$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Over the past few decades, low back pain (LBP) has emerged as the most significant musculoskeletal disorder affecting quality of life1. LBP has become an increasingly important public health concern, imposing a substantial economic burden on society due to lost labor and additional medical expenses2,3. In the United States alone, the direct and indirect costs associated with LBP exceed $100 billion annually, including medical expenditures, income losses, and labor losses4. LBP is often caused by intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD)5,6,7,8. Given the high prevalence and economic impact of LBP, accurately modeling IVDD is crucial for exploring treatment strategies.
To understand the pathophysiology of IVDD and evaluate treatment strategies, various preclinical in vivo animal models have been developed and utilized9. Multiple methods have been employed in these models to induce disc degeneration, including surgical or chemical disc injury, non-invasive mechanical stress, genetic modification, and natural occurrence10. Among these methods, surgical injury accounts for up to 64.9% of IVDD induction, with needle puncture being the primary surgical technique11. The needle puncture model is characterized by its ease of establishment and minimal damage to experimental animals. Common needle puncture approaches include open retroperitoneal access to the lumbar disc space and percutaneous posterolateral puncture. The depth of insertion can be determined using radiographic monitoring or needle length. Notably, the percutaneous approach may reduce iatrogenic tissue damage compared to open surgical methods, while retroperitoneal access provides the benefit of direct visualization-features that have not been quantitatively compared in prior literature. While studies have investigated the effects of using needles of different diameters12 and puncturing different discs10 on IVDD induction, comparative studies focusing on different needle puncture approaches remain limited. The selected rabbit model offers particular utility for researchers requiring cost-effective longitudinal studies with frequent imaging assessments, given its anatomical similarity to human discs and its advantages over rodent models in terms of size and structure13.
In this study, rabbit models of lumbar IVDD were established using two methods: open retroperitoneal access to puncture the lumbar disc space and percutaneous posterolateral puncture. A comprehensive set of outcome measures, including morphological, histological, and radiological changes, was analyzed.