$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
In a separate study11, DNA was extracted from bone powder generated from each anatomical sampling location in 11 individuals, using a standard DNA extraction protocol optimized for short fragments from calcified tissue2. Single-stranded libraries were then produced28 and sequenced on a HiSeq 4000 (75 bp paired-end) to a depth of ~20,000,000 reads per sample. The resulting sequence data was then evaluated for endogenous human DNA content using the EAGER pipeline29 (BWA settings: Seed length of 32, 0.1 mismatch penalty, mapping quality filter of 37). All representative results are reported using the same metrics as Parker et al. 202011 for consistency. Libraries from the powdered portions of the pars petrosa yielded, on average, higher endogenous DNA than any of the other 23 anatomical sampling locations surveyed (Figure 6A-B). The seven additional anatomical sampling locations presented in this protocol (the cementum, first pass of the dental pulp chamber, and dentin of permanent molars; cortical bone from the vertebral body and superior vertebral arch of the thoracic vertebra; cortical bone from the apical tuft of the distal phalanx; and cortical bone from the neck of the talus) produced the next highest yields (with no statistical significance between these anatomical sampling locations; Figure 6A-B; Supplemental File 1: EndogenousDNAPreCap). These alternative locations all consistently produced DNA yields adequate for standard population genetics analyses such as mitochondrial analyses and single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analyses. Duplication rates in libraries stemming from all anatomical sampling locations were low (cluster factors < 1.2 on average, calculated as the ratio of all mapping reads to unique mapping reads, Table 2; Supplemental File 1: ClusterFactor), indicating that all libraries screened were of very high complexity. Similarly, average exogenous human DNA contamination estimates were low, averaging < 2% (X chromosome contamination in males, n = 7, as reported by the ANGSD30 pipeline) in all anatomical sampling locations except for the superior vertebral arch (average estimated contamination: 2.11%, with one sample removed as an outlier; KRA005: 19.52%, see Table 2; Supplemental File 1: Xcontamination). Average fragment length (after filtering to remove all reads < 30 bp) was lowest in the material collected from the dental pulp chamber and dentin, with no significant variation among other anatomical sampling locations (55.14 bp and 60.22 bp, respectively in comparison to an average median of 62.87, pair-wise p-values < 0.019, Table 2; Supplemental File 1: AvgFragLength). Additionally, the teeth and thoracic vertebrae each contain multiple anatomical sampling locations where high endogenous DNA recovery was observed, making them particularly suitable as alternatives to the pars petrosa.

Figure 6: Human DNA content for all screened samples. Black lines represent the overall mean, while red lines represent the median (solid: human DNA proportion, dashed: mapped human reads per million reads generated). Individual anatomical sampling locations with an average human DNA proportion higher than the overall mean (8.16%) are colorized in all analyses. (A) The proportion of reads mapping to the hg19 reference genome. The blue dashed line represents the theoretical maximum given the pipeline's mapping parameters (generated using Gargammel31 to simulate a random distribution of 5,000,000 reads from the hg19 reference genome with simulated damage). Individual means (black X) and medians (red circle) are reported for those samples with a higher average human DNA proportion than the overall mean. Confidence intervals indicate upper and lower bounds excluding statistical outliers. (B) The number of unique reads mapping to the hg19 reference genome per million reads of sequencing effort (75 bp paired end). Confidence intervals indicate upper and lower bounds excluding statistical outliers. This figure has been adapted from Parker, C. et al. 202011. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Table 2: Average duplication levels (mapping reads/unique reads), average and median fragment lengths, and X chromosome contamination estimates for all anatomical sampling locations. Error reported as the standard error of the mean. This table has been adapted from Parker, C. et al. 202011.
| Sampling location | Average duplication factor (# mapped reads /# unique mapped reads) | Average fragment length in bp | Average estimated proportion of X chromosome contamination |
| Petrous pyramid | 1.188 ± 0.006 | 65.40 ± 1.36 | 0.000 ± 0.003 |
| Cementum | 1.197 ± 0.028 | 67.28 ± 1.76 | 0.011 ± 0.003 |
| Dentin | 1.188 ± 0.061 | 60.22 ± 2.37 | 0.002 ± 0.007 |
| Pulp | 1.179 ± 0.024 | 55.14 ± 2.90 | 0.013 ± 0.006 |
| Distal phalanx | 1.191 ± 0.049 | 65.95 ± 1.08 | 0.013 ± 0.005 |
| Vertebral body | 1.194 ± 0.037 | 66.14 ± 1.03 | 0.008 ± 0.003 |
| Superior vertebral arch | 1.19 ± 0.017 | 63.02 ± 1.23 | 0.021 ± 0.009* |
| Talus | 1.198 ± 0.010 | 68.20 ± 1.24 | 0.011 ± 0.003 |
| *Sample KRA005 removed as an outlier at 0.1952 | | | |
Code availability
All analyses programs and R modules used in the analyses of this manuscript are freely available from their respective authors. All custom R code is available by request.
Data availability
All raw data used in the calculation of representative results is freely available in the European Nucleotide Archive ENA data repository (accession number PRJ-EB36983) or supplemental materials of Parker, C. et al.11.
Supplemental File 1. Please click here to download this File.