$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex), named after the physiologist Paul Hoffmann, can be evoked by electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves, which carry axons of sensory and motor neurons arising from and leading to the same muscles. It is the electrically induced analog of the monosynaptic stretch reflex, and shares the same pathway1. Unlike the muscle stretch, the H-reflex results from electrical stimulation. When peripheral nerves are electrically stimulated at low current intensity, the Ia afferent fibers are typically depolarized first due to their large axon diameter2. Their action potentials excite alpha motorneurons (αMNs) in the spinal cord, which in turn elicit action potentials that travel down the αMN axons toward the muscle (Figure 1). This cascade generates a muscular response with small amplitude, reflected in the so-called H-wave. By gradually increasing the stimulus intensity, the amplitude of the H-wave increases due to the recruitment of additional motor units. From a certain stimulus intensity, action potentials in the thinner axons of the αMNs are elicited directly, which is recorded as the M-wave. This M-wave appears with a shorter latency than the H-wave (Figure 2). If the stimulation intensity is further increased, the amplitude of the M-wave becomes larger due to the recruitment of more αMN axons, whereas the H-wave gradually becomes smaller. The H-wave can be suppressed at high stimulus intensities due to antidromic backpropagation of action potentials in the αMN axons. These triggered action potentials collide with those from the Ia stimulation and can thus cancel each other out. At supramaximal stimulus intensities, orthodromic (toward the muscle) and antidromic (toward the spinal cord) action potentials occur in all MN axons; the former gives rise to the maximal M-wave amplitude (Mmax), whereas the latter results in complete abolition of the H-reflex3.
For the evaluation of post-stroke spasticity (PSS) or spinal cord injury (SCI), the H-reflex has been used to assess the neural basis of movement and spasticity in humans1. An improved quantification of the change in the H-reflex between measurements and between subjects is achieved by using the ratio of the H- and M-wave (H/M ratio). Alternatively, the rate-dependent depression (RDD) is measured, using a set of ascending frequencies (e.g., 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, and 5.0 Hz). The RDD reflects the integrity of inhibitory circuits that may be disturbed by stroke or SCI. When all neural circuits are intact, there is a uniform, frequency-independent suppression of the H-reflex. However, if there is reduced neural inhibition as a result of stroke or SCI, the suppression of the H-reflex decreases with increasing stimulation frequency4.
The correct electrophysiological recording using surface electrodes can be challenging and may be affected by motor tasks, inhibitory mechanisms, and αMN excitability5. In the transcutaneous recording in rodents, a stimulus electrode is placed near the tibial nerve, and a recording electrode is placed near the related muscles in the forepaw. According to our experience, however, the correct placement of the transcutaneous electrodes (Figure 1A) is even more complex and variable in rodents than surface electrode placement in humans. This can lead to differences in length, frequency, and stimulation intensity necessary to elicit the H-reflex. These methodological challenges could explain why there are only a very limited number of H-reflex measurement studies (e.g., in experimental stroke models3,4, and other spasticity models6. A precise (long-term) stimulation and recording of the H-reflex on individual nerves could, in principle, be achieved using implantable electrodes surrounding the target nerve7,8. Due to the challenging surgery with potential side effects for the animal and potential instability of the probe, this approach has not become a standard in the field. The method presented here also requires some surgical expertise. However, it allows a novel, precise stimulation and recording of isolated nerves in vivo using low stimulation intensities, which avoids simultaneous stimulation of neighboring nerves.