$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
In general, rodents are able to compensate for respiratory distress for much longer than patients would. They can remain cardiocirculatory stable and sufficient under spontaneous ventilation for much longer and during more invasive procedures, e.g., even through liver transplantation, which is known to be one of the procedures most stressful for cardiopulmonary circulation1,2,3.
However, endotracheal intubation is a basic requirement for translational research in rat models for various settings and interventions originating from a variety of biomedical fields and is essential in today's scientific landscape4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11. While the majority of experimental laboratory animal work performed in rats in general still does not require invasive ventilation12, there are certain experimental setups that require intubation and controlled ventilatory assistance. These experimental setups include any experiment requiring a secured airway, high ventilation pressures, and laparoscopy or direct access to the thoracic cavity and organs.
Especially in the case of required access to the thoracic cavity and organs, endotracheal intubation is imperative as the collapse of the lung will result in a fatal respiratory insufficiency once the negative pressure in the intrapleural space and the inspiration mechanism by the intercostal muscles and the diaphragm are lost13.
While there are many publications on methods for non-invasive endoorotracheal intubation in rodents14,15,16,17, there seems to be a lack of procedure protocols for invasive endotracheal intubation by tracheotomy. Despite the invasiveness of the latter, which only allows for application in non-survival animal models, there are great advantages of intubation via tracheotomy. These include a steeper learning curve, higher and more persistent success rates, less required technical equipment, and improved success monitoring opportunities18,19.
Intubation success is essential for outcome. While various false intubations, as well as repeated intubation attempts in patients, are clearly associated with adverse events and complications as serious as death20,21, such events are also deleterious in test animals. In the best case, they represent a strong confounder variable in the experiment, but they can also lead to the unnecessary loss of the animal. Therefore, it makes sense to increase intubation success rates at the cost of non-invasiveness if the experimental setup and strategy allow it.
This standardized protocol of intubation via surgical tracheotomy offers several advantages, including reduced variability in intubation success rates, minimized effects on the cardiorespiratory physiology parameters, and full investigational control and manipulation of parameters. It aids in providing a secured airway, especially for inexperienced researchers in the procedure of endotracheal intubation via direct laryngoscopy, and allows researchers to conduct non-survival studies with highly controlled conditions. We highlight key anatomical landmarks and provide insights into troubleshooting common challenges encountered during the procedure.