$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Vaginal tissue was collected from 10 independent donors undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery. Using the described protocol, cells were isolated from human vaginal tissue. Cell populations had a characteristic elongated, flat, and spindle-shaped appearance. Like other studies, we observed significantly slower cell doubling capacities and reduced clonogenic ability of fibroblasts with increasing age of the donor. These differences were marked when comparing fibroblasts isolated from older individuals (75-78 years old) to those isolated from young individuals (35-47 years old). Cells from middle-aged donors exhibited an intermediate profile (56-61 years old). Cell proliferation rates were initially estimated by direct visualization using a phase-contrast microscope with the same known seeding density.

Figure 1: Diagrammatic representation of the protocol. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 1 shows a diagrammatic representation of the dissociation and isolation protocol. Following these steps, this protocol yielded a 90% success rate of primary fibroblast isolation in nine out of ten donors in sufficient cell numbers to allow for subculturing cells. The median age of donors was 59.
| Protocol (Author, year) | Donor tissue of original protocol | Number of Donors | Donor age in years | Fibroblasts obtained | Morphology |
| Ruiz-Zapata et al., 2013 | Human vagina | 3 | 56-78 | No | N/A |
| Khan et al., 2016 | Mouse ear and tail | 2 | 48-65 | No | N/A |
| Waise et al., 2019 | Human tissue | 3 | 56-75 | No | N/A |
| Nadalutti et al., 2020 | Human foreskin | 1 | 65 | No | N/A |
| Current | Human vagina | 10 | 35-79 | Yes | Spindle-shaped |
Table 1: Comparison of Protocols for Successful Isolation of Human Vaginal Fibroblasts. Comparison of different existed protocols with ours and evidenced by morphological results.
Table 1 shows the results of using other protocols to attempt vaginal fibroblast isolation in this study. We developed a standard protocol for the isolation of primary fibroblasts from vaginal mucosa and older donors5.
We tested several established protocols, including those listed in Table 1, and observed no success in cell isolation using these protocols in our study. We propose the following reasons for their limitations.
The protocol published by Ruiz et al.3 involves scraping off fascia and cutting the tissue into small pieces. In our experience, it is hard to distinguish fascia, and attempts at scraping may result in a significant reduction in cell yield. While this method is straightforward, it lacks critical details, which limits its generalizability. Additionally, the mechanical digestion in this protocol appears insufficient for postmenopausal tissue, which tends to be denser.
Protocols published by Khan et al.9 and Waise et al.13 employ scissors for tissue mincing, which do not introduce significant multidirectional shearing forces compared to the scalpel technique. In our experience, the scissors method did not work effectively either.
Lastly, the Nadalutti et al.14 protocol, which used the explant method, did not successfully yield fibroblasts in our hands. This method may be less effective due to the nature of postmenopausal tissue, which may require more aggressive mechanical and enzymatic processing to dissociate fibroblasts successfully.

Figure 2: Phase contrast image of suspended cells on day 0. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2 shows suspended cells on day 0 using our protocol.

Figure 3: Phase contrast image of vaginal primary fibroblasts on day 14 of culture at 100x magnification from a pooled cell suspension of three 1 cm2 tissue biopsies. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3 shows primary fibroblasts at 100x magnification from a pooled cell suspension of 3 tissue biopsies of 1 cm² in dimensions.
Fibroblast identity was investigated by immunofluorescent techniques as described earlier with minor modifications. To verify the cellular origin of primary vaginal cells, we used specific biomarkers of fibroblastic origin via immunofluorescent staining. Cells were identified as fibroblasts based on positive staining of vimentin (Figure 4), F-actin, and α-SMA from premenopausal and postmenopausal tissue samples (Figure 5). Fibroblasts were cultured to expansion with high viability (>90%) for use in experiments.

Figure 4: Positive staining of vimentin of vaginal fibroblasts. The isolated premenopausal and postmenopausal tissue primary fibroblasts were subjected to IF analysis and the images were taken at 200x magnification. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Positive staining of F-actin and α-SMA of vaginal fibroblasts. The results of protein expression compared with IgG control. The images were collected at 200x magnification. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.