The care for patients with ARDS has greatly improved over the past five decades. Menk et al. reviewed the standards for ventilatory management, pharmacotherapy, and adjuncts to ventilation in treating this inflammatory process1. Individualized ventilation pressure and volume limitation, use of positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) for oxygenation and lung recruitment, and spontaneous breathing trials to minimize diaphragm atrophy are mainstays of care that continue to evolve1. In a multicenter randomized controlled trial, Villar et al. found that the early administration of dexamethasone to patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS reduced time on the ventilator and overall mortality2. Additional multicenter randomized clinical trials, such as RECOVERY and CoDex, studied the use of dexamethasone in patients with COVID-19-related ARDS. They found that early administration of dexamethasone to patients with COVID-19 and moderate or severe ARDS, along with standard care, reduced time on the ventilator and resulted in lower 28-day mortality3,4.
Prone positioning, an effective ventilatory adjunct for patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS, is not a new intervention. Guerin et al. demonstrated that prone positioning for ARDS significantly lowers 28- and 90-day mortality and increases the chance for successful extubation5. Yet placing a patient in the prone position is not without risk; iatrogenic complications such as ET obstruction, central catheter displacement, and pressure injury can occur when attempting this maneuver with a mechanically ventilated patient6,7.
Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, some institutions initiated prone positioning for moderate-to-severe ARDS ad hoc or infrequently, akin to what Spece et al. reported about the slow adoption of low tidal volume ventilation for ARDS despite compelling evidence of its efficacy6,8,9. The COVID-19 pandemic though, demanded a rapid implementation of new knowledge, irrespective of previous gaps in the application of clinical research to patient care.
During the pandemic, both early anecdotal reports, as well as well-constructed studies later, established that proning not only improved physiologic parameters but also reduced patient mortality for patients with COVID-19 ARDS. Shelhamer et al. found that one in-hospital death was avoided for every eight patients with moderate-to-severe ARDS, who were proned during their ICU stay10. Prone positioning was strongly supported as a standard treatment for the COVID-19 patient with ARDS versus being a last-ditch maneuver1,7. However, staff shortages during the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in redeployment of non-critical care staff to critical care areas. These redeployed staff lacked expertise with this high-volume high-risk procedure11. Stressors on these teams both at work and at home resulted in uncertainty and difficulty in maintaining processes. It was imperative to develop a strategy to mitigate adverse events related to prone positioning12.
The goal of this protocol is to demonstrate the effectiveness of a team-based, step-by-step approach to the proning maneuver for patients with COVID-19 ARDS. We have shown that this procedure carries a low risk for device dislodgment and other adverse events. In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, the occurrence of proning is frequent. The advantages of the technique used here include full visual and physical access to the patient with attached tubes, wires, and other equipment, less stress on the patient and healthcare workers by using a breathable transfer matt, and multidisciplinary team participation to decrease adverse outcomes13.
With other manual proning methods, such as the "burrito" method, attached tubes, lines, and wires cannot be visualized during the entire proning process14. Additional techniques found in the wider body of literature rely upon a portable proning frame or a specialized proning bed. Though effective, these methods may be prohibitive if the equipment is not readily available, is too expensive, or if staff lack interprofessional training on management of emergency situations that could occur while using the equipment14,15,16.
Teamwork
The COVID-19 crisis revealed the need to adopt a team mentality because of the high volume of patients, scarcity of supplies, and human resources among hospital-based healthcare professionals. Although interprofessional collaboration in healthcare is not a new concept, being able to quickly pull together a team and perform a high-risk procedure is not something that most nursing staff and allied health professionals train to do17. Some staff discovered they had various levels of proficiency and confidence in relation to proning a patient, as well as competing ideas on the best approach with the least amount of patient complications.
Leadership, respect, adaptability, monitoring each other's performance, closed-loop communication, and team orientation are key elements for a safe and effective team17. Having a shared vision of the critical considerations can be achieved by promoting a standard operating procedure that supports safe and effective care for the patient who needs to be proned. Papazian et al. recommend having a written procedure and detailed training for proning teams18.
Simulation
Practicing or simulating the proning maneuver using a multidisciplinary staff can be an effective tool for both new staff and a review for incumbent staff16. Being mindful and attentive to potential complications during and after proning can be achieved through focused education and multidisciplinary teams for proning8. An ICU nurse and respiratory therapist (RT) focused on critical tube and vascular access management, a wound specialist or skin champion focused on preventing skin injury, and a physical therapist assessing body mechanics and soft tissue injury prevention are examples of effective workload management. Maximum clinical benefit can be achieved by using the unique strengths of specialized staff19.