This protocol describes a low-cost production and efficient validation method for glue-based TMA construction, providing a convenient pathological diagnosis platform for tumor and disease research.
Method Article
This protocol describes a low-cost production and efficient validation method for glue-based TMA construction, providing a convenient pathological diagnosis platform for tumor and disease research.
Tissue microarray technology (TMA) is a high-throughput platform for the simultaneous detection and analysis of multiple tissue samples, facilitating efficient tumor and disease biomarker research. However, conventional TMA construction methods often face limitations such as operational complexity, time-consuming procedures, and variable accuracy. A glue-based TMA construction method was developed to overcome these challenges, offering improved tissue core fixation and enhanced structural stability. Systematic validation included histological evaluation (HE staining), immunohistochemical profiling of target proteins, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. Results demonstrated that the glue-based method maintained excellent slice integrity, improved signal-to-noise ratio, and ensured consistent batch-to-batch reproducibility. Although the approach is limited to manual operation, it presents a reliable and cost-effective option for moderate-throughput TMA production. This method is particularly suited to research environments that value flexibility and sample diversity over large-scale automation, expanding the utility of TMA in academic and diagnostic settings.
Tissue Microarray (TMA) is a high-throughput technique for analyzing tissue samples1,2,3. Multiple donor tissue cores are obtained, and donor paraffin blocks are transferred into recipient tissue blocks for simultaneous differential and comparative molecular analysis under theoretically the same performance conditions2,4. The classic way to construct a tissue microarray (TMA) is to use a hole punch to extract tissue cores from a donor tissue sample and arrange them sequentially into a recipient paraffin block. This method is suitable for donor paraffin blocks of similar depth and allows for the efficient analysis of multiple samples on a single slice, greatly improving the efficiency of the study and the consistency of data5,6,7. Nevertheless, this method still possesses certain limitations, including inadequate handling of the tissue core during the embedding process, which may result in inconsistent staining of samples in subsequent analyses8.
The second method of TMA construction is the tape method9,10. This method inverts the construction process by casting the block around inverted upright cores that, upon completion, are flush with the top of the TMA, irrespective of core length11,12. However, this method requires ensuring the proper placement of the tissue core and the effectiveness of the tape, and also limits the number of samples that can be processed compared to traditional techniques.
This study proposes an innovative glue method for constructing TMA, aiming to solve problems such as the insufficient stability of tissue cores and complex operation that exist in traditional techniques13. This method uses glue to precisely fix multiple tissue cores together and has the advantages of simple operation and strong sample firmness. Compared with the traditional sectioning or tape methods, the glue method can increase the retention rate of tissue cores and reduce costs. This method is applicable to clinical studies with a medium sample size and is particularly suitable for research designs that require flexible adjustment of the experimental plan. However, it should be noted that the processing capacity of this method does not meet the demands of ultra-high throughput9. Meanwhile, in the actual application process, a complete set of standardized operation norms and quality control systems must be established. Operators need to receive systematic training and pass professional assessments to ensure the standardization of technical operations and the repeatability of results. Comprehensive analysis indicates that this technology achieves a good balance among operational flexibility, cost-effectiveness, and technical reliability, and is particularly suitable for research scenarios where resources are limited but quality control still needs to be guaranteed.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
All donor blocks were obtained from archival pathological specimens collected between 2016 and 2018 at the Affiliated Huai'an No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University. The samples were deidentified prior to use and processed in compliance with approved protocols (the ethics committee of the Affiliated Huai'an No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, KY-2024-250-01).
1. Assessment and tagging of donor tissue
2. Tissue core extraction
3. Tissue core fixation
4. Cassette installation and paraffin embedding
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
In the present study, high-quality tissue microarrays were constructed using the glue method. To verify the effectiveness of the method, a series of experiments were performed, including H&E staining, immunohistochemical detection of specific proteins, and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis. A critical component of the construction process is the presence of tissue core dots at the expected positions and distances apart from one another, which is assessed by visual inspection. Visual inspecti...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
As an innovative method for constructing tissue microarrays (TMA), the glue method has shown significant advantages due to its ease of construction procedures and cost-effectiveness. Compared to the traditional needle array method, which relies on sophisticated instruments14,15, the glue method enables sample fixation by glueing, which can be done with only basic tools, greatly reducing the technical threshold. In contrast to the traditional embedding method, the...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
Thank you to the team members for their support and contribution to this experiment.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Breast cancer HER2 Detection kit | Anbiping | 2502001 | Breast cancer HER2 Detection kit |
| CDHR4 antibody | Abcam | ab166914 | CDHR4 antibody |
| CDK1 antibody | Abcam | ab265590 | CDK1 antibody |
| CRTAC1 antibody | Abcam | ab254691 | CRTAC1 antibody |
| DNASE1L3 antibody | Abcam | ab203669 | DNASE1L3 antibody |
| Embedding machine | P.S.J MEDICAL | BM450A | Embedding machine |
| Fully automatic tissue dehydrator | Leica Biosystems | ASP3005 | Fully automatic tissue dehydrator |
| Glass microscope slides | Citotest | 250124A1 | Glass microscope slides |
| Glue | TIZO | 200 | Glue |
| GPR146 antibody | Abcam | ab117104 | GPR146 antibody |
| IGSF10 antibody | Abcam | ab197671 | IGSF10 antibody |
| ITIH1 antibody | Abcam | ab233032 | ITIH1 antibody |
| Low Profile Microtome Blades | Thermo Fisher | 3052835 | Low Profile Microtome Blades |
| Marker pen | Deli | SK109 | Marker pen |
| Microtome | Leica Biosystems | HistoCore BIOCUT | Microtome |
| Paraffin wax | Solarbio | YA0012 | Paraffin wax |
| SMAD9 antibody | Abcam | ab262940 | SMAD9 antibody |
| TARBP1 antibody | Abcam | ab115896 | TARBP1 antibody |
| ZCCHC24 antibody | Abcam | ab88756 | ZCCHC24 antibody |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request Permission