We describe a minimally invasive surgery using a full-endoscopy system for the single segmental thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum, combined with dural ossification, at Hebei General Hospital.
Ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) can result in spinal stenosis. Thoracic spinal cord compression due to spinal stenosis is a common cause of progressive thoracic myelopathy in Asian countries. The incidence of complications is high in open decompression surgeries for thoracic OLF. With dural ossification (DO), the risk of complications is even higher in thoracic OLF. We introduce a full-endoscopic decompression surgery for thoracic OLF combined with DO under local anesthesia. Hemilaminectomy is performed using a high-speed burr under the endoscopy first, and then decompression of the contralateral spinal canal is completed using an “over the top” technique. DO resection uses the eggshell technique; after the base of the DO is cut from the lamina, forceps or lamina rongeurs are typically used for removal. The dural defect left after resection does not need repair. Neurological function was improved, and no complications such as hematoma or neck pain occurred. On imaging, no pseudodural cyst, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, or wound complications were observed after the operation. Endoscopic surgery causes less damage to the posterior ligament complex, so no cases of persistent back pain complaints or secondary internal fixation requirements were found in this study. Full-endoscopic decompression can achieve good imaging and clinical effects in the treatment of thoracic OLF with DO.
Ossification of the ligamentum flavum (OLF) is one of the most common causes of thoracic myelopathy or radiculopathy in Asian countries, especially in Japan1,2. The prevalence has been reported to vary from 3.8% to 26% in East Asia1,3,4. Posterior decompression is recommended for the treatment of thoracic OLF according to the compression location and its aetiologies5. Dural ossification (DO) is a difficult problem in surgical procedures6; when the dura mater is ossified, the incidence of surgical complications such as cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage and spinal cord or nerve root injury increase.
Endoscopic surgeries have been widely used in the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis, with satisfactory clinical outcomes7,8,9. Endoscopic surgeries have many advantages. First, preservation of the posterior ligament complex prevents lumbar instability during these operations. Second, wound healing complications related to cerebrospinal fluid leakage rarely occur in endoscopic surgeries because of thick muscle coverage. As the thoracic and lumbar spine have similar anatomical features, we transplanted this technique to the thoracic spine.
OLF is mostly located in the lower thoracic vertebrae, where the posterior ligament complex is particularly important because of the maximum tensile force10. In cases with dural ossification, CSF leakage resulting from dural defects is inevitable11,12. The incidence rate is 32% in thoracic OLF11. Prevention of the wound problem caused by CSF leakage is a troubling problem for spinal surgeons.
We introduce a full-endoscopic decompression surgery for thoracic OLF combined with DO. In this surgery, bilateral decompression of the spinal canal is achieved by an "over the top" technique. The DO can be completely removed without wound complications. The long-term clinical outcome is satisfactory.
This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hebei General Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants.
1. Preoperative preparation
2. Skin marking and anesthesia
3. Working sheath establishment
4. Endoscopic operation
5. Postoperative care
NOTE: The patient stayed in bed for 24 h after the operation.
From June 2017 to December 2020, full-endoscopic decompression surgeries were performed on four patients in our hospital, including one male and three females aged 46-72 years with an average age of 64.3 years. The average operation time was 185.3 min. The mean follow-up was 16 months. Patients experienced relief of their myelopathy symptoms. The modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) score improved at the last follow-up. The Patient Satisfaction Index (PSI)14 at the last follow-up was 75%, which can be seen in a previous study15 and Table 1.
No complications such as hematoma or neck pain occurred. No imaging pseudo dural cyst, cerebrospinal fluid leakage or wound complications occurred after operation (Figure 13).
Figure 1: Operation plan in the picture archiving and communication system (PACS). (A) Measurement of the thickness of the ossification and lamina. Line a represents the thickness of the ossification. Line b represents the thickness of the lamina. Line c represents the midline. Line d represents the operation path. (B) Measurement of the range of the ossification on the sagittal CT scan. The line represents the length of the ossification. This figure has been modified from Li et al.15. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: The puncture path. (A) The puncture path on the C-arm fluoroscopic anteroposterior imaging. (B) The puncture target on the fluoroscopic imaging: the center point of the triangle formed by upper and lower pedicles and spinous process. (C) The puncture path marked on the skin surface. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: The puncture. (A) Puncture with the blunt head rod. (B) Position of the guide rod under fluoroscopy. This figure has been modified from Li et al.15. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Working sheath establishment. (A) Nail the Kirschner wire into the lamina (A). (B) Position of the wire under fluoroscopy (B). This figure has been modified from Li et al.15. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: The "bone hole" left on the lamina surface by the Kirschner wire as shown by the arrow. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: The extent of the bone window to be removed. The distance can be evaluated by the diameter of the burr. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 7: Exposure of the ossification of the ligamentum flavum. ○ represents the lamina. Δ represents the ossification of the ligamentum flavum. □ represents the soft hypertrophic ligamentum flavum. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 8: Separationg of the ossification from the spinal cord. (A) Separate the ossification from the spinal cord with the hook. (B) Take the ossification out with forceps. → represents the spinal cord. Δ represents the ossification of the ligamentum flavum. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 9: Contralateral spinal canal decompression using the "over the top" technique. (A) → represents the spinal cord. Δ represents the ossification of the ligamentum flavum. ○ represents the lamina. (B) Axial CT image showing the contralateral decompression technique. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 10: Isolate the ossification. (A) Grind the ossification into a thin eggshell.(B) The isolated ossification. → represents the spinal cord. Δ represents the ossification of the ligamentum flavum. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 11: Resection of the dural ossification. (A) The thin and floating dural ossification. (B) Separate the ossification by a hook. (C) Take the ossification out with forceps. (D) The dural ossification taken out from the spinal canal. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 12: Endoscopic view of the decompressed spinal cord. → represents the spinal cord. represents the arachnoid. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 13: Images of a patient with thoracic ossification of the ligamentum flavum combined with dural ossification before, after, and 3 months after surgery. (A) Preoperative CT scan; (B) Postoperative CT scan; (C) Preoperative MRI; (D) Postoperative MRI; (E) MRI 3 months after surgery. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
No. | Sex | Age | Operating segment | Operation time (minutes) | Preoperative mJOA | Last follow-up mJOA | Patient satisfaction |
(Years) | (11points) | (11points) | index | ||||
1 | Female | 46 | T10-11 | 172 | 3 | 7 | 1 |
2 | Female | 67 | T10-11 | 158 | 1 | 5 | 2 |
3 | Female | 72 | T10-11 | 191 | 4 | 6 | 2 |
4 | Male | 72 | T9-10 | 220 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
Overall | 64.3 | 185.3 | |||||
mJOA=modified Japanese Orthopedic Association | |||||||
Patient satisfaction index: 1. Surgery met my exception; 2. surgery improved my conduction enough so that I would go though it again for the same outcome; 3. surgery helped me but I would not go though it again for the same outcome; 4. I am the same or worse compared to before surgery. 1or 2: satisfied. 3or 4: unsatisfied |
Table 1: Clinical information of the four patients in the study.
Although endoscopic thoracic surgery has achieved satisfactory clinical outcomes10,15,16, there are still debates on some operation details, such as the operation sequence, surgical instruments, and decompression skills. The operation sequence and the resection of the DO are the key steps of the surgery. Some surgeons prefer to perform contralateral decompression first and then remove the ipsilateral ossification17, while others perform ipsilateral decompression first and then perform contralateral decompression15,16. If contralateral decompression is performed first, ipsilateral ossification can restrain the floating of the spinal cord so as not to affect the contralateral operation. If ipsilateral decompression is carried out first, the dura can be exposed quickly after the spinal canal breaks through, and the locations of the spinal cord and ossification can be confirmed as soon as possible. At the same time, the pressure of the spinal canal can be released, which is helpful for subsequent operations. In our experience, for the fused type18, decompression from the ipsilateral side first is recommended.
Some surgeons prefer to use a circular saw16, but we prefer to use a diamond burr throughout the process. The circular saw technique is highly efficient, but it requires good hand sensation and multiple X-ray confirmations, and the risk of nerve injury is also higher. Although the efficiency of the drill is slightly lower, the whole procedure is under view, so the operational safety is higher.
DO resection is an intricate problem. When the base is still connected with the OLF, it can be ground into pieces. Once the DO floats, it should be removed en masse by forceps or rongeurs. After removal of the DO, there will be dural defects and an increased risk of spinal cord injury. In all cases in this study, we resected the DO completely and preserved the arachnoid membrane as much as possible. The defective dura was not repaired during the operation, and there was no spinal cord injury or CSF leakage. This could be due to the magnifying effect of endoscopic surgery and the small damage to muscles. To obtain clear vision, endoscopic hemostasis is very important. The measures to do so include raising the infusion bag, dealing with the small bleeding points before it gets out of control, and vessel electrocoagulation before bleeding. Try not to raise the height of the bag while keeping the operation view clear.
For the evaluation of spinal stability after surgery, the follow-up time in this study was 16 months. No case patient complained of persistent back pain or required secondary internal fixation in this study. This could be related to the supporting function of the thorax and ribs, and the fact that endoscopic surgery causes less damage to the posterior ligament complex.
Full-endoscopic decompression surgery has the following technical advantages: the surgical trauma is significantly less than that of open surgery; endoscopic surgery is safer because the enlarged field of vision can identify anatomical structures more clearly; the patients under this anesthesia method were fully conscious during the surgery; when the spinal cord is stimulated, the patient can give good feedback to the operator; and good muscle coverage can avoid cerebrospinal fluid leakage.
The long operation time is a disadvantage of this surgery. Other disadvantage is the steeper learning curve as the operational cases are rarer. We believe that with the optimization of surgical procedures and the improvement of skills and instruments, the operation time will gradually shorten.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
None.
Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) | Neusoft Co., Ltd. | Neusoft PACS | Image requirement: DICOM; Running system: Windows 7 or Windows 10 |
Endoscope system | SPINENDOS GmbH | SP081430.030 | Inner diameter:4.3mm; Outer diameter:7.0mm; Field angle: 80 °; Visual angle: 30 °; Working length: 181 mm. |
Working sheath | SPINENDOS GmbH | SP082615.265 | Φ7.2mm×178mm |
Puncture needle | SPINENDOS GmbH | SP082016.150 | 1.6mm×150mm |
Guide rod | SPINENDOS GmbH | SP082616.300 | Φ7.0mm×225mm |
Endoscopic rongeur | SPINENDOS GmbH | SP082700.040L | Φ4.0mm×360mm |
Bipolar electrocoagulation probe | ELLIQUENCE | DTF-40 | 40cm |
Endoscopic forceps | SPINENDOS GmbH | SP082781.835 | Φ2.5mm×330mm |
Endoscopic hook | SPINENDOS GmbH | SP082628.351 | Φ2.5mm×310mm |
High-speed burr | XIYI | MQZ | Φ3.2mm×328mm |
.