RESEARCH
Peer reviewed scientific video journal
Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods
Visualizing science through experiment videos
EDUCATION
Video textbooks for undergraduate courses
Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments
BUSINESS
Video textbooks for business education
OTHERS
Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments
Products
RESEARCH
JoVE Journal
Peer reviewed scientific video journal
JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments
Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods
EDUCATION
JoVE Core
Video textbooks for undergraduates
JoVE Science Education
Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments
JoVE Lab Manual
Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses
BUSINESS
JoVE Business
Video textbooks for business education
Solutions
Language
English
Menu
Menu
Menu
Menu
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Research Article
Erratum Notice
Important: There has been an erratum issued for this article. View Erratum Notice
Retraction Notice
The article Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) in Microbiome Data (10.3791/61715) has been retracted by the journal upon the authors' request due to a conflict regarding the data and methodology. View Retraction Notice
To study CD8 T cell differentiation and function in vitro, CD8 T cells can be isolated from the mouse to be co-cultured long-term with preformed infected murine vaginal epithelial organoids. Here, we describe this process and assess the acquisition of resident memory T cell markers upon co-culture.
Barrier mucosal tissues play an important role in the differentiation and function of resident T cells. Among the diverse cell populations within these tissues, epithelial cells are key drivers of T cell differentiation. However, our understanding of the epithelial-derived signals that shape T cell biology in mucosal environments remains limited, largely due to a lack of specific tools and the complexity of available model systems. Here, we describe a murine vaginal epithelial organoid-CD8 T cell co-culture system that models dynamic interactions between infected epithelium and virus-specific CD8 T cells. This protocol enables phenotypic and functional analysis of T cell responses within a physiologically relevant three-dimensional epithelial microenvironment. Using this system, we demonstrate the differentiation of effector CD8 T cells into tissue-resident memory T cells (TRM). This versatile in vitro culture system provides reductionist opportunities to investigate molecular details of epithelial cues behind CD8 T cell differentiation that govern protective immunity and immunopathology in barrier organs.
CD8 resident memory T cells (TRMs) represent a unique population of memory CD8 T cells that are retained permanently in the peripheral tissues without routinely circulating through blood and lymphoid tissues. These TRM cells are strategically positioned in barrier organs, including skin, lungs, intestines, and the reproductive tract, where they act as sentinels against pathogens and nascent tumors1,2. Upon pathogen detection, CD8 TRM cells rapidly release cytotoxic granules to directly eliminate infected cells while simultaneously secreting inflammatory cytokines that alert surrounding tissue cells and recruit circulating immune effectors to contain pathogen dissemination3,4. The effectiveness of CD8 TRMs in antipathogen immunity as well as cancer immunotherapy has already been demonstrated5,6. Accordingly, positioning an abundant quantity of functionally competent CD8 TRM in barrier mucosal tissues is a crucial goal for vaccines and immunotherapeutic strategies.
The formation and maintenance of CD8 TRM in peripheral organs is critically dependent on local tissue-specific programming. These local environmental cues include unique tissue-derived cytokines and metabolic agents, as well as intercellular interactions that collectively enforce the tissue-specific TRM identity7,8,9. This tissue programming allows TRM to adapt to tissue-specific demands in the execution of their immunosurveillance duties. However, our understanding of the nature of these interactions is incomplete, owing to the lack of robust model systems that faithfully capture these processes. Small animal models, while being very informative, often suffer from a highly interconnected, complex web of interactions that thwart rapid high-throughput studies.
Here, we describe an in vitro alternative to the mouse model that will allow investigation into the molecular details of epithelial cell-derived cues behind CD8 TRM differentiation. By co-culturing preformed vaginal epithelial organoids (VEOs) with activated CD8 T cells, we generated CD8 TRM in vitro. A detailed description of the CD8 T cell activation and co-culture process will allow wider adoption of this process across tissues, leading to a greater understanding of cellular interactions shaping CD8 T cell memory in frontline tissues.
All procedures involving animals were reviewed and approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Brown University (Protocol number 22-10-0001).
1. Basic setup and preparation of an activation plate
2. Harvesting and dissociation of adult mouse secondary lymphoid organs
3. CD8 T cell enrichment and activation
4. Removing activation signals and resting activated CD8 T cells
5. Infecting preformed murine vaginal epithelial organoids with virus
NOTE: We have used both Herpes Simplex virus-2 (HSV-2) and Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV) to perform viral infection of the organoids. Both are considered Biosafety Level-2 (BSL-2) agents. Carry out all procedures involving infectious agents inside a certified BSL-2 biosafety cabinet. Clean work areas with 70% ethanol both prior to and following use, and discard all materials according to institutional biosafety guidelines. For this protocol, we established VEOs from vaginal epithelial cells harvested from the vaginal epithelium of C57BL/6 female mice as described before10.

6. Co-culturing CD8 T cells with virus-infected, preformed murine vaginal epithelial organoids
7. Collecting co-cultured CD8 T cells for flow cytometry analysis
Microscopic visualization of CD8 T cell-infected organoid co-culture
Preformed mouse VEOs were infected with LCMV and co-cultured with LCMV-specific CD8 T cells. We have also performed these co-cultures with HSV-2 infection model to establish the versatility of the protocol but are showing microscopic data for LCMV model and have included T cell differentiation data in HSV-2 model below. The LCMV expresses yellow fluorescent protein (YFP), so the infected cells can be visualized using routine epifluorescence microscopy. For this, 7-day-old VEOs were infected with LCMV-YFP, 24 h before CD8 T cell incubation (Figure 1A). Separately, LCMV-specific transgenic P14 CD8 T cells were activated using the activation and resting protocol described above. On the day of co-culture, the infected organoids were released from the BME matrix and mixed with the appropriate number of activated CD8 T cells mentioned earlier. This mixed population was resuspended in a new BME matrix and was plated in a 96-well plate for imaging (Figure 1B). Abundant viral replication in organoids can be noted as early as 4 h after co-culture, marked by green fluorescence. However, the CD8 T cell accumulation near infected organoids became prominent later. We also noted loss of organoid integrity at later time points presumably caused by CD8 T cell-induced cell death.
Phenotypic characterization of co-cultured CD8 T cells
We performed flow cytometry-based phenotyping of CD8 T cells that were incubated with infected VEOs at different times post-co-culture; the gating strategy used for analysis is shown in Supplemental Figure S1. For this, HSV-2 infected VEOs were co-cultured with HSV-2-specific transgenic gBT-I CD8 T cells for 7-30 days. A group of activated gBT-I CD8 T cells embedded in BME matrix in the absence of VEOs was also maintained as a negative control (Figure 2A, top row). CD8 T cells isolated from these conditions were assessed for their adoption of phenotypic features of TRM including upregulation of CD69+ CD103+ (double positive) markers, suggestive of an epithelial CD8 TRM population (Figure 2A,B). The co-cultured cells also exhibited downregulation of CD62L and upregulation of PD-1 and CD38, markers associated with a residency signature11. Importantly, the residency features were more pronounced on day 13 and 30 compared to day 7 post co-culture, indicating a gradual differentiation process under the influence of epithelial signals. CD8 T cells co-cultured with uninfected VEOs failed to acquire the canonical CD69⁺CD103⁺ TRM phenotype, indicating that epithelial co-culture alone is insufficient to drive TRM differentiation in the absence of antigenic stimulation (Supplemental Figure S2). Comparatively, CD8 T cells maintained alone were very few on day 7 and showed an aberrant phenotype bearing markers CD103+, CD69-, CD62L- and low for PD-1 and CD38 (Figure 2A). To ensure these in vitro-generated TRM are functional, we also stimulated these cells with 1 µg/mL antigenic peptide for 3 h and tested their ability to secrete cytokines. The CD69+ CD103+ CD8 T cells significantly upregulated intracellular interferon-gamma and IL-2 upon stimulation compared to untreated CD8 T cells (Figure 3A,B).

Figure 1: Localization of antiviral CD8 T cells near infected organoids. (A) Schematics of the co-culture process. (B) Seven-day-old mouse VEOs were infected with LCMV-YFP and were cultured with P14 CD8 T cells. Imaging was performed at 4 h, 41 h, 75 h, and 114 h post co-culture. Representative images from three separate experimental repeats are shown. The rectangular box indicates the region shown in the enlarged image beneath. White arrow indicates clustering of CD8 T cells next to an infected group of VEOs, and black arrows show further aggregation of CD8 T cells and consequent reduction in YFP signal (in green). Scale bars = 500 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Acquisition of CD8 TRM phenotypes among co-cultured CD8 T cells. (A) Flow cytometry plots showing expression of indicated markers on CD8 T cells isolated from day 7, day 13, and day 30 post co-culture. Top row shows CD8 T cells cultured in the absence of organoids. The cells are gated on live CD45.1+ CD8 T cells (CD45.1 marks gBT-I HSV-2 specific CD8 T cells). (B) Bar graph showing percentage of CD69+ CD103+ TRM cells at different days post-co-culture indicating gradual upregulation of TRM markers. Data are representative of three repeats with n= 3-4/condition. Bars indicate mean ± SEM. Ordinary one-way ANOVA with Tukey's multiple comparison test. **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: In vitro differentiated CD8 TRM functionality. Flow cytometry plots (A) and bar graph (B) showing upregulation of IFN-gamma and IL-2 on CD8 T cells upon antigenic stimulation for 3 h with 1 µg/mL antigenic peptide. The cells are gated on live CD69+ CD103+ CD8 T cells. Data are representative of two repeats with n= 4-10/condition. Bars indicate mean ± SEM. Student's T test. ****p < 0.0001. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Supplemental Figure S1: Gating scheme to identify CD8 T cells in coculture. Representative flow cytometry gating strategy used to identify CD8 T cells from organoid-T cell cocultures. Lymphocytes were first gated based on forward and side scatter, followed by singlet discrimination (FSC-A vs FSC-H), live cell gating, and selection of CD45.1⁺ cells. Expression of CD69 and CD103 was assessed on gated live CD45.1⁺ CD8 T cells. Please click here to download this File.
Supplemental Figure S2: Uninfected VEOs failed to generate CD69+ CD103+ CD8 TRM. Representative flow cytometry plots showing CD69 and CD103 expression on CD8 T cells isolated from day 7 co-cultures with either LCMV-infected or uninfected VEOs (in the absence of supplemental antigenic peptide). Cells are gated on live CD45.1⁺ CD8 T cells. Please click here to download this File.
CD8 TRMs rely on local environmental cues for differentiation and maintenance. These cues instill tissue-specific programming that allows CD8 TRMs to adapt to their surroundings and perform their immunosurveillance duties as needed. Unfortunately, TRMs failed to survive in vitro once extracted from the tissue, and this has limited their detailed analysis12,13. In this protocol, we have provided a method by which CD8 T cells can be co-cultured with epithelial cells to develop into TRMs with the phenotypic features similar to those of in vivo TRMs. This method can be used to study TRMs in the long term, as well as be easily manipulated to accommodate other tissues, viruses, and genetic modifications.
The most critical element of this protocol is related to cell health. T cells must be proliferating and alive prior to co-culture. T cells that have not been sufficiently activated and provided sustained IL-2 will still not survive long-term culture unless provided with other survival signals, including IL-7 and IL-15; although we have seen that VEOs themselves can partially support T cell viability10. If T cells are not above 80% viability at the time of co-culture, the co-culture should not move forward, and freshly isolated T cells should be activated for another attempt. VEOs must also be of sufficient size (~100 microns) and healthy (>90% viable) at the time of co-culture. It is important not to use preformed VEOs that are too old, as this will impact VEO longevity during co-culture, especially for long-term studies. Conversely, it is also important to avoid using preformed VEOs that are too young and small. Small VEOs are indicative of insufficient growth and/or differentiation, which will impact the communication of signals being received by the T cells for their differentiation. It is recommended that preformed VEOs between 7-10 days post culture be used to balance differentiation and size with VEO maintenance during co-culture.
Some of the issues that may arise during this protocol include maintaining VEO integrity, T cell differentiation, and BME plating. VEOs can lose longevity after several passages, depending on the depletion of stem cells. In such cases, it is recommended that earlier passages of VEOs be used. If preformed VEOs are struggling to survive until the experimental endpoint, disaggregated VEOs may be used instead of preformed VEOs. We have previously demonstrated that disaggregated VEOs co-cultured with T cells can also give rise to TRMs10; however, disaggregated VEOs experience reduced organoid growth due to the removal of the TGF-β signaling inhibitor in the co-culture media that is needed to support TRM differentiation. Viral infection of VEOs may also drastically reduce VEO longevity in co-culture due to T cell killing and effector function. If intact VEOs are desired for end analysis, VEOs may be pulsed with antigenic peptides instead. We have demonstrated that VEOs pulsed with antigen and co-cultured with antigen-specific T cells can last up to 14 days in co-culture10. Besides cell health, the BME matrix may also be prone to depolymerizing during longer culturing periods. Some of the issues that may contribute to this include compromised integrity during plating and changing of media. It is important that bubbles be minimized to preserve the BME structure while ensuring complete resuspension of the VEOs and T cells within the BME mixture for homogeneous plating. BME should be worked with quickly when exposed to room temperature and should not be disturbed during regular media changes by focusing the media deposition on the outer edges of the well. If the BME dome containing VEOs and T cells detach from the bottom of the wells during co-culture, the co-cultures are still viable, but special care must be taken when changing media to avoid aspirating the dome. In these instances, it is recommended that a light microscope be used during the process to locate the dome prior to removing media.
As a reductionist model, this co-culturing method is inherently limited by the lack of other cell types that would be otherwise present in vivo. Here, we are specifically focused on the interactions between epithelial cells and CD8 T cells; however, CD8 T cells in barrier tissues interact with and are influenced by other immune and non-immune cells, such as dendritic cells, macrophages, and fibroblasts. There have been several recent developments in building assembloid systems that incorporate more stromal and immune cells to better mimic the native tissue14,15. To fully harness the potential of these in vitro models, several engineering and biological challenges must be systematically addressed and overcome. One such challenge is the static nature of our system as it does not reflect the dynamic processes in vivo, such as continuous nutrient and gas exchange and waste removal. More complex organoid models with continuous perfusion and vascularized compartments are being attempted to address these issues16,17.
Despite these limitations, this VEO-T cell co-culture model nonetheless provides a high-throughput tool for studying CD8 TRM differentiation that has been hitherto limited by the difficulty of TRM extraction and maintenance in vitro. An improved in vitro model reduces the burden of animal study and provides an ethical and accurate cell culture alternative. In addition, T cells can be genetically modified to study the transcriptional regulation important for TRM development, function, and maintenance. Although this protocol focuses on murine vaginal organoids and T cells, it can potentially be adapted for other mucosal and non-mucosal epithelial organoids as well as human tissues, for many of which organoids have already been developed. Co-culturing organoids and T cells presents a powerful tool with which to study the signals important for CD8 TRM differentiation that can, in the future, enable more mechanistic studies into the immune control of infections and tumorigenesis, as well as the means to eliminate TRM in autoimmune pathologies18.
The authors have no competing interests to declare.
This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health Grant R01AI177704-01A1, R21AI183017-01, Brown University seed grant (to L.K.B.) and F31AI186444 (to Y.L.). We would like to thank Dr. Dorian B. McGavern (NINDS, NIH) for providing the Lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus expressing YFP. We acknowledge the help of Dr. Sanghyun Lee and his lab for help with the Cytation-5 imaging and Brown University flow cytometry core for facilitating the flow-based assays.
| 16% Paraformaldehyde Aqueous Solution | Electron Microscopy Sciences | 15710-S | |
| 24-Well Polystyrene Non-Treated Multiple Well Tissuce Culture Plates | VWR International | 10861-558 | |
| 2-Mercaptoethanol | Gibco | 21985023 | |
| 3 mL Sterile Syringes | Fisher Scientific | 14-955-457 | |
| 5 mL, Snap Cap, Sterile, Round-Bottom Polystyrene Test Tubes | Falcon | 352058 | |
| 60 mm Petri Dishes | Fisher Scientific | FB0875713A | |
| 70 μm Sterile Cell Strainers | Fisher Scientific | 22-363-548 | |
| 96-well Non-treated Polystyrene Round Bottom Microplates | Greiner Bio-One | 650101 | |
| 96-Well Polystyrene Non-Treated Multiple Well Tissue Culture Plates | VWR International | 10861-562 | |
| Albumin bovine/fraction V | Thermo Scientific Chemicals | J6465518 | |
| Ammonium Chloride | Fisher Scientific | A661-500 | |
| Amphotericin B | Sigma-Aldrich | A9528-100MG | |
| B-27 Supplement | Gibco | 17504044 | |
| ioTek Cytation 5 Cell Imaging Multimode Reader | |||
| DMEM/F12 1:1 Medium | Cytiva | SH30271.FS | |
| Dulbecco's Phosphate-Buffered Salt Solution 1x | Corning | 21031CV | |
| Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (0.5 M Solution/pH 8.0) | Fisher Scientific | BP2482-500 | |
| Extra Fine Micro Dissecting Scissors | Roboz Surgical Instrument Co. | RS-5882 | |
| Fetal Bovine Serum - Charcoal/Dextran Treated | R&D Systems | S11650 | |
| Flowjo v10 software | Becton, Dickinson and Company | FlowJo (RRID:SCR_008520) | |
| Graefe Forceps | Roboz Surgical Instrument Co. | RS-5135 | |
| HEPES Solution | Cytiva | SH30237.01 | |
| L-Glutamine (200 mM) | Gibco | A2916801 | |
| Magnet 5mL | Biolegend | 480019 | |
| Mouse CD8 Naïve T Cell Isolation Kit | Biolegend | 480044 | |
| Mouse EGF Recombinant Protein | Gibco | 315091MG | |
| Non-Essential Amino Acids Solution (100x) | Gibco | 11140050 | |
| Penicillin-Streptomycin solution | Cytiva | SV30010 | |
| Potassium Bicarbonate | MP Biomedicals | 0215255780 | |
| Purified anti-mouse CD3ε Antibody | Biolegend | 100360 | |
| Recombinant Mouse B7.1 (CD80)-Fc Chimera (carrier-free) | Biolegend | 555406 | |
| Recombinant Mouse IL-12 (p70) (carrier-free) | Biolegend | 577004 | |
| Recombinant Mouse IL-2 (carrier-free) | Biolegend | 575406 | |
| Reduced Growth Factor Basement Membrane Extract | R&D Systems | BME001-10 | |
| RPMI 1640 Media | Cytiva | SH30027.LS | |
| Sodium Azide | Fisher Scientific | S227I-25 | |
| Sodium Pyruvate (100 mM) | Gibco | 11360070 | |
| Trypsin 0.25% protease with porcine trypsin | Cytiva | SH30042.02 | |
| Viability Dye (Red 780) | Cytek Biosciences | 13-0865-T100 |