$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The use of living cells as a therapeutic product has recently emerged as a promising new treatment option for several health challenges. For example, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have brought durable remission to those with so-called liquid cancers — leukemia, lymphoma, and multiple myeloma — that were refractory to all previously available treatments1. More recently, a mesenchymal stem/stromal cell (MSC) product (Ryoncil) was approved to treat children suffering from steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGvHD), a condition with > 50% mortality2. But extension to other unmet clinical needs requires intensive development of both the therapy and the means to develop and manufacture that product.
One such unmet clinical need can be found in individuals suffering from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). ARDS is discussed here to provide a specific use case to illustrate the method, results, and discussion of possible extensions to other disease targets. A critical (progression in hours to days), prevalent (> 200,000 annual cases in the US), and deadly indication (27%-46% mortality, depending on the severity of presentation), ARDS drew renewed and widespread attention during the COVID-19 Pandemic as the typical mechanism of death for patients infected with SARS-CoV-23,4. ARDS is characterized by increased pulmonary vascular permeability leading to interstitial edema, alveolar flooding, and infiltration of cellular components, including neutrophils and red blood cells, into the alveolar compartment5. In the initial exudative phase of ARDS, innate immune-cell mediated inflammation drives these pathogenic results by damaging endothelial and epithelial barrier integrity and promoting immune cell recruitment and activation through secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines; successful resolution of the inflammatory response, repair of barrier integrity, and avoidance of excessive fibrosis are critical for survival3. While anti-viral therapies such as Remdesivir have shown promise in combating SARS-CoV-2-mediated ARDS, for other etiologies, there are currently no approved pharmacological interventions available that reduce mortality5.
MSCs may offer a promising approach to treating ARDS, given their lung-specific tropism upon systemic injection and their ability to secrete immunomodulatory paracrine signals into their surrounding microenvironment6,7. Mechanistic studies have implicated expression of such paracrine factors as interleukin-10 (IL-10)8, indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1)9, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2)10, and others in driving putative MSC therapeutic potency for multiple indications, including acute lung injury (ALI)/ARDS11; therefore, expression levels of these gene products represent potential critical quality attributes (pCQAs) that may be predictive of clinical efficacy, providing tractable release criteria for the final cell product during manufacture. However, producing sufficient quantities of cells to reach an effective therapeutic dose is challenging; Ryoncil, for example, is indicated for dosing at 2 x 106 cells/kg of patient mass, administered twice weekly for 4 weeks12. For an 80 kg patient, this equates to > 1.2 billion MSCs for a single course of treatment, necessitating a large physical footprint to house sufficient surface area for this 2D growth condition. Given that this living cell product cannot be sterilized prior to patient administration without harming the cells' therapeutic potential, utilization of current Good Manufacturing Practice guidelines for production in a sterile fashion is paramount, adding to the logistic complexity of cell manufacture and thus the cost of goods13.
Further, prior studies have shown evidence that typical MSC production in tissue culture polystyrene (TCPS) flasks contributes to the onset of intra-population phenotypic heterogeneity. For some end uses, this renders quality control efforts between batches challenging in research and in clinical translation14,15,16,17. It is speculated that the limited biochemical control available in TCPS flasks, including diffusional gradients of gases, nutrients, and metabolic waste products, poor pH regulation, etc., contributes to these challenges.
These issues motivate the adoption of bioreactor-based culture to leverage the superior biochemical regulation and cell density available in a controlled three-dimensional growth format with dynamic mixing18. However, bioreactor-based processing or manufacturing comes with its own set of challenges: as an anchorage-dependent cell type, MSCs require some form of substrate upon which to grow in a bioreactor, necessitating the addition of microcarriers. Additionally, many commercially available bioreactors operate at volume scales that are prohibitively resource-intensive (> 3 L of growth media) for the kind of exploratory benchtop research needed to identify and refine unknown process parameters that affect expression of measurable indicators of cell quality. These features are described as potential critical quality attributes or pCQAs19.
Krupczak et al. previously reported a microcarrier-microbioreactor approach that produced MSCs with improved pCQA expression for ARDS, limited to in vitro assessments20. This approach combined the use of a dissolvable gelatin microcarrier platform produced in-house with a commercially available microbioreactor platform, the Mobius Breez microbioreactor21. This microbioreactor utilizes 2 mL single-use disposable reactor chambers and incorporates many desirable features for improved biochemical control, including regulation of temperature, pH, CO2, and O2 in a dynamically mixed, closed-loop perfusion-fed system, but was not designed with anchorage-dependent cells like MSCs in mind. Indeed, the standard microfluidic channels used to inject reactor contents are too small to allow passage of microcarriers, necessitating substantial adaptation to enable successful production of MSCs in this platform.
Here, a detailed protocol is described and illustrated for the purpose of adapting this microbioreactor for the anchorage-dependent culture of MSCs. The process parameters reported herein were identified with the intention to inform process development and manufacturing of MSCs for pre-clinical, in vitro assessment of therapeutic efficacy for ARDS. However, in principle, this protocol can be adapted for other end-user applications, other inflammatory or immunomodulatory-related conditions, and other anchorage-dependent cell types that could benefit from enhanced biochemical control in a benchtop-scale setting. Figure 1 schematizes the protocol described in the accompanying video, and Figure 2, Figure 3, and Figure 4 illustrate key results.