As shown in Table 4 and Table 5, the systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were significantly greater in the MET group than those in the CON group from 1 to 4 weeks. After HTJDTLD treatment, the SBP and DBP of the rats were significantly lower than those in the MET group. Notably, the combined utilization of HTJDTLD and EM had a stronger antihypertensive effect than HTJDTLD treatment alone.
According to HE staining and Masson's trichrome staining, the endometrium of the aortic vessel wall was incomplete and not smooth, and the media was significantly thickened. There was smooth muscle cell proliferation and hypertrophy, the number of layers of arrangement increased, and the fibers were disordered in the MET group compared with those in the CON group. However, the vascular endometrium recovered more completely and smoothly, the media thickening was significantly reduced, and intimal damage in the MET + HTJDTLD + EM, MET + EM, and MET + HTJDTLD groups was significantly relieved (Figure 1 and Figure 2). Furthermore, the Hcy concentration in the methionine group was 2-fold greater than in the control group. However, the Hcy concentrations in the MET + HTJDTLD + EM, MET + EM, and MET + HTJDTLD groups were significantly lower than those in the MET group. Notably, the most significant reduction was found in the MET + HTJDTLD + EM group, which was approximately 1-fold lower than that in the MET group (Figure 3). The mRNA and protein expression results showed that the expression of GPR78, TRAF2, JNK, p-JNK, and caspase-3 was obviously upregulated after methionine treatment. However, HTJDTLD, EM, and the combination of HTJDTLD and EM significantly inhibited the upregulation of GPR78, TRAF2, JNK, and caspase-3. Notably, the combined application of HTJDTLD and EM had the most significant effect (Figure 4 and Figure 5).

Figure 1: HE staining. Thoracic aorta tissues histological changes from (A) CON group, (B) MET group, (C) MET + HTJDTLD + EM group, (D) MET + EM group, and (E) MET + HTJDTLD group. Nuclei are stained blue, whereas the cytoplasm and extracellular matrix have varying degrees of pink staining (100x). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Masson staining. (A) CON group, (B) MET group, (C) MET + HTJDTLD + EM group, (D) MET + EM group and (E) MET + HTJDTLD group. Masson staining of aortic vessels in each group was performed to evaluate the effect of HTJDTLD on deposition and fibrosis (100x). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: The level of Hcy. The serum Hcy concentration of each group was detected by ELISA. Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 6, SD are as follows: CON: 236.5 nmol/L, MET: 185 nmol/L, MET + HTJDTLD + EM: 126.8 nmol/L, MET + EM: 124 nmol/L, MET + HTJDTLD: 325 nmol/L). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: The mRNA expression of GRP78, TRAF2, JNK and caspase-3. After treatment with MET, MET + EM + HTJDTLD, and MET + EM, the expression of ERS-related genes was detected by qRT-PCR. Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 6, SD as follows: GRP78 [CON: 0.12, MET: 0.13, MET + HTJDTLD + EM: 0.11, MET + EM: 0.17, MET + HTJDTLD: 0.12]; TRAF2 [CON: 0.09, MET: 0.09, MET + HTJDTLD + EM: 0.07, MET + EM: 0.11, MET + HTJDTLD: 0.13]; JNK [CON: 0.99, MET: 0.01, MET + HTJDTLD + EM: 0.03, MET + EM: 0.06, MET + HTJDTLD: 0.07; caspase-8 [CON: 0.06, MET: 0.10, MET + HTJDTLD + EM: 0.01, MET + EM: 0.13, MET + HTJDTLD: 0.03). * represents a significant difference compared with the CON group, # represents a significant difference compared with the MET group, Δ represents a significant difference compared with the MET + HTJDTLD group, and ∇ represents a significant difference compared with the MET + EM group. p < 0.01. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: The protein expression of GRP78, TRAF2, JNK, p-JNK and Caspase-3. (A) The protein samples were analyzed by western blotting with GRP78, TRAF2, JNK, p-JNK, and Caspase-3 antibodies. GAPDH was used as a control. (B) Quantification of GRP78, RAF2, JNK, p-JNK, and Caspase-3 proteins was determined by densitometry and has been normalized to GAPDH. Data were presented as mean ± SD (n = 6). * represents a significant difference compared with the CON group, p < 0.01. # represents a significant difference compared with the MET group, Δ represents a significant difference compared with the MET + HTJDTLD group, and ∇ represents a significant difference compared with the MET + EM group. p < 0.01. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Reverse transcription reaction | |
| Component | Volume (mL) |
| Total RNA | 2 |
| gDNA digester Mix | 3 |
| SuperMix plus | 5 |
| RNase-free Water | 10 |
| The reaction program was as follows: 25 °C, 5 min; 55 °C, 15 min; 85 °C, 5 min. |
| RT-PCR | |
| Component | Volume (mL) |
| Template | 2 |
| Forward Primer (10μM) | 0.4 |
| Reverse Primer (10μM) | 0.4 |
| Green qPCR Mix | 10 |
| Nuclease-free Water | 7.2 |
| The reaction program was as follows: pre-denaturation 95 °C, 5 min; denaturation 95 °C, 10 s; annealing/extension 60 °C, 45 s, for a total of 40 cycles. |
Table 1: Reverse transcription reaction volumes.
| Primer name | Sequence (5’ to 3’) |
| GPR78-F | CGTCGTATGTGGCCTTCACT |
| GPR78-R | ATTCCAAGTGCGTCCGATGA |
| TRAF2-F | GAAGGGAGCATTCCTAGACC |
| TRAF2-R | GAAGGGAGCATTCCTAGACC |
| JNK-F | GTCAGAATCCGAACGAGA |
| JNK-R | GTCTACGCAGGCAATCG |
| Caspase-3-F | GCGGTATTGAGACAGACAGTGGAAC |
| Caspase-3-R | GCGGTAGAGTAAGCATACAGGAAGTC |
Table 2: List of primers.
| 10% separation gel, 5 mL system: | |
| Component | Volume (mL) |
| H2O | 1.9 |
| 30% acrylamide | 1.7 |
| 1.5 mol/L Tris-HCL (pH 8.8) | 1.3 |
| 10% SDS | 0.05 |
| 10% ammonium persulfate | 0.05 |
| TEMED | 0.002 |
| 5% concentrated gel, 3 mL system: | |
| Component | Volume (mL) |
| H2O | 2.1 |
| 30% acrylamide | 0.5 |
| 1.0 mol/L Tris-HCL (pH 6.8) | 0.38 |
| 10% SDS | 0.03 |
| 10% ammonium persulfate | 0.03 |
| TEMED | 0.003 |
Table 3: Composition of separation and concentrated gel.
| Group | 1 week | 2 week | 3 week | 4 week |
| CON | 163.4 ± 6 | 150.1 ± 7.0 | 134.2 ± 9.9 | 158.8 ± 10.2 |
| MET | 192.1 ± 9.5## | 166.7 ± 12.8# | 177.3 ± 19.7## | 187 ± 23.6## |
| MET+HTJDTLD+EM | 165.4 ± 9.2## | 148.9 ± 11.1* | 134.5 ± 12.3** | 159.2 ± 19.6** |
| MET+EM | 173 ± 9.1## | 149.9 ± 18.7* | 145 ± 12.5** | 162.4 ± 19.1** |
| MET+HTJDTLD | 176.7 ± 8.4## | 154.9 ± 22.8 | 168.3 ± 10.2 | 172.2 ± 17.4 |
Table 4: The changes in systolic pressure. #p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 vs. control group, *p <0.05 and **p < 0.01 vs. MET group.
| Group | 1 week | 2 week | 3 week | 4 week |
| CON | 138.4 ± 13.8 | 121.2 ± 12.5 | 107 ± 19.7 | 131.1 ± 16.3 |
| MET | 147.9 ± 7.7# | 131 ± 11.9 | 143.7 ± 19.6## | 146 ± 21.4## |
| MET+HTJDTLD+EM | 139.4 ± 10 | 123.1 ± 18.5 | 117.1 ± 9.6** | 129.2 ± 18.6** |
| MET+EM | 140.9 ± 13.4 | 119.6 ± 7.8 | 123.6 ± 10.8** | 128 ± 25.2** |
| MET+HTJDTLD | 140.4 ± 11.3 | 129.5 ± 11.1 | 138.3 ± 15.1 | 132.8 ± 16 |
Table 5: The changes in diastolic pressure.#p < 0.05 and ##p < 0.01 vs. control group, **p < 0.01 vs. MET group.