$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Data are available via the WUSTL Digital Research Materials Repository (DRMR) doi: https://doi.org/10.7936/6RXS-108249
Spectral characterization of water
Water, one of the most common biological absorbers, has characteristic, highly absorbing peaks in the NIR and SWIR. These characteristic peaks are so strong that when measuring the absorbance of water, it must often be diluted with deuterated water to prevent saturation. The difference in absorbance between water and deuterated water is shown in Figure 3, highlighting more than an order of magnitude increase in water absorbance over deuterated water. Strong water absorption in the SWIR also makes it difficult to obtain the absorption spectra of other biological absorbers that contain water in the sample or that use water as the solvent and reference. As a solution to this problem, deuterated water can be used instead of water. Deuterated water acts in a similar manner to water while being a much weaker SWIR absorber, making it an ideal replacement for water in SWIR spectroscopy measurements.
To measure the absorption spectrum of water, water was used as the sample and deuterated water as the reference. To prevent saturation in the SWIR, the sample was diluted with deuterated water in the SWIR region. The resulting water absorption spectrum shows low absorption in the VIS, which increases at longer wavelengths. Characteristic absorption peaks can be seen at approximately 750 nm, 970 nm, 1,200 nm, and 1,450 nm (Figure 4). The resulting water spectrum has an SNR of 3536.6 and was compared to Hale and Querry's water absorption spectrum20, showing a similar absorption curve from ~500 nm to 1,600 nm. However, from 400 to 500 nm, the absorption curves differ, with Hale and Querry showing a higher absorbance value at lower wavelengths. This difference could be due to residual small particles in the water that will have higher scattering at shorter wavelengths compared to longer wavelengths3 and may invalidate the assumptions of no scattering in Beer-Lambert law-based absorption measurements.
Spectral characterization of melanin
Melanin, the skin's primary optical absorber, was spectrally characterized using powdered melanin as the sample and DMSO as the solvent and reference. The resulting spectrum has a SNR of 172 and was compared to eumelanin data from Sarna et al.21,22 and Crippa et al.23 (Figure 5). Eumelanin is the primary pigment responsible for the color of skin and, therefore, provides the most accurate data for how melanin will impact optical devices. The spectrum collected using the protocol described herein shows high correlation to these literature values.
Spectral characterization of corn oil
To investigate the absorption spectrum of a lipid, corn oil was chosen due to its minimal optical scattering when compared to other lipids and its known similarity in chemical composition to animal fats1. To take the absorption spectrum of corn oil, corn oil was used as the sample with air as the reference. As seen in Figure 6, the corn oil spectrum contains characteristic peaks at approximately 930 nm, 1,210 nm, and 1,410 nm. The resulting corn oil spectrum has a SNR of 10363.1 and was overlaid with Cao et al.'s corn oil spectrum1, showing a strong correlation.
Spectral characterization of oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin
While the characterization of the absorption of oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin is one of the most important feats in biomedical optics, their absorption spectra spanning the VIS to the SWIR remains poorly understood. One of the most challenging aspects of determining the absorption spectrum of oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin in the SWIR is removing the water in blood, which overwhelms the relatively small hemoglobin absorption. To disentangle the absorbance of hemoglobin and water, hemoglobin was first isolated from human whole blood using centrifugation and the supernatant was removed and replaced with deuterated water. Deuterated water was also used as the reference and solvent that hemoglobin was reconstituted in to cause hypotonic burst. As shown in Figure 3, deuterated water has a much lower optical absorption than water, making it an ideal solvent and reference for SWIR absorption measurements. The resulting oxygenated hemoglobin spectrum spans the VIS to the SWIR with a SNR of 23118.7 and matched very closely Prahl's published oxygenated hemoglobin spectrum4 (Figure 7). In the VIS, the oxygenated hemoglobin spectrum shows high absorption with characteristic absorption peaks at approximately 415 nm and a doublet peak from approximately 540 to 575 nm. In the NIR, the oxygenated hemoglobin spectrum shows a characteristic peak spanning a wider range of wavelengths, approximately 800 nm to 1,100nm. In the SWIR, the absorption of hemoglobin is low. However, from approximately 1,400 nm to 1,600 nm, the hemoglobin spectrum shows higher absorption with peaks, likely due to water in hemoglobin that was unable to be fully removed during the centrifugation process.
For deoxygenated hemoglobin, sodium dithionite was added to the hemoglobin solution to introduce dissociation of dioxygen from oxygenated hemoglobin and converting the sample to deoxygenated hemoglobin. The resulting spectrum has an SNR of 9813.9 and was compared against Prahl's deoxygenated hemoglobin spectrum and shows a very strong correlation between 400 nm and 1,000 nm4 (Figure 8). The resulting deoxygenated hemoglobin spectrum shows characteristic absorption peaks at approximately 430 nm, 560 nm, and 760 nm. After this, the absorption of deoxygenated hemoglobin drops off but contains smaller absorption peaks around 1,200 nm and from 1,400 nm to 1,600 nm. The absorbance between 1,400 and 1,600 nm is likely due to water that was not fully removed from the hemoglobin sample during the centrifugation process.
Comparison of biological absorbers from the VIS-SWIR
The full VIS-SWIR spectra from all the biological absorbers characterized in this protocol are shown in Figure 9, scaled based on their biological concentration in tissue2, which highlight the distinct spectral differences between biological absorbers. For instance, melanin, oxygenated hemoglobin, and deoxygenated hemoglobin have strong, characteristic absorption in the VIS that generally decreases with wavelength, whereas water and lipid show characteristic peaks in the NIR and SWIR. In biological tissue, the combination of decreases in melanin and hemoglobin as well as decreases in optical scattering provide increased optical penetration depth in the NIR and SWIR. Additionally, the NIR and SWIR's reduced melanin absorption enable optical investigation of oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin, lipid, and water with minimal effects due to skin pigmentation.

Figure 1: Previously published spectra of common biological absorbers across the UV to the SWIR. The oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin spectra were plotted using data from Prahl4. The melanin spectrum was plotted using data from Sarna21 and Crippa23. The lipid spectrum was plotted using data from van Veen24. The water spectrum was plotted using data from Hale and Querry20. Abbreviation: SWIR = short-wave infrared. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Photo of the supernatant and red blood cell pellet from centrifuged whole blood. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Absorbance spectrum comparison of water and deuterated water collected with identical acquisition settings in log (left) and linear (right) absorbance scale. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Comparison of water absorbance spectrum acquired using methods described herein versus Hale and Querry20. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: Comparison of melanin absorbance spectrum acquired using methods described herein versus Sarna et al.21,22 and Crippa et al.23. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Comparison of corn oil absorbance spectrum acquired using methods described herein versus Cao et al.1. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 7: Comparison of oxygenated hemoglobin absorbance spectrum acquired using methods described herein versus Prahl4. Spectral features from 1,400 to 1,600 nm likely attributed to residual water in the sample. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 8: Comparison of deoxygenated hemoglobin absorbance spectrum acquired using methods described herein versus Prahl4. Spectral features from 1,400 to 1,600 nm likely attributed to residual water in the sample. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 9: VIS-SWIR spectra of common biological absorbers. Abbreviation: VIS-SWIR = visible-short-wave infrared. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.