The formation of a puncture wound thrombus that leads to bleeding cessation is one of the most essential events in life1. Yet despite that essentiality, knowledge of what occurs structurally during thrombus formation, be it in a vein, an artery, an atherosclerotic event, or an occlusive clot, has been limited by resolution and imaging depth. Conventional light microscopy is limited in depth when compared to a fully formed puncture wound thrombus, 200 to 300 µm in Z1, and in resolution level when compared to the size of platelet organelles and their spacing, often less than 30 nm2. Two-photon light microscopy can yield the needed depth of imaging but does not improve resolution significantly. The most recent advances in light microscopy, for example, super-resolution techniques, are still resolution limited, in practice ~20 nm in XY and twice that in Z, and depth limited, no more than conventional light microscopy. Furthermore, super-resolution light microscopy, like much of research light microscopy, is based on fluorescence microscopy, a technique that is inherently biased to a small set of candidate proteins for which good antibodies exist or good tagged constructs3. In conclusion, conventional scanning electron microscopy can, at most, visualize the surface of the forming platelet-rich thrombus.
To overcome these technical limitations to characterizing thrombus structure, we had three goals. First, reproducibly produce a defined puncture wound in a mouse vein or artery that could then be readily stabilized in situ by chemical fixation. Second, apply a preparative procedure that emphasizes membrane preservation, a goal consistent with the aim of defining the position of individual platelets within the forming thrombus. Third, use an unbiased visualization technique that, in a single image, could be scaled between nanometer to near millimeter scale.
Montaged, wide-area electron microscopy was chosen as a major end visualization technique for a single important reason: in electron microscope imaging, one sees a vast array of features within a cell that outlines its organelles and features within the organelles. Small objects such as ribosomes can be recognized. This range of features is seen because the electron-dense heavy metal stains, uranyl, lead, and osmium, that are used for electron microscopy to yield contrast bind to a wide range of molecules. In an electron microscope image, one sees much of what is there, while with immunofluorescence and protein tagging approaches, one only sees what lights up. This means, for example, the antigen sites present on a given individual protein species. In the case of a tagged molecule, often a protein, it is the site(s) where that protein is. All other molecules are dark and not lit up. However, is this choice of electron microscopy practical? A puncture wound thrombus has a size of 300 by 500 µm and, at a pixel size of 3 nm, that is an image of 100,000 by 167,000 pixels. A high-quality electron microscope camera has 4000 by 4000 pixels. That means that approximately 1000 frames must be stitched/blended to give a single image. That is a possibility that has been present in most electron microscopes manufactured in the last 15 years. The microscope stage is computerized, and the images can be stitched together with a computer. That is the rationale that led to choices underlying the formulation of the presented protocol.
Conclusively, we present below a series of steps that give a reproducible wound in the vein or artery of mice that then, following in situ fixation steps and later embedding steps, can be visualized by montaged, wide-area transmission electron microscopy at nm scale and in the stitched image visualized at near mm scale, the scale of the actual in situ fixed thrombus. Scalability of this kind is required for understanding thrombus formation as both a problem in hematology/health and as a developmental biology system in which platelets are the major cell type. These advances deliver a major virtue of electron microscopy, namely, one sees what is there, not only what lights up. For a detailed protocol on the preparation of samples for serial block face scanning electron microscopy (SBF-SEM), the reader is directed to a recent article by Joshi et al.4.