$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Critical steps of the protocol and troubleshooting - no light and take care of the mask
As highlighted directly in the protocol description above, avoiding even the trace amounts of light both during cultivation of etiolated plants seedlings or just before starting the protocol is of critical importance11. In our setup, we use a dedicated dark chamber located in the walk-in phytotron and separated from the rest of the phytotron with light-tight rotating door (Supplementary Figure 3). The chamber is equipped with plant cultivation space and workbench allowing to accommodate the device together with control PC and fume hood. This allows us both to grow the plants in darkness and start the measurement without the need for plate transportation.
The way of plant cultivation and mask generation is critical for subsequent quantification of chlorophyll fluorescence signal via the assay proposed. One should avoid getting clumps of gelling agent or small visual trash/dust in the media as it might cause light reflection. As the recognition of chlorophyll fluorescence by the software is limited by the mask, a plant area that will not be covered by the mask will simply not be analyzed by the software. During the 4 h measurement, seedlings grow/move a bit, therefore designated mask could require adjustments as it may not fit through all the measurement rounds for the accurate signal intensity quantification. According to our experience, the imperfect mask definition seems to be the main source of variability. During the optimization experiments, we monitored the changes in the variability of chlorophyll fluorescence values taken for analysis in i) individual seedlings and a group of seedlings with ii) higher (30-40 seeds) and iii) lower (10-15 seeds) density sowing (Supplementary Figure 5). We used a higher density of seed sowing since it showed the lowest variability. The higher variability seen in case of individual seedlings/lower density sowing originates mostly from the higher proportion of pixels located at the edge between the signal and the background and the slight movement of the seedlings during the 4 h measurement interval.
To ensure that all measurements are accurate, check if the plant mask fits the first round, then to the 15th, 30th, 45th, 60th 75th and so on till the last one (by picking the number of the round and clicking Refresh Preview). This will take only a couple of minutes but will ensure that the whole cotyledon area is being covered and evaluated. If at any round the plant mask does not fit (the required area is not fully covered), divide the experiment into several parts. Then perform the protocol starting from Step 4 (4.1-4.13) to create a specific mask separately for each part of the experiment. For example, if you notice the displacement of the plant mask at the round 60-61 (or slightly earlier), divide the experiment into two parts - 1st part (1-60 rounds) and 2nd part (61-121 rounds). For the 1st part use the image of round 41 to generate a plant mask and for the 2nd part use round 91. At Step 4.13, when analyzing the data, be careful to choose the rounds according to the corresponding part of the experiment (e.g., rounds 1-60 for the first part and 61-121 for the second one, as in the aforementioned example) before clicking Analyze. When working with Arabidopsis, the movement of plants is negligible as they grow rather slowly but if applying the protocol for different species (see below), the growth pace should be taken into account.
Modifications and limitations
The number of parameters can be modified, including the intensity and wavelength of the actinic light and/or the light being applied between the intervals of actinic light application. The measuring device includes the integrated, fully motorized, and software-controlled filter wheel. Thus, the measuring algorithm suitable for the quantification of other pigments, typically also products of the tetrapyrolle biosynthetic pathway10,12, might be included in the protocol in case of adding the appropriate filters.
Also, as it was mentioned earlier, the protocol can be used not only for Arabidopsis plants. However, when working with other plant species, each step of the protocol should be revised accordingly taking into consideration the species-specific features including the germination and growth rate and/or the size (Supplementary Figure 6).
One of the important limitations of the protocol is the timespan, during which the chlorophyll quantification analysis can be performed. After chlorophyll becomes integrated into the photosystem complexes, the fluorescence signal becomes biased by the photosynthesis energy consumption (what is called the variable chlorophyll florescence is present) as has been observed during later stages of de-etiolation13. As assayed using OJIP transients assay14,15, no signs of photosynthetic activity was detectable using this experimental setup during the first 4 h of de-etiolation7. However, if the extended time period of photomorphogenesis is supposed/necessary to be assayed, the level of photosystems assembly and possible effect of photosynthesis on the overall fluorescence levels should be tested.
Finally, it should be mentioned that our protocol based on the fluorescence measurements, allows relative, not absolute chlorophyll quantification. If absolute quantification is needed, corresponding calibration must be performed using an alternative, e.g. HPLC approach.
Significance with respect to existing methods - simple, fast, and statistically robust chlorophyll quantification with high time and spatial resolution
The procedure described here allows the real-time detection and quantification of chlorophyll in living Arabidopsis seedlings during early stages of de-etiolation. Compared to other approaches mostly relying on chlorophyll extraction from detached plant material16,17 or recently developed optical methods18,19 this approach is purely non-invasive, allowing chlorophyll quantification by in vivo measurement of fluorescence intensity. Also, there is no need for additional reagents necessary for sample preparation as with other existing alternative methods including the aforementioned HPLC- or spectrophotometry-based approaches. The newly introduced protocol is simple, fast, and accurate, as previously verified using HPLC5. Using the standard protocol settings, the final curve of a single biological repeat is made out of 120 measuring points (fluorescence intensity means) taken during 4 h of the measurement, each consisting of up to 15 measuring spots. Typically, the final curve includes the data of three biological replicas (e.g., three independently prepared plates), and three measuring spots (three technical replicas), each consisting of 30-40 seedlings. Thus, there are around 300 seedlings assayed in each time interval, providing statistically robust dataset, allowing to reliably detect even small differences as demonstrated on mutants affected in various steps of chlorophyll biosynthesis7. Here we encourage the user to employ the recently developed statistical approach based on generalized linear mixed models combined with classical time series models as a suitable tool for the chlorophyll kinetics data analysis20.
Future applications of the technique - fast and cheap screening
The aforementioned features make this approach a useful tool suitable for fast and cheap screening and highly precise quantification of traits associated (directly or indirectly) with chlorophyll biosynthesis. This might include studies employing the forward genetic screening to better characterize the complex and multi-level regulations of chlorophyll biosynthesis10,12,21. Considering the possibility of various compound treatment, the protocol is also highly valuable to study, for example, the importance of light-mediated hormonal regulations22,23 or screening for low-molecular compounds with possible impact on chlorophyll accumulation kinetics.