Despite a reduction in sheath sizes and improvements in percutaneous closure over the years, access site-related bleeding remains a prevalent complication after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI)1,2. While the primary access, used for inserting the valve prosthesis, has been the main target for reducing these complications, a significant proportion of access site bleeding is related to the secondary access sites3,4. These access sites include secondary arterial access, which is required for invasive hemodynamic measurements and angiographic guidance, and a third (venous) access site, which is needed for patients requiring a temporary pacing lead. Retrospective studies have reported on the feasibility of using the radial artery as secondary arterial access during TAVI, showing a reduced incidence of bleeding complications related to this secondary access site3,5. However, randomized data were lacking.
In addition to angiographic guidance, rapid ventricular pacing is usually required for accurate valve deployment. Additionally, rapid ventricular pacing is required during pre- or post-dilatation. Rapid ventricular pacing minimizes cardiac output and creates a short window of opportunity in which the operator can deploy the valve prosthesis. Previously, to perform rapid pacing, a temporary pacing lead was inserted in all TAVI patients using either the femoral or the jugular vein. This temporary pacing lead also provides backup in case high-degree conduction disturbances occur. These disturbances are encountered frequently due to the anatomical location of the conduction pathways near the aortic annulus6,7. Despite these risks, pacing over the left ventricular stiff wire proved an effective and safe strategy for rapid ventricular pacing in patients with a low pre-procedural risk of conduction disturbances8,9. This approach concomitantly omitted the need for a third access site in eligible patients. Despite these advancements, temporary pacing leads are still typically placed in patients with a high pre-procedural risk of conduction abnormalities10, resulting in an increased risk of access site-related complications. In particular, the jugular or femoral veins, which are commonly used for pacing lead insertion, are prone to access site-related bleeding11. Moreover, jugular or femoral venous access for temporary pacing lead insertion precludes early mobilization to prevent lead dislocation after the procedure.
In an attempt to address and improve both secondary access sites, the TAVI XS trial investigated whether using an upper-extremity approach for secondary access would result in fewer clinically relevant access site-related bleeding complications12. Aside from investigating secondary radial access, the TAVI XS trial aimed to investigate an upper-extremity approach for temporary pacing lead placement. This novel strategy had previously been investigated in a prospective registry, which showed that its use is safe and effective11. Moreover, the use of this upper-extremity approach for temporary pacing lead placement is associated with a significantly shorter time to mobilization compared with a femoral or jugular approach. This is particularly relevant as prolonged immobilization is a known risk factor for delirium13,14, which is subsequently associated with an increased duration of hospitalization and higher rates of rehospitalization and mortality15,16.
The TAVI XS trial was a pragmatic study with few exclusion criteria, affirming the scope of the presented approach. All transfemoral TAVI patients, with no evident contraindications for radial- or femoral arterial access (such as known occlusion) and no contraindications for upper-arm or femoral venous access (such as a known disruption of vascular patency) and no intended use for a cerebral embolic protection device, were deemed eligible for participation. As the results of the aforementioned registry and clinical trial show the possible benefit of this approach, the main objective of this protocol is to describe the upper-extremity approach as investigated in the TAVI XS trial, in greater detail. This protocol focuses mainly on the upper-extremity venous access for temporary pacing lead insertion, as most operators will be unfamiliar with this approach. The method presented is readily applicable to most TAVI patients, directly reduces access site-related bleeding complications, and reduces time to mobilization in patients requiring extended pacing. It should, therefore, be considered in all eligible transfemoral TAVI patients.