Predicting transfusion reactions remains a significant challenge in the field of transfusion medicine. Over the past 4 decades, the monocyte-monolayer assay (MMA), pioneered by Tong and Branch1,2, has served as a valuable in vitro cellular assay for predicting the clinical outcome of hemolysis in blood transfusion patients1. Indeed, this assay has been instrumental in distinguishing between clinically significant and insignificant red blood cell (RBC) antibodies2. While monocytes have traditionally been the standard leukocyte used in this assay, our research aims to explore the potential benefits of using monocyte-derived macrophages as an alternative. These cells may enhance the assays’ ability to assess the clinical relevance of red cell alloantibodies.
In the historical MMA, monocytes, which are the precursors to macrophages, the immune cells responsible for the clearance and destruction of red blood cells during an adverse transfusion reaction, are introduced in an in vitro assay along with RBCs and antibodies1,2,3,4,5,6,7. Phagocytosis is then assessed visually by counting phagocytosed RBCs within monocytes. A phagocytic index (PI) of < 5 phagocytosed RBCs per 100 monocytes counted indicates the patient is at a reduced risk of experiencing an adverse transfusion reaction, and the antibody is deemed clinically insignificant4,5,6,7. Preliminary experiments demonstrate using peripheral blood-derived monocytes may not be ideal for determining clinical significance as they have a lower phagocytic capacity than activated monocytes and certain macrophages.
Monocytes are a subset of cells found in the blood, spleen, and bone marrow and account for 10% of the total leukocytes in humans8. These cells typically circulate for 1-2 days before being recruited by different tissues, where they go on to differentiate into macrophages8. This typically happens during hematopoiesis, in which the bone marrow produces monocytes that are released into circulation to become tissue macrophages that reside in the spleen and the liver2. Known as the first line of defense against foreign pathogens, macrophages are large phagocytic mononuclear cells that play a role in adaptive and innate immunity9. Among the intricate and complex roles of the immune system, understanding and characterizing macrophage phenotypes presents a formidable challenge that is yet to be fully understood. Over the past two decades, the notion of macrophage polarization has garnered increasing recognition, with recent studies employing the use of single-cell RNA sequencing to discern the spectrum in which these macrophages exist.
Classically activated M1 and M1-like macrophages arise in inflammatory environments dominated by Toll-like receptors (TLRs)10. These cells may be involved in autoimmune diseases and arteriosclerosis and present surface markers such as MHC-II, CD80, and CD8611,12. Anti-inflammatory M2 and M2-like macrophages are found in environments dominated by Th2 responses, lack expression of CD80, and present surface markers such as CD209 and CD20611,12. M1/M2 macrophages may be cultured in vitro from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, with lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and cytokines such as GM-CSF and IFNγ (M1) and M-CSF and IL-4 (M2) stimulating their polarization10,12.
This manuscript and associated studies aim to demonstrate that M2 macrophages exhibit increased sensitivity for phagocytosis compared to M1 macrophages and monocytes. Investigating the phagocytic activity of M1/M2 macrophages versus monocytes in the context of red cell alloantibodies and transfusion medicine is an area that is yet to be explored. Here, we describe current ongoing work for the generation of M1/M2 macrophages and compare the classic monocyte monolayer assay (MMA) to the novel monocyte-macrophage assay, using the acronym M-MA to distinguish this macrophage assay from the monocyte assay, to improve the predictive value of in vitro phagocytosis assays.