$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
We have described a method for the localized recruitment of mOrange-Nano proteins on model membranes, such as supported lipid bilayer and giant unilamellar vesicles by using the photoswitchable protein disiLID8. Aspects that contribute to the quality of the pattern include the quality of the proteins as well as the good quality of SLBs and GUVs.
To ensure a good protein quality after expression and purification, it is important to first evaluate the photoswitchable properties of disiLID. To this purpose, the absorption of the FMN cofactor has to be measured in the dark and after blue light illumination. UV-Vis spectra of disiLID are expected to show the characteristic triple peak of the cofactor FMN in the dark, which significantly decreases upon blue light illumination and recovers in the dark13. This photoswitchable behavior is crucial to obtaining reproducible and reversible recruitment in the following steps. Working with protective red light and exposing disiLID to minimum external illumination during the preparation of the samples increases the performance of the experiments.
Another critical step, and perhaps the most crucial, is the formation of proper SLBs. Defects in the membranes and/or the formation of inhomogeneous SLBs (i.e., the presence of multilayers or patched SLBs) will affect the quality of the protein patterning. Therefore, for inexperienced users, it is recommended to reproduce the protocol by labeling the SUVs with some membrane dyes, such as DiD and DiO, in order to form fluorescently labeled SLBs. In this way, the properties and quality of SLBs can be well characterized with fluorescence microscopy. FRAP measurements represent a typical approach to assessing the quality of an SLB by evaluating the fluidity of the membranes. Alternatively, in the case of biotinylated SLBs such as the ones described in this protocol, fluorescently labeled SAv (e.g., Atto 488-SAv) can be used to visualize and assess the quality of SLBs.
The first part of the protocol describes the formation of patterns on SLBs. To ensure an optimal result, it is important to add mOrange-Nano onto the SLBs and let the sample incubate in the dark for 15 min. During the photoactivation, the selection of the ROI is not restricted to a specific size. However, laser intensity and exposure time need to be regulated in order to reduce undesired photobleaching of the fluorescent proteins.
This method is not restricted to biotinylated proteins, and other approaches can be used to anchor disiLID to SLBs. For example, His-tagged disiLID can be expressed and anchored onto Ni- NTA-containing SLBs. However, it is crucial to express Nano and disiLID with different tags in order to avoid replacement of the proteins on the SLBs. This method also allows the possibility to invert the order of the proteins, thus functionalizing SLBs with Nano and recruiting disiLID (or disiLID-fused proteins) upon blue light illumination.
For dynamic control of protein localization, the reversible localization of the protein to the selected region should be possible repeatedly. To achieve this, the concentration of Nano (200 nM) in the solution is a critical parameter to obtain high reversibility.
Another concern is the recruitment of Nano to the disiLID-functionalized GUV surface. As in the case of protein patterning on SLBs, this method can be extended to different membrane functionalization strategies. In this protocol, the entire GUV was illuminated with blue light to recruit mOrange-Nano on the entire GUV surface. However, the selection of small ROIs localized on the GUV membrane should lead to the precise localization of proteins in a more restricted area.
This method presents only a limitation related to the choice of fluorophore employed for imaging of the Nano recruitment at the SUVs' or GUVs' membrane. In particular, fluorophores with an excitation spectrum in the blue-light range must be avoided, as their usage will interfere with the photoactivation of (dis)iLID. Therefore, the choice of fluorophores in the green or red-light range (e.g., mOrange or Cy5) is recommended for this type of experiment.
The disiLID design offers a simple and adaptable way to improve local protein recruitment to membranes and broadens the dynamic range of iLID and Nano from optogenetics4. These methods focus on the recruitment of Nano onto mimic membranes such as lipid bilayers and GUVs. Nevertheless, this approach is extendable to the numerous optogenetic tools in cells where (dis)iLID or Nano are linked to a membrane.