Effect of DIO on kidney tissue in IgAN mice model
Compared with the control group, the mucosal immune-induced IgAN mice model (model group) had a significant increase in proteinuria (Supplementary Figure 2), IgA deposition was visible in the mesangial region, fluorescence was uniformly distributed in clusters throughout the entire mesangial region (Figure 1A), PAS staining of the renal tissue showed mesangial cells proliferation and stromal hyperplasia (Figure 1B), which was reduced in the DIO gavage group (DIO group).
Effect of DIO on B lymphocytes in Peyer's patch
Peyer's patch is the leading site of the conversion of B lymphocytes into IgA-secreting cells. We took Peyer's patch as the research object to observe the effect of DIO on B lymphocytes by detecting the expression of B cell markers CD20 and CXCR5. Immunohistochemical results showed that the expression of CD20 and CXCR5 was significantly higher in the model group compared with the control group. DIO could inhibit the expression of the above molecular markers (Figure 2A,B).
The safe concentration range of DIO on DAKIKI cells
LDH is a marker of plasma membrane integrity and an indicator of cell death, with higher LDH release rates indicating more severe cell damage. The LDH release assay was used to determine the safe concentration range of DIO. The maximum safe concentration of DIO was determined by an LDH release rate below 10%. The results (Figure 3) showed no significant cytotoxicity induced by DIO at concentrations of 0.25 to 1.0 µg/mL. Therefore, the following study used 0.25, 0.5, and 1.0 µg/mL DIO as the dosing level.
Effects of DIO on DAKIKI cell proliferation
The experimental results (Figure 4) showed that compared with the model group (LPS-stimulated group), DIO inhibited LPS-induced DAKIKI cell proliferation in a concentration-dependent manner. DIO at 0.5 and 1.0 µg/mL concentrations significantly inhibited LPS-induced DAKIKI cell proliferation (P < 0.01).
Effects of DIO on the secretory function of DAKIKI cells
Gd-IgA1 levels are closely related to the pathological process of IgAN, and total IgA is tested together as an indicator of cellular secretory function. An ELISA assay was used to detect IgA and Gd-IgA1 content in the supernatant of the DAKIKI cell culture. The results showed (Figure 5A,B) that DAKIKI cells stimulated by LPS secreted more IgA compared with the control group (P < 0.01). In comparison, DIO significantly inhibited DAKIKI cells from secreting IgA (P < 0.01) in a concentration-dependent manner. Compared with the control group, DAKIKI cells stimulated by LPS secreted more Gd-IgA1 with a statistical tendency (P < 0.10), and DIO inhibited Gd-IgA1 secretion from LPS-stimulated DAKIKI cells in a concentration-dependent manner (P < 0.05 and P < 0.01), among which DIO at 1.0 µg/mL significantly inhibited the secretion of Gd-IgA1 with the inhibited rate of 25%.
The mechanism of DIO inhibits Gd-IgA1 secretion by DAKIKI cells
To further investigate the possible mechanism of DIO inhibiting excessive Gd-IgA1 secretion by DAKIKI cells, the levels of glycosylated transferase C1GALT1 and chaperone protein Cosmc mRNA in DAKIKI cells were detected by qRT-PCR, and the results showed (Figure 6A,B) that the relative mRNA expression of C1GALT1 and Cosmc was down-regulated in DAKIKI cells in the model group compared with the control group (P < 0.01). DIO up-regulated the relative mRNA expression of C1GALT1 and Cosmc to different degrees compared with the model group, with DIO 1.0 µg /mL significantly up-regulated the relative mRNA expression of C1GALT1 and Cosmc (P < 0.05).
At the same time, the WB method was used to detect the effect of DIO on the protein expression of C1GALT1 and Cosmc in DAKIKI cells. Compared with the control group, the protein expression of C1GALT1 and Cosmc in DAKIKI cells in the model group decreased obviously (P < 0.05). Compared with the model group, the protein expression of C1GALT1 and Cosmc after DIO intervention was up-regulated. The protein expression of C1GALT1 and Cosmc was significantly up-regulated by DIO at a concentration of 1.0 µg/mL (P < 0.05) (Figure 7A-C).

Figure 1: Histopathology of the kidneys. (A) Immunofluorescence microscope. Kidney sections of mice in each group were stained with anti-IgA (green) and DAPI (blue). The above picture scale bar = 200 μm. The below picture scale bar = 50 μm. n = 6 per group. (B) Representative pictures of PAS staining of kidney tissue from mice in the Control, Model, and DIO groups. Scale bar = 30 μm. The downward arrow shows the mesangial cells and the upward arrow shows the stroma. Scale bar = 30 μm. n = 6 per group. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Effect of DIO on B lymphocyte markers. (A) The expression of CD20 in the Peyer's patch. Scale bar = 200 μm. n = 6 per group. (B) The expression of CXCR5 in the Peyer's patch. The scale bars are in the lower right corner of the image. Scale bar = 200 μm. n = 6 per group. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3. Screening of the safe concentration of DIO on DAKIKI cells. Statistical values are expressed as the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4. Different concentrations of DIO affect the proliferation of DAKIKI cells. The data were expressed as mean ±SD. Compared with the control group, **P < 0.01; compared with the model group, #P < 0.05‚ ##P < 0.01; The results of all experiments were repeated three times. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5. DIO inhibits IgA and Gd-IgA1 secretion by DAKIKI cells. (A) ELISA method detected the expression of IgA in each group. (B) ELISA method detected the expression of Gd-IgA1 in each group. The data were expressed as mean ± SD. Compared with the control group, **P < 0.01; compared with the model group, #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01; all experimental results were repeated three times. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6. The mechanism of DIO inhibits excessive Gd-IgA1 secretion by DAKIKI cells. (A) QRT-PCR detected the mRNA expression of C1GALT1. (B) QRT-PCR detected the mRNA expression of Cosmc. The data were expressed as mean ± SD. Compared with the control group, **P<0.01; compared with the model group, #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01; all experimental results were repeated three times. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7. DIO affects protein expression of C1GALT1 and Cosmc in DAKIKI cells. (A) WB verified the up-regulation of protein expression of C1GALT1 and Cosmc by DIO. (B) Semi-quantitative analysis of C1GALT1 expression was performed using Image J. (C) Semi-quantitative analysis of Cosmc expression using Image J. The data were expressed as mean ±SD. Compared with the control group,*P < 0.05; compared with the model group, #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01, all experimental results were repeated three times. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplementary Figure 1. The schema for the in vivo model. Please click here to download this figure.
Supplementary Figure 2. Changes in proteinuria. The data were expressed as mean ± SD; n = 6 per group. Please click here to download this figure.