$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Conjugation test
The conjugation test showed that goat-IgG and neutravidin-biotinylated ACE2 were successfully conjugated to the microspheres. The assay detection specificity was confirmed by probing ACE2-conjugated microspheres with PE-labeled secondary antibodies generated in different animal species (Figure 2). No cross-reactivity between the different detection antibodies was observed. When the bead mixtures were probed with goat anti-ACE2 + anti-goat IgG PE, a median fluorescence intensity (MFI; arbitrary units) value above the background was detected for both ACE2 and goat IgG-conjugated microspheres but not for the unconjugated microsphere (bare) or for the biotin-coated microspheres. Anti-mouse IgG PE and anti-rabbit IgG PE were used as negative controls to check for false-positive signals. A negligible fluorescence signal was generated upon incubation with the microspheres, indicating that the positive signals for the ACE2 and the goat IgG were specific.
Viral particle detectability in cell supernatants
Magnetic beads coupled to recombinant human ACE2 were used to capture SARS-CoV-2 viral particles from infected and control (no virus) VeroE6 cell culture supernatants and were then simultaneously probed for two distinct viral spike regions using a monoclonal antibody and one of five distinct scFvs. A concentration-dependent signal in the dilutions of SARS-Cov-2 infected cell supernatants was observed in both reporter channels (RP1 and RP2) (Figure 3), indicating that both the commercial Hu-anti-S1 antibody and the different scFvs detected the viral particle bound to the ACE2-conjugated microsphere. With three out of five scFvs, the virus is detectable in dilutions down to 1:18 (scFv2, scFv3, scFv5); for the remaining two scFvs (scFv7 and scFv9), it is detectable down to 1:6 dilutions. This could be attributable to a different affinity for the target. As shown in Figure 3 and Table 1, scFv3 provides the highest MFI intensity, followed by scFv5, scFv2, scFv7, and scFv9, respectively.
Globally, scFvs detection results in lower MFI in comparison to the Hu-anti-S1. This could indicate lower affinity, but it could also be an artifact due to the labeling with different fluorescent dyes (PE and BV421). Another trend that can be seen for scFv7 and scFv9 is that the MFI values are slightly lower for the RP1 channel (anti-spike) as well compared to the other three configurations. This could indicate that the scFvs are either cross-reacting or interfering in another way with the ACE2-Hu-anti-S1 interaction, which could also explain the lower signal in the RP2 channel. No viral particles were detected in the supernatant of the non-infected Vero E6 cells in either the RP1 or the RP2 channel.
The neutravidin-biotin conjugated microsphere, the goat-IgG microsphere, and the unconjugated microspheres are used as negative control beads. The viral particles were captured with magnetic microspheres coupled to ACE2 and tested with commercial human anti-spike in the RP1 reporter channel and with different scFvs in the RP2 reporter channel (scFv is indicated in the top left of each panel). No virus particles were detected in any of the infected and non-infected samples.
Assay precision and robustness
To evaluate assay precision, all the conditions were run in triplicate. A coefficient of variance (CV) for the ACE2 microsphere was calculated for each dilution point. All of the calculated CVs for the assay were below 15%, where the highest measured CV was 13%, and the lowest CV was 1% (Table 2). As can be seen in the density plot (Figure 4) of the RP1 channel, PE detection of the commercial Hu-anti-S1 shows higher precision, mainly concentrated around a CV of 3%. The RP2 channel, BV detection of scFVs, shows higher CVs. However, as can be seen in Table 2, the higher range of CVs is driven by the samples with low concentrations of viral particles, such as the blank. To test the robustness of the protocol, the assay was repeated twice by different operators, using bead mixtures generated on different days and a lower sample volume (72% lower). A very good Pearson correlation, ranging between 0.98 and 1, was observed for both the RP1 and the RP2 channels (p-value < 0.01), confirming assay robustness and the possibility of applying the assay when less sample is available (Figure 5). This flow analysis technology follows the "ambient analyte theory"17, making the assay sensitive to concentration but not volume.

Figure 1: The virus particle assay. (A) Cell supernatant from both infected and un-infected Vero E6 cells are added in a serial dilution to either a 96-well or 384-well plate, together with magnetic microspheres conjugated with neutravidin, and then coupled to either biotinylated human ACE2 or Biotin. Unconjugated microspheres coupled with goat-IgG and bare microspheres are used as negative controls together with the neutravidin-biotin conjugated microsphere. (B) Microsphere-virus particle complexes that have formed are detected with a detection cocktail consisting of Hu-anti-S1 and one of the different scFvs with FLAG-tag. A fluorescent mix with anti-human IgG PE targeting the Hu-anti-S1 and anti-FLAG Brilliant Violet 421 targeting the scFvs is then added. (C) The three-laser, dual-detection system emits a red, green, and violet laser to detect the microparticle complex. The red laser detects the microsphere dye label, while the green and violet lasers detect the anti-S1 and the scFvs, respectively. The generated data are then analyzed. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Conjugation confirmation plot. The bead mixtures consisted of four different microsphere IDs, each conjugated with a different protein: neutravidin-biotin-ACE2 (ACE2), unconjugated microsphere (Bare Bead), neutravidin-biotin (Biotin), and goat-IgG (Goat IgG). In the conjugation test three different configurations of detection fluorophores were used. Namely, goat anti-ACE2 + anti-goat IgG PE, anti-mouse IgG PE, and anti-rabbit IgG PE. The Y-axis shows the average measured MFI (median fluorescence intensity; arbitrary units) signal from each microsphere with the three different conditions. The X-axis shows the different capture antibodies applied. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Multiplexed detection of surface proteins. Y-axis: Mean MFI (median fluorescence intensity; arbitrary units ± standard deviation) for each sample, analyzed in triplicate wells per condition. X-axis: Serial dilution points of cell supernatant. Orange: Virus particles in supernatant from Vero E6 infected with SARS-CoV-2 WT detected with human anti-spike + anti-human PE (phycoerythrin). Blue: Supernatant from Vero E6 infected with SARS-CoV-2 WT detected with the different scFvs + anti-FLAG Brilliant Violet 421. Grey: Non-infected cell supernatant detected with human anti-spike + anti-human PE. Black: Non-infected cell supernatant detected with the five different scFvs + anti-FLAG Brilliant Violet 421. The viral particles were captured with magnetic microspheres coupled to ACE2 and tested with commercial human anti-spike antibodies in the RP1 reporter channel and with different scFvs in the RP2 reporter channel (scFv is indicated in the top left of each panel). No virus particles were detected in any of the non-infected samples. The epitope targeted by scFv3 had the highest affinity. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Variation dispersion plot. The Y-axis is the frequency of events, and the X-axis shows the coefficient of variance (CV) in percentage for each replicate of the different samples. RP1 and RP2 are the first and second reporter channels that detect fluorescence associated with phycoerythrin and Brilliant Violet 421, respectively. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Run correlation matrix. (A,B) Y-axis: Pearson correlation matrix in log10-scale between three separate runs, run by three different operators and with different bead mixtures. A lower sample volume was applied in the third run. The histograms show the distribution of the different variable clusters based on measured MFI. (A) Correlation for the RP1 reporter channel between the different runs. (B) Correlation for the RP2 reporter channel between the different runs. MFI=median fluorescence intensity in arbitrary units. ***p < 0.001. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Detection | Reactivity |
| scFv2 | ++ |
| scFv3 | +++ |
| scFv5 | ++ |
| scFv7 | + |
| scFv9 | + |
| Human anti-Spike IgG | ++++ |
Table 1: Ranking of scFvs in detection based on the MFI intensity obtained in the standard curves.
| RP1 (PE) | RP2 (BV421) |
| Sample Dilution | CV range [%] | CV range [%] |
| Blank | 3–11 | 2–13 |
| 1:1458 | 1–7 | 2–7 |
| 1:456 | 4–6 | 3–8 |
| 1:162 | 3–6 | 3–7 |
| 1:54 | 2–4 | 2–4 |
| 1:18 | 2–4 | 1–4 |
| 1:6 | 2–6 | 1–6 |
| 1:2 | 1–5 | 1–3 |
Table 2: CV% (mean/standard deviation × 100) range of each dilution point of the SARS-CoV-2 infected supernatant for both the RP1 and the RP2 reporter channels.
Supplementary File 1: Immunoglobulin single-chain variable fragment (scFv) generation. Please click here to download this File.
Supplementary Table 1: Screening scFvs in pairs with Fabs against serial dilution of recombinant Spike (RBD). To evaluate the performance of different detection peptides, 12 combinations of spike protein, Fab, were used as capture in buffer spiked with recombinant RBD. Ten (10) scFvs targeting different epitopes of the spike protein were applied as detection. Depending on the performance of the capture-detection pair, they were either marked as failed (-) or successful (+). Please click here to download this File.
Supplementary Table 2: Screening scFvs in pairs with Fabs against serial dilution of SARS-Cov-2 infected Calu-3 cell supernatant. For evaluation of different detection peptides performance, 12 combinations of spike protein, Fab, were used as capture in SARS-Cov-2 infected Calu-3 cell supernatant. Ten (10) scFvs targeting different epitopes of the spike protein were applied as detection. Depending on the performance of the capture-detection pair, they were either marked as failed (-) or successful (+). Please click here to download this File.