$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
This assay provides a platform to observe and investigate the real-time dynamics of individual CMGs, both in isolation and in the context of the desired additional factors. However, as with many single-molecule fluorescence techniques, there are some common challenges that can require optimization to overcome. These usually relate to imaging fluorophores over long periods of time (photobleaching, brightness), DNA substrate preparation (DNA damage), the quality of the flow cell surface (background noise, non-specific interactions), or the quality of the purified protein preparation (nuclease contamination, labeling efficiency).
Each fluorophore varies in photostability and brightness, so it is important to choose an appropriate molecule. When imaging fluorescently labeled oligomeric proteins, like RPA, a lower laser power can be used as many fluorophores will be excited in close proximity, generating a visible signal. For imaging single fluorophores, for example, CMG labeled on a single subunit, a higher laser power is needed to observe the fluorophore clearly. Fluorophore lifetime can be extended by minimizing laser exposure, such as by reducing the frequency at which images are taken. Additionally, exciting a fluorophore generates reactive oxygen species (ROS), which can contribute to photobleaching. Including an oxygen scavenging system in the imaging buffer can extend the lifetime of fluorophores by eliminating ROS. However, some oxygen scavenging systems can affect pH12.
Regarding DNA substrate preparation, it is crucial to minimize DNA damage, such as nicks or single-stranded gaps. Excessive damage prevents extensive DNA unwinding, limiting how much data can be collected. Damage can arise from mechanical shearing, excessive heating, as a result of nuclease contamination, or ROS generated during imaging. Shearing can be minimized by handling the DNA sample with care by using wide-bore tips for pipetting, pipetting slowly, and avoiding flicking the sample. The effect of ROS can be minimized by either reducing laser exposure or including an oxygen scavenging system in the imaging buffer. After the preparation of the DNA substrate, it is possible to use commercial DNA repair kits to repair the damage before performing an unwinding reaction.
The efficiency of DNA unwinding also depends on the purity and activity of CMG. It is a good practice to assess sample purity after each purification step by SDS-PAGE electrophoresis to determine where optimization is necessary. If too many contaminants are observed after the final step, it may help to modify the salt gradient volumes used for the elution from CaptoHiRes Q (5/50) column. It is also highly important to remove any excess fluorescent peptide used for the protein labeling, as it can create undesirable background on the coverslip surface. It is also essential to avoid nuclease contamination, as this can degrade the DNA substrate. After an experiment, staining the remaining DNA with SYTOX orange can be a good way to check whether the DNA has been degraded significantly or not. A certain level of DNA damage is unavoidable over the course of an experiment, but significant damage often indicates problematic nuclease contamination.
The assay is also inherently limited by the resolution of diffraction-limited spots, requiring fluorescent proteins to be hundreds of base pairs away (if not more) to distinguish them as separate. This limits the detail in which CMG progression and interactions can be observed.
The number of unwinding events we observe for each analysis varies. For a successful experiment, we expect to see at least several RPA tracts of sufficient length per field of view 512x512 pixels (pixel size = 154.6 nm). Multiple fields of view can be imaged in the same experiment, allowing more data collection when necessary. The tracts do not need to be of the same length nor reach the end of the DNA to be useful. For example, the average tether distance for each experiment can be determined by measuring the length of SYTOX-stained DNA prior to adding CMG. This can be used to estimate how much DNA has been unwound for any RPA tract (as long as enough DNA is unwound to visibly move the fork) by converting distance from 'µm traveled' to 'kb unwound'.
CMG exhibits unwinding activity on a variety of DNA substrates, but it is essential to provide a free 3' DNA end on a polyT flap of at least 30 nt to accommodate the footprint of CMG10. Including multiple biotin moieties at the fork ensures robust surface tethering. The rest of the DNA substrate can be re-designed in a multitude of ways, such as to include different DNA sequences, lengths and chemical modifications. The conformation of the DNA can be altered by using different concentrations of magnesium acetate. At higher concentrations (≥10 mM) of magnesium acetate, the RPA-coated ssDNA filament is compacted, leading to the DNA being pulled taught by RPA binding during unwinding. This can be useful as it prevents the DNA from moving excessively, allowing the position of CMG and of unwinding progression to be more accurately measured. At low concentrations (~3 mM) of magnesium acetate, the RPA-ssDNA remains relaxed throughout.
The described single-molecule assay represents a platform that can be built upon and modified to investigate further aspects of DNA replication. During DNA replication, CMG acts as a core that the replisome and its components assemble around. Therefore, additional purified proteins can be added to this assay, including accessory factors like TIMELESS, TIPIN, and CLASPIN, to study their effect on CMG dynamics. These proteins have been shown to affect the rate of replication forks13, but it is not clear how they affect the rate of CMG unwinding. Therefore, it would be interesting to investigate how different replisome proteins affect CMG using this assay. Addition of DNA polymerases may give better insight into DNA replication beyond DNA unwinding alone, as described previously with yeast proteins14. Furthermore, purification of modified CMG may provide a better understanding of how certain mutations or post-translational modifications affect helicase activity15,16. Additionally, designing different DNA substrates can allow DNA unwinding by CMG to be studied under a variety of conditions mimicking replication stress17. These modifications include DNA obstacles9,18, inter-strand crosslinks19,20,21, and discontinuities in the DNA strands22.