A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Computed Tomography (CT) Guided Implantation of a Totally Implantable Venous Access Port (TIVAP) through Subclavian Vein

776 views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/65939

⸱

January 13th, 2026

 ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

Implantation of a totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) through the subclavian vein under CT guidance is a highly safe and precise method that can effectively reduce the incidence of complications and facilitate early detection of potential complications.

Abstract

Totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs) have been proven to be safe and effective and are commonly used in cancer patients. Here, we introduce the entire procedure of CT-guided implantation of a TIVAP through the subclavian vein. A total of 283 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, including 215 males and 68 females, underwent TIVAP through the right subclavian vein, with an average age of 46.4 years (range 13-74). One patient experienced a failed right subclavian vein puncture but was able to successfully undergo a left subclavian vein puncture guided by ultrasound. The average operation time was 36.2 min (range 20-90 min), and the length of the catheter was 17.1 cm (range 14-21 cm). There were 3 cases of arterial puncture, 1 case of catheter displacement, 2 cases of hemothorax, 2 cases of pneumothorax, 2 cases of thrombosis, and 2 cases of wound infection. The overall complication rate was 5.3% (15/283). The computed tomography (CT)-guided implantation of a totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) via the subclavian vein can, therefore, be considered a safe and reliable technique.

Introduction

Most patients with advanced cancer require long-term central venous access for the safe delivery of chemotherapeutic agents, total parenteral nutrition, antibiotics, transfusion of blood and blood products1,2,3. Totally implantable venous access port (TIVAPs) and peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are widely used for these purposes. Compared to peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs), totally implantable venous access ports (TIVAPs) are increasingly favored among cancer patients due to their demonstrated advantages, including higher catheterization succes....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

The Institutional Review Board of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center approved the protocol described. Informed consents were waived due to the retrospective nature of this study.

1. Preparations

  1. Prior to performing the procedure, assess the available information and clarify the surgical indications. Ensure there are no active infections and anatomical deformities of the cervical and thorax region that impede central venous access routes, such as clavicle fractures.
  2. Ensure the patient has completed hematology examination, blood test, and coagulation function. Exclusion criteria included coagulopathy (....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

A total of 283 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients underwent TIVAP through the right subclavian vein, with an average age of 46.4 years (range 13-74), including 215 males and 68 females (Table 1). One patient experienced a failed right subclavian vein puncture but was able to successfully undergo a left subclavian vein puncture guided by ultrasound. The average operation time was 36.2 min (range 20-90 min), and the length of the catheter was 17.1 cm (range 14-21 cm). There were 3 cases of arterial puncture.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

First implantation of a TIVAP was performed in 1982 by John Niederhuber using the cephalic vein with the surgical technique10. Now it is generally used in oncology. There are two approaches to perform TIVAPs, the surgical approach and the percutaneous approach. Due to the specialized surgical skills required for the open technique and the widespread perception of percutaneous methods as a more straightforward and safer alternative, the surgical approach has experienced a decline in utilization, wi.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China (Grant No. 2021A1515010479), Guangdong Province Key Field R&D Program Project (2019B110233001), and Guangdong Province Science and Technology Planning Project (2017A010105028).

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Basic Surgical Instrument Set120-5000Fine Science Tools Inc.ISO 13485 certified
Computed Tomography System (SOMATOM Definition AS)20173301123Siemens Healthcare GmbHNMPA valid until 2027-08-21
Heparin Sodium Injection (5000 IU/mL)H51021209Chengdu Haitong Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.NMPA Approval H51021209
Implantable Vascular Access Port (Celsite)20173661677B. Braun Medical SAS (France)CE Mark No. 0123
Lidocaine HCl Injection (2%, 10mL)H3102107Shanghai Zhaohui Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.NMPA Approval H31021073
Patient Monitor (CARESCAPE B650)20213170093GE Medical Systems Finland OyNMPA National Medical Device Registration No. 20213170093
Povidone-iodine Skin Disinfectant Solution3211-0003Likang Pharmaceutical Technology Jiangsu Co., LtdJiangsu Provincial Health License
Sodium Chloride Injection (0.9%, 500mL)H43020455Hunan Kelun Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.NMPA Approval H43020455
Sterile Surgical Gloves (Latex, Size 7.5)MG-100Winner Medical (Guilin) Co., Ltd.Guiyang Medical Equipment Registration No. 20152140022
Surgical Scalpel Blade (#11)SL-011Suzhou Shilai Medical Equipment Co., Ltd.Suxie registration 20162021476

References

  1. Viart, H., Combe, C., Martinelli, T., Thomas, J., Hida, H. Comparison between implantation costs of peripherally inserted central catheter and implanted subcutaneous ports. Ann Pharm Fr. 73, 239-244 (2015).
  2. Zhang, N., Piao, M., Zhao, H. Highlights....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Totally Implantable PortCatheter PlacementPort ComplicationsGuide Wire TechniquePeel Away SheathCavoatrial JunctionBlunt Dissection