$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
This experimental protocol is unique in providing a smooth transition of patients with epilepsy from the EMU to the scanning room, allowing it to be used in clinical and research settings. The use of FDA-approved MR conditional electrodes is an essential component for both clinical recordings during the time spent in the EMU and for safe transfer to MRI without having to remove or exchange the scalp electrodes from the patient. In the EMU, the MR conditional electrodes are connected to an amplifier for simultaneous video and EEG monitoring. For EEG-fMRI recordings, an MR conditional EEG amplifier and an MRI scanner can be used with a 20-channel head-coil, which accommodates the size of the electrode set and connecting wires. It must be noted that before conducting the simultaneous EEG-fMRI recordings in patients with epilepsy, a test run with a healthy subject is highly recommended to confirm the proper operation of all equipment and to become familiar with each required step.
In addition, concrete organization of the team and careful selection of patients also play a significant role in this protocol. To be viable for both clinical and research settings, it is required to have a structured team of epileptologists, nursing staff, EEG technologists, and engineers. For patient selection, the above-listed inclusion and exclusion criteria must be firmly considered.
Furthermore, it is important to address that when EEG-informed fMRI analysis is conducted, clear presence of the key features of EEGs must exist to guide the corresponding BOLD changes in fMRI. Therefore, when conducting the EEG-fMRI recording, it is important to consider patients who have previously demonstrated target EEG features. During the interictal period in patients with epilepsy, IEDs, which are abnormal and suggest epileptogenic potential, are a well-known EEG feature to reference to the BOLD changes16, even though the example here does not include this case. When targeting to obtain IEDs in the interictal EEG-fMRI recordings, experimenters should consider patients with frequent IEDs (at least three IEDs/hour) observed by a scalp EEG, in order to ensure sufficient epileptiform discharges during a scanning session. The number of IEDs can be determined from the EEG monitoring in the EMU, or from referencing the IED frequency seen in the subjects' prior EEG recordings if they exist. The obtained recordings of interictal EEG-fMRI data can bring benefits to understanding and potentially localizing the seizure onset zone17.
Once a clean EEG is obtained after processing the artifact removal steps, further EEG analysis can be applied. For example, EEG source imaging (ESI) can be obtained by applying standardized low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography (sLORETA)18 to estimate the brain's corresponding electrical activity on the cortical surface. The estimated sources can be obtained by inverting the computed lead field matrix based on the head, outer skull, inner skull, and cortex layers created from the patient's MRI using the boundary element method19. There are numerous publicly available toolboxes to obtain EEG source imaging, and Brainstorm is one popularly used MATLAB-based toolbox20.
When ESI is considered using the processed EEG, the total number of electrodes and their distributions must be carefully taken into account so that they can reasonably cover the entire head. The minimum number of electrodes necessary to implement ESI is 32 channels21,22, which is more than the standard number of electrodes used in clinical settings. Thus, it is recommended to include extra channels to cover the entire head with reasonable spacing. The channel selection in this study includes 21 channels, which are conventionally used in the clinic for EEG monitoring, and 11 additional channels to cover the head entirely (Figure 1).
Here, we do not include details of fMRI analysis, since this is out of the scope of our study. However, a possible direction is EEG-informed fMRI analysis23. For instance, the occurrence time of IEDs can be saved as event triggers to correlate with the fMRI, which can lead to a routine event-related fMRI analysis. In this case, a generalized linear model analysis can be used to find the brain regions showing changes in fMRI signal at the time of IEDs.
We point out that a recently published study10 has shown it is possible to use a carbon wire loop system when a more robust artifact removal technique is required16. However, we want to apprise that the integration of the carbon wire loop system in our experimental setting with the MR conditional electrode has not been investigated yet.
Even though this study specifically focuses on the interictal period of epilepsy, the introduced protocol for simultaneous EEG-fMRI can be further extended to the ictal or postictal period. However, specific considerations must be followed when any customized settings are considered. For the postictal phase, an important concern that we are cognizant of is that the patient is given a benzodiazepine prior to transport to the MRI. As for the frequency analysis of EEGs, it has been reported that benzodiazepines do not necessarily alter the specific frequency bands24,25, and in the case of modest changes, these are confined to the somatosensory-motor region26 or frontal lobes27. Furthermore, with respect to simultaneous EEG-fMRI, delta EEG-BOLD correlations showed no changes after benzodiazepine injection compared to a control with saline injection27. The BOLD signal was decreased in only the small areas of Heschel's gyrus and supplementary motor area.