$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Breast cancer (BC) is the most common and the second-highest cancer-related death for women in the United States. Projections for 2025 estimate that there will be 316,950 new breast cancers, and 42,170 women will die from BC1. Currently, bilateral prophylactic mastectomy is the most effective procedure to prevent BC. However, this is a highly invasive procedure that involves a complete removal of the epithelial cells, from which breast carcinoma arises, and the surrounding tissue. Due to its invasiveness as well as the psychological and social impact of this procedure, less than 50% of high-risk women undergo risk-reducing mastectomy2. We, and others, have developed intraductal (ID) delivery procedures for primary prevention and/or local treatment of breast cancer in rodent models2,3 as an alternative to the current preventions and treatments. Ethanol (EtOH) has a low toxicity and safety profile that is well established and is used in multiple clinical applications, such as sclerosing agents for treatment of venous malformations and as an ablative agent for local treatment of some cancers3. Typically, several milliliters of EtOH are infused or delivered at 90-100% concentration in these clinical procedures. In our previous work, delivery of 70% EtOH directly into the ductal tree system of mouse and rat models was effective at chemically ablating mammary epithelial cells with limited damage to adjacent normal tissue, and at preventing breast tumor formation4,5,6,7. As this procedure is scaled up to the larger ductal tree system of a rabbit with a larger luminal volume to luminal epithelial cell surface area ratio, we explore the ablative properties of a solution with a lower percentage of EtOH (10% to 70%). With a lookout for clinical translation, we reason that the lowest percentage of ethanol that is effective at ablating epithelial cells will be the most well-tolerated and have the best safety profile.
Confirmation of complete ductal tree filling is necessary to guarantee that the ablative solution has come in direct contact with mammary epithelial cells. In our previous studies in rodent models, X-ray visualization of infused ductal tree(s) by microCT imaging was used after the procedure. Due to the required lapse of time to anesthetize, transfer, set, and position the animal for imaging, FDA-approved Omnipaque (iohexol) or similar iodine-containing fast-diffusing contrast agents were not suitable for ductal tree visualization in rodents6,8. We found that nanoparticle-based contrast agents, especially those containing tantalum oxide nanocrystal, were slower diffusing and more suitable for ductal tree visualization in rodents6,7,8,9. However, this posteriori confirmation by microCT imaging does not allow us to monitor or control the amount of infused volume and deviates from clinically established diagnostic procedures, such as ductography10,11, for ductal tree visualization. Thus, a key step to establishing the technical feasibility of translating this ID procedure to humans is to demonstrate real-time fluoroscopy visualization of the infused ductal tree in an animal model of increasing size and complexity of its mammary glands. This protocol scales up this ablative procedure from rodents4,5 to rabbit models. Evolutionarily, anatomically, and physiologically, rabbit mammary glands are more similar to human breasts than those of rodents or other large animal models, such as cows and sheep12,13,14. Female rabbits have four pairs of mammary glands, each containing four ductal trees, whereas rodents have only one ductal tree per mammary gland. Rabbit teats can be cannulated15,16 using a procedure similar to ID administration of contrast agent in clinical ductography in first-in-human clinical research. Therefore, rabbits provide a practical and relevant intermediate large-animal model for the translational application of this ID ablative procedure to humans. This protocol addresses technical challenges of ID delivery and in vivo imaging of a multi-ductal tree system that could not have been addressed in rodent models. This protocol uses instruments, reagents, and materials that are compatible with current clinical practice for visualization of ductal trees. Thus, the described procedure for fluoroscopy-guided infusion of iohexol-containing ethanol-based ablative solution could be readily implemented and evaluated in first-in-human clinical trials.
This method has been implemented in our laboratory to successfully cannulate and sequentially infuse all four ductal trees of one or more mammary glands in a rabbit, in a single session, with an ethanol-based ablative solution containing a contrast agent (Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3). This method involves infusing the ablative solution directly into the cannulated teat opening with a 27 G blunt-tipped needle of a rabbit (4-month virgin) on a fluoroscopy table. This procedure is performed on an animal under general anesthesia (isoflurane) with peri- and post-procedure anti-inflammatory treatment (ketoprofen, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug). Fluoroscopy imaging allows us to monitor the filling of the ductal tree in real-time, to control the rate and amount of dispensed volume, and/or to determine how successful ID delivery is in each individual tree system (Figures 1, Figure 2, Figure 3). This fluoroscopy technique approximates more closely to the intended clinical application for image-guidance of the ablative treatment and can help limit the overall radiation dose imposed on the patient. This protocol demonstrates that FDA-approved Omnipaque (iohexol) is a suitable contrast agent to visualize the initial filling of the rabbit ductal tree (Figure 3). Observations by gross examination and histological analysis show that an ethanol concentration of 70% causes rapid tissue damage within and outside the ductal tree and extending beyond the mammary gland structure (Figure 3). Ethanol concentration in the 10-40% range provides adequate epithelial cell ablation with lower collateral tissue damage than 70% ethanol (Figure 4). Longitudinal studies using this procedure with appropriately powered group size per ablative solution and timed tissue collections will be required to establish optimal parameters of the ablative solution for its clinical evaluation in human patients.