$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Here, an overview of the steps involved in robotic cochlear implantation is presented. An important part is the selection of suitable candidates for the procedure. To ensure that the safety margins during surgery can be maintained, careful candidate screening needs to be performed to ensure eligibility for the procedure. The distance between the virtually planned trajectory and the facial nerve should be at least 0.4 mm. In addition, at least 0.3 mm distance to the chorda tympani needs to be available. To provide more flexibility in trajectory planning after preoperative imaging on the day of surgery, even larger limits can be considered for patient selection.
As the robotic system relies on the fiducial landmark screws to transfer the plan to the patient, they are of central importance for a safe procedure. The surgeon should carefully select the positions of the fiducial screws to ensure that enough space is available for trajectory drilling. A linear arrangement of three screws should be avoided. Also, it needs to be ensured that the screw for the patient marker is positioned such that the marker remains visible throughout the procedure. The instructions for use of the robotic system provide detailed guidelines for screw positioning. When placing the screws, it needs to be ensured that the holes are pre-drilled perpendicularly to the surface of the mastoid bone. Tight fixing of the screws ensures that no movement occurs during the procedure.
For preoperative imaging, patients should be scanned in apnea, as the breathing motion of the patient can cause motion artifacts that may not be immediately identifiable in the images but later on during the registration process can cause errors that impede commencing the procedure. It should be ensured that the person performing the preoperative planning has received extensive training to confidently identify and label the anatomical structures. In particular, the course of the facial nerve, the chorda tympani, and the selection of the target at the cochlea (usually the center of the round window membrane) need to be trained. For facial nerve generation, additional safety through over-segmentation of the nerve should be considered. In case no imaging modality is available directly in the operating room or no mobile imaging system can be transported into the operating room, the patient needs to be transferred to the neuroradiological department for imaging. The additional patient transfer time needs to be considered. Preoperative planning can be performed in parallel with patient transfer and preparation to save time.
The team should extensively train head positioning in the headrest to ensure that the patient marker and screws are visible to the system at later stages. Wrong head positing can result in invisibility of the markers or infeasible kinematics of the robotic arm. At all stages during robotic cochlear implantation, it needs to be ensured that all the screws are tightly fixed, the patient marker is rigidly attached, and the handpiece of the robot is fixed.
For intraoperative imaging using mobile imaging devices (e.g., mobile cone beam CT), sufficient clearance of the patient's head and the headrest with the sterile draping needs to be ensured. Motion artifacts caused by the scanner touching the sterile drape could worsen the image quality of the intraoperative image and impede decision-making on the safety of the drilled trajectory required for commencing of the drilling.
In an optimal case, the round window membrane is preserved after robotic inner ear access, sealing the inner ear from bone dust and blood that might be introduced by the consecutive steps involved in implant management. As the fiducial screws and patient reference marker are required for inner ear access, it is not recommended to prepare the implant bed before inner ear access to ensure sufficient space for screw placement. In case the round window membrane is not intact after inner ear access, the round window could be temporarily covered as a protective measure until the electrode array insertion is performed.
After access to the inner ear is established, the surgeon may use different techniques to visualize the access. Microscopic inspection through a tympanomeatal flap or direct endoscopic inspection are possible. However, for the later electrode array insertion, we recommend performing a tympanomeatal flap to provide direct access to the electrode array, if required13. The electrode array lead can be marked before insertion to indicate full insertions at the surface of the mastoid bone. We also recommend using the insertion guide tube during insertion to avoid contact with blood and bone dust and to constrain the electrode array to the insertion trajectory14.
The presented procedure applies task-autonomous robotics in the field of otological microsurgery. Potential advantages of the procedure include reproducible, minimally invasive access to the cochlea and, ultimately, targeted, and accurate insertion of electrodes, which could expand the pool of CI patients in the future. The current limitations of the system are the associated additional costs for material and trained staff, the longer surgical duration, and the still manually performed electrode insertion. Currently, robotic cochlear implantation requires more time (about 4 h) than conventional cochlear implantation (about 1.5 h). Therefore, the condition of the patient should be also considered for eligibility.