A modified no-scalpel vasectomy technique reduces the postoperative recanalization rate. This protocol describes a modified no-scalpel vasectomy technique that can reduce the postoperative recanalization rate.
Method Article
A modified no-scalpel vasectomy technique reduces the postoperative recanalization rate. This protocol describes a modified no-scalpel vasectomy technique that can reduce the postoperative recanalization rate.
No-scalpel vasectomy (NSV) is a commonly used contraceptive method for males. In previous applications of this surgical method, issues such as knot detachment and postoperative recanalization resulted in a reduced contraceptive success rate after vasectomy. This new technique innovatively modifies the ligation procedure during NSV to address knot detachment and postoperative recanalization. Two ligations of the testicular end of the vas deferens and one ligation of the abdominal end are completed before transection of the vas deferens. A fourth ligation of the abdominal end is performed using the suture tails of the third ligature of the testicular end after transection of the vas deferens. The fifth ligation of the abdominal end is performed using the suture tails of the first ligature of the testicular end. These modifications strengthen the ligations and reduce the postoperative recanalization rate. Additionally, the two stumps are gathered together, creating better conditions for a possible vasovasostomy in the future, thereby achieving overall better outcomes with vasectomy.
Vasectomy is a surgical sterilization procedure for men to prevent future fertility1,2,3. It is equally effective as tubal ligation for preventing pregnancy but is simpler, safer, faster, and less expensive4. This type of surgery has lower implementation requirements, and more than 80% of vasectomies are performed in the office5. Since 1971, when Li Shunqiang et al. performed the first modified vasectomy (the no-scalpel vasectomy or NSV)6, the procedure has advanced significantly. The invention of the extracutaneous vas deferens fixation ring clamp has reduced the number of surgical steps, while simultaneously minimizing surgical damage and the difficulty of the procedure1. As a result, NSV has become the mainstream surgical method for vasectomy.
However, NSV still uses a single ligation and transection to seal the bilateral vas deferens ends, and the postoperative recanalization rate remains high. It has been reported that the occlusive failure rate after simple vasectomy is around 13.79%, and the postoperative recanalization rate is still 5.85% after vasectomy and fascial interposition7. As such, andrologists continue to explore improvements to vasectomy. Literature reports indicate that the postoperative recanalization rate can be reduced to 1% by using mucosal cautery on the ligated stumps8. Additionally, non-divisional vasectomy with extended electrocautery can further reduce the postoperative recanalization rate to 0.64%9.
However, for medical institutions lacking electrocautery equipment, reducing the postoperative recanalization rate remains a challenge. Therefore, the new technique proposes performing five ligations of the vas deferens without electrocautery conditions, building on the NSV method to reduce the postoperative recanalization rate. After five ligations, the formation of a vas deferens ischemic zone greater than 1 cm in length can increase the difficulty of vas deferens recanalization. This modified technique is also advantageous for exploring the ends of the vas deferens during future vasovasostomy. Compared to previous reports10, this modification does not require electrocautery equipment during surgery, thereby reducing equipment requirements. This approach can help operating rooms without electrocautery equipment to perform a vasectomy.
The surgical method described in this paper has been approved by the Ethics Committee of the West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University, and the use of patient surgical videos has been authorized. Informed consent was obtained from the patients, and their data was used for presentation. The consumables and equipment used for this study are listed in the Table of Materials.
1. Preparation for operation
2. Surgical procedure
3. Postoperative care and follow-up
4. Statistical analysis
From January 2021 to August 2023, 58 vasectomies were performed at this hospital. All 58 patients had at least one child with their spouses before undergoing vasectomy. Although the modification involved more surgical steps compared to NSV, it did not significantly increase the difficulty of the operations. As a result, all 58 vasectomies were successfully completed without any unsuccessful operations. Patients were followed up regularly by telephone. Follow-up ended when the PVSA demonstrated less than 2,00,000 sperm/mL. If more than six months after the vasectomy, a patient impregnated his wife or the last PVSA showed more than 2,00,000 sperm/mL, it was designated as recanalization.
In the NSV group, all 24 vasectomies were successfully performed. Three patients experienced recanalization after vasectomy. Four patients had incomplete data: three declined the PVSA, and one refused phone calls. The remaining 17 patients had complete data, with ages ranging from 23-47 years (median 35 years), and a follow-up period ranging from 1-25 months (median 9 months). None of the patients reported any discomfort after surgery.
In the modified group, all 34 vasectomies were successfully performed after the NSV group. However, it is regrettable that 10 patients declined the PVSA. A total of 24 patients had complete data, with ages ranging from 28 to 46 years (median 33.5 years), and a follow-up period ranging from 1-17 months (median 2.5 months). Only one patient reported chronic left scrotal pain. None of the 57 patients who answered the phone had undergone vasovasostomy.
No significant difference in age was found between the two groups (p > 0.05), indicating that both groups were within the same age range. However, there was a significant difference in follow-up duration (p < 0.05), suggesting superior adherence in the modified group. It is possible that a longer surgical time encourages patients to be more attentive to postoperative follow-up. The last PVSA was performed more than 11 months after the vasectomy, and the sperm concentrations were over 25,000,000 sperm/mL in the three patients who experienced recanalization in the NSV group. Two of the 24 patients in the NSV group (one of whom refused phone calls) impregnated their wives, while the patients in the modified group were deemed sterile. The follow-up results of the modified group were significantly better than those of the NSV group. The demographic information of the patients is displayed in Table 1.

Figure 1: Location and relationship of the 5 ligations. The figure illustrates the location and relationship of the five ligations used in the procedure. The modification technique interlaces the two ends of the vas and binds them together. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Items | NSV | The modification | P value | |
| Patients | 24 | 34 | ||
| Patients were recanalized after surgery | 3 | 0 | ||
| Patients rejected the PVSA | 3 | 10 | ||
| Patients impregnated their spouses after surgery | 2 | 0 | ||
| Patients refused phone calls | 1 | 0 | ||
| Patients whose spouses have completed childbirth before surgery | 24 | 34 | ||
| Patients had complete data | 17 | 24 | ||
| The Age of patients had complete data, year | 35 (32,36) | 33.5 (30.5,35) | 0.408 | |
| The end of the follow-up,months | 9 (3,13.5) | 2.5 (1,4) | 0.001 | |
| Postoperative complications | 0 | 1 | ||
Table 1: Demographic data. Statistical differences were considered significant when P < 0.05. Abbreviations: PVSA = post-vasectomy semen analysis.
The gold standard for vasectomy is ligation with mucosal cautery13, but not all operating rooms have electrocautery equipment. Therefore, this modification technique achieved ideal surgical results by ligating the vas deferens five times with non-absorbable silk sutures, without the need for electrocautery equipment. It has been documented that applying excessive pressure to the vas with sutures can create ischemia and sloughing of the ligated stump, leading to recanalization. This may explain some of the higher failure rates associated with these methods14. The most significant modification compared to NSV is the repeated ligation-two times at the testicular end and three times at the abdominal end. Additionally, the third and fourth ligations use the same suture, as do the first and fifth ligations, to minimize the sloughing of the knots.
In addition, histological studies of vasectomy sites after failure have reported that one or more channels (canaliculi) can form through the connective and scar tissue between the vas stumps, allowing the passage of sperm, especially in cases of chronic inflammation15. The critical step of the modification technique is interlacing and binding the two ends of the vas together, which results in the separation of the two transected sections. Consequently, an ischemic region of at least 1 cm is formed, making natural recanalization more difficult in the future.
Moreover, some patients may reconsider natural paternity after vasectomy due to events like the death of a child, divorce, or remarriage16. This modification technique, which binds the two vas stumps together, creates better surgical conditions and makes it easier to locate the vas ends when performing vasovasostomy in the future.
The limitation of this modification technique is that the operation time is longer than that of NSV due to repeated ligations. The modified vasectomy lasted approximately 30 min; however, no additional anesthetics were needed during the surgery. The longer operation time may lead patients to pay more attention to the procedure and improve adherence.
In summary, this modification technique could result in better outcomes for vasectomy, particularly in operating rooms without electrocautery equipment.
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
The authors would like to thank the West China Second University Hospital of Sichuan University for providing cases and medical records related to this work. There is no funding support for this study.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3-0 silk braided non-absorbable suture | Johnson & Johnson Medical (China) Ltd. | SA84G | 15 × 60cm |
| 5-0 Coated VICRYL Plus (Polyglactin 910) Synthetic Absorbable Suture | Ethicon.Inc. | VCP433H | 13 mm 1/2c (70cm) |
| Dissecting clamp | Xinhua Surgical Instruments Co., Ltd. | ZJ197R | 125 mm |
| Extracutaneous vas deferens fixation ring clamp | Xinhua Surgical Instruments Co., Ltd. | ZJ196R | 140 mm |
| Scissors | Xinhua Surgical Instruments Co., Ltd. | ZC344R | 140 mm |
| SPSS 23.0 | IBM |
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request Permission