Electromyography involves recording electrical potentials generated by muscle fibers during contraction. These properties are determined by neural activation signals sent from motor neurons to individual muscles. EMG is widely used in rehabilitation, motor, brain, and nerve-related studies, and the measurement methods can be broadly classified into surface EMG (sEMG) and intramuscular EMG (iEMG)1. Surface electrodes offer several advantages, particularly in wearable applications, as they are non-invasive and require a simple preparation process2. In implanted sEMG, the surgical process is simpler compared to iEMG, where the electrode does not need to penetrate the muscle. Despite these advantages, sEMG is prone to signal contamination, such as disturbances at the muscle-electrode interface, motion artifacts, the quality of the electrode contact, and signal crosstalk from adjacent muscles1. These challenges are particularly problematic when the electrodes are placed in close proximity, as is often the case in studies involving small animals. On the other hand, iEMG requires an additional surgical procedure for electrode penetration. Despite the extra procedural steps, this method provides muscle-specific EMG recordings with greater precision and less crosstalk, as the electrodes are permanently embedded in the muscle tissue3. In small animal motor studies, iEMG is preferred since muscle-specific EMG information with reliable electrode installation is critical4.
Several approaches have been reported for acquiring EMG recordings from electrodes in small animals. Tether cables are commonly used to connect electrodes to external measurement equipment5,6,7,8,9,10,11, devices can be implanted inside the body12, or a wireless wearable platform can be placed on the animal13. Tether cables are the most widely reported method due to the availability of compatible commercial equipment for this purpose; however, the tether wires cause discomfort to the animals, and their movement is often constrained by the cables, which may impact the study. Implantable devices offer wireless solutions, but their limited battery life may restrict the duration of experiments. Additionally, the size and weight of permanently installed devices can cause stress and discomfort to the animals, which might affect the study. Wireless power transfer techniques have been proposed to address the issues in implantable devices, but maintaining a reliable energy link to a small device is typically very difficult14. Moreover, exposure to high electromagnetic fields can lead to unforeseen consequences, such as reduced immune function and potential neurodegenerative changes in the brain15,16.
The acquisition system can also be implemented as a wireless, wearable platform that handles signal processing and wirelessly transmits the EMG recordings to a base station. Although this is the preferred method, it presents a technical challenge for the users, and experimental details are often not fully addressed in the literature.
In this work, we present a simple, low-cost, and reliable EMG acquisition method for locomotion studies in small animals. A pair of iEMG electrodes are implanted in the hindlimb muscles of a rat, while the rest of the signal acquisition system, including amplification, an analog-to-digital converter, and wireless telemetry, is mounted on the animal's back. The EMG data is transmitted to a personal computer for real-time monitoring, with data logged locally. A treadmill locomotion experiment is conducted to demonstrate the system in a stroke recovery study.