$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
This protocol describes how to develop confocal-derived osteocyte models to investigate the amount of fluid flow shear stress an osteocyte and its dendritic processes are subjected to due to mechanical loading. An aged and a young C57BL6 mouse were selected to build young and aged confocal image-based osteocyte models. Six other simulated osteocyte models were generated from the same young osteocyte model using the geometry modification technique to study the alteration of LCN morphology due to aging or bone disease. Geometry-modified parameters included the lacunar-canalicular thickness, canalicular density, and diameter. Modified osteocyte models were developed by changing one parameter at a time while holding the other parameters the same. Therefore, the effect of each of the morphological parameters on FFSS is examined in isolation. The results revealed that the amount of FFSS experienced by an osteocyte was different in these osteocyte models, showing the dependency of FFSS on LCN morphology. FFSS values were predicted on various parts of the osteocyte model, such as the osteocyte cell body or dendritic membranes. Dendrites in all models experienced greater FFSS values than the osteocyte cell body membrane.
Figure 5 shows the FFSS contours for young vs. aged osteocyte models generated directly from confocal FITC image stacks and six other osteocyte models developed from Model 1 using the geometry modification technique. The average FFSS on osteocyte and dendritic membranes in the young osteocyte model (Model 1) was 0.42 Pa, which is more significant than the average FFSS of 0.13 Pa in the aged osteocyte model (Model 2). The obtained data show an increase in average FFSS in osteocytes with larger lacunar-canalicular space (Model 7 and Model 8) and a decrease in FFSS in osteocytes with lower canalicular density (Model 3 and Model 4), while FFSS did not significantly change with changing dendrite diameter in Model 5 and Model 6. Model 2 and Model 4 had the lowest FFSS values of 0.19 Pa and 0.13 Pa, respectively. The magnitude of FFSS in Model 8 is greater than in the other osteocyte models. Not only are most of the dendrites in red color in Model 8 but the osteocyte cell body also experiences higher FFSS than in other models.
FFSS experienced by osteocytes was also presented based on the lacunar-canalicular space volume and surface area, which were obtained by post-processing in ANSYS CFX to find out the correlation between FFSS and the altered structure of the LCN. It was also possible to measure the surface area of each model exposed to FFSS greater than 0.8 Pa, which is thought to be the level of FFSS that causes bone formation21,22. The osteocyte modeling showed a correlation between the average FFSS and the lacunar-canalicular space volume or surface area for all osteocyte models, as shown in Table 1. The aged osteocyte (Model 2) and simulated middle-aged osteocyte (Model 4) with the lowest canalicular density had the lowest lacunar-canalicular surface area of 1372.7 µm2 and 1122.6 µm2. Model 2 and Model 4 also had the lowest lacunar-canalicular space volume of 229.4 µm3 and 203.5 µm3, respectively, which can be correlated to their low amounts of FFSS. Model 6, with the largest dendrite diameter, had the largest lacunar-canalicular surface area. Model 8 had the largest lacunar-canalicular space volume and the greatest FFSS values.

Figure 1: Single Z-plane confocal images of a transverse section of a FITC-stained femur taken with 5x, 20x, and 100x oil objectives. The Lacunar-canalicular network is visible in the image taken with the 100x objective. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Confocal image-based models of a young (Model 1) and an aged (Model 2) osteocyte generated from the FITC-stained femur of 4-month-old and 22-month-old C57BL6 mouse. The magnified image shows the lacunar-canalicular (LC) thickness for young osteocyte and the same for the aged osteocyte. Model 1 image has been modified with permission from Niroobakhsh et al.23. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Six osteocyte models developed from Model 1 using the geometry modification technique. Canalicular density was reduced to generate Model 3 (simulated middle-aged) and Model 4 (simulated aged), while dendrite diameter and LC thickness were the same as Model 1. Model 5 and Model 6 were developed with the same canalicular density and LC thickness as Model 1, whereas their dendrite diameter was two and four times greater than Model 1. Model 7 and Model 8 had two times and four times greater lacunar-canalicular thickness, respectively, while canalicular density and dendrite diameter remained the same as in Model 1. Model 1 image has been modified with permission from Niroobakhsh et al.23. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: 3D view confocal image-based young osteocyte model. 3D view of the cross-sectional area of the confocal image-based young osteocyte model depicting the modeling of the lacunar-canalicular space, which is used for fluid analysis around the osteocyte and dendrites. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: FFSS distribution for all osteocyte models shows the dependence of FFSS magnitude on osteocyte morphology. Red regions show the highest FFSS values, especially on the dendritic membranes rather than the osteocyte cell body. This image has been modified with permission from Niroobakhsh et al.23. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Models | Lacunar-canalicular surface area (µm2) | Lacunar-canalicular space volume (µm3) | Ave FFSS (Pa) |
| Confocal image-based osteocyte models | Model 1 | 2652.9 | 261 | 0.42 |
| Young (4-month-old) |
| Model 2 | 1372.7 | 229.4 | 0.19 |
| Aged (22-month-old) |
| Simulated osteocyte models generated using geometry modification technique | Model 3 | 1530.4 | 242.6 | 0.27 |
| (Simulated middle-aged) |
| Model 4 | 1122.6 | 203.5 | 0.13 |
| (Simulated aged) |
| Model 5 | 3724.9 | 302.9 | 0.49 |
| (2 x dendrite diameter) |
| Model 6 | 4791 | 337 | 0.57 |
| (4 x dendrite diameter) |
| Model 7 | 3116.3 | 440.6 | 1.17 |
| (2 x LC thickness) |
| Model 8 | 3542.2 | 658.2 | 1.89 |
| (4 x LC thickness) |
Table 1: Comparison of osteocyte models. Comparison of average FFSS, lacunar-canalicular space volume, and surface area in eight distinct osteocyte models, including two confocal image-based models and six simulated models generated from Model 1 using the geometry modification technique.