Method Article

Simultaneous Label-Free Autofluorescence Multi-Harmonic Microscopy

DOI:

10.3791/68637

August 29th, 2025

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This protocol presents a step-by-step guide for the Simultaneous Label-free Autofluorescence Multi-harmonic (SLAM) microscopic technique, including details on how to generate the laser light source, prepare a tissue sample, conduct imaging, and analyze the data. SLAM advances nonlinear microscopy by measuring four complementary label-free contrasts to investigate the tissue microenvironment.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Nonlinear optical microscopy images biological samples by detecting signals from the nonlinear interaction of ultrashort laser pulses with endogenous molecules. This method allows fast chemical and structural identification at subcellular resolution in a label or tag-free and nondestructive manner, thereby enabling a powerful approach to investigate cells and tissues. These distinctive nonlinear contrasts include multiphoton-excited autofluorescence and harmonic generation. Because each of these contrasts offers unique advantages and limitations, their combination and their spatiotemporal co-registration provide a complementary contrast palette that enhances the analytical capabilities of nonlinear optical microscopy. Therefore, our group developed Simultaneous Label-free Autofluorescence Multi-harmonic (SLAM) microscopy, an imaging technique that measures four or more concurrently generated nonlinear optical signals, aiming to identify distinct morphological, metabolic, and functional features in biological specimens. Here, we present a protocol for SLAM imaging of tissues, focusing on essential components of the technique, including the laser source, pulse compression, and microscope. In addition, we discuss sample preparation and outline the data processing pipeline for SLAM data. The presented workflow is suitable for investigating the metabolic state, arrangement, cellular responses, and composition of both human and animal tissues without relying on exogenous labels.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Nonlinear optical microscopy leverages the response of a specimen to intense optical radiation (light with electric fields larger than 3 × 103 V/cm) to derive image contrast, where the induced polarization (and thus the signal generated) depends nonlinearly on the incident intensity1,2,3. Because these multiple contrasts are each mediated by different light-matter interactions, nonlinear microscopy provides simultaneous access to unique information regarding both the morphology and chemical landscape of a specimen1,2,3. While traditional microscopy techniques involving a linear interaction with the illumination light also enable quantitative imaging, nonlinear microscopy permits a more multimodal approach, often having improved imaging depth and optical sectioning, while also causing less photodamage to the sample4. In the context of biomedical applications, such as intraoperative histology-like evaluation of tissue5,6, this technique enables the direct probing of native biomolecules, facilitating seamless investigations of living cells without the need for external markers or modifications. This approach avoids the use of tags, labels7, exogenous molecules, genetically expressed fluorescent proteins, or nanoparticles, which not only require extensive labor but also have the potential to disrupt the specimen's native biochemistry and negatively impact target cells or tissues8,9,10. Thus, the nonlinear microscope serves as a powerful and genuine analytical tool that provides continuous imaging of microscopic structures without altering the specimen's chemical and structural integrity. This capability opens a wide array of applications, ranging from diagnosis and drug discovery to cell signaling and systems biology.

Multiphoton contrasts such as two-photon autofluorescence (2PAF), three-photon autofluorescence (3PAF), second-harmonic generation (SHG), and third-harmonic generation (THG) each confer analytical advantages in characterizing samples. 2PAF is generated by endogenous flavins, with flavin adenosine dinucleotide (FAD) being the most abundant in biological systems11. 3PAF leverages near-infrared excitation to visualize intrinsic chromophores such as NAD(P)H and enables metabolic imaging while circumventing UV-related phototoxicity and attenuation issues12. SHG specifically reveals non-centrosymmetric molecular structures such as fibrillar collagen (types I, II, and III) and protein arrays13,14,15,16,17, providing structural insights1. Lastly, THG, sensitive to interfaces and small structural features, excels in imaging lipid distributions and extracellular vesicles18,19,20,21,22.

Each of these contrast signals has been independently explored by research groups, establishing the niche for multiphoton nonlinear microscopy as a reliable and versatile tool for biological applications23,24,25,26. These efforts were spearheaded by the inventors of the 2PAF microscope, who harnessed their innovative technology to make new insights into tissue morphology, cell metabolism, and even the morphofunctional features of pathologies such as Alzheimer's disease and cancer23. Their work has ultimately driven groundbreaking applications in neuroscience27,28. In the following years, several researchers highlighted the sensitivity of the SHG to changes in the extracellular matrix, the scaffold that provides structural support to cells and which undergoes substantial alterations during cancer pathogenesis29. Notably, Campagnola et al.14,24,30,31 demonstrated that SHG microscopy enables the visualization of macromolecular and supramolecular assemblies, revealing details such as the arrangement, concentration and type of collagen that are not detectable with conventional fluorescence-based techniques. These results underscored the potential of SHG microscopy as a viable diagnostics tool in clinical settings. Finally, THG microscopy was successfully applied to visualize retinal layers in rodents at subcellular resolution25, map brain structures32, and capture the multi-interfacial topography of melanoma cell invasion33.

These historical implementations of nonlinear microscopy generally involved a mode-locked femtosecond (fs) laser coupled to a high numerical aperture (NA) objective to generate and collect the nonlinear signals, which were then directed with a dichroic mirror to a bandpass filter and collected with a photomultiplier tube (PMT)34. Despite similar implementations, most applications focused on acquiring only one, or, at most, two contrasts, while overlooking the others. To fully realize the potential of the multiphoton microscope, Boppart et al. first implemented the sequential acquisition of multiple nonlinear contrasts21,35,36,37, followed by their simultaneous detection4,22,38,39,40,41. The resulting technique, known as Simultaneous Label-free Autofluorescence Multi-harmonic (SLAM) microscopy, spatially and temporally co-registers the nonlinear 2PAF, 3PAF, SHG, and THG signals through single-shot excitation and multiplex detection, thereby achieving superior analytical power. The spatiotemporal co-localization of these four channels provides highly ranked and feature-rich data42 offering advantages over sequentially acquired data by eliminating motion artifacts and ensuring improved image registration. Consequently, SLAM enables the generation of composite features, such as optical reduction-oxidation ratios, that effectively characterize metabolic properties43,44,45. Moreover, the combined analysis of signals across modalities facilitates the engineering of additional features based on the correlation and colocalization of channels. For instance, Shi et al. demonstrated the importance of the colocalization features of SLAM microscopy in accurately classifying Chinese Hamster Ovary (CHO) cells used in pharmaceutical production42. In this way, SLAM lays the groundwork for what is now considered the state-of-the-art in multiphoton microscopy, paving the way for future advancements in the field46.

In this protocol, we outline the key components of a SLAM microscope (Figure 1) and describe a step-by-step methodology for its implementation. This includes the generation and shaping of the excitation pulses, representative tissue specimen preparation, imaging procedures, and the processing, as well as the display of the resulting data. By utilizing off-the-shelf technology and established techniques, this protocol is universal, transferable, and can be easily reproduced using similar optical systems across different laboratories.

SLAM microscope diagram; optical setup for scanning, excitation; photon detectors for spectral analysis.
Figure 1: The optical design of a simultaneous label-free autofluorescence multiharmonic (SLAM) microscope. The femtosecond laser outputs 1040 nm light in 370 fs pulses at a repetition rate of 10 MHz. Intensity and polarization of the laser are carefully controlled before pumping a photonic crystal to generate a supercontinuum. The pulses are then compressed in by a pulse shaper and directed into a customized laser scanning microscope (dashed box). Dichroic mirrors and bandpass filters isolate the nonlinear signals generated by the sample before they are detected by high-sensitivity photon detectors such as photomultiplier tubes (PMTs) or hybrid photodetectors (HPDs). Optical design is based on a previously described system41. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

All animal studies were performed as per the protocol UIUC#23031 approved by the University of Illinois Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and strictly followed all relevant guidelines and regulations.

1. Cleaving and aligning photonic crystal fiber (PCF)

  1. Using fiber cutters or wire cutters, cut a section of photonic crystal fiber (PCF, Table of Materials) to a length of slightly over 15 cm.
    NOTE: Lengths of at least 1.5 cm will be cleaved from each end of the PCF since this length is required to securely clamp the PCF during cleaving. The final length of the PCF (12 cm) used in this study was determined based on a previous simulation using the generalized nonlinear Schrödinger equation47 and empirical testing. In general, the best PCF length may vary depending on the PCF type, the pump laser input, and the desired supercontinuum.
    CAUTION: While cutting PCF, wear personal protective equipment (PPE) to protect the experimenter's eyes and skin. Immediately dispose of fiber scraps into the sharps disposal container.
  2. Strip off about 3 cm of the plastic coating from each end of the PCF using a fiber stripper (Table of Materials) or razor blade, and clean any residual plastic with tissue paper (Table of Materials) and 100% methanol.
  3. Place one end of the PCF into the holder on a precision optical fiber cleaver (Table of Materials) and align the blade 1.5 cm from the end of the PCF. Carefully close the clamps and press the cleave button.
    NOTE: Carefully follow the user manual of the fiber cleaver, including specific guidelines for cleaving PCFs. The settings, such as fiber tension, may require fine-tuning for consistent and high-quality cleaves for each type of PCF.
  4. Inspect the cleaved face and side of the PCF using the integrated microscope (10× magnification) on a glass fiber processing workstation (Table of Materials), ensuring the cleave is of good quality (Figures 2A,C). Re-cleave if there is debris (Figure 2D), scratches (Figure 2E), or the cleaved surface is not flat and perpendicular to the length of the PCF (Figure 2B).
    NOTE: Extreme care should be taken in this step and subsequent steps to avoid touching the cleaved ends of the PCF to any surface to avoid causing damage.
  5. Cleave the second end of the PCF, ensuring the desired final length.
    NOTE: The PCF used in this protocol is cut to 12 cm.
  6. As with previous steps, inspect the newly cleaved end of the PCF (refer to step 1.4). If the cleave appears faulty or inconsistent, discard the current PCF and repeat the process with a new one.
  7. Clamp the input end of the PCF on a 3-axis stage (Table of Materials) at approximately the focal length of the fiber coupling lens as measured with a ruler. Securely support the other end of the PCF with a temporary post or mount.
    NOTE: Do not clamp the output yet to avoid breaking the PCF during gross adjustment.
    CAUTION: Supporting the output end, and surrounding it with sufficient beam blocks, is necessary to reduce the risk of laser exposure.
  8. Place an optical power meter (Table of Materials) in the beam path just before the PCF to measure the input power. Ensure that the femtosecond laser (Table of Materials) is blocked by shutter 1 before turning on the laser.
    NOTE: Always complete any required laser safety training programs to understand the risks associated with laser use.
    CAUTION: When operating the laser, wear appropriate laser safety eyewear specifically rated for the wavelength and power of the laser in use. Before operating the laser, remove all jewelry, watches, and other reflective items that can cause dangerous stray reflections.
  9. Turn on the laser and allow it to warm up for the laser's specified "cold warm up time". Open shutter 1 and adjust the power using the half wave plate (HWP1) just before the polarizing beam splitter until the power meter reads 260 mW or less.
    NOTE: The use of 260 mW for alignment was determined empirically as being low enough to avoid damaging the PCF (even while misaligned) while still providing a bright beam for visualization on an IR viewer or fluorescent target.
  10. Block the laser using shutter 1 and move the power meter to the output end of the PCF.
  11. Unblock the laser and adjust the optical axis of the PCF input face using the 3-axis stage until signal appears on the power meter, indicating some light is coupled into the core, cladding, or plastic coating of the PCF. If positioning the PCF input at the focus of the beam is beyond the range of the 3-axis stage, block the laser, then adjust and re-clamp the PCF.
    NOTE: An infrared (IR) viewer or fluorescent target can be used to visualize where the beam is focused.
  12. Using the 3-axis stage, adjust one dimension of the optical axis of the PCF to find the range over which light is coupled, calculate the middle of that range, and move the stage there. Repeat this for the second dimension to approximately center the beam on the core of the PCF.
    NOTE: The µm tick marks on the 3-axis stage can help measure distances and find the center of the PCF.
  13. Iteratively adjust the three dimensions of the 3-axis stage in a repeating sequence while optimizing coupling efficiency to precisely center and focus the beam into the core of the PCF.
    NOTE: If the maximum coupling efficiency, as measured by the power meter, is noticeably lower than 80% of the input power close shutter 1, unclamp the PCF and inspect it for damage. If damaged, restart from step 1.1, else, block the laser, re-clamp the PCF and restart alignment from step 1.11.
  14. Block the beam with shutter 1 and increase the laser power to 1.6 W.
    NOTE: The use of 1.6 W was determined through simulation and empirical testing to generate a sufficiently broad supercontinuum, while staying below the damage threshold of the PCF.
  15. Open shutter 1 and once again iteratively adjust the 3-axis stage to adjust the PCF input location to optimize coupling efficiency.
    NOTE: Empirically, the maximum efficiency is typically about 80%.
  16. Close shutter 1 and clamp the output of the PCF at approximately the focal length of the parabolic mirror. Place a beam block at the output of the parabolic mirror.
  17. Reduce the laser power again to 260 mW or less.
  18. Open shutter 1 and use the parabolic mirror's 3-axis stage to align the optical axis of the parabolic mirror to minimize distortion of the beam. Next, adjust the focus and collimate the beam in the far-field.
    NOTE: Use an IR viewer or fluorescent target to view the output beam.
  19. Adjust mirrors after the parabolic mirror to ensure the beam is aligned to the rest of the optical system.
    NOTE: Install permanent flip alignment targets or irises to make this step reproducible.
  20. Close shutter 1 and increase the laser power to 1.6 W. Open shutter 1 and verify the beam path is unchanged.
  21. Measure the output power of the pulse shaper (Table of Materials) using a power meter. Rotate the half-wave plate in front of the pulse shaper (HWP3) to optimize the transmission efficiency of the pulse shaper.

Microscopy image showing photonic crystal structures; diffraction pattern analysis at microscale.
Figure 2: Cleaved ends of the photonic crystal fiber (PCF). (A, B) Images of the side of the cleave. (C-F) Images of the face of the cleave. (A) A well-cleaved PCF has a flat and perpendicular face. (B) A poorly cleaved PCF with an angled and chipped face. (C) A well-cleaved PCF with a clean face. (D) A mishandled PCF that has dirt on its surface. (E) A poorly cleaved PCF with scratches on its surface. (F) An old PCF that was replaced. There is visible damage to the core of the PCF as seen by the dark spot in the center of the PCF. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

2. Pulse characterization and optimization

  1. Using a spectrometer or optical spectrum analyzer (OSA, Table of Materials), measure the laser after the parabolic mirror to verify the supercontinuum generation of the PCF.
  2. Rotate the half wave plate after the polarizing beam splitter (HWP2) to optimize the width of the supercontinuum.
  3. Turn on the microscopy autocorrelator (Table of Materials). Using the software, set the detector to the internal detector and set the scan range to 5 ps to ensure the entire width of the pulse autocorrelation will be captured.
    NOTE: For setups with longer pulse widths (for example, due to dispersion in a long PCF), the scan range should be increased appropriately. Keep in mind that the pulse width measured by an intensity autocorrelator is not the true pulse duration, but it can still serve as a useful reference for pulse compression. For accurate and complete characterization of both the pulse amplitude and phase, spectrally resolved techniques such as Frequency-Resolved Optical Gating (FROG)48 should be used.
  4. Unblock the laser and align the autocorrelator to the beam exiting the pulse shaper until a signal appears.
    NOTE: Placing temporary mirrors (two at the input and two at the output of the autocorrelator) will enable alignment of the beam to the autocorrelator without affecting the rest of the optical system.
  5. Ensure that shutter 2 is closed and apply the appropriate immersion media (such as water or oil) to the objective lens (Table of Materials). Place the autocorrelator external detector on the microscope stage (Table of Materials) and adjust the stage to position the detector directly above the objective.
    NOTE: Unlike typical microscope objectives, the recommended objectives used for SLAM microscopy are ultraviolet transmissive to improve the detection of THG38.
  6. Turn on the scanning galvanometer mirrors (Table of Materials) to set their voltage to zero. Open the shutter and use an IR viewer or fluorescent target to verify that the beam is reaching the external detector.
  7. Set the autocorrelator detector to be the external detector. Adjust the stage position until the signal shows up.
    NOTE: If the detector saturates, lower the power using the neutral density filter.
  8. Adjust the polynomial coefficients (orders of dispersion) of the pulse shaper to iteratively minimize the pulse width measured by the autocorrelator. Reduce the autocorrelator scan range appropriately as the pulse width decreases to improve accuracy and visualization of the autocorrelation function.
    NOTE: The optimal pulse width as measured with a Gaussian fit should be a few tens of femtoseconds (fs).

3. Sample preparation

NOTE: For simplicity, this protocol describes ex vivo tissue imaging. However, due to the label-free nature of SLAM, in vivo imaging procedures are easily adapted38.

  1. Euthanize the animal via CO2 asphyxiation or other IACUC-approved method of euthanasia.
  2. Harvest the organ(s) of interest using standard necropsy procedure49 within 10 min post-mortem and rinse with pre-chilled phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) to remove blood.
    NOTE: In this study, the liver and lungs were harvested.
  3. Dissect the organ vertically or horizontally using a blade, depending on the required orientation for analysis. Ensure that the dissection is performed with precision to maintain the integrity of the tissue structure.
  4. Place the piece of tissue in a sterile tissue culture dish filled with phenol red-free complete cell culture media. Refrigerate the tissue at 4 °C if not collecting images immediately.
    NOTE: The cell culture media used in this study was HEPES buffered-Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS), 4 mM glutamine, and endothelial cell growth medium supplements (Table of Materials). This media was carefully chosen to maintain the physiological viability of the epithelial and endothelial cells residing in the renal tissue sample during the imaging duration50.
  5. To prepare fluorescence calibration standards, zero a precision scale to the weight of an anti-static weighing boat and measure approximately 5 mg of flavin adenine dinucleotide disodium salt (FAD, Table of Materials) or 5 mg of reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide disodium salt (NADH, Table of Materials).
  6. Use a single-channel pipette to dispense an appropriate volume of 1 M HEPES buffer into the weighing boats containing pre-weighed FAD or NADH powders to prepare 5 mM stock solutions. Pipette up and down repeatedly to dissolve the powder.
  7. Prepare 1 mM working solutions from the stock solutions by 1:5 dilution into the HEPES buffer.
    NOTE: The 1 mM working concentration used in this study was determined empirically to produce high signal while avoiding detector saturation.
  8. Store the stock FAD and NADH solutions in microcentrifuge tubes at 4 °C.
    NOTE: Solution standards may be stored refrigerated for several days, but it is recommended to prepare fresh solutions for each experiment.
  9. Just prior to collecting SLAM microscopy images, place the tissue samples into 35 mm glass bottom imaging dishes (Table of Materials). Alternatively, use a glass coverslip. Aliquot the FAD and NADH solutions into identical dishes or coverslips.
    NOTE: Uncoated glass or poly-D-lysine coated glass is strongly recommended due to reduced background signal. Ensure that the glass thickness is appropriate for the microscope objective being used (this study used #0).

4. SLAM setup and operation

  1. Verify that the laser input to the PCF is blocked by shutter 1 and switch on the laser. Let the laser warm up for the specified "cold warm up time" of the laser.
    NOTE: 30 min cold warm up time is used for the laser in this study.
  2. Verify that the beam path is clear of obstructions and place an optical power meter in the beam path just before the PCF. Open shutter 1 and measure the input power.
  3. Close shutter 1 and move the power meter to the output of the PCF after the parabolic mirror. Open shutter 1 and maximize the PCF output using the input 3-axis stage.
  4. Let the PCF warm up for 10 min, then maximize the output power again. Record the transmission of the PCF. If the transmission falls below 50%, replace the PCF.
    NOTE: Throughout operation of the SLAM microscope (in the steps that follow), it is recommended to measure the output power of the PCF every hour to ensure consistent data.
  5. Move the power meter after the neutral density (ND) filter and rotate the filter to control the laser power that reaches the sample.
    NOTE: Multiply the measured power by the transmittance of the remaining optical components. The transmittance is measured by placing the power meter after the objective lens. For this study, an average laser power of 20 mW at the sample was used. The laser power was determined empirically for the given sample, imaging depth, and microscope system to generate high-quality images while avoiding sample damage or detector nonlinearity. While there is no definitive standard, typical label-free multiphoton imaging is limited to several tens to hundreds of milliwatts 7,32,33,51,52.
  6. Turn on the galvanometers and stage. Open the acquisition software and enter the desired parameters for imaging.
    NOTE: This study used 512 × 512 pixels and a pixel dwell time of 13.65 µs to image a 360 × 360 µm2 field of view. Five frames taken at 0.333 Hz were averaged into a single high-quality frame.
  7. Place the sample on the stage using the appropriate immersion media for the objective as was used before in step 2.5.
  8. Turn off the room lights and close curtains.
    NOTE: To avoid damaging detectors, never turn on room lights while detectors are on, or detector shutters are open.
  9. Switch on the detector power supplies and amplifiers.
  10. Shut the light box surrounding the stage.
  11. Use the electronic control switches to manually open the detector shutters (S3, S4, S5, S6).
  12. In the microscope acquisition software, click Click to Start Acquisition to begin collecting SLAM images. Adjust the focus of the microscope by rotating the knob on the microscope stage controller (Table of Materials) until the sample comes into focus.
    NOTE: The glass coverslip generates a strong THG signal, which can be used to accurately determine the depth of imaging using the stage position displayed on the microscope stage controller. For example, all images of solution standards taken in this study were taken at a focal plane 20 µm above the coverslip.
  13. Use the joystick on the microscope stage controller to locate the desired field of view in the sample, then click Stop and Reset.
    NOTE: If the image saturates, return to step 4.5, and lower the power. If the image has a signal to noise ratio below 10, the power may instead be carefully increased.
  14. Under the Saving tab, click Save Data to toggle it to Yes, then click Click to Start Acquisition. Wait until the acquisition finishes before continuing.
  15. To change or manipulate the sample during imaging, close the detector shutters and use a flashlight or headlamp for light. Once the sample is modified, return to step 4.10.
    NOTE: To enable repeatability and quantitative analysis, collect SLAM images of FAD and NADH solution standards. Ensure that the field of view, image size and excitation power is consistent with what was used for the biological samples.
  16. To end SLAM image acquisition, close the detector shutters, and turn off the detectors before turning on the room lights.
  17. Block the laser using shutter 1, then turn off the laser.
  18. Turn off the galvanometers and stage. Close the microscope acquisition software.
  19. Dispose of the tissue appropriately and clean the workplace.

5. Data visualization

NOTE: The following image analysis may occur in an image analysis software such as ImageJ53 (Table of Materials) or a programming language with image analysis capabilities, such as Python or MATLAB. The following steps describe how to perform data visualization using ImageJ.

  1. Ensure that the images from each channel are in a lossless image format (e.g., TIFF or PNG).
    NOTE: The custom microscope control software used in this study automatically saved images as TIFFs. To save an image as a TIFF, open it in ImageJ and select File > Save As > Tiff.
  2. To generate illumination standard images, open the FAD and NAD(P)H channel images of FAD and NADH solutions, respectively, into ImageJ. For each image, select Process > Filters > Gaussian Blur…, set Sigma (Radius) to 41, then click OK.
    NOTE: Adjust the Sigma (Radius) of the Gaussian filter as needed to sufficiently smooth the image.
  3. To simultaneously correct uneven illumination and normalize the fluorescence intensity, open the FAD and NAD(P)H channel images of the sample. For each image, select Process > Image Calculator…, for Image1 select the sample image, for Operation select Divide, and for Image2 select the illumination standard image that corresponds with the sample image's channel, then click OK.
    NOTE: This step is critical for correcting system variability and maintaining consistency in quantitative evaluations of autofluorescence, such as the optical redox ratio (ORR).
  4. If multiple images are taken to form a larger field of view or z-stack, stitch or combine the images together into single image or stack of images.
  5. To generate an ORR image, first sum the FAD and NAD(P)H images. Select Process > Image Calculator…, for Image1 and Image2, select the FAD and NAD(P)H channel images respectively, for Operation select Add, then click OK. To compute the ORR image, select Process > Image Calculator…, for Image1 select the FAD channel image, for Operation select Divide, and for Image2 select the result of the sum of FAD and NAD(P)H, then click OK.
  6. To apply a colormap to the ORR image, select Image > Color > Edit LUT…, click Open, select the desired look-up-table (.lut) file and click OK. Select Image > Adjust > Brightness/Contrast and adjust the contrast as desired.
    NOTE: It is recommended to use an isoluminant colormap such as the (inverted) CET-I254,55 colormap used in this study. To invert a colormap in ImageJ after applying it to an image, select Image > Color > Invert LUTs.
  7. To improve the clarity of the features in the ORR image, scale the brightness by the intensity of the fluorescence channels. First, select the result of the sum of FAD and NAD(P)H and select Process > Enhance Contrast…, make sure Normalize is checked, then click OK. Select Edit > Copy to copy this result to the clipboard. Next, select the ORR image and select Image > Type > RGB Color", then select Image > Type > HSB (32-bit). Move the slider at the bottom of the image all the way to the right to view the Brightness channel, select Edit > Paste, then select Image > Type > RGB Color.
  8. To visualize the SLAM image as a composite, open the four SLAM channels in ImageJ and select: Image > Color > Merge Channels… For C2 (green), select the SHG channel image, for C5 (cyan) select the NAD(P)H channel image, for C6 (magenta) select the THG channel image, and for C7 (yellow) select the FAD channel image. Make sure Create composite is checked and click OK.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The complex multichannel, multimodal approach of the SLAM microscope (Figure 1) can make it difficult for new users to troubleshoot issues and understand results. First, a well-cleaved PCF features a clean face (Figure 2C) with a flat surface that is perpendicular to the PCF's length (Figure 2A). An angled, chipped cleave face (Figure 2B) and the presence of scratches (Figure 2E

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Generating a suitable supercontinuum is crucial for successful SLAM imaging, but it can be challenging due to the complexity of setting up the PCF. Ensuring precise cleaving and careful handling of the PCF is essential to maintain clean surfaces free from debris, dirt, or scratches, all of which can interfere with effective coupling, supercontinuum generation, and even shorten the lifespan of the PCF. Since the PCF requires regular replacement, practicing fiber cleaving and fine-tuning cleaver settings can help achieve o...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Funding for the equipment used in this study was provided in part by GSK through the Center for Optical Molecular Imaging at the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology. This work was also supported in part by the NIH/NIBIB Center for Label-free Imaging and Multiscale Biophotonics (CLIMB) (P41EB031772) and the NSF Science and Technology Center for Quantitative Cell Biology. K.K.D.T was supported by the NIEHS Research Training Program in Toxicology and Environmental Health (5T32ES007326-25), A.D.C was supported by the Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology Postdoctoral Fellows program, and A.H. was supported by the NIBIB Tissue Microenvironment Training Program (T32EB019944). The authors thank Darold Spillman for his management of lab spaces, equipment, and technology and thank Drs. Janet E. Sorrells and Rishyashring R. Iyer for their past contributions to the SLAM microscope system used in this study.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
3-axis stageThorLabsMAX316Discontinued.
35 mm glass bottom imaging dishMatTekP35G-0-14-CUncoated #0 coverglass.
DMEMGibco21063029High glucose, HEPES, no phenol red.
Endothelial cell growth medium supplementsPromoCellC-39210Omit Fetal Calf Serum.
FemtoTrain femtosecond laserSpectra-Physics1040-5Average Power: >5.0 W, Pulse Energy: >500 nJ, Wavelength: 1040 nm ±8 nm, Repetition Rate: 10 MHz, Pulse Width (FWHM): <220 fs.
Fetal Bovine SerumCytivaSH30071.03HyClone Characterized.
Fiber stripperThorLabsT10S13
Flavin adenine dinucleotide disodium salt hydrateSigma-AldrichF6625
Galvanometer mirrorsCambridge Technology6215HDiscontinued.
Glass processing workstationVytranGPX3800
ImageJEliceiri lab at the University of Wisconsin MadisonVersion 2.16.0FIJI Distribution.
Kimwipe tissue paperKimberly-Clark Professional34120
L-GlutamineCytivaSH30034.01
Microscope stageApplied Scientific InstrumentationFTP-2050
Microscope stage controllerApplied Scientific InstrumentationMS-2000-500-UDSW
Microscopy autocorrelatorAngewandte Physik und Elektronik GmbHCarpe
Objective lensOlympusXLPLN25XWMP2Water immersion, 25X magnification, 1.05 NA.
Optical power meterNewport919P-003-10600 - 1700 nm.
Optical spectrum analyzerThorLabsOSA202C
Photonic crystal fiberNKT PhotonicsLMA-PM-15 NKTLarge mode area, polarization maintaining. Core Diameter: 15 µm.
Precision optical fiber cleaverFujikuraCT-101
Pulse shaperBiophotonics Solutions Inc.FemtoJock-DDiscontinued.
β-Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide, reduced disodium salt hydrateSigma-Aldrich10128023001

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Boyd, R. W. Nonlinear optics. , Academic Press. Amsterdam. (2008).
  2. Potma, E. O. Foundations of nonlinear optical microscopy. , John Wiley and Sons. (2024).
  3. Mukamel, S. Principles of nonlinear optical spectroscopy. , Oxford University Press. Oxford, New York. (1999).
  4. Boppart, S. A., You, S., Li, L., Chen, J., Tu, H. Simultaneous label-free autofluorescence-multiharmonic microscopy and beyond. APL Photonics. 4 (10), 100901(2019).
  5. Sun, Y., et al. Real-time three-dimensional histology-like imaging by label-free nonlinear optical microscopy. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 10 (11), 2177-2190 (2020).
  6. Yang, L., et al. Intraoperative label-free multimodal nonlinear optical imaging for point-of-procedure cancer diagnostics. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron. 27 (4), 6801412(2021).
  7. Talone, B., et al. Label-free multimodal nonlinear optical microscopy reveals features of bone composition in pathophysiological conditions. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 10, 1042680(2022).
  8. Liu, H. S., Jan, M. S., Chou, C. K., Chen, P. H., Ke, N. J. Is green fluorescent protein toxic to the living cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 260 (3), 712-717 (1999).
  9. Tsoi, K. M., Dai, Q., Alman, B. A., Chan, W. C. W. Are quantum dots toxic? Exploring the discrepancy between cell culture and animal studies. Acc Chem Res. 46 (3), 662-671 (2013).
  10. Alford, R., et al. Toxicity of organic fluorophores used in molecular imaging: Literature review. Mol Imaging. 8 (6), (2009).
  11. Macheroux, P., Kappes, B., Ealick, S. E. Flavogenomics - a genomic and structural view of flavin-dependent proteins. FEBS J. 278 (15), 2625-2634 (2011).
  12. Xu, C., Webb, W. W. Multiphoton excitation of molecular fluorophores and nonlinear laser microscopy. Top Fluoresc Spectrosc. 5, 471-540 (2002).
  13. Ranjit, S., et al. Imaging fibrosis and separating collagens using second harmonic generation and phasor approach to fluorescence lifetime imaging. Sci Rep. 5 (1), 13378(2015).
  14. Mohler, W., Millard, A. C., Campagnola, P. J. Second harmonic generation imaging of endogenous structural proteins. Methods. 29 (1), 97-109 (2003).
  15. Cox, G. Biological applications of second harmonic imaging. Biophys Rev. 3 (3), 131(2011).
  16. Aghigh, A., Bancelin, S., Rivard, M., Pinsard, M., Ibrahim, H., Légaré, F. Second harmonic generation microscopy: A powerful tool for bio-imaging. Biophys Rev. 15 (1), 43-70 (2023).
  17. Williams, R. M., Zipfel, W. R., Webb, W. W. Interpreting second-harmonic generation images of collagen I fibrils. Biophys J. 88 (2), 1377-1386 (2005).
  18. Yelin, D., Silberberg, Y. Laser scanning third-harmonic-generation microscopy in biology. Opt Express. 5 (8), 169-175 (1999).
  19. Oron, D., et al. Depth-resolved structural imaging by third-harmonic generation microscopy. J Struct Biol. 147 (1), 3-11 (2004).
  20. Débarre, D., et al. Imaging lipid bodies in cells and tissues using third-harmonic generation microscopy. Nat Methods. 3 (1), 47-53 (2006).
  21. Tu, H., et al. Stain-free histopathology by programmable supercontinuum pulses. Nat Photonics. 10 (8), 534-540 (2016).
  22. You, S., et al. Label-free visualization and characterization of extracellular vesicles in breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 116 (48), 24012-24018 (2019).
  23. Zipfel, W. R., et al. Live tissue intrinsic emission microscopy using multiphoton-excited native fluorescence and second harmonic generation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 100 (12), 7075-7080 (2003).
  24. Campagnola, P. J., Loew, L. M. Second-harmonic imaging microscopy for visualizing biomolecular arrays in cells, tissues and organisms. Nat Biotechnol. 21 (11), 1356-1360 (2003).
  25. Masihzadeh, O., et al. Third harmonic generation microscopy of a mouse retina. Mol Vis. 21, 538-547 (2015).
  26. Denk, W., Strickler, J. H., Webb, W. W. Two-photon laser scanning fluorescence microscopy. Science. 248 (4951), 73-76 (1990).
  27. Denk, W., Svoboda, K. Photon upmanship: Why multiphoton imaging is more than a gimmick. Neuron. 18 (3), 351-357 (1997).
  28. Maiti, S., Shear, J. B., Williams, R. M., Zipfel, W. R., Webb, W. W. Measuring serotonin distribution in live cells with three-photon excitation. Science. 275 (5299), 530-532 (1997).
  29. Winkler, J., Abisoye-Ogunniyan, A., Metcalf, K. J., Werb, Z. Concepts of extracellular matrix remodelling in tumour progression and metastasis. Nat Commun. 11 (1), 5120(2020).
  30. Campagnola, P. J., Dong, C. Y. Second harmonic generation microscopy: Principles and applications to disease diagnosis. Laser Photonics Rev. 5 (1), 13-26 (2011).
  31. Pavone, F. S., Campagnola, P. J. Second harmonic generation imaging. , CRC Press. Boca Raton. (2016).
  32. Witte, S., et al. Label-free live brain imaging and targeted patching with third-harmonic generation microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 108 (15), 5970-5975 (2011).
  33. Weigelin, B., Bakker, G. J., Friedl, P. Intravital third harmonic generation microscopy of collective melanoma cell invasion: Principles of interface guidance and microvesicle dynamics. Intravital. 1 (1), 32-43 (2012).
  34. Carriles, R., et al. Imaging techniques for harmonic and multiphoton absorption fluorescence microscopy. Rev Sci Instrum. 80 (8), 081101(2009).
  35. Graf, B. W., Jiang, Z., Tu, H., Boppart, S. A. Dual-spectrum laser source based on fiber continuum generation for integrated optical coherence and multiphoton microscopy. J Biomed Opt. 14 (3), 034019(2009).
  36. Graf, B. W., et al. In vivo multimodal microscopy for detecting bone-marrow-derived cell contribution to skin regeneration. J Biophotonics. 7 (1-2), 96-102 (2014).
  37. Liu, Y., Tu, H., Benalcazar, W. A., Chaney, E. J., Boppart, S. A. Multimodal nonlinear microscopy by shaping a fiber supercontinuum from 900 to 1160 nm. IEEE J Sel Top Quantum Electron. 18 (3), (2012).
  38. You, S., et al. Intravital imaging by simultaneous label-free autofluorescence-multiharmonic microscopy. Nat Commun. 9 (1), 2125(2018).
  39. You, S., Chaney, E. J., Tu, H., Sun, Y., Sinha, S., Boppart, S. A. Label-free deep profiling of the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Res. 81 (9), 2534-2544 (2021).
  40. Cadena, A. D. L., Park, J., Tehrani, K. F., Renteria, C. A., Monroy, G. L., Boppart, S. A. Simultaneous label-free autofluorescence multi-harmonic microscopy driven by the supercontinuum generated from a bulk nonlinear crystal. Biomed Opt Express. 15 (2), 491-505 (2024).
  41. Lee, J. H., et al. Simultaneous label-free autofluorescence and multi-harmonic imaging reveals in vivo structural and metabolic changes in murine skin. Biomed Opt Express. 10 (10), 5431-5444 (2019).
  42. Shi, J., et al. Accelerating biopharmaceutical cell line selection with label-free multimodal nonlinear optical microscopy and machine learning. Commun Biol. 8 (1), 157(2025).
  43. Georgakoudi, I., Quinn, K. P. Label-free optical metabolic imaging in cells and tissues. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 25, 413-443 (2023).
  44. Alhallak, K., Rebello, L. G., Muldoon, T. J., Quinn, K. P., Rajaram, N. Optical redox ratio identifies metastatic potential-dependent changes in breast cancer cell metabolism. Biomed Opt Express. 7 (11), 4364-4374 (2016).
  45. Ostrander, J. H., et al. Optical redox ratio differentiates breast cancer cell lines based on estrogen receptor status. Cancer Res. 70 (11), (2010).
  46. Cadena, A. D. L., Renteria, C. A., Aksamitiene, E., Boppart, S. A. Label-free hyperspectral multiphoton microscopy. Opt Lett. 50 (5), 1484-1487 (2025).
  47. Agrawal, G. Nonlinear fiber optics. , 5th ed, Academic Press. 553-612 (2013).
  48. Trebino, R., et al. Measuring ultrashort laser pulses in the time-frequency domain using frequency-resolved optical gating. Rev Sci Instrum. 68 (9), 3277-3295 (1997).
  49. Stewart, K., Schroeder, V. A. Diagnostic necropsy and tissue harvest in rodents. J Vis Exp. , e10294(2020).
  50. Akis, N., Madaio, M. P. Isolation, culture, and characterization of endothelial cells from mouse glomeruli. Kidney Int. 65 (6), 2223-2227 (2004).
  51. Huttunen, M. J., et al. Multiphoton microscopy of the dermoepidermal junction and automated identification of dysplastic tissues with deep learning. Biomed Opt Express. 11 (1), 186-199 (2020).
  52. Fung, A. A., et al. Label-free multimodal optical biopsy reveals biomolecular and morphological features of diabetic kidney tissue in 2D and 3D. Nat Commun. 16 (1), 4509(2025).
  53. Schindelin, J., et al. Fiji: An open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods. 9 (7), 676-682 (2012).
  54. Kovesi, P. Good colour maps: How to design them. arXiv. , (2015).
  55. Kovesi, P. ColorCET perceptually uniform colour maps. , https://colorcet.com (2025).
  56. Tian, Z., Liang, M. Renal metabolism and hypertension. Nat Commun. 12 (1), 963(2021).
  57. Wang, G., Shi, J., Iyer, R. R., Sorrells, J. E., Tu, H. Fiber-optic nonlinear wavelength converter for adaptive femtosecond biophotonics. arXiv. , (2024).
  58. Lozovoy, V. V., Pastirk, I., Dantus, M. Multiphoton intrapulse interference. IV. Ultrashort laser pulse spectral phase characterization and compensation. Opt Lett. 29 (7), 775-777 (2004).
  59. Croce, A. C., Bottiroli, G. Autofluorescence spectroscopy and imaging: A tool for biomedical research and diagnosis. Eur J Histochem. 58 (4), (2014).
  60. Theodossiou, A., et al. Autofluorescence imaging to evaluate cellular metabolism. J Vis Exp. (177), e63282(2021).
  61. Yang, L., et al. Label-free multimodal polarization-sensitive optical microscope for multiparametric quantitative characterization of collagen. Optica. 11 (2), 155-165 (2024).
  62. Smith, H. E., et al. The use of NADH anisotropy to investigate mitochondrial cristae alignment. Sci Rep. 14 (1), 5980(2024).
  63. Dailey, M. E., Marrs, G. S., Kurpius, D. Maintaining live cells and tissue slices in the imaging setup. Cold Spring Harb Protoc. 2011 (4), (2011).
  64. Johnson, S., Rabinovitch, P. Ex vivo imaging of excised tissue using vital dyes and confocal microscopy. Curr Protoc Cytom. 61 (1), 9.39.1-9.39.18 (2012).
  65. Sorrells, J. E., et al. Label-free nonlinear optical signatures of extracellular vesicles in liquid and tissue biopsies of human breast cancer. Sci Rep. 14 (1), 5528(2024).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Label Free MicroscopyNonlinear Optical MicroscopyMultiphoton MicroscopyHarmonic GenerationAutofluorescence ImagingPhotonic Crystal FiberPulse CompressionTissue ImagingMetabolic ImagingRedox Ratio

Related Articles