$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Regular physical activity (PA) has multiple health benefits and reduces the risk of developing various non-communicable diseases1. However, these effects depend on the intensity at which physical activity is performed (i.e., light, moderate, or vigorous)2. To obtain these effort levels, they can be evaluated using a Cardiopulmonary Exercise Test (CPET); this allows us to objectify the functioning of the cardiorespiratory system to objectify its PA intensity levels based on the ventilatory thresholds (VT), which are the gold standard to differentiate the passage from light to moderate or vigorous PA3.
Accelerometers are wearable devices that measure the accelerations of the body segment on different axes to which the monitor is attached4. The accelerometer measures the PA intensity in an arbitrary unit named counts per minute (CPM). The amount and intensity of PA may be obtained by classifying counts, a measure that quantifies acceleration within a specific time interval (epoch) with a set of cutpoints, i.e., intensity thresholds for PA intensity classification4. Light PA in healthy people usually corresponds to activities such as walking at less than 3.2 km/h and warm-up games. Moderate PA includes activities such as walking at more than 3.2 km/h and aerobic games. Lastly, vigorous PA includes running and high-intensity games5.
Although accelerometry provides quantifiable data, these vary depending on the types of accelerometers used or their positioning on the body6. The traditional cut-off points to identify the different levels of intensity of PA have been proposed from data obtained in normal-weight subjects7, and they have even been previously used in hospitalized patients4. In adults, cut-off points usually used are 0-2689 CPM (light PA), 2690-6166 CPM (moderate PA), 6167-9642 CPM (vigorous PA), and 9643 and above CPM (very vigorous PA)8.
It is unknown whether the PA intensity identified with a triaxial accelerometer corresponds to the intensity detected through ventilatory thresholds (VT1 and VT2) during a CPET. So, the aim of this research was to assess the physical activity intensity levels measured by indirect calorimetry and wrist and waist-worn accelerometry during an incremental walking-jogging test on an oval track and examine the agreement between these assessment methods in young healthy women9.