Method Article

Confluence Protocol For XR-based Cricket Batting: A Framework For Integrated Performance Analysis

DOI:

10.3791/68899

June 12th, 2026

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The confluence protocol presents a framework for integrating extended reality (XR) into cricket batting analysis using EMG, VO₂, motion capture, and heart rate. It demonstrates how XR environments capture coordinated responses during batting, providing a structured methodology for multi-modal assessment and supporting future research in training and performance evaluation.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Extended reality (XR) technologies provide immersive training environments in sport, but their effectiveness for skill development and performance analysis requires careful and systematic evaluation. This protocol presents an integrated XR training methodology for cricket batting that combines immersive simulation with physiological and biomechanical measurements. It outlines procedures to collect and analyze muscle activity, metabolic responses, and motion-capture data during XR-based batting to characterize physiological and biomechanical responses. The goal is to evaluate batting performance (including power hitting) within a controlled virtual scenario while measuring muscle activation via electromyography (EMG), metabolic demands via respiratory gas analysis (VO₂), heart rate (HR), and kinematic outputs via motion capture. A single batter (n = 1) wears a VR headset and inertial sensors to face a virtual bowler, with EMG electrodes on key upper-body muscles and a portable metabolic system for breath-by-breath analysis. The protocol outlines the setup of the XR system, sensor calibration, and execution of standardized batting trials, with representative results presented as time-synchronized outputs. EMG traces indicated peak muscle activation during stroke execution, while VO₂ and HR fluctuations suggested a moderate aerobic response. Joint kinematics, including elbow extension and trunk rotation, were captured through motion data. These results illustrate the feasibility of using XR-based training to capture physical and physiological responses, offering a novel framework for enhancing performance and analyzing responses. The critical implementation steps, advantages over traditional drills, potential troubleshooting issues, and considerations for integrating XR into cricket training programs are discussed. This confluence of immersive technology with sports science measurements provides a framework for objectively assessing and exploring batting performance metrics in an XR setting and could be replicated in other sports.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The overall goal of this method is to integrate extended reality (XR) (encompassing virtual (VR), augmented (AR), and mixed reality (MR))1 into cricket batting training and analytics. XR allows athletes to practice in immersive, controlled simulations of match scenarios. In cricket, batting success requires not only technical skill but also rapid decision-making and psychological resilience under pressure2. Traditional training (e.g., net sessions) cannot fully replicate high-pressure game contexts or continuously capture detailed performance data. XR technology addresses these gaps by creating a realistic virtual batting environment with adjustable difficulty and enabling comprehensive real-time data collection on the athlete’s biomechanical and physiological responses. The rationale behind this technique is grounded in ecological dynamics and representative learning design, which stress that practice should closely resemble competition conditions to effectively transfer skills3,4. By facing virtual bowlers and scenarios, batters can experience varied deliveries and pressure stimuli that engage their perception-action coupling similarly to real matches5,6.

This XR-based approach offers several advantages over alternative techniques. Unlike standard video-based training, fully immersive VR provides 360° visual input and interaction, which can improve perceptual-cognitive skills such as anticipatory judgment and situational awareness7,8,9. For example, previous research with a VR cricket simulator successfully induced competition-like anxiety among batters and measured its effects on performance, demonstrating that virtual environments can elicit authentic psychological and physiological responses (e.g., elevated heart rate under pressure)10. Moreover, XR systems allow precise control over variables (bowling speed, line, length, etc.), enabling repetitive practice of specific scenarios (e.g., scoring runs off a yorker or bouncer) that might be rare in real training. The integration of advanced sensors into this protocol (EMG, motion capture, metabolic analyzers) enables objective assessment of performance-related metrics. Such comprehensive monitoring is rarely feasible on the field; for instance, motion capture can quantitatively assess batting technique and joint kinematics with high fidelity11. Similarly, synchronized physiological measurements (VO₂, heart rate) reveal the internal load of batting in XR, informing conditioning needs. This confluence of technology and sports science aligns with recent calls for greater use of innovation in cricket coaching, particularly as the sport embraces a new(er) industrial revolution12.

In the broader literature, XR in sports training has shown promise across various disciplines. Studies in baseball13, soccer14, and others have found that VR-based training can enhance various performance parameters (motor skills, decision-making, psychology, cognitive, and anxiety) often matching or even exceeding gains from conventional practice5,13,14,15. A narrative review by Richlan et al.16 concluded that well-designed VR interventions can produce real effects in sports performance, improving both physical execution and mental skills such as focus and stress management. Importantly, XR’s benefits are not limited to elite athletes; accessibility improvements mean even lower-tier players can use affordable setups to develop their skills. However, it is crucial to ensure the face validity and fidelity of the virtual scenarios so that athletes perceive them as realistic and relevant9. Recent work in cricket suggests that players value high-fidelity VR experiences and that these can closely mimic on-field batting demands when designed properly17. The protocol discussed in this paper incorporates principles from these studies (such as life-sized bowler avatars, accurate ball physics, and integrated feedback) to maximize the realism and effectiveness of training.

This protocol should help readers determine if XR-based batting training suits their application. It is particularly appropriate for researchers and coaches interested in quantitatively evaluating changes in technique or physiological responses during a training intervention. If one’s goal is to refine a batter’s technique under pressure or to compare training strategies (e.g., XR vs. traditional nets) with objective metrics, this method provides a template. Conversely, if resources for XR hardware or expertise in sensor integration are lacking, a simpler approach might be more feasible initially. Nonetheless, as XR becomes more widespread in sport, approaches such as this can help bridge the gap between research and practice by providing a structured framework for examining XR-based training using objective, multimodal data. By sharing this detailed protocol and representative results, the aim is to accelerate the adoption of XR in cricket and other sports and to illustrate how combining XR with performance analytics (EMG, VO₂, kinematics) can yield insights beyond what either traditional coaching or standalone simulations can achieve.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Due to the nature of this research study, no ethical approval from either an institution or cricket board was deemed necessary. The participant voluntarily participated and provided informed consent prior to inclusion in the study.

1. Equipment setup and calibration

  1. XR system installation
    1. Set up the virtual reality batting simulator in an open indoor area.
    2. Mount the VR tracking base stations around the batting area according to manufacturer guidelines.
    3. Ensure the batting area (approx. 3 m × 3 m) is free of obstacles.
  2. Virtual environment configuration
    1. Load the cricket batting simulation software (iB Cricket or similar) on a high-performance computer.
    2. Select a batting scenario (e.g., facing a right-arm fast bowler – depending on the game or simulation being used).
    3. Ensure the virtual bowler’s delivery release point and height are realistic (approximately 2.2–2.5 m for an adult bowler).
    4. VR headset calibration: Have the participant put on a VR headset (Meta Quest or similar). Hand the participant a physical cricket bat or a haptic cricket bat (instrumented as per step 1.4) and ensure its position is properly represented in VR.
      NOTE: Some systems allow a virtual representation of the bat using controller tracking or custom models (verify alignment so the participant can accurately judge the bat's position in virtual space).
  3. Bat sensor attachment: Attach motion tracking sensors to the cricket bat if available. For example, affix a small inertial measurement unit (IMU) on the bat’s face or proximal end to capture swing data.
    NOTE: If using optical motion capture, apply reflective markers on the bat (e.g., at the toe and shoulder of the bat) and on anatomical landmarks of the batter (wrists, elbows, shoulders, hips, etc.) for joint angle measurement.
  4. In addition to EMG sensors, equip the batter with an IMU placed on the bat.
    NOTE: The IMU includes a tri-axial accelerometer and gyroscope, capturing both linear acceleration (ACC X, Y, Z) and angular velocity (GYRO X, Y, Z) data (IMU sampling rate: 240 Hz). These data enable detailed analysis of bat swing tempo and angular motion, as well as the quantification of phenomena such as bat lag and rotational timing (parameters not easily captured by motion capture alone).
  5. EMG system setup
    1. Turn on the wireless EMG sensor system (Delsys Trigno) and connect the receiver to the computer. Prepare EMG electrodes by cleaning the skin over the muscles of interest (shaving and swabbing with alcohol, if necessary).
    2. Ensure that the EMG acquisition software is configured to the appropriate sampling rate (e.g., 1200 Hz) and that channels are labeled for each muscle (e.g., “lead forearm flexors,” “trail forearm flexors,” “biceps brachii,” “triceps,” etc.).
    3. Calibrate or zero the EMG signals with the participant relaxed to establish baseline noise levels.
  6. Metabolic and heart rate setup
    1. If measuring VO₂, equip the participant with a portable metabolic analyzer or a stationary gas analysis system. Calibrate the gas analyzers with reference gases (e.g., 16% O₂, 5% CO₂) and perform a volume calibration of the flow sensor (e.g., using a 3 L syringe pump).
    2. Fit the participant with a comfortable respiratory mask, ensuring no leaks. Connect a heart rate monitor strap and verify that the data feed (to the metabolic system or a separate device) is working.
  7. System synchronization
    1. Connect all measurement systems to a common timing signal or ensure a clear protocol for later synchronization. For example, use a digital trigger from the VR system to mark the start of a trial across EMG, motion capture, and metabolic recordings.
    2. If possible, have the participant perform a distinct action (e.g., a clap or a jump) that produces a recognizable spike in all sensors (visual motion, EMG burst, VO₂ change) to serve as a sync event.
    3. Capture ground reaction forces (Fx, Fy, Fz) and moments (Mx, My, Mz) during selected batting trials using a force plate system. This can provide data on balance, load transfer, and peak impact forces as the batter executes dynamic footwork and swings.

2. Participant preparation

  1. Instruct the batter to warm up for 5–10 min.
    NOTE: This can include light aerobic activity (e.g., jogging in place or stationary cycling if available) and dynamic stretches, especially for the upper body (shoulders, arms, wrists) and trunk, to mitigate injury risk during maximal swings.
  2. EMG electrode placement
    1. Apply surface EMG electrodes on the target muscle groups. For a right-handed batter, place electrodes on the left forearm flexor group (for grip and bat control of the lead arm), right forearm flexors (trail arm), left biceps brachii (front arm elbow flexor), right triceps brachii (back arm elbow extensor), and possibly on major trunk muscles such as the external oblique or latissimus dorsi.
    2. Use anatomical landmarks to position electrodes over the belly of each muscle, aligning parallel to muscle fiber direction.
    3. Press firmly to ensure optimal contact and apply adhesive tape if needed to secure the electrodes against movement during swinging. Attach the wireless EMG transmitters to each electrode.
  3. Motion capture
    1. Dress the participant in a motion capture suit (depending on the participant’s comfort level) or attach individual markers if using an optical system.
    2. Key marker placements should include bilateral acromion (shoulders), lateral epicondyles (elbows), ulnar styloid (wrists), anterior superior iliac spines (hips), lateral femoral condyles (knees), and lateral malleoli (ankles), in addition to the bat markers.
      NOTE: Use elastic straps or adhesive for markers on segments that may experience high acceleration (such as the hands holding the bat) to prevent marker loss during swings.
  4. Metabolic gear fitting
    1. Fit the participant with the respiratory mask connected to the metabolic analyzer. Ensure the mask is snug and that the participant can breathe comfortably.
    2. Have the participant stand in the batting stance while wearing the mask and VR headset together to check that there is no obstruction of vision or movement.
    3. Place the metabolic unit (if portable) in a small backpack or waist harness on the participant or route the tubing safely if it’s a cart-based system, to avoid entanglement.
    4. Secure the heart rate monitor around the chest and confirm that it is transmitting to the recording system.
  5. Baseline measurements
    1. With all equipment on, record a 1–2 min baseline with the participant standing at rest in batting stance.
      NOTE: These include resting EMG (minimal aside from postural activity), baseline VO₂ and heart rate, and a still reference pose for motion capture (useful for model calibration).
    2. Ensure during this time that all systems are recording correctly and data appear normal (e.g., EMG noise floor ~<50 µV, VO₂ values at rest ~0.3–0.5 L/min depending on the subject, HR around resting ~60–80 bpm).
    3. Address any irregular readings now (for example, reattach any EMG electrode that shows excessive noise or recalibrate the VO₂ if values drift).
  6. XR orientation
    1. Have the participant take a few practice swings in VR to familiarise. In the virtual environment, they should see the cricket pitch, bowler, and relevant markers (stumps, field, etc.).
    2. Guide them to focus on timing and getting used to the lack of physical ball contact.
    3. Allow the participant to practice triggering the start of a delivery (if the system requires a signal or if an operator will initiate each ball; however, most ball deliveries in VR cricket games are automated).
      NOTE: This step helps reduce the novelty effect so that during actual data collection, the participant performs as naturally as possible.
  7. Safety check
    1. Remind the participant to perform within their comfort zone and not to overextend if they feel any pain.
    2. Have an assistant ready to spot the participant since the VR headset blocks real vision - ensure the participant’s immediate 360° area is clear.
    3. If the participant feels dizzy or disoriented at any point, pause the session and let them remove the headset.
      CAUTION: The combination of VR, the VO₂ mask, and physical exercise can induce dizziness; always prioritize participant safety and discontinue if strong discomfort arises.

3. XR batting trial execution

  1. Start of trial
    1. Begin the integrated recording on all systems (EMG, motion capture, metabolic) either via a unified software trigger or manual start in quick succession (as synchronized in step 1.7).
    2. Announce Recording start and have a clear signal (auditory or via system) that the trial is live.
  2. Delivery sequence
    1. Initiate the first virtual ball delivery. For example, press the Bowl control in the VR software or have the participant signal readiness (some systems bowl when the batter taps the bat, points to an icon in the virtual space, or says a keyword).
    2. Ask the participant to attempt to hit the virtual ball with a desired cricket stroke. Use a standardized sequence of six deliveries (an over) to simulate realistic conditions.
    3. Vary the deliveries in a predetermined way (e.g., some might be full length, short, off-stump, leg-side, or even straight) to engage different batting shots.
      NOTE: The protocol can be adjusted; six balls can be utilized as one trial for demonstration, but longer sessions can be performed if fitness and/or comfort levels permit. Each batter faces 6 balls: 2 short, 2 full, 2 good lengths.
  3. Batting performance cues
    1. Encourage the participant to hit each ball with maximal but controlled effort, especially focusing on power hitting when appropriate (e.g., for balls pitched in the arc for lofted drives).
    2. Optionally, batters could run an imaginary quick single after hitting (to incorporate footwork and realism), but ensure they stay in the calibrated area for tracking.
  4. Inter-delivery interval
    1. After each shot, allow ~10–15 seconds before the next delivery (as in real cricket, the bowler returns to the start mark).
    2. During this brief pause, ask the participant to reset to the batting stance.
      ​NOTE: The experimenter can check live data for any saturation or issues (for example, if an EMG channel flat-lined because a sensor moved, quickly adjust it during a pause).
    3. Keep communication with the participant minimal to maintain focus, unless providing brief coaching cues such as “Good swing” or instructing adjustments (e.g., “move a bit back in stance” if they drifted forward).
  5. Trial completion
    1. After the final (6th) delivery and stroke, instruct the participant to remain in place for a few seconds. Stop the recording on all systems simultaneously if possible.
    2. Verbally indicate “End of trial.” If multiple trials are planned (e.g., to compare conditions or collect more data for reliability), give the participant a rest period (at least a few minutes or until heart rate and breathing return closer to baseline) before repeating.
      NOTE: For this protocol, it can be assumed that a single trial is for data collection demonstration.
  6. Remove equipment
    1. Carefully remove the VR headset from the participant, followed by the metabolic mask (allowing them to catch their breath normally).
    2. Detach EMG sensors and any motion capture markers. Save the recorded data files from each system with synchronized timestamps or labels (e.g., “Trial1_VR_batting_EMG.csv”, “Trial1_VO2.csv”, “Trial1_motion.bvh”).
      ​NOTE: If any equipment slips or malfunctions during the trial (e.g., an electrode becomes loose), note it and consider repeating the trial after fixing the issue to ensure data quality and reliability.
  7. System calibration check (post)
    1. Perform a brief post-trial calibration check. For instance, run a quick static trial on the motion capture to ensure marker data is still valid (no large drifts).
    2. Also, check the metabolic system’s calibration if another trial will follow, to ensure no significant baseline shift occurred due to sensor heating or drift.
    3. Reset any systems as needed. Omit this step if only one trial is performed and the data looks consistent, but it’s useful for troubleshooting if something seems off in the collected data.

4. Data analysis

  1. EMG data processing:
    1. Quantify key metrics such as peak EMG amplitude for each muscle during the trial and the time of occurrence relative to the swing.
      ​NOTE: In the representative analysis, the EMG is observed around the moment of bat-ball impact (as indicated by the motion capture or a spike in accelerometer data on the bat).
    2. Identify the muscle activation patterns for the power hit: for instance, the triceps in the trail arm may show a peak as it extends the elbow through the swing, while forearm flexors show sustained activity for grip stabilization.
  2. Metabolic data calculation:
    1. Review the breath-by-breath data from the VO₂ system. Remove any obviously erroneous breaths (e.g., if the participant coughed or a sensor misread, resulting in out-of-range values).
    2. Compute a moving average or a fitting curve for VO₂ to visualize the kinetics - how quickly oxygen uptake increased when the batting started and how it plateaued or changed throughout the swing(s).
    3. Calculate total VO₂ consumed over the trial (area under the VO₂-time curve) to estimate energy expenditure and note the peak VO₂ (highest value reached during or immediately after the trial).
    4. Similarly, extract heart rate data and determine peak and average HR. If the respiratory exchange ratio (RER = VCO₂/VO₂) is of interest, derive it from the VO₂ and VCO₂ signals to see if the effort was largely aerobic (RER around 0.8–1.0) or edging towards anaerobic (RER >1.0).
  3. Motion capture analysis:
    1. Import the motion capture data (e.g., .bvh file) into a biomechanics analysis tool. Reconstruct joint angles for key movements: elbow flexion/extension of both arms, shoulder rotation, trunk (thorax relative to pelvis) rotation, knee flexion, etc.
    2. Compute the bat’s angular velocity during the swing from the marker data or IMU data on the bat. Identify the frame of impact (if the simulation provides that timestamp or infer it from when the bat’s path intersects the ball’s path).
    3. At impact, record the joint angles (this can indicate technique, e.g., front elbow may be slightly flexed vs. fully extended) and the bat speed. Determine the maximum bat speed during the downswing phase.
      ​NOTE: These kinematic metrics will be used to evaluate technique and compare with known ranges from literature (for instance, whether the batter’s bat speed is in line with that of skilled players)18.
  4. Data synchronization and integration:
    1. Align the datasets on a common time axis using the sync events. Verify that the temporal sequence makes sense - e.g., a spike in triceps EMG should coincide with the moment the motion data shows elbow extension acceleration, and a rise in VO₂ should occur shortly after the series of swings begins (metabolic lag).
    2. Once synchronized, integrate the findings: for example, create a timeline plot with the swing events marked, overlaying muscle activation and heart rate.
      ​NOTE: This provides insight into how each swing contributed to physiological load. If multiple trials or participants were involved, compile the results to compute means and variability. For the scope of this single-case demonstration, focus can be placed on data from a single representative trial.
  5. Quality control:
    1. Perform a quality check on the data analysis. Confirm that EMG signals are free of major artifacts and that peaks are plausible.
    2. Check that VO₂ baseline and post-exercise recovery follow expected patterns (e.g., VO₂ should return towards baseline after exercise stops).
    3. Ensure motion capture angle calculations do not have jumps (which could indicate marker swaps or tracking loss). If any anomalies are found, annotate these. This step completes the data analysis phase.
    4. Mitigate potential signal interference from wireless sensors using shielded cables and pre-trial calibration.

5. Statistical analysis

  1. Perform all data processing and visualization using Python (Version 3.12.0, Python Software Foundation) within Jupyter Notebook (Version 7.2). Use Pandas (Version 2.2.2) for data structuring, NumPy (Version 1.25.1) for numerical operations, and Matplotlib (Version 3.9.0) for visualization.
  2. Given the single-participant nature of this pilot protocol, limit the analysis to descriptive statistics, including mean and standard deviation values across repeated swings.
  3. Do not perform inferential statistical testing, as the protocol is designed for demonstration and feasibility rather than hypothesis testing across groups or conditions.
  4. Focus on generating representative outputs to illustrate data integration and workflow reproducibility.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

To demonstrate the analytical potential of this XR-based protocol, a series of example visualizations was generated to illustrate the types of time-aligned outputs that can be derived from the collected data, including muscle activation profiles (root mean square EMG), synchronized physiological responses (VO₂ and HR), multi-sensor timelines, 2D and 3D kinematic visualizations of swing trajectories (Figure 1) and ground reaction force plots from the force plate. While the plots presented her...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This methods-focused discussion evaluates the protocol’s effectiveness, critical steps, troubleshooting, and how XR-based training compares to conventional methods. The results above illustrate that the XR batting protocol successfully captures both performance and physiological metrics. Crucial aspects of the methodology that underpin these outcomes are highlighted, along with a discussion of potential modifications, limitations, and the significance of this XR approach in comparison to traditional training method...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The author acknowledges and thanks the MIT Immersion Lab for providing technical support.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
VR Headset (Meta Quest 2)Meta899-00182-02Standalone VR headset for XR batting simulation
VR Cricket Software (iB Cricket)ProYuga Advanced TechnologiesN/AImmersive cricket simulation software
Wireless EMG System (Trigno)DelsysTrigno AvantiMuscle activation measurement; sampling rate ~1200 Hz
Surface EMG ElectrodesDelsysDE-2.1Disposable electrodes for EMG signal acquisition
Inertial Measurement Unit (IMU)Xsens / NoraxonMTw AwindaTri-axial accelerometer & gyroscope; ~240 Hz
Motion Capture SystemOptiTrackOptiTrack Prime3D kinematic tracking system
Reflective MarkersOptiTrackN/AMarker-based tracking for anatomical landmarks
Force PlateAMTI / BertecOR6-7Ground reaction force measurement (Fx, Fy, Fz)
Portable Metabolic AnalyzerCOSMEDK5Breath-by-breath VO2 measurement system
Respiratory MaskCOSMEDMask 7400 SeriesMask for gas exchange analysis
Calibration Gas Tank (16% O2, 5% CO2)Airgas / BOCN/AUsed to calibrate metabolic analyser
Heart Rate Monitor (Chest Strap)PolarH10Wireless heart rate tracking
Jupyter Notebook SoftwareProject Jupyterv7.2Data processing and analysis environment
PythonPython Software Foundationv3.12.0Programming language for analysis
Pandas LibraryPyDatav2.2.2Data structuring and manipulation
NumPy LibraryNumPyv1.25.1Numerical computations
Matplotlib LibraryMatplotlibv3.9.0Data visualisation

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Le Noury, P., Polman, R., Maloney, M., Gorman, A. A narrative review of the current state of extended reality technology and how it can be utilised in sport. Sports Med. 52 (7), 1473-1489 (2022).
  2. Noorbhai, H. Quantifying and simulating decision-making time for shot selection in cricket batting against fast and spin bowling. Int J Hum Mov Sports Sci. 13 (4), 809-820 (2025).
  3. Müller, S., et al. Attributes of expert anticipation should inform the design of virtual reality simulators to accelerate learning and transfer of skill. Sports Med. 53 (2), 301-309 (2023).
  4. Pastel, S., et al. Training in virtual reality enables learning of a complex sports movement. Virtual Real. 27 (2), 523-540 (2023).
  5. Gray, R. Virtual environments and their role in developing perceptual-cognitive skills in sports. Anticipation and Decision Making in Sport. Williams, M., Jackson, R. , Routledge. 342-359 (2019).
  6. Fadde, P. J., Zaichkowsky, L. Training perceptual-cognitive skills in sports using technology. J Sport Psychol Action. 9 (4), 239-248 (2018).
  7. Kittel, A., Larkin, P., Elsworthy, N., Lindsay, R., Spittle, M. Effectiveness of 360° virtual reality and match broadcast video to improve decision-making skill. Sci Med Football. 4 (4), 255-262 (2020).
  8. Lindsay, R., Spittle, S., Spittle, M. Skill adaptation in sport and movement: Practice design considerations for 360° VR. Front Psychol. 14, 1124530(2023).
  9. Runswick, O. R. Player perceptions of face validity and fidelity in 360° video and virtual reality cricket. J Sport Exerc Psychol. 45 (6), 347-354 (2023).
  10. Kelly, N., Stafford, J., Craig, C., Herring, M. P., Campbell, M. Using a virtual reality cricket simulator to explore the effects of pressure and competition anxiety on batting performance. Psychol Sport Exerc. 63, 102244(2022).
  11. Maduwantha, K., et al. Accessibility of motion capture as a tool for sports performance enhancement for beginner and intermediate cricket players. Sensors. 24 (11), 3386(2024).
  12. Noorbhai, H. Cricket coaching and batting in the 21st century through a 4IR lens: a narrative review. BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 8 (3), e001435(2022).
  13. Wilkins, L. A framework for using virtual reality to enhance psychological performance in baseball. J Sport Psychol Action. 16 (3), (2024).
  14. Harrison, K., Potts, E., King, A. C., Braun-Trocchio, R. The effectiveness of virtual reality on anxiety and performance in female soccer players. Sports (Basel). 9 (12), 167(2021).
  15. Faure, C., Limballe, A., Bideau, B., Kulpa, R. Virtual reality to assess and train team ball sports performance: A scoping review. J Sports Sci. 38 (2), 192-205 (2020).
  16. Richlan, F., Weiß, M., Kastner, P., Braid, J. Virtual training, real effects: A narrative review on sports performance enhancement through interventions in virtual reality. Front Psychol. 14, 1240790(2023).
  17. Kulshreshtha, A., Kaur, H., Agrawal, P. Innovative virtual reality training schedule for cricket batting skill enhancement: design, validation, and implementation. J Inf Syst Eng Manag. 10 (38s), (2025).
  18. Peploe, C., McErlain-Naylor, S. A., Harland, A. R., King, M. A. Relationships between technique and bat speed, post-impact ball speed, and carry distance during a range hitting task in cricket. Hum Mov Sci. 66, 148-158 (2019).
  19. Noorbhai, H., Moon, S., Fukushima, T. A conceptual framework and review of multi-method approaches for 3D markerless motion capture in sports and exercise. J Sports Sci. , (2025).
  20. Varesco, G., et al. Fatigue in elite fencing: Effects of a simulated competition. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 33 (11), 2250-2260 (2023).
  21. Witte, K., Bürger, D., Pastel, S. Sports training in virtual reality with a focus on visual perception: a systematic review. Front Sports Act Living. 7, 1530948(2025).
  22. Hadlow, S. M., Panchuk, D., Mann, D. L., Portus, M. R., Abernethy, B. Modified perceptual training in sport: A new classification framework. J Sci Med Sport. 21 (9), 950-958 (2018).
  23. Pradhan, G. N., et al. Integration of motion capture and EMG data for classifying human motions. IEEE Data Eng Workshop, , 56-63 (2007).
  24. Sagnier, C., Loup-Escande, E., Lourdeaux, D., Thouvenin, I., Valléry, G. User acceptance of virtual reality: An extended technology acceptance model. Int J Hum-Comput Interact. 36 (11), 993-1007 (2020).
  25. Geisen, M., Klatt, S. Real-time feedback using extended reality: A current overview and further integration into sports. Int J Sports Sci Coach. 17 (5), 1178-1194 (2022).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

XR TrainingCricket BattingPerformance AnalysisImmersive SimulationMuscle ActivationElectromyography EMGMotion CaptureMetabolic ResponseVirtual Reality SportsBiomechanical Measurement
Video Coming Soon

Related Articles