgical scissors to destabilize the medial meniscus.
  5. Perform sham surgery on the right knee as a control procedure, in which the MML was visualized but not transected.
  6. Close the joint capsule with 8-0 absorbable polyglactin sutures and skin incision with 7-0 non-absorbable sutures for both DMM and sham procedures to assure proper use of the knee once healing has occurred.
  7. Inject SR Buprenorphine (0.20-0.5 mg/kg) subcutaneously (SC) immediately before the surgical procedure for analgesia, which provides pain relief up to 72 h after a single injection. Monitor operated animals after surgery.
  8. Euthanize animals using a CO2 chamber at 2, 8, and 16 weeks post-surgery. After unconsciousness, confirm the death of the animals by a physical method (opening the chest cavity). These methods of euthanasia are consistent with the recommendations of the Panel on Euthanasia of the American Veterinary Medical Association (AVMA).
  9. Harvest the knee joints for histological analyses at 2, 8, and 16 weeks after DMM surgery and at 2 and 16 weeks after Sham surgery to obtain mouse knee joints with different degrees of OA severity or SCB thickening.

2. Preparation of tissue sections and histologic images

  1. Fix mouse knee joint tissue samples in 2% paraformaldehyde, decalcify them in 25% formic acid, embed in paraffin, and section coronally to examine both the medial and lateral compartments.
  2. Cut knee specimens from the posterior side of the knee using a microtome and collect tissue sections that are 5-µm-thick at 70-80 µm intervals to obtain about 40 tissue slides across the entire knee joint. A micrometer-assisted estimation suggests that slide numbers 1-6 are from the far-posterior, 11-18 from mid-posterior, 23-30 from mid-anterior, and 35-40 from the far-anterior portion of the knee joint. Discard or collect intervening sections for additional stains.
  3. Perform Safranin-O and fast green stains according to the manufacturer's instructions to specifically identify cartilage cells and matrices on every five slides. Perform Hematoxylin-Eosin staining according to the manufacturer's instructions to examine the knee joints at the cellular and tissue levels as described previously19,20,21,22.
  4. Acquire histologic images with a microscope equipped with a digital camera. General histopathologic analysis and histologic OA grading were conducted as described previously15,19,20,21,22.

3. Quantitative measurement of osteoarthritic subchondral bone with ImageJ software

  1. Download the ImageJ software and open histologic images of interest.
    1. Download the ImageJ bundled with Java 1.8.0_172 from https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/.
    2. Open the ImageJ program. Click the File tab on the Ribbon and click the Open option to open the histologic image.
    3. Find the file directory address, select the picture file, and click Open.
  2. Calibrate ImageJ with the micrometer on the histologic images.
    1. Use the straight-line tool to sketch one unit of length on the micrometer and click Analyze > (then) Set scale. Set the Known distance and Pixel aspect ratio to 1 and click OK. ImageJ can convert the pixel length to the unit length on micrometer.
    2. Set the measured factor to area. Click Analyze > Set Measurement and check Area and Limit to threshold box under new window. This step sets ImageJ to measure the parameter "Area" within selected "Threshold".
  3. Measure total subchondral bone (SCB) area of interest.
    1. Define the SCB region of interest (ROI) as shown in the orange boxes of Figure 1A, which covers the SCB cortical plate and a portion of the underlying trabecular bone adjacent to the cortical plate in the medial femoral condyle (MFC) and medial tibial plateau (MTP) with specific dimensions for each ROI. Osteoarthritic SCB thickening usually occurs in these areas. Define the SCB ROI with the same shape and dimension in each MFC or MTP for all examined joints to ensure that the same size of the specific ROI was measured for all animals.
    2. Sketch the outline of the total SCB area of interest by using the Polygon selection tool under the main window of ImageJ.
      NOTE: The selection tools give the system a threshold to limit the measured area.
    3. Measure the total SCB area: After the threshold is selected, click Analyze > Measure. A "Results" window with area measurement will open.
  4. Measure the bone substance area containing solid bone without bone marrow.
    1. Click Edit > Clear Outside to exclude the area outside the total SCB area.
      NOTE: Only the total SCB area is visible after clicking Clear Outside option. The picture outside the total SCB area will turn black. This step allows observers to focus on the bone substance area within the area of interest.
    2. Click Image > Adjust > Color threshold to open the "Threshold Color" window. Click Original at the bottom of the "Threshold Color" window to restore the picture to the original status. Use selection tools in step 3.3.2 to draw a small box in the bone substance region. Click the Sample option at the bottom of the "Threshold Color" window to define the bone substance area.
      NOTE: The "Sample" option in the "Threshold Color" window allows ImageJ to select all the same pixels on the total SCB area as the bone substance sample area. The selected bone substance area will turn red.
    3. Click Select at the bottom of the threshold color balance window to create an area measurement threshold. Click Analyze > Measure at ImageJ main menu, and the bone substance area measurement result will show on the "Results" window.
    4. Save the data of the total SCB area and bone substance area.
  5. Calculate the ratio of bone substance area (mm2) to total SCB area (mm2) of interest which represents the bone substance thickness (mm2/1.0 mm2) within the total SCB area.
  6. Measure the SCB thickness of histologic sections/images (as described in steps 3.1-3.5) of far-posterior, mid-posterior, mid-anterior, and far-anterior areas (as described in step 2.2) of DMM-induced OA to assess area-specific SCB thickness of 6 knee joints (Figure 1B).
    ​NOTE: This can validate the reliability of this quantitative measurement protocol because it is known that osteoarthritic SCB changes co-localize with cartilage lesions and that osteoarthritic cartilage damage with SCB thickening is more severe in the weight-bearing areas (mid-portion) of rodent knee joints14,15. Therefore, it is appropriate to use mid-sections for quantitative measurement of osteoarthritic SCB thickening.

4. Statistics

  1. Perform statistical analyses using data from quantitative measurement and visual grading of SCB thickness. Determine the inter- and intra-observer variability and reproducibility by Pearson's correlation coefficient analyses.
  2. Determine the significance of differences between study groups using Student's t-tests or one-way ANOVA, followed by a post-hoc test (Tukey) using spreadsheet software. Consider a p-value of less than 0.05 to be statistically significant.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Reproducibility comparison between visual estimate grading and ImageJ-assisted quantitative measurement:
SCB thickness in 48 regions of interest (ROI) (24 MFC and 24 MTP), defined from a mid-section of each knee from 24 knees/animals was scored by three independent individuals using the existing 0-3 visual scoring scheme as described in the literature15,23, where 0 = normal (no SCB thickening), 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe SCB thick...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Measuring SCB thickening is an important component of histologic assessments of OA severity. Most existing OA grading systems focus mainly on cartilage changes15,16,17. A widely used murine osteoarthritic SCB thickness grading method that categorizes SCB thickening as mild, moderate, and severe is largely subjective, and its reliability has not been fully validated15. The present study has developed and v...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors declare no competing conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) under Award Number R01 AR059088, the Department of Defense (DoD) under Research Award Number W81XWH-12-1-0304, and the Mary and Paul Harrington Distinguished Professorship Endowment.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Safranin-OSigma-AldrichS8884
Fast greenSigma-AldrichF7252
HematoxylinSigma-AldrichGHS216
EosinSigma-AldrichE4382
illustratorAdobeNot applicable

References

  1. Kotlarz, H., Gunnarsson, C. L., Fang, H., Rizzo, J. A. Insurer and out-of-pocket costs of osteoarthritis in the US: evidence from national survey data. Arthritis and Rheumatology. 60 (12), 3546-3553 (2009).
  2. Buckwalter, J. A., Martin, J. A. Osteoarthritis. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews. 58 (2), 150-167 (2006).
  3. Weinans, H., et al. Pathophysiology of peri-articular bone changes in osteoarthritis. Bone. 51 (2), 190-196 (2012).
  4. Baker-LePain, J. C., Lane, N. E. Role of bone architecture and anatomy in osteoarthritis. Bone. 51 (2), 197-203 (2012).
  5. Li, G., et al. Subchondral bone in osteoarthritis: Insight into risk factors and microstructural changes. Arthritis Research and Therapy. 15 (6), 223(2013).
  6. Madry, H., van Dijk, C. N., Mueller-Gerbl, M. The basic science of the subchondral bone. Knee Surgery, Sports, Traumatology, Arthrosclerosis. 18 (4), 419-433 (2010).
  7. Milz, S., Putz, R. Quantitative morphology of the subchondral plate of the tibial plateau. Journal of Anatomy. 185, Pt 1 103-110 (1994).
  8. Blalock, D., Miller, A., Tilley, M., Wang, J. Joint instability and osteoarthritis. Clinical Medicine Insights: Arthritis and Musculoskeleton Disorders. 8, 15-23 (2015).
  9. Waung, J. A., et al. Quantitative X-ray microradiography for high-throughput phenotyping of osteoarthritis in mice. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 22 (10), 1396-1400 (2014).
  10. Botter, S. M., et al. Cartilage damage pattern in relation to subchondral plate thickness in a collagenase-induced model of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 16 (4), 506-514 (2008).
  11. Nalesso, G., et al. Calcium calmodulin kinase II activity is required for cartilage homeostasis in osteoarthritis. Science Reports. 11 (1), 5682(2021).
  12. Ding, M., Christian Danielsen, C., Hvid, I. Effects of hyaluronan on three-dimensional microarchitecture of subchondral bone tissues in guinea pig primary osteoarthrosis. Bone. 36 (3), 489-501 (2005).
  13. Kraus, V. B., Huebner, J. L., DeGroot, J., Bendele, A. The OARSI histopathology initiative - recommendations for histological assessments of osteoarthritis in the guinea pig. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 18, Suppl 3 35-52 (2010).
  14. McNulty, M. A., et al. A comprehensive histological assessment of osteoarthritis lesions in Mice. Cartilage. 2 (4), 354-363 (2011).
  15. Glasson, S. S., Chambers, M. G., Van Den Berg, W. B., Little, C. B. The OARSI histopathology initiative - recommendations for histological assessments of osteoarthritis in the mouse. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 18, Suppl 3 17-23 (2010).
  16. Pritzker, K. P., et al. Osteoarthritis cartilage histopathology: grading and staging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 14 (1), 13-29 (2006).
  17. Mankin, H. J., Dorfman, H., Lippiello, L., Zarins, A. Biochemical and metabolic abnormalities in articular cartilage from osteo-arthritic human hips. II. Correlation of morphology with biochemical and metabolic data. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American. 53 (3), 523-537 (1971).
  18. Glasson, S. S., Blanchet, T. J., Morris, E. A. The surgical destabilization of the medial meniscus (DMM) model of osteoarthritis in the 129/SvEv mouse. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 15 (9), 1061-1069 (2007).
  19. Wang, J., et al. Transcription factor Nfat1 deficiency causes osteoarthritis through dysfunction of adult articular chondrocytes. Journal of Pathology. 219 (2), 163-172 (2009).
  20. Zhang, M., Lu, Q., Budden, T., Wang, J. NFAT1 protects articular cartilage against osteoarthritic degradation by directly regulating transcription of specific anabolic and catabolic genes. Bone Joint Research. 8 (2), 90-100 (2019).
  21. Zhang, M., et al. Epigenetically mediated spontaneous reduction of NFAT1 expression causes imbalanced metabolic activities of articular chondrocytes in aged mice. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 24 (7), 1274-1283 (2016).
  22. Rodova, M., et al. Nfat1 regulates adult articular chondrocyte function through its age-dependent expression mediated by epigenetic histone methylation. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research. 26 (8), 1974-1986 (2011).
  23. Jackson, M. T., et al. Depletion of protease-activated receptor 2 but not protease-activated receptor 1 may confer protection against osteoarthritis in mice through extracartilaginous mechanisms. Arthritis and Rheumatology. 66 (12), 3337-3348 (2014).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Osteoarthritis Mouse ModelImageJ QuantificationMedial Meniscus DestabilizationHistologic ImagingBone SclerosisQuantitative Bone MeasurementMedial Femoral CondyleMedial Tibial PlateauVisual Grading System

Related Articles