Stress urinary incontinence (SUI) affects 26% of women in a USA prevalence study; in addition, 16% more women have both stress and urgency incontinence1. Tension-free vaginal tape evolved as a less morbid surgical treatment for SUI associated with a comparable success rate and faster recovery than the gold standard colposuspension2,3. However, suburethral polypropylene (PP) mesh tapes were introduced without testing in a relevant animal model, leading to adverse responses4,5. In recent years there have been reports of significant complications following the use of polypropylene not relatable to surgical technique and thought to be possibly related to tissue reaction to the material itself including mesh erosion through the vagina, chronic pain and infection6. The most commonly reported surgical complications included bladder perforation, urinary retention, and bleeding6,7.
Nearly 100 products have been developed for genito-urinary surgical implantation application8. Major concerns have been identified regarding the implantation of mesh for the treatment of pelvic organ prolapse6,7. There is a high incidence of spontaneous pelvic floor prolapse in ewes and, on this basis, a sheep model for pelvic organ prolapse in women has been advocated and has demonstrated graft erosion9,10,11. Recent basic science work has added support to the suggestion that tissue reaction to polypropylene may play an important role in the development of untoward complications with this material12. Generic animal studies have investigated tissue reaction in the abdominal wall of small animals to PP mesh after implantation13,14. Because these models do not reproduce the anatomical environment of mesh implantation in human surgery, a sheep model -- featuring anatomical parallels to human surgery -- was evaluated. This model has proven effective in evaluating new implant materials for pelvic organ prolapse surgery, placing the graft between the rectum and vagina9,10,11.
More recently, contemporaneous work replicating the transvaginal retropubic technique used in human SUI surgery reported a top-down approach for tape insertion in three ewes15. A recent report from the present authors highlighted the versatility of this model, demonstrating its suitability for both a retrograde (bottom-up) insertion approach using the TVT device and a top-down approach for the insertion of polypropylene with the TVT device and a novel material manufactured from polyurethane16. This video-augmented article describes in detail the preparation and use of this sheep model for the insertion of both polypropylene using the TVT device and the novel new material using the bottom-up approach. The TVT insertion technique is as previously reported3. The polyurethane is inserted mounted on a needle introducer and passed from an anterior vaginal wall incision upward into the retropubic space, replicating the bottom-to-top path used for insertion of TVT.
To validate the model, the feasibility of creating a surgical plane between the urethra and vagina was assessed, with careful attention to avoid injury to either structure. Potential pelvic and intra-abdominal complications associated with needle-guided tape passage were also evaluated. Additionally, this study examines a novel electrospun polyurethane graft, previously untested for suburethral implantation, and compares its tissue response and biocompatibility to that of conventional polypropylene mesh three months postoperatively.