$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The performance of the chamber was tested in three ways: (1) measurement of the temperature gradients across the chamber, (2) monitoring of the temperature over a 24 h period after initial construction and a 168 h period after 7 months of use, and (3) collection of cycling data for lithium-ion battery coin cells over 100 cycles or ~3 months. These results, discussed below, demonstrate that the chamber is able to maintain constant temperature over several months with an average temperature variation of less than 0.75 °C, resulting in consistent electrochemical cycling data.

Figure 3: Three-dimensional temperature dependence of the cold chamber. The YZ plane is the plane depicted in Figure 1. A custom 2-axis temperature data logger was built that could be used inside the mini-fridge. Each data point represents a unique temperature measurement, resulting in an overall temperature variation throughout the chamber of ± 0.4 °C. Further description of data collection and analysis is provided in Supplemental File 2. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Temperature gradient:
The temperature variation throughout the chamber was relatively consistent and only varied ± 0.4 °C, as seen in Figure 3. The variation showed a slightly warmer volume closer to the right thermoelectric module, which could be due to variation in the modules themselves or the amount of power being delivered to each.
The surface of the thermoelectric modules was consistently a few degrees colder than the air near it, so ensuring that the battery holders were not in contact with the modules was important for accurate temperature management. Using the battery holder alignment guide decreased the likelihood of contact between the holders and the modules.

Figure 4: Temperature Variation with Time. (A) Initial temperature distribution soon after construction shows a variation of ± 0.13 °C std when measured every 10 s over a 24 h period. (B) After 7 months of use, the temperature distribution was measured every 10 s over a 1 week period, resulting in a variation of ± 0.75 °C std. More information about this data acquisition and Gaussian smoothing is provided in Supplemental File 2. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Temperature monitoring:
The average temperature variation was measured every 10 s for 168 h after 7 months of use and can be seen to be stable over that period in Figure 4. The block-like nature of the data in Figure 4B is likely due to the quick oscillations of temperature. A more sophisticated control method could be used to lessen these oscillations if that were needed. The average temperature initially varied by ± 0.13 °C, as shown in Figure 4A, but increased over a 7 month period to ± 0.75 °C as shown in Figure 4B. This could be a sign that the chamber becomes more unstable as time goes on, but it could also be due to other factors, such as the lab's ambient temperature increasing. Nonetheless, the stability of the temperature over time is significant, and this level of temperature control is generally adequate for most low-temperature battery investigations. Additional details on the characterization of temperature inside the chamber is provided in Supplemental File 2.

Figure 5: Battery capacity evolution over 100 cycles. (A) Cycling data using a circulating bath system for temperature control. Large variances in the capacity were observed due to temperature fluctuations and corrosion issues caused by condensation on the batteries. (B) Cycling data using the customized low-temperature chamber presented in this paper, exhibiting significantly less noise. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Electrochemical cycling data:
To test the performance of the chamber in maintaining temperature during battery testing, galvanostatic cycling tests were performed on four commercially available 2032 Li-ion coin cell batteries. These coin cells were cycled at 0 ± 1 °C at a C-rate of C/7 for 100 cycles, which took ~3 months. The results are shown in Figure 5B. These data are compared to a previous generation of temperature chamber, which employed a Styrofoam-insulated aluminum chamber with a circulating bath containing antifreeze solution. The circulating bath method resulted in large deviations in the measured cell capacities, as observed in Figure 5A, and resulted in corrosion of the battery cells during repeated cycling. The new chamber design reported here shows a significant improvement in the measured cell capacities, highlighted by an improved temperature stability, absence of cell corrosion, and a significant reduction in noise in the data.
Proper operation of the chamber will be indicated by constant temperature maintained with only minor fluctuations, and electrochemical data that is free from unexplained or sudden changes such as erratic voltages, or sudden increases and decreases in cell capacity. After the chamber is initially assembled and turned on, it is advisable to log the temperature in the chamber for 24 h up to several days to ensure that there is not a gradual increase or decrease in temperature that would indicate the fridge settings need to be adjusted to optimize the heat dissipation.
Supplemental File 1: STL files for 3D printing. Files include Gasket Jig.stl, Heat Sink Clamp.stl, On-Off Mount.stl, Protoboard Mount.stl, Wire to Alligator Converter.stl, Wiring Station Bottom.stl, Wiring Station Top.stl, Chamber.stl, and Chamber Lid.stl files. Please click here to download this File.
Supplemental File 2: Printing instructions and temperature characterization. Please click here to download this File.
Supplemental File 3: STL files to 3D print the main lid and lid holder. Please click here to download this File.