A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Murine Nasal Lavage Fluid Collection without Blood Contamination

3.6K views

DOI:

10.3791/68451

July 11th, 2025

* These authors contributed equally

In This Article

Summary

The present protocol describes a novel method for avoiding blood contamination in murine nasal lavage fluid (NLF). Since this method ensures the NLF collection without blood contamination, it allows for more accurate detections of immunological components and various respiratory pathogens.

Abstract

Upper airway samples, including nasal lavage fluid (NLF) and nasal swabs, are useful in detecting pathogens, including viruses and bacteria, which can cause respiratory diseases. NLF has been used to examine cellular and humoral components in the respiratory system, for example, in evaluating the induction of immunoglobulin (Ig) A following mucosal vaccinations. In experimental rodents, the NLF samples can be collected by either the trans-pharyngeal or trans-tracheal route. Although the trans-pharyngeal route has been reported to be more efficient in collecting the NLF samples than the trans-tracheal route, the NLF samples collected by the trans-pharyngeal route were often contaminated with blood, affecting the levels of cellular and humoral contents in the original NLF samples. Thus, this study aimed to establish a novel NLF collection method in experimental mice to minimize blood contamination. Briefly, before the lower jaw of the mouse was separated, cotton balls were placed in the mouth to absorb blood. When the bleeding was stopped, the NLF samples were collected by inserting a micropipette into the choana and flushing with 200 µL of phosphate-buffered saline twice (final volume: 400 µL/mouse). To detect blood contamination, a simple and sensitive forensic luminol test that detects hemoglobin was used. The luminol test demonstrated that blood contamination was detectable in the NLF samples harvested by the conventional method (without cotton balls), but not those harvested by the novel method (with cotton balls). Due to the contamination of blood, the total IgA and IgG concentrations in the NLF samples were higher in the conventional method than in the novel method; blood has been known to contain much higher levels of IgA and IgG than NLF. Therefore, this unique method can be used as a simple and sensitive method to collect NLF samples from experimental mice to prevent blood contamination.

Introduction

In both clinical and basic research, appropriate sample collection methods are most crucial to evaluating the results. Nasal lavage is an irrigation technique used to analyze the cellular and humoral components in the respiratory tract1,2,3. Clinically, nasal lavage fluid (NLF) has been used as an effective noninvasive sample for biomarker discovery, with several studies supporting its use across various respiratory diseases, including sinusitis, cystic fibrosis, and general respiratory disorders4,5,6,7. In experimental animals, NLF has also been used to study respiratory disease models, including influenza, coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), and allergic disease3,8,9. This method is widely used to determine key inflammatory biomarkers, such as polymorphonuclear cells and cytokines, which are often examined as indicators of responses to allergens, asthma, and respiratory infections10,11,12. More recently, to investigate the efficacy and safety of potential intranasal vaccine candidates, NLF samples have often been collected from experimental animals, and the levels of pathogen and immunoglobulin (Ig) in NLF samples have been quantified as indicators13.

In experimental mice, NLF can be collected using the trans-pharyngeal or trans-tracheal method. In the trans-pharyngeal method, the murine head, including the palatopharyngeal region, was separated from the larynx, and then a catheter was inserted through the pharyngeal opening into the choana to inject phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and collect NLF from the nostril14. The trans-tracheal method gained access to the respiratory tract through the trachea without severing the head, and NLF was collected from the nostril, minimizing the risk of blood contamination. Although these two primary methods have been employed for NLF collection in experimental mice, both conventional methods have their own limitations. The trans-tracheal method has been demonstrated to yield lower amounts of NLF than the trans-pharyngeal method due to the leakage of trans-tracheal lavage fluid into the oral cavity. The previous study showed that, following injection of PBS, the recovered fluid volumes in NLF were 70%-80% and 90%-100% in the trans-tracheal and trans-pharyngeal methods, respectively14. Although the trans-pharyngeal method can be considered better with larger amounts of NLF than the trans-tracheal method, blood contamination during the procedure was inevitable to some extent14,15. Similarly, several studies have reported that NLF samples were often contaminated with high levels of blood serum proteins16,17,18. This can interfere with the detection and quantification of NLF-specific biomarkers for respiratory diseases19. This may also affect the concentrations of Ig, particularly IgA and IgG, in NLF samples since blood contains larger amounts of IgA and IgG than NLF.

To address these challenges, this study aimed to establish a unique, simple, and reliable trans-pharyngeal method for collecting NLF samples from experimental mice, maximizing sample yield and minimizing blood contamination. During the experimental processes, cotton balls were placed into the mouth of the mouse to inhibit blood contamination, and then PBS was injected to collect NLF samples from the nostril. The levels of blood contamination in NLF were determined using a forensic technique, luminol-based chemiluminescence, that enables semi-quantification of hemoglobin (Hb) levels in NLF samples; the luminol reaction in NLF collected by the novel method was negative. Thus, the current novel method can improve the NLF sample quality for various biological experiments, such as antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs), cytokine profiles, immunological and medical biomarker determinations, and murine respiratory disease models.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

All experimental procedures were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) of Kindai University Faculty of Medicine and performed according to the criteria outlined by the National Institutes of Health (NIH)20. 4-month-old male C57BL/6 mice were used in this study. Information on reagents and equipment used in this study are listed in the Table of Materials.

1. NLF collection

  1. Euthanize a mouse with 5% isoflurane21 following institutionally approved protocols.
  2. Place the mouse on its back on a surgical plate and fix it by pinning down all four limbs.
  3. Take blood from the heart using a 1 mL syringe.
  4. Open the abdominal cavity using scissors to expose the visceral organs and diaphragm.
  5. Incise the diaphragm and ribs using scissors to make the right atrium visible.
  6. Puncture the right atrium using scissors to remove blood further.
  7. Place three cotton balls into the mouth of the animal while pulling the tongue.
  8. Separate the lower jaw using scissors while raising the head (nose-up position) to inhibit blood contamination in NLF.
  9. Replace the cotton balls with new ones to avoid blood contamination.
  10. After bleeding has stopped, inject 200 µL of sterile PBS into the choana and collect NLF ejected from the nostrils into a 1.5 mL tube.
  11. Repeat the step 1.10 once more.

2. Detection of blood contamination by luminol chemiluminescence

  1. Dissolve 1 mg of luminol and 5 mg of sodium peroxide (Na2O2) with 1 mL of sterile water using a 1.5 mL tube to make the stock solution.
    NOTE: The final concentration is 1 mg/mL luminol and 5 mg/mL Na2O2.
  2. Cover the tube with aluminum foil and store it at 4 °C until use.
  3. Dilute the stock solution 10-fold with deionized water to make a working solution.
    NOTE: The final concentration is 0.1 mg/mL luminol and 0.5 mg/mL Na2O2.
  4. Pipette 2 µL of the NLF samples into wells of a 96-well plate.
  5. Add 100 µL of the diluted luminol solution to each well.
  6. Briefly shake the 96-well plate to mix the samples with the luminol solution.
  7. Directly observe luminol chemiluminescence in the dark.
  8. Semi-quantify the Hb concentration using a luminometer, if necessary.

3. Quantification of IgA and IgG by ELISAs

  1. Coat wells of 96-well plates with 100 µL/well of a total anti-mouse IgA (20 ng/well; 200 ng/mL) or IgG (10 ng/well; 100 ng/mL) antibody (see Table of Materials).
  2. Seal the plates and incubate them at 4 °C overnight.
  3. Wash the plates three times with 300 μL/well of a washing buffer containing 0.05% Tween 20 in PBS each time, and then blot the plates on paper towels.
  4. Add 200 µL of an assay diluent containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 0.2% Tween 20 in PBS to each well.
  5. Incubate the plates at room temperature (RT) for 60 min.
  6. Aspirate the assay diluent and then blot the plates on paper towels.
  7. Prepare 100 ng/mL of a mouse IgA or IgG standard with the assay diluent and make two-fold serial dilutions: 50 ng/mL, 25 ng/mL, 12.5 ng/mL, 6.25 ng/mL, 3.13 ng/mL, 1.56 ng/mL, and 0.78 ng/mL.
    NOTE: The required volume of each standard is 100 µL per well.
  8. Dilute the samples with the assay diluent at the appropriate dilutions: serum (104 to 106), NLF (10, 50, 200, and 500), and BALF (101 to 104).
    NOTE: The required volume of each sample is 100 µL per well.
  9. Add 100 µL of IgA or IgG standards and samples to the appropriate wells.
  10. Incubate the plates at RT for 75 min.
  11. Wash the plates three times with 300 µL/well of the washing buffer each time, and then blot the plates on paper towels.
  12. Dilute a peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse F(ab')2 antibody (see Table of Materials) with the assay diluent at the appropriate dilution: 104-fold dilution.
    NOTE: The required volume is 100 µL per well.
  13. Add 100 µL of the diluted peroxidase-conjugated anti-mouse F(ab')2 antibody to each well.
  14. Incubate the plates at RT for 75 min.
  15. Wash the plates five times with 300 µL/well of the washing buffer each time, and then blot the plates on paper towers.
  16. Add 100 µL of a substrate solution containing tetramethylbenzidine (TMB) and hydrogen peroxide to each well.
  17. Incubate the plates at RT for 5 min.
  18. Add 50 µL of a stop solution, 2 N sulfuric acid (2N H2SO4), to each well.
  19. Measure the absorbance at 450 nm using a microplate reader.
  20. Determine the concentrations of IgA and IgG in each sample by utilizing the standard curves.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Using the conventional or novel method, NLF samples were collected from C57BL/6 mice through the trans-pharyngeal route. As shown in Figure 1, the NLF samples collected by the conventional method were slightly pink-tinged (Figure 1A); the NLF samples collected by the novel method were clear (Figure 1B). Since the difference seemed to result from blood contamination in the NLF samples by the conventional method, blood contamination i...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Nasal lavage is a valuable technique for acquiring biochemical, cytological, and biological information in respiratory diseases, such as influenza and COVID-1923. Besides identifying various infiltrating cells, the non-cellular composition of the respiratory tract can be examined from the NLF samples using various methods, such as ELISAs, immunoblot, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction1,19,24. Here...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We thank Seiichi Omura, Ph.D., Cong Thanh Nguyen, M.D., Ph.D., Kota Moriguchi, M.D., Ph.D., Reona Shiro, M.D., and Sandesh Rimal, M.S., Department of Microbiology, Kindai University Faculty of Medicine, and Hirotaka Ebina, Ph.D., Shinya Okamura, Ph.D., and Yasuo Yoshioka, Ph.D., Virus Vaccine Group, BIKEN Innovative Vaccine Research Alliance Laboratories, Research Institute for Microbial Diseases, Osaka University, for helpful discussions. We also express our gratitude to the members of the Life Science Research Institute, Kindai University, for their excellent technical assistance. This work was supported by the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology, Japan, through the Monbukagakusho (MEXT, 2021-2025) Scholarship (I.A.), Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research KAKENHI from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) JP23K06493 (F.S.), JP21K07287/JP24K10500 (A.-M. P.), and JP22K18378/JP24K10163 (I.T.), and Kindai University Research Enhancement Grant KD2406 (F.S.) and KD2506 (I.T.).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Animal fixation needleNatsume Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Tokyo, JapanKN-358-AWe fixed a mouse with animal fixation needles. Stainless steel; total length, 23 mm; and needle tip, 15 mm.
BD OptEIATM TMB Substrate Reagent SetBD Biosciences, San Diego, CA, USA555214We added 100 μL of TMB substrate solution per well.
Bell JarNANAWe used a bell jar for anesthesia.
Clear Flat-Bottom Immuno Nonsterile 96-Well Plates ThermoFisher Scientific, Rochester, NY, USA442404We used Clear Flat-Bottom Immuno Nonsterile 96-Well Plates with MaxiSorp surface treatment for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays.
Cotton ballSansho Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan94-1951We used cottons balls to avoid blood contamination. The diameter of cotton balls was 7 mm.
Fetal bovine serumSigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USA172012-500 MLWe added 10% of fetal bovine serum to the assay diluent.
Forceps (Micro tweezers for research experiments, curved tip)Sansho Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan91-1506We used forceps for disection. Model, HSC 551-10; and overll all length, 105 mm.
Forceps (Precision tweezers)Sansho Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan91-2772We used forceps for disection. Model, HSC 607-12; overll all length, 120 mm; and tip diameter, 0.3 mm.
Goat Anti-Mouse IgA-UNLBSouthernBiotech, Birmingham, AL, USA1040-01We coated Clear Flat-Bottom Immuno Nonsterile 96-Well Plates with 100 μL/well (20 ng/well) of total immunoglobulin A.
Isoflurane Viatris Inc., Canonsburg, PA, USANAWe used isoflurane for anesthesia.
Luminol Rection Reagent SetFUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan124-06511We used a luminol reaction reagent set to detect hemoglobin in NLF samples.
MicrotubeWatson Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan131-7155CWe used  microtubes for collecting NLF and BALF (1.5-mL microtube with lockining-cap, round bottom, soft touch-cap).
Milli-Q waterMerck KGaA, Darmstadt, GermanyMilli-Q Direct 8We used MilliQ water to make a luminol rection solution.
Mini-Shaker PSU-2TBiosan Ltd., Riga, LatviaPSU-2TWe shaked 96-well plates using the Mini-Shaler PSU-2T.
Mouse strainCLEA Japan, Inc., Tokyo, JapanNAwe used 4-month-old C57BL/6 male mice.
Nunc MicroWell 96-Well, Nunclon Delta-Treated, Flat-Bottom MicroplateThermo Fisher Scientific Nunc A/S . Kamstrupvej,Roskilde, Denmark136101We used the NuncTM MicroWellTM 96-Well, Nunclon Delta-Treated, Flat-Bottom Microplate for the luminol test.
Peroxidase-conjugated AffiniPure F(ab')2 Fragment Goat Anti-Mouse IgG, F(ab')2 Fragment Specific (minimal cross-reaction to Human, Bovine, and Horse Serum Proteins)Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc., West Grove, PA, USA115-036-072We added 100 μL of peroxidase-conjugated AffiniPure F(ab')2 fragment goat anti-mouse IgG, F(ab')2 fragment specific, as the detection antibody (10,000-fold dilution) to each well.
Phosphate-buffered salineSigma-Aldrich Co., St. Louis, MO, USAD8537-500MLWe used Dulbecco's Phosphate-Buffered Saline (modified without calcium chloride and magnesium chloride, liquid, sterile-filtered, suitable for cell cullture) for NLF and BALF collection.
Pipette Watson Co., Ltd., Tokyo, JapanNAWe used a 200-μL pipette for nasal lavage.
Pipette tipWatson Co., Ltd., Tokyo, JapanNAWe used a 200-μL multifit pipette tip for nasal lavage.
Polyoxyethylene(20) Sorbitan Monolaurate (Tween 20)FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Corporation, Osaka, Japan167-11515We added 0.05% of Tween 20 to the washing buffer and 0.2% of Tween 20 to the assay diluent.
Purified Goat anti-mouse IgG (minimal x-reactivity) AntibodyBioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA405301We coated Clear Flat-Bottom Immuno Nonsterile 96-Well Plates with 100 μL/well (10 ng/well) of total immunoglobulin G.
Small scissors, double-pointedSansho Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan91-7005We used scissors for disection. Model, S-4A; and overll all length, 115 mm.
Sulfuric acidWako Pure Chemical Industries, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan192-04755We added 50 μL of 2 N sulfuric acid to each well to stop the reaction.
Surflo intravenous catheter Terumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan SR-FS2032We used a surflo intravenous catheter and injected PBS into the trachea for bronchoalveolar lavage. Catheter, 20G; catheter length, 32 mm; catheter inner diameter, 0.80 mm; catheter outer diameter, 1.1 mm; and inner needel, 22G.
Surgical straight scissorsSansho Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan91-7004We used scissors for disection. Model, S-3B; and overll all length, 120 mm.
Surgilcal plateNatsume Seisakusho Co., Ltd., Tokyo, JapanKN-321-BWe used a cork board for dissection. Depth, 20 cm; width, 15 cm; and height 3 cm.
Synergy H1 Hybrid Multi-Mode Microplate Reader Agilent Technologies, Inc., Santa Clara, CA, USANAWe measured the absorbance of samples at 450 nm, using the Synergy H1 Hybrid Multi-Mode Microplate Reader.
SyringeTerumo Corporation, Tokyo, Japan SS-01TWe used a 1-mL syringe for blood collection from the heart.
Thread Niccho Kogyo Co., Ltd. Tokyo JapanNAWe tied a catheter with thread to ensure proper positioning during the procedure.

References

  1. Cortegano, I., et al. Age-dependent nasal immune responses in non-hospitalized bronchiolitis children. Front Immunol. 13, 1011607(2022).
  2. Yao, S., et al. Control of pathogenic effector T-cell activities in situ by PD-L1 expression on respiratory inflammatory dendritic cells during respiratory syncytial virus infection. Mucosal Immunol. 8 (4), 746-759 (2015).
  3. Gould, V. M. W., et al. Nasal IgA provides protection against human influenza challenge in volunteers with low serum influenza antibody titre. Front Microbiol. 8, 900(2017).
  4. Casado, B., Pannell, L. K., Viglio, S., Iadarola, P., Baraniuk, J. N. Analysis of the sinusitis nasal lavage fluid proteome using capillary liquid chromatography interfaced to electrospray ionization-quadrupole time of flight-tandem mass spectrometry. Electrophoresis. 25 (8), 1386-1393 (2004).
  5. Hull, J., Skinner, W., Robertson, C., Phelan, P. Elemental content of airway surface liquid from infants with cystic fibrosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 157 (1), 10-14 (1998).
  6. Roponen, M., et al. Inflammatory mediators in nasal lavage, induced sputum and serum of employees with rheumatic and respiratory disorders. Eur Respir J. 18 (3), 542-548 (2001).
  7. Santos Galvão, C. E., et al. Inflammatory mediators in nasal lavage among school-age children from urban and rural areas in São Paulo, Brazil. São Paulo Med J. 122 (5), 204(2004).
  8. Winkler, E. S., et al. SARS-CoV-2 causes lung infection without severe disease in human ACE2 knock-in mice. J Virol. 96 (1), e01511-e01521 (2022).
  9. Kieran, T. J., et al. Exploring associations between viral titer measurements and disease outcomes in ferrets inoculated with 125 contemporary influenza A viruses. J Virol. 98 (2), e01661-e01723 (2024).
  10. Peden, D. B. The use of nasal lavage for objective measurement of irritant-induced nasal inflammation. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 24 (1 II), 68-75 (1996).
  11. Rusznak, C., et al. Mechanisms of pollution-induced allergy and asthma. Rev Fr Allergol Immunol Clin. 38 (7 Suppl. 1), 397-402 (1998).
  12. Laumbach, R. J., et al. Nasal effects of a mixture of volatile organic compounds and their ozone oxidation products. J Occup Environ Med. 47 (11), 1182-1189 (2005).
  13. Kawai, A., et al. The potential of neuraminidase as an antigen for nasal vaccines to increase cross-protection against influenza viruses. J Virol. 95 (20), 1180-1201 (2021).
  14. Cho, S. H., et al. Spontaneous eosinophilic nasal inflammation in a genetically-mutant mouse: Comparative study with an allergic inflammation model. PLoS One. 7 (4), e35114(2012).
  15. Puchta, A., Verschoor, C. P., Thurn, T., Bowdish, D. M. E. Characterization of inflammatory responses during intranasal colonization with Streptococcus pneumoniae. J Vis Exp. (83), e50490(2014).
  16. Ghafouri, B., et al. Comparative proteomics of nasal fluid in seasonal allergic rhinitis. J Proteome Res. 5 (2), 330-338 (2006).
  17. Lindahl, M., Ståhlbom, B., Svartz, J., Tagesson, C. Protein patterns of human nasal and bronchoalveolar lavage fluids analyzed with two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Electrophoresis. 19 (18), 3222-3229 (1998).
  18. Lindahl, M., Ståhlbom, B., Tagesson, C. Identification of a new potential airway irritation marker, palate lung nasal epithelial clone protein, in human nasal lavage fluid with two-dimensional electrophoresis and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time of flight. Electrophoresis. 22 (9), 1795-1800 (2001).
  19. Schoenebeck, B., et al. Improved preparation of nasal lavage fluid (NLF) as a noninvasive sample for proteomic biomarker discovery. Biochim Biophys Acta Proteins Proteomics. 1854 (7), 741-745 (2015).
  20. National Research Council (US) Committee for the Update of the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Guide for the care and use of laboratory animals. , (2011).
  21. Roustan, A., et al. Evaluating methods of mouse euthanasia on the oocyte quality: Cervical dislocation versus isoflurane inhalation. Lab Anim. 46 (2), 167-169 (2012).
  22. Park, A. M., Tsunoda, I. Forensic luminol reaction for detecting fecal occult blood in experimental mice. Biotechniques. 65 (4), 227-230 (2018).
  23. Gao, K. M., et al. Human nasal wash RNA-Seq reveals distinct cell-specific innate immune responses in influenza versus SARS-CoV-2. JCI Insight. 6 (22), e152288(2021).
  24. Kirkeby, L., et al. Immunoglobulins in nasal secretions of healthy humans: Structural integrity of secretory immunoglobulin A1 (IgA1) and occurrence of neutralizing antibodies to IgA1 proteases of nasal bacteria. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 7 (1), 31-39 (2000).
  25. Webb, J. L., Creamer, J. I., Quickenden, T. I. A comparison of the presumptive luminol test for blood with four non-chemiluminescent forensic techniques. Luminescence. 21 (4), 214-220 (2006).
  26. Ahmad, I., et al. Exploring the role of platelets in virus-induced inflammatory demyelinating disease and myocarditis. Int J Mol Sci. 25 (6), 3460(2024).
  27. Olsson, T., Bergström, K., Thore, A. A sensitive method for determination of serum hemoglobin based on iso-luminol chemiluminescence. Clin Chim Acta. 122 (2), 125-133 (1982).
  28. Van der Meer, W., Dinnissen, J. M. B., de Keijzer, M. H. Evaluation of the Sysmex XT-2000i, a new automated haematology analyser. Sysmex. (2002), Available at: https://www.sysmex.co.jp/en/products_solutions/library/journal/vol12_no2/summary03.html (2002).
  29. Oshiro, I., Takenaka, T., Maeda, J. New method for hemoglobin determination by using sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS). Clin Biochem. 15 (2), 83-88 (1982).
  30. Hamaguchi, Y., Oshiro, I., Maeda, J. A study on reaction mechanism of sodium lauryl sulfate-hemoglobin (SLS-Hb), Part 1. Rinsho Byori. 40 (6), 649-654 (1992).
  31. McGee, D. W., McMurray, D. N. The effect of protein malnutrition on the IgA immune response in mice. Immunology. 63 (1), 25(1988).
  32. Castigli, E., et al. Impaired IgA class switching in APRIL-deficient mice. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 101 (11), 3903-3908 (2004).
  33. Matsuo, K., et al. CCL28-deficient mice have reduced IgA antibody-secreting cells and an altered microbiota in the colon. J Immunol. 200 (2), 800-809 (2018).
  34. McDonald, K. G., et al. Aging impacts isolated lymphoid follicle development and function. Immun Ageing. 8 (1), 1-12 (2011).
  35. Abolins, S., et al. The comparative immunology of wild and laboratory mice, Mus musculus domesticus. Nat Commun. 8 (1), 1-13 (2017).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Murine Sample CollectionPharyngeal RouteTracheal RouteImmunoglobulin AImmunoglobulin GLuminol ReactionChemiluminescence DetectionMicrobiome Analysis