RESEARCH
Peer reviewed scientific video journal
Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods
Visualizing science through experiment videos
EDUCATION
Video textbooks for undergraduate courses
Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments
BUSINESS
Video textbooks for business education
OTHERS
Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments
Products
RESEARCH
JoVE Journal
Peer reviewed scientific video journal
JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments
Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods
EDUCATION
JoVE Core
Video textbooks for undergraduates
JoVE Science Education
Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments
JoVE Lab Manual
Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses
BUSINESS
JoVE Business
Video textbooks for business education
Solutions
Language
English
Menu
Menu
Menu
Menu
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Research Article
Liuqing Jiang1, Jimei Wang1, Xiaoli Qian1, Yuejia Ding1, Pengpeng Chen2, Zhongheng Zhang2,3,4,5, Huiqing Ge1
1Regional medical center for National Institute of Respiratory Diseases, Respiratory care department, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine,Zhejiang University, 2Department of Emergency Medicine, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 3Provincial Key Laboratory of Precise Diagnosis and Treatment of Abdominal Infection, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital,Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 4School of Medicine,Shaoxing University, 5Longquan Industrial Innovation Research Institute
Erratum Notice
Important: There has been an erratum issued for this article. View Erratum Notice
Retraction Notice
The article Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) in Microbiome Data (10.3791/61715) has been retracted by the journal upon the authors' request due to a conflict regarding the data and methodology. View Retraction Notice
Recruitment maneuvers (RMs) and PEEP titration improve gas exchange and reduce ventilator-induced lung injury in ARDS. This protocol demonstrates clinically applicable recruitment strategies, including sigh, sustained inflation, stepwise PEEP, APRV, and prone positioning, and individualized PEEP maintenance and de-escalation procedures using dynamic monitoring tools.
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by diffuse alveolar injury, refractory hypoxemia, and high mortality. Lung recruitment maneuvers (RMs) aim to reopen collapsed alveoli and improve oxygenation, while positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration prevents decruitment and maintains alveolar stability. This protocol outlines five clinically feasible RM strategies: sigh, sustained inflation, stepwise PEEP recruitment, APRV-based recruitment, and prone positioning-assisted recruitment. Each maneuver is described with step-by-step procedures, parameter settings, monitoring targets, and termination criteria. Additionally, we present a structured approach to PEEP maintenance and de-escalation based on respiratory mechanics, gas exchange, and bedside imaging (e.g., Static Compliance, Electrical Impedance Tomography, or lung ultrasound). Dynamic assessment of oxygenation and compliance helps identify optimal PEEP and supports lung-protective ventilation. The protocol prioritizes patient safety, with criteria for preparation, exclusion, and real-time monitoring. This comprehensive guide supports standardized and individualized implementation of RMs and PEEP strategies in ARDS patients across critical care settings.
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is characterized by diffuse inflammation of the lung parenchyma, resulting in impaired gas exchange and an in-hospital mortality rate ranging from 33% to 52%1. Mechanical ventilation remains the primary supportive strategy in patients with ARDS presenting with refractory hypoxemia. However, dependent atelectasis commonly develops due to increased lung tissue weight from interstitial and alveolar edema2 . The interface between aerated and collapsed lung regions, along with cyclic tidal recruitment and derecruitment, imposes shear stress on alveolar units and contributes to ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI)3.
Recruitment maneuvers (RMs) are transient elevations in transpulmonary pressure that aim to reopen collapsed alveoli and improve oxygenation. Multiple RM techniques have been proposed, including sigh breaths, sustained inflation, stepwise incremental PEEP, APRV-based strategies, and prone positioning4,5,6. While computed tomography (CT) is the gold standard for assessing lung recruitment, it is impractical for routine bedside use due to logistical and radiation concerns7,8. Patient transport, specialized staffing, complex monitoring, and the substantial doses associated with helical multi-detector CT limit its feasibility in everyday clinical practice9,10.
Therefore, bedside tools such as electrical impedance tomography (EIT), lung ultrasound (LUS), pressure-volume curves, and esophageal pressure monitoring are increasingly employed to guide RM implementation and PEEP titration. Post-recruitment, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) must be individually optimized to sustain alveolar inflation without inducing overdistension. However, both under- and over-application of PEEP may lead to adverse effects, making titration crucial for lung-protective ventilation9,10.
This article presents a comprehensive protocol for five clinically feasible lung recruitment strategies and a structured PEEP maintenance and de-escalation approach. It aims to support reproducible, standardized, and safe application of these techniques in ARDS patients under mechanical ventilation.
NOTE: A variety of lung recruitment maneuvers (LRMs) are presented below. Clinical evaluation must be performed beforehand to ensure patient safety.
1. Preparations
2. Lung recruitment procedure
3. PEEP titration procedure
We have summarized the commonly used methods for lung recruitment and PEEP titration in clinical practice (Table 2 and Table 3). Each approach has distinct advantages and limitations, and the optimal strategy should be tailored to individual patient conditions and physiological responses.
RMs should be comprehensively assessed using a combination of physiological, mechanical, and imaging parameters. Key evaluation metrics include:1) Gas exchange: Improvement in SpO2 and PaO2/FiO2 ratio; 2) Respiratory mechanics: Increased static compliance, reduced driving pressure; 3) Hemodynamics: Maintenance of MAP > 60 mmHg without instability; 4) EtCO2 trends and volume-pressure (V-P) loop analysis; 5) Imaging modalities, such as lung ultrasound (LUS) or electrical impedance tomography (EIT).
An increase in oxygenation and improved lung compliance generally indicates successful recruitment. However, excessive pressures may increase the risk of barotrauma, highlighting the need for real-time monitoring and individualized strategies.
Lung ultrasound (LUS)
LUS offers a low-cost, non-invasive, bedside alternative to CT for evaluating atelectasis. Its ability to perform dynamic, repeatable assessments makes it ideal for tracking lung changes during and after RMs. The effectiveness of recruitment can be visualized by changes in characteristic lung ultrasound patterns17. Prior to the recruitment maneuver, lung ultrasound revealed regions of consolidation, coalescent B-lines, or irregularly distributed B-lines. Following recruitment, a transition toward normal A-lines or a reduction in consolidated areas was observed, consistent with alveolar reopening.
In Figure 4 (left panel), ultrasound imaging shows a heterogeneous consolidation pattern with a "shred sign" suggestive of partial alveolar collapse. After recruitment, the right panel demonstrates restored aeration, with the previously collapsed region replaced by normally inflated lung parenchyma.
Electrical impedance tomography (EIT)
EIT provides real-time, radiation-free, regional ventilation mapping at the bedside. It dynamically displays tidal ventilation distribution, enabling continuous monitoring during lung recruitment. The dynamic images display real-time changes in air distribution during ventilation, with colors ranging from dark blue (minimal ventilation) to white (maximal ventilation) indicating regional variations18, while gray areas represent non-ventilated regions (e.g., atelectasis). During lung recruitment, when the gray areas turn blue, it indicates that recruitment has opened the collapsed alveoli.
This regional quantification allows clinicians to observe recruitment in previously non-aerated zones and adjust PEEP or ventilation strategy accordingly (Figure 5).
Together, LUS and EIT complement traditional physiologic parameters by providing visual confirmation of recruitment efficacy, supporting safer and more personalized lung-protective strategies in ARDS management.
PEEP titration strategies
Effective PEEP titration is essential to maintain alveolar recruitment while avoiding overdistension. Multiple approaches, ranging from evidence-based tables to individualized physiological measurements, can guide clinicians in selecting the optimal PEEP for patients with ARDS.
ARDS Network (Table 1)
The NIH ARDS Network provides a PEEP/FiO2 table supported by high-level evidence. For patients with mild ARDS, the lower PEEP strategy is generally sufficient to maintain adequate oxygenation. In contrast, for moderate to severe ARDS, the higher PEEP table is recommended to enhance alveolar recruitment and improve gas exchange19.
Pressure-volume curve-guided titration
In early ARDS, the P-V curve typically displays a triphasic pattern: 1) Initial flat segment at low volumes, reflecting low compliance (atelectasis); 2) Steep middle segment, where compliance improves with recruitment; 3) Terminal flattening, indicating overdistension.The lower inflection point (LIP) represents the pressure threshold at which alveolar units begin to reopen. The upper inflection point (UIP) marks the onset of overdistension. The pressure at LIP has been suggested for the setting of the optimal PEEP in order to optimize recruitment and to prevent end-expiratory collapse, ensuring ventilation occurs in the steep, compliant portion of the curve. The tidal volume should be selected such that the plateau pressure does not exceed UIP20. Most modern ventilators can automatically generate the P-V curve and mark the inflection points for analysis.
Compliance-based titration
This method involves stepwise adjustment of PEEP-either incrementally or decrementally-while monitoring static compliance (C = VT / [Pplat- PEEP]). The PEEP level with the highest compliance is considered optimal. This approach is simple, widely applicable, and can be integrated into routine bedside assessment.
Decremental PEEP titration after recruitment maneuver
After performing a recruitment maneuver, PEEP is gradually decreased in 2-3 cmH2O steps. At each level, compliance and oxygenation (e.g., SpO2, PaO2/FiO2) are assessed. The PEEP value associated with peak compliance is identified. To prevent derecruitment, PEEP is then set 2 cmH2O above this value15. Clinical variables such as blood pressure and oxygen saturation must be closely monitored throughout the process.
Esophageal manometry-guided titration (Figure 3)
After inserting the esophageal balloon catheter into the mid-to-lower segment of the esophagus (usually located behind the heart), correct placement was confirmed using the end-expiratory occlusion test. End-inspiratory and end-expiratory hold maneuvers were performed to obtain the following parameters: airway plateau pressure (Pplat), total positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEPtot), and esophageal pressures at end-expiration (Pes,exp) and end-inspiration (Pes,ins). PLexp is calculated as PLexp = PEEPtot- Pes,exp. PLins is calculated as PLins = Pplat- Pes,ins. Select the optimal PEEP: (1) end-inspiratory PL < 15-20 cmH2O, PLexp≈ 0 cmH2O (±2 cmH2O), and (2) ΔPtp ( ΔPtp =PLins- PLexp) < 10 - 12 cm H2O21 .
Electrical impedance tomography-guided titration
The Overdistension and Collapse (OD/CL) Method is commonly used in EIT-guided PEEP selection. During a decremental PEEP trial, EIT quantifies regional overdistension and collapse percentages. The intersection point between these two curves represents the optimal PEEP, where both phenomena are minimized, maximizing lung recruitment without overinflation18. If the intersection falls between two PEEP levels, the Regional Ventilation Delay (RVD) index can be used to choose the level with better regional homogeneity and smaller ventilation delay.

Figure 1: The sustained Inflation function of the ventilator. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: The Pressure-Volume (P-V) curve. The P-V curve was recorded under adequate sedation. The ventilator software automatically recorded and displayed the P-V Curve With PEEP set to 0 and a flow rate of 3 L/min. The lower inflection point (LIP) was approximately 5 cmH2O, thus the optimal PEEP was set to 5 cmH2O. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Esophageal pressure monitoring. The ventilator interface of an ARDS patient with esophageal pressure monitoring. By using the end-expiratory hold method, the transpulmonary pressure was measured, and the PEEP was continuously adjusted to maintain the transpulmonary pressure between -2~2 cmH2O. The optimal PEEP for this patient was 10 cmH2O. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Lung ultrasound assessment of lung recruitment. The ultrasound of a patient with atelectasis in the left lower lung is shown. Left: A significant amount of shredded sign is observed before recruitment. Right: The consolidation has decreased, partially replaced by normal aerated parenchyma, with the presence of B-lines indicating interstitial thickening. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: EIT illustration of PEEP titration. The PEEP was decremented from 18 cmH2O to 6 cmH2O, steps of 2 cmH2O at a rate of 2~5 min per step. The crossover point between overdistension (orange line) and collapse (white line) was observed at a PEEP between 8 and 10 cmH2O. Given that RVD (yellow line) was relatively lower at a PEEP of 10 cmH2O, this level was identified as the optimal PEEP. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: APRV mode. The APRV mode for a clinical patient with ARDS caused by pancreatitis is shown. The expiratory flow switches at 55% of the peak flow rate, and the remaining unexpired gas is retained in the alveoli, forming intrinsic PEEP, which helps to reinflate the collapsed alveoli. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Table 1: ARDS Network. Please click here to download this Table.
Table 2: Lung Recruitment Maneuvers. Please click here to download this Table.
Table 3: PEEP titration. Please click here to download this Table.
RMs and PEEP Titration are key strategies in mechanical ventilation to optimize oxygenation and reduce ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI). RMs involve temporarily applying high airway pressures (such as sustained inflation or incremental PEEP) to reopen collapsed alveoli, improving lung homogeneity. Meanwhile, PEEP titration aims to identify the minimum effective PEEP level required to maintain alveolar recruitment while balancing the benefits of reopening against the risks of overdistension. The adjustment of PEEP after lung recruitment is a crucial procedure; otherwise, the recruitment may prove ineffective.
Multiple RM techniques are available (Table 2). However, all involve a rise in intrathoracic pressure, which may impair venous return and cause hemodynamic instability. In some cases, oxygenation may transiently deteriorate during RMs due to overdistension, highlighting the importance of continuous monitoring11. Therefore, we emphasize the critical importance of close clinical monitoring of vital signs during LRM. Among simpler methods, Sigh may improve the lungs by reducing regional heterogeneity, enhancing lung elasticity, increasing the release of active surface-active substances and decreasing respiratory effort, thereby alleviating the ventilation load on the lungs. A recent multicenter non-inferiority randomized clinical trial enrolled 258 patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure or acute respiratory distress syndrome. Randomly divided into the Sigh group and the No Sigh group, no significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of mortality (16% vs. 21%, p = 0.342) and ventilator-free days (Sigh: 22 [7-26] vs. No Sigh: 22 [3-25] days, p=0.300). In ICU patients with hypoxic intubation, the application of sigh is feasible and does not increase the risk22. The sustained inflation (or CPAP) method commonly involves abruptly increasing the airway pressure over a given time interval23. Some ventilators now have a Sustained inflation feature that makes them easier to operate. A study has shown that this method can significantly improve oxygenation in early ARDS patients14. Sustained high pressure may temporarily increase intrathoracic pressure, leading to hemodynamic instability24. Therefore, the patient's blood pressure should be closely monitored during the procedure. Stepwise recruitment, using incremental PEEP titration, may be more effective and hemodynamically stable than sustained inflation. Gradually applied pressure allows better recruitment with reduced risk of abrupt barotrauma25. In cases of poor RM response, advanced strategies such as APRV and prone positioning can further improve oxygenation. APRV provides continuous high pressure with brief release phases, enhancing recruitment while supporting spontaneous breathing26(Figure 6). Prone positioning redistributes transpulmonary pressure, reduces dorsal atelectasis, and mitigates VILI by promoting more uniform alveolar stress27.
The setting of PEEP is crucial because insufficient PEEP can lead to alveolar collapse, while excessive PEEP may cause overdistension and injury to alveolar units. In clinical practice, multiple methods are available for PEEP titration, each with its own advantages and limitations. The optimal PEEP titration strategy should be selected based on individualized patient needs and clinical feasibility (Table 3). ARDS Network is a widely used empirical method that sets PEEP based on FiO2, and it is very easy to implement at the bedside. However, it ignores individual respiratory mechanics, resulting in an inability to balance oxygenation and lung protection in patients with low compliance28. The most traditional method for plotting a P-V loop is the supersyringe technique. Due to its impracticality for clinical use, the quasi-static technique (or the Constant Flow technique) is now more commonly employed. A software program displays the resulting pressure-volume curve29. It is important to note that high flow rates are undesirable and may shift the P-V curve to the right. This method requires deep sedation and muscle paralysis. It has been shown to correlate closely with lung CT measurements of PEEP-induced lung recruitment30. In clinical practice, it can be challenging to identify the lower inflection point on the P-V curve in some patients31. Compliance can yield the lowest driving pressure, but it may not accurately reflect regional lung mechanics in different pulmonary compartments. Decremental PEEP titration preceded by a recruitment maneuver is popular in some medical centers. This method titrates PEEP based on patient-specific compliance and oxygenation responses, while offering straightforward clinical implementation. It improved VD/VT (dead space fraction), FRC (functional residual capacity), CRS (respiratory system compliance), and PaO2/FIO2 in ARDS patients32.
Esophageal manometry is used to estimate pleural pressure and can help differentiate the contributions of the chest wall and the lungs (transpulmonary) to the overall respiratory system mechanics. An increase in pleural pressure can lead to a negative transpulmonary pressure at the end of expiration, potentially causing lung collapse. By measuring esophageal pressure and adjusting PEEP to ensure a positive transpulmonary pressure, it is possible to reduce atelectasis and the cyclic opening and closing of airways and alveoli. This optimization improves lung mechanics and oxygenation33. Using esophageal pressure as a guide to set the positive end-expiratory pressure allows clinicians to apply more precise pressures than conventional methods, while ensuring that the lungs are not overinflated, thereby preventing ventilator-induced lung injury.
EIT provides real-time, regional visualization of lung ventilation, allowing PEEP titration based on minimizing both alveolar overdistension and collapse. The OD/CL method uses dynamic impedance changes to identify an inflection point where both risks are lowest. EIT-guided PEEP titration has been associated with improved compliance, reduced mechanical power, and lower mortality compared to empirical tables34. A recent crossover trial demonstrated that, in patients with moderate to severe acute respiratory distress syndrome, EIT-guided PEEP titration significantly reduced mechanical power compared to the high PEEP/FiO₂ table strategy, suggesting its potential to enhance lung-protective ventilation35.
In conclusion, RMs and PEEP titration are often used in tandem to maintain alveolar stability and optimize ventilation in ARDS. While numerous techniques exist, no single method has proven definitively superior. Recruitment maneuvers may cause hemodynamic instability and barotrauma, while PEEP titration lacks a universally reliable method for determining the optimal level, often relying on individualized compromise. Future research should focus on integrating multimodal physiologic data, such as esophageal pressure, EIT imaging, compliance, and driving pressure, to develop personalized, adaptive PEEP titration strategies. These approaches may help better match ventilator support to individual lung pathophysiology, ultimately improving outcomes in patients with ARDS.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
The authors have no acknowledgements.
| Ventilator | Mindray | Mindray SV850 | |
| EIT | Dräger | Swisstom BB2 | |
| Ultrasound Machine | Mindray | M9 |