$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
In the group undergoing short co-incubation procedures, patients who received rescue were excluded. Out of 47 patients receiving short-term insemination, no significant differences were observed in terms of patients' age and the number of retrieved oocytes (Table 1). The immediate partial removal of OCCC resulted in a loosening of the remaining OCCC around the oocytes (Figure 3), facilitating the detection of a second polar body. The average procedure time was significantly shorter in the partial removal of OCCC group (4.42 ± 1.68 min vs. 9.29 ± 5.04 min, P < 0.001) compared to the control group, despite no significant differences found in the cleavage rate, optimal embryo rate, and optimal blastocyst rate.
In another cohort of 68 patients undergoing traditional in vitro fertilization (IVF), where fertilization checks were conducted 18-20 h post-insemination, similarities were noted in patients' age and the number of retrieved oocytes between the two groups (Table 2). An increased looseness in the structure of granulosa cells surrounding the oocyte was observed in patients who underwent immediate partial removal of OCCC during egg retrieval (Figure 4). Although a slightly shorter average operation time was noted in the partial removal of the OCCC group (4.93 ± 0.80 min vs. 6.54 ± 7.77 min, P = 0.207), no statistically significant difference was evident. While tight adhesions in some cases could lead to prolonged observation procedures exceeding 40 min, the generally loose adhesions of OCCC in most cases after overnight storage could account for the lack of statistical variance in operation times between the two groups. Like the previous group, no significant discrepancies were identified in the cleavage rate, optimal embryo rate, and optimal blastocyst rate.
Overall, the representative results indicate that immediate partial removal of the OCCC significantly shortens operation times in short-term insemination procedures without compromising key IVF outcomes such as cleavage rate, optimal embryo rate, and optimal blastocyst rate. This technique facilitates easier detection of the second polar body by loosening the remaining OCCC around the oocytes, which likely contributes to reduced operation times. In the context of traditional IVF procedures, although a trend towards shorter operation times was observed with immediate partial removal of OCCC, the difference was not statistically significant, potentially due to the inherent variability in the adhesion of cumulus cells after overnight storage. These findings suggest that while immediate partial removal of OCCC can enhance procedural efficiency, particularly in short-term insemination contexts, its impact on traditional IVF timelines might be less pronounced.

Figure 1: Preparation of the Pasteur pipette using an alcohol burner. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Typical image of OCCC that needs to be processed. The typical oocytes with a diameter exceeding 2.5 mm from (A and B) two patients underwent partial removal along the delineated red dashed line. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Typical micrographs depicting the morphological features of fertilization 4-6 h after co-incubation with spermatozoa. Typical oocyte (A) with or (B) without partial removal of OCCC. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Typical micrographs depicting the morphological features of pronuclei evaluation 18-20 h after co-incubation with spermatozoa. Typical oocyte (A) with or (B) without partial removal of OCCC. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Partial removal of OCCC group | Control group | p-value |
| Patients (n) | 26 | 21 | |
| Age (y) | 32.04 ± 4.11 | 33.33 ± 3.41 | 0.193 |
| No. of retrieved oocytes | 12.85 ± 9.02 | 11.38 ± 5.32 | 0.493 |
| 4 h procedure time (min) | 4.42 ± 1.68 | 9.29 ± 5.04 | <0.001 |
| Cleavage rate, n (%) | 98.89 ± 0.04, 24 | 100.00 ± 0.00, 19 | 0.221 |
| Optimal embryo rate, n (%) | 71.38 ± 35.46, 24 | 72.14 ± 35.72, 19 | 0.945 |
| Optimal blastocyte rate, n (%) | 58.13 ± 28.29, 19 | 65.18 ± 28.09, 12 | 0.504 |
Table 1: Comparison of fertilization outcomes between the two groups with or without the immediate partial removal of OCCC undergoing short co-incubation procedures.
| Partial removal of OCCC group | Control group | p-value |
| Patients (n) | 29 | 39 | |
| Age (y) | 32.21 ± 4.11 | 32.72 ± 4.25 | 0.619 |
| No. of retrieved oocytes | 12.93 ± 7.00 | 12.44 ± 7.26 | 0.777 |
| 20 h operation time (min) | 4.93 ± 0.80 | 6.54 ± 7.77 | 0.207 |
| Cleavage rate, n (%) | 98.81 ± 0.04, 28 | 95.93 ± 0.17,37 | 0.39 |
| Optimal embryo rate, n (%) | 72.07 ± 36.75, 28 | 72.62 ± 30.01,36 | 0.948 |
| Optimal blastocyte rate, n (%) | 62.93 ± 28.30, 21 | 63.36 ± 24.61, 28 | 0.955 |
Table 2: Comparison of fertilization outcomes between the two groups with or without the immediate partial removal of OCCC undergoing traditional in vitro fertilization (IVF).