$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Concrete is the main building material for construction projects around the world1,2. One study found that cement is the second most consumed material in the world, behind only water3. Nearly 4.1 billion tons of cement are produced each year4,5. Traditional production, processing, and application of cement results in nearly 8% of the global CO2 emissions annually6. Due to the high demand and yet damaging effects of traditional cement production, a novel carbon-neutral method for cementation is a top priority for global sustainability goals7,8,9,10.
Biocementation is the process of using microorganisms to produce a cement, adhesive, or substance that can be used to create a solid surface or structure1,11. The most well-defined biocementation process involves using ureolytic bacteria to precipitate calcium carbonate, linking particles together into a hardened cement material12,13.
When considering an eco-friendly alternative to traditional cement, the alternative must also meet the strength expectations for cement. The unconfined compression test is an analytical measurement used to determine the shear strength of a rock, building material, or soil sample14. For effective shear testing, the sample must be prepared according to industry standards, which include a 1:2 diameter-to-height ratio and a cylindrical shape15. A custom-designed 3D-printed mold was created to meet these standards and increase efficiency in executing an MICP protocol. These custom-designed molds allow for the flow-through application and drainage of sequential MICP treatments. Bacterial culture and cementation solution can easily be applied to the top reservoir, which then runs through the mold and passes through a mesh-lined opening on the base of the mold. The molds are designed to rest on top of a beaker or other waste collection container. The mold is split in half vertically to allow for easy unmolding of the cemented brick. It is held together by eight magnets affixed to the frame of the mold and sealed with epoxy to prevent damage to the magnets from exposure to the MICP solutions. The two halves also contain an inset groove to place a rubber gasket, which helps seal the mold and prevent leaking. On the inside of the cylindrical mold is a groove to indicate the fill level for sand/soil to produce a brick 3 inches in height; the space above that groove is intended to be used as a reservoir for the application of treatment solutions. A piece of wire mesh placed over the bottom opening on the inside of the mold, when constructed, prevents the sand or soil from falling out through the bottom of the mold. Additionally, a piece of wire mesh is placed on the top of the sand or soil to assist in evenly distributing the applied solutions and ensure the brick that is formed has an even top without any sharp ridges, which could affect the unconfined compression test results.
The molds were designed using computer-aided design (CAD) software, and an STL file (Supplementary File 1 and Supplementary File 2) was generated from the CAD file (Supplementary File 3 and Supplementary File 4). This STL file was uploaded into the 3D printer program and subsequently printed. After the molds were printed, a water jet system was used to remove the support material generated from the 3D printer, leaving the final 3D-printed structure. The file for printing a tamping device to aid in compacting the sand/soil in the mold and creating a level top surface has also been included.