Cholelithiasis is among the most common clinical diseases in general surgery, and 10%-15% of patients concurrently experience cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis1. Common bile duct (CBD) primary closure, a procedure typically performed after biliary exploration or removal of biliary stones involves direct closure of the CBD incision and is performed to maintain the normal anatomical structure and biliary flow2,3. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) + laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) is considered an effective treatment option for patients with both gallbladder and CBD stones4, and its safety and efficacy have been previously reported3,5. With the development of laparoscopic techniques and medical devices, surgeons can now perform LCBDE using different approaches, including the transcystic and transductal approaches. Furthermore, in the last decade, significant advances have been made with LCBDE with primary sutures, which is gradually replacing the T-tube drainage procedure6,7.
However, complications are unavoidable in LCBDE and are primarily related to CBD resection (biliary leakage and stenosis). Postoperative bile leakage and bile duct stenosis can occur due to insufficient suturing or inadequate closure of the CBD8; these complications may cause abdominal infection and liver function damage, which can significantly delay recovery, increase the length of hospital stay, and lead to higher morbidity and mortality rates. Hence, to reduce the incidence rate of bile leakage, some surgeons tend to use T-tube drainage after LCBDE. However, carrying a T-tube for several weeks is uncomfortable for the patients. Furthermore, biliary leakage may occur if the T-tube is displaced. Therefore, it is vital to choose the appropriate incision and drainage process.
A transcystic approach to CBD exploration has been proposed to avoid CBD damage and eliminate the subsequent need for a T tube9,10. Nevertheless, the transcystic procedure is sometimes limited to patients presenting with a dilated cystic duct and poses challenges when addressing large stones11,12. Hence, the generalization of transcystic LCBDE with primary closure is currently restricted13.
To minimize CBD damage and optimize the use of the cystic duct, we propose a modified micro incision starting from the cystobiliary junction to the CBD. This technique is deemed suitable for patients with a non-dilated cystic duct because the incision contains both the cystobiliary junction and CBD. Furthermore, the technique allows surgeons to perform cholangioscopy and the primary sutures after LCBDE more easily. Further, a shorter incision on the CBD means less damage to the CBD, which can lead to lower postoperative biliary leakage and stenosis rates.