In evaluating the performance of edge-of-field conservation practices that reduce nutrient loss from subsurface drainage water (saturated buffers, bioreactors, and drainage water management), it is important to accurately determine drainage discharge and nutrient concentrations. Standard methods are readily available for accurately determining nutrient concentrations (e.g., nitrate), such as laboratory methods from water samples1 or sensors for continuous monitoring of nutrients2,3. Determination of drainage flow rates in edge-of-field conservation practices, on the other hand, is not as straightforward as with nitrate concentration and usually involves the use of a drainage water level control structure4,5. A drainage water level control structure is used in an edge-of-field conservation practice with the dual purpose of controlling the upstream water head and monitoring the discharge flow rates with the use of weirs. Important components to consider while determining drainage flow rates include the size of the drainage control structure, the type of weir used in the structure, flow conditions within the structure, accurate measurement of heads, and the use of appropriate weir equations to convert heads to discharge flow rates. While these structures are generally limited to artificially "tile" drained lands, drained agricultural land exceeds 21 million ha in the US6 and impacts nutrient loads to streams and rivers7.
Determination of flow rates using weirs is a common practice, and standard procedures and calibration equations are available for flows in open channels8. However, only a limited number of studies have developed calibration equations for weirs in a drainage control structure5,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17. Chun and Cooke10 pioneered the development of calibration equations for rectangular weirs for various sizes of control structures. Following Chun and Cooke10, Christianson et al.9 developed a single calibration equation for a 45° V-notch weir in 15 cm (6 in) and 25 cm (10 in) control structures with weirs placed at different heights from the bottom of the structures. Shokrana and Ghane14 provided a different flow equation for a 45° V-notch weir in a 25 cm (10 in) structure from Christianson et al.9, when the weir was placed about 30 cm above the bottom of the structure. The authors attributed the difference in the two calibration equations to the use of a calibrated weighing device for measuring flow rates, suggesting that a unified procedure for obtaining flow rates, heads, and the calibration equations for weirs for flows contained within the V-notch in control structures is lacking.
In our recent study11, we developed calibration equations for 45° V-notch weirs in Agri Drain control structures based on their size (15cm [6 in], 20 cm [8 in], and 30 cm [12 in]) for flows contained within the V-notch and overtopping flows (i.e., when the head exceeds the top of a V-notch weir). While the calibration equation for flows contained within the V-notch is a simple power relationship between head (h) and flow rate (Q, equation 1)5,9,11,13,14, overtopping flows require the use of a compound weir equation, which is more complicated (i.e., has more terms) because it combines equations for a V-notch weir and a rectangular weir (equation 2)11.
(1)
where, Q = flow rate, h = head, and a and b = weir coefficients whose values depend on the shape of the weir, the size of the control structure, the flow conditions, and the units for Q and h.
(2)
where, Q = flow rate, h = the total head, h1 = head above the top of V-notch weir (i.e., in the rectangular weir above the V-notch), W = width of the rectangular weir section above the top of V-notch weir, Wv = top width of the V-notch weir, a and b = weir coefficients for the V-notch weir, and a1 and b1 = weir coefficients for the rectangular section above the V-notch weir.
The adoption of a smart drainage system with sensors to monitor and automatically adjust the water levels in a control structure using remotely controlled adjustable gate valves is increasing in edge-of-field conservation practices in the US. Most of these systems, which were originally designed to use only a simple power function, cannot accommodate the compound weir equation (equation 2) for the overtopping flows and demand the development of unique flow equations of the form shown by equation (1) for each drainage control structure for overtopping flows. Additionally, users involved in measuring and monitoring flow rates and nutrient losses may find it cumbersome to use equation (2) for overtopping flows due to the requirement for more parameters. To overcome these challenges, we developed the "Weir Flow Equation Coefficients Calculator" tool. This online tool (available at: https://www.ars.usda.gov/midwest-area/ames/nlae/docs/tools-available-from-nlae/) provides weir flow equation coefficients for standard sizes of drainage control structures (Table 1) for a 45° V-notch weir. More importantly, the tool calculates weir flow equation coefficients for overtopping flow and consists of only two parameters, as presented in equation (1), based on the size and dimensions of the control structure provided by the user. When the appropriate equipment is available to measure site-specific flow rate vs. head relationships, the tool also accepts a calibration equation for flows contained within the V-notch weir as user input and calculates the weir flow equation coefficients for overtopping flows. Thus, this protocol describes the setup for flow measurement in a drainage control structure and a universal method for the development of a site-specific calibration equation. Next, the use of the tool "Weir Flow Equation Coefficients Calculator" for calculating weir flow equation coefficients for flows contained within the V-notch and overtopping flows is described. Finally, monitoring and maintenance of flows in a drainage control structure is described, which will facilitate accurate estimation of drainage flow rates using the weir equations obtained from the tool.