A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Case Report

Robotic Duodenal Sleeve Resection for Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor with Rare Exon 8 KIT Mutation Following Neoadjuvant Imatinib

697 views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/68372

⸱

April 3rd, 2026

 ,  ,  ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

This video case report demonstrates the unique management of a duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor with a rare, understudied, exon 8 KIT mutation. Neoadjuvant therapy resulted in a 30% reduction in tumor size, making the patient a candidate for a robotic-assisted duodenal sleeve resection instead of the more morbid pancreaticoduodenectomy.

Abstract

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) predominantly arise in gastric tissue, with only 5% occurring in the duodenum. While surgery remains the cornerstone of treatment, patients with large tumors or a high risk of recurrence may benefit from targeted therapy. Most GISTs harbor mutations in the KIT receptor tyrosine kinase, making them potentially responsive to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) such as imatinib. Mutations in exons 9, 11, 13, and 17 are most common and are therefore included in most genetic panels. However, up to 15% of patients lack mutations in these exons and demonstrate variable responses to TKIs.

This video demonstrates the management of a duodenal GIST located near the ampulla. Given the tumor's size and location, pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) would likely be required for resection. Genetic testing was performed to assess the potential for targeted therapy to reduce tumor burden and allow for a more limited resection. Although no mutations were identified in exons 9, 11, 13, or 17, additional testing revealed a rare exon 8 KIT mutation. Exon 8 mutations have been reported in hematopoietic malignancies but are rarely described in GISTs, and their sensitivity to TKIs remains unclear. After informed consent, imatinib was initiated, resulting in a 30% reduction in tumor size at 6 months. The patient subsequently underwent a robotic duodenal sleeve resection with lateral duodenojejunostomy. His postoperative course was uncomplicated, and he was discharged on postoperative day 5. The patient received adjuvant imatinib and remains recurrence-free at three years.

Given the rarity of exon 8 KIT mutations in GISTs, this mutation is not included in standard genetic panels. Although further study is needed, this case suggests that exon 8-mutant GISTs may respond to TKIs, potentially enabling less extensive surgical resection.

Introduction

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) can be found throughout the entire gastrointestinal tract but are most common in the stomach (60%) and small intestine (30%). Only 5% of tumors present in the duodenum, which can be a challenging location for surgical resection1,2. Although surgery continues to be the primary modality of GIST treatment, targeted systemic therapies, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), can be considered for patients with high tumor burden or increased risk of recurrence. Key pathological factors in prognostication and risk stratification include tumor size, mitotic rate, and, more recently, tumor location has been implicated, where gastric tumors tend to be more indolent and intestinal tumors more aggressive3,4.

The majority of GISTs have a mutation in the KIT receptor tyrosine kinase or platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha (PDGFRA). However, up to 15% lack a mutation in the commonly tested KIT exons 9, 11, 13, and 17 or PDGFRA exons 12, 14, 185,6. Evaluating tumor mutational status can have a significant impact on management and clinical outcomes. These include confirmation of diagnosis and prognostication if other studies are inconclusive, as well as predicting responsiveness to targeted systemic therapies2. Tumors lacking these well-described mutations are typically defined as 'wild-type GISTs' and generally considered to have little to no response to TKI therapy6. This GIST subset, however, is likely an oversimplification, as tumors may be more genetically heterogeneous than previously thought. Recent reports have challenged this notion, demonstrating that wild-type GISTs with an activating exon 8 mutation have an in vitro response to imatinib, and patients with this mutation may benefit from imatinib administration7,8,9.

For optimal oncologic outcomes of any GIST, an R0 resection without lymph node clearance remains the goal. However, the unique anatomy of the duodenum and close proximity to several critical structures, such as the pancreas, biliary ducts, and ampulla of Vater, may pose a significant challenge for managing duodenal GISTs10,11. Broadly, options for resection include a limited duodenal resection or a more extensive PD. Factors contributing to this decision include tumor size, proximity to the ampulla, and risk of tumor rupture. Another important consideration in performing an oncologic resection is minimizing post-operative surgical morbidity, which could impact resumption of systemic therapy, if indicated. Thus, the surgical procedure of choice is not standardized for duodenal GISTs and remains highly individualized10,11.

CASE PRESENTATION:

A 73-year-old male with an unremarkable past medical and surgical history presented with symptomatic anemia for which he underwent an esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and colonoscopy at an outside facility. No abnormalities were found on colonoscopy, but a large, ulcerated mass was identified near the ampulla of Vater during the EGD. Biopsies were obtained but were negative for malignancy. He was then transferred to our facility for additional care.

Diagnosis, Assessment, and Plan:

A repeat EGD along with endoscopic ultrasound was performed, showing a hypoechoic, lobulated mass with overlying ulceration (Figure 1). The mass appeared to be originating from the muscularis propria and was opposite and 1cm distal to the ampulla of Vater. A fine needle aspiration (FNA) biopsy was performed, revealing strong positivity for KIT (CD117) and DOG1, markers of GISTs, on immunohistochemical staining. Unfortunately, a mitotic count could not be obtained due to scant sampling. Staging computed tomography (CT) showed the disease was isolated to the duodenum with the mass measuring 4.7 x 3.3 x 2.9 cm (Figure 2).

Due to the size and location of the mass, a PD was likely necessary if surgical resection had been pursued at time of presentation For this reason, genetic testing was obtained to evaluate the potential for targeted therapy to reduce the tumor burden, potentially allowing for a more limited resection. Initial genetic testing was negative, but further testing revealed a rare exon 8 KIT mutation. Following consultation with the patient, neoadjuvant therapy with imatinib was started at a daily dose of 400 mg to facilitate a more conservative surgical approach. Imaging performed at 3 and 6 months demonstrated tumor size decreases of 18% and 30%, respectively. In light of this response, surgical management was subsequently pursued.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Patient positioning and placement of robotic ports

  1. The patient was placed in a supine position on a split-leg table with arms out. After sterile preparation, the patient was draped in standard fashion.
  2. An optical separator device was inserted through a left upper quadrant incision. CO2 insufflation was carried out after entry into the peritoneal cavity.
  3. The peritoneal lining and surface of visceral organs were carefully inspected to evaluate for metastatic disease that would alter intended operative management.
  4. Four robotic ports were positioned in the upper abdomen, and two assistant ports were placed inferiorly (Figure 3). The 12-mm port located in the left lower quadrant was assigned for stapler introduction.
  5. Once port placement was completed, the patient was placed in the reverse Trendelenburg position, after which the robotic system was docked.

2. Entry into the lesser sac and Kocherization of the duodenum

  1. Cranial retraction of the liver was achieved using a flexible right flank liver retractor.
  2. Access to the lesser sac was obtained with a bipolar electrocautery device along the stomach's greater curvature, while carefully preserving the gastroepiploic vessels.
  3. A mobilization of the hepatic flexure of the right colon was performed, as well as a wide Kocher maneuver to mobilize the duodenum.

3. Mobilization of GIST and jejunum

  1. In our case, the duodenal mass was visualized in the 3rd portion of the duodenum
    NOTE: It was noted to be invading the transverse colon mesentery.
  2. Dissection of the mass away from the retroperitoneum ensued. Involvement of the transverse colon mesentery required further dissection to medialize (Figure 4).
  3. The ligament of Treitz was identified and divided from the patient's right using electrocautery. The jejunum was mobilized into the patient's right upper quadrant.
  4. A mesenteric window was opened with a bipolar electrocautery device. The proximal jejunum was transected using a 60-mm purple Endo GIA stapler cartridge. The jejunal mesentery was then further dissected up to the level of the pancreas.

4. Resection of GIST and removal of specimen

  1. Duodenal mobilization was completed, allowing for resection of the devascularized duodenum and mass using an additional 60 mm purple staple load.
  2. The specimen was placed into a 15 mm endoscopic bag. The supraumbilical port site incision was extended to allow extraction. The specimen was oriented extracorporeally and taken to pathology for evaluation.
  3. A sealant gel port was placed in the extended extraction site, and the abdomen was re-insufflated.

5. Cholecystectomy and creation of duodenojejunal anastomosis

  1. A top-down cholecystectomy was performed: hook electrocautery was used to mobilize the gallbladder from the liver bed and clear all surrounding tissue until identification of two structures entering the gallbladder ("the critical view of safety"). The cystic artery was clipped and then divided with a bipolar cautery device.
  2. A transverse incision was made across the cystic duct using robotic scissors.
  3. A Fogarty catheter was passed into the duodenum via the transected cystic duct to confirm intact ampulla of Vater.
  4. An enterotomy was created in the mesenteric portion of the duodenum and another in the jejunum. A side-to-side stapled duodenojejunostomy was performed using a 60 mm purple load on an Endo GIA stapler.
  5. Here, the Fogarty catheter was visualized directly passing through the ampulla of Vater into the neo-duodenal lumen via common enterotomy.
  6. Once intact biliary anatomy had been confirmed, the Fogarty catheter was removed and cholecystectomy completed: two endoscopic clips were placed on the proximal cystic duct and one clip distal to the transverse incision. Transection of the duct between clips was completed.
  7. The common enterotomy was closed in two layers: 3-0 V-Loc running suture on the inner layer and 3-0 silk Lembert sutures to imbricate enterotomy suture line.
  8. The duodenal staple line was imbricated using 3-0 silk Lembert sutures.

6. Drain placement and abdominal closure

  1. The abdomen was thoroughly irrigated with multiple liters of saline and inspected to ensure adequate hemostasis.
  2. A single 19-French Blake drain was positioned in the right upper quadrant, coursing posterior to the duodenojejunostomy.
  3. The robot was undocked at that time. A laparoscopic port-site closure device was utilized to secure the 12-mm left lower quadrant port using a #1 Vicryl figure-of-eight suture, followed by abdominal desufflation.
  4. The extended midline specimen-extraction site was closed with #1 PDS figure-of-eight sutures.
  5. The skin and subcutaneous layers were irrigated and subsequently closed using 4-0 Monocryl sutures.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

The patient had an unremarkable recovery in the immediate post-operative period. He was admitted to the surgical floor with a nasogastric tube in place for gastric decompression due to the newly created duodenojejunal anastomosis. This tube was removed on postoperative day one, and he tolerated a clear liquid diet, which was subsequently advanced to a regular diet on postoperative day three. His surgical drain output remained low in volume and serosanguinous in quality; it was ultimately removed on post-operative day fou...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Here, we present the unique management of a patient with a duodenal GIST in close proximity to the ampulla. At presentation, the mass was potentially resectable but would have likely required a multivisceral resection with PD rather than a more limited duodenal sleeve resection. Further, typical prognostication and risk stratification was unsuccessful given the inability to determine a mitotic index on biopsy pathology and standard genetics panel, yielding negative results. Additional testing revealed a rare exon 8 KIT m...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Figure 3 was created in BioRender. Sestito, M. (2025) https://BioRender.com/ x13h100

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
#1 Vicryl SutureMedtronicCL-64-M
0 Vicryl TiesEthiconJ646H
2-0 Silk Suture - Cut to 8"EthiconK833-H
3-0 V-LOC V-20 6" x 3CovidienVLOCM0604
4-0 MonocrylEthiconY496G
4-0 Prolene on RB 1Ethicon8557H
4-0 V-Loc CV-23 6" x 2CovidienVLOCM0024
5-0 Polydioxanone RB-2 Cut to 5"EthiconZ148-H
Banded bag 28" x 36"McKesson13628Cover non-sterile equipment in sterle field
BD ChloraPrep Hi-Lite Orange 26-mL applicator with sterile solutionBD (Becton, Dickinsone and Company)930815Sterile Chlorhexidine preparation
Bladeless optical trocar, 5 mm size, 100 mm lengthCovidienONB5STF
Bladeless Trocar, 12 mm size, 100 mm lengthCovidienNONB12STF
Bladeless Trocar, 15 mm size, 100 mm lengthCovidienNB15STF
Bladeless Trocar, 5 mm size, 100 mm lengthCovidienNONB5STF
BLAKE Silicone Drain, Size 19 Fr, RoundEthicon2232Abdominal drain
CadiereIntuitive Surgical471049
Clean and protect laparoscope lenseMcKesson21345
Coaxial umbilical cableMedtronic203CXC
Da Vinci XI Arm DrapeIntuitive Surgical470015Sterile drape for robotic arms
Da Vinci XI Column DrapeIntuitive Surgical470341Sterile drape for bedside robot
Da Vinci XI Universal Seal 5-12 mmIntuitive Surgical470500Robotic Trocar seal
Endo catch gold single-use specimen pouchCovidien173050GLaparoscopic specimen pouch
Endo Floating Ball ElectrodesMedtronic122011Monopolar electrocautery device
Endo GIA Ultra Universal StaplerCovidienEGIAUXLLaparoscopic stapler
Endoscopic surgery swabCovidien173019Swab fluid and assist with blunt dissection
Exofin Skin AdhesiveMcKessonEX71010Skin glue
Fenestrated BipolarIntuitive Surgical471205
First Entry Access System, 5 x 100 mmApplied MedicalCTF03
Garment compress Medium, CalfZimmer BiometVG501MSequential compression device applied to calves for deep venous thrombosis prophylaxis
Gelpoint Retracter Sleeve introducerApplied MedicalCNGL2
Gelseal alexis mini Sleeve 10 mm, 12 mmApplied MedicalCNGL3
Hook electrocauteryIntuitive Surgical470183
Jackson-Pratt bulb reservoir 100 ccMcKessonSU1301305Drainage suction bulb reservoir
Laparoscopic Blade Electrode, 6.5"CovidenE14506Laparoscopic electrocautery blade
Laparoscopic Clip applier 10 mmCovidien176657Laparoscopic clip applier
Laparoscopic Clip applier 5 mmCovidien176630Laparoscopic clip applier
Laparoscopic electrode Flat L-hookCovidienE3774-36CLaparoscopic electrocautery hook
Laparoscopic sealer/divider, Maryland, curved JawCovidienLF1944
Laparotomy sponge, 4" x 18", X-ray and RF-DetectableMedtronicL041804P01C1
Large needle driverIntuitive Surgical471006
Large SutureCut needle driverIntuitive Surgical471296
Maryland BipolarIntuitive Surgical471172
Monopolar Curved scissor tip cover accessoryIntuitive Surgical400180
Monopolar curved scissorsIntuitive Surgical470179
Optical Obturator, 8mm, bladelessIntuitive Surgical470359Obturator for placement of robotic trocar
OR Fluid warming drapeMedlineSDREC44
Pneumoclear smoke evacuation tube setSTRYKER620050350Smoke evacuator tubing
PrograspIntuitive Surgical471093
Skin StaplerCovidien8886803712Skin stapler
Small grasping forcepIntuitive Surgical471400
Smoke MGMT EXTD Nozzle for 4 in electrodeMedtronicVSMEN4Electrocautery pencil with smoke evacuation
Smoke pencil with edge electrode 10 FtMedtronicVSMP10Electrode for electrocautery
Stapler reload, 60 mm, reinforcedCovidienSIGTRSB60AXT
Step insufflation/access needle, 100 mmCovidienS100000Laparoscopic blunt tip access needle
Sterile surgical Leggings 31" W X 48" LMcKesson89408
Sterile table Drape, 4'Grayline Medical418HDS
Suction irrigation system, battery operatedMcKesson250070520
Suction tube handle, Bulb tip YankauerMcKessonK86Yankauer Suction handle
Suction Tubing 20FT, 9/32 inchMcKessonN720ASuction tubing
Surgical GownMcKesson41734
Surgical utility drape with tapeMedlineDYNJP2405Drapes for sterild field
SURGICEL Absorbable HemostatEthicon1952SHemostatic cellulose
Tip up GrasperIntuitive Surgical471344
Umbilical tapeEthiconW276
Vessel Loop SiliconeMcKesson31145660Vessel loop for retraction of vascular, pancreatic neck
Vessel sealer extendIntuitive Surgical480422

References

  1. Miettinen, M., Lasota, J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors: pathology and prognosis at different sites. Semin Diagn Pathol. 23 (2), 70-83 (2006).
  2. Miettinen, M., et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the jejunum and ileum: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 906 cases before imatinib with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol. 30 (4), 477-489 (2006).
  3. Miettinen, M., Sobin, L. H., Lasota, J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 1765 cases with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol. 29 (1), 52-68 (2005).
  4. Miettinen, M., Sobin, L. H., Lasota, J. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors of the stomach: a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 1765 cases with long-term follow-up. Am J Surg Pathol. 29 (1), 52-68 (2005).
  5. Lasota, J., Miettinen, M. Clinical significance of oncogenic KIT and PDGFRA mutations in gastrointestinal stromal tumours. Histopathology. 53 (3), 245-266 (2008).
  6. Kays, J. K., Sohn, J. D., Kim, B. J., Goze, K., Koniaris, L. G. Approach to wild-type gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol. 3, 92(2018).
  7. Huss, S., et al. A subset of gastrointestinal stromal tumors previously regarded as wild-type tumors carries somatic activating mutations in KIT exon 8 (p.D419del). Mod Pathol. 26 (7), 1004-1012 (2013).
  8. Hartmann, K., et al. Novel germline mutation of KIT associated with familial gastrointestinal stromal tumors and mastocytosis. Gastroenterology. 129 (3), 1042-1046 (2005).
  9. Ito, T., et al. Gastrointestinal stromal tumors with exon 8 c-kit gene mutation might occur at extragastric sites and have metastasis-prone nature. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 7 (11), 8024-8031 (2014).
  10. Zhou, Y., et al. Surgery for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pancreaticoduodenectomy versus local resection. Asian J Surg. 43 (1), 1-8 (2020).
  11. Liu, Z., et al. Clinicopathological features, surgical strategy and prognosis of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a series of 300 patients. BMC Cancer. 18 (1), 563(2018).
  12. Amin, M. B., et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. , Springer. (2017).
  13. Yoshino, O., Vrochides, D., Martinie, J. B. Robotic distal pancreas-sparing duodenectomy (duodenal sleeve resection) with transmesenteric approach: robotic approach for tumors in the third and fourth parts of the duodenum. Surg Endosc. 37 (4), 3246-3252 (2023).
  14. Joensuu, H. Risk stratification of patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal stromal tumor. Hum Pathol. 39 (10), 1411-1419 (2008).
  15. Joensuu, H., et al. Risk of recurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumour after surgery: an analysis of pooled population-based cohorts. Lancet Oncol. 13 (3), 265-274 (2012).
  16. Corless, C. L., et al. Pathologic and molecular features correlate with long-term outcome after adjuvant therapy of resected primary gastrointestinal stromal tumor: the ACOSOG Z9001 trial. J Clin Oncol. 32 (15), 1563-1570 (2014).
  17. Joensuu, H., et al. One vs three years of adjuvant imatinib for operable gastrointestinal stromal tumor: a randomized trial. JAMA. 307 (12), 1265-1272 (2012).
  18. Fiore, M., et al. Preoperative imatinib mesylate for unresectable or locally advanced primary gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Eur J Surg Oncol. 35 (7), 739-745 (2009).
  19. Rutkowski, P., et al. Surgical treatment of patients with initially inoperable and/or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumors during therapy with imatinib mesylate. J Surg Oncol. 93 (4), 304-311 (2006).
  20. Chok, A. -Y., et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing pancreaticoduodenectomy versus limited resection for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol. 21 (11), 3429-3438 (2014).
  21. Fu, X., et al. Surgical strategies for duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 407 (2), 835-844 (2022).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Duodenal GISTKIT Exon 8 MutationRobotic Sleeve ResectionTyrosine Kinase InhibitorGenetic TestingLateral DuodenojejunostomyPancreaticoduodenectomy AlternativeAdjuvant Imatinib