$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Motivational interviewing (MI) is a collaborative therapeutic approach that encourages behavioral change. During MI sessions, MI practitioners help patients articulate and foster their motivation for change1. To this aim, they use dialogue strategies, such as reflections or questions, reinforced by non-verbal behaviors, such as smiles or specific head and body postures.
As the frequency of mental health issues has increased in recent years, a gap has emerged between the demand for mental health services and the available resources2. This has led to longer waiting times for patients before they can access therapy2,3. One proposed solution to alleviate this issue involves virtual agents capable of replicating MI for patients awaiting appointments. By offering immediate support and intervention, these virtual agents can help reduce the impact of waiting periods, especially in therapeutic contexts that require multiple sessions4. Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of such agents or chatbots5,6,7,8,9 whose goal is not to replace MI experts; they are intended to serve as a complementary tool within the therapeutic process. For instance, they could provide MI intervention in between sessions.
Although previous MI agents often exhibit limited adaptive behaviors, MI is inherently a cooperative and adaptive form of communication. Therefore, developing an agent capable of adapting its dialogue to the context could significantly enhance the effectiveness of therapy10. During MI sessions, therapists adjust both their verbal (conversational strategies) and nonverbal behaviors based on the patient's responses, motivation, or engagement level11,12, as well as their individual profiles13. Depending on the patient's level of motivation, the therapist will modify their approach accordingly. Thus, personalization and adaptability are essential for developing effective MI virtual agents.
The Greta 2.0 platform14 is a modular virtual agent framework that supports real-time interactions. It has recently been extended to incorporate capabilities that enable the dynamic adaptation of generative AI models during interaction.
The platform includes a model called MODIFF-815, which generates real-time facial expressions that dynamically adapt to the user's own facial expressions. This diffusion-based model was trained on multimodal data collected in the context of MI, namely the AnnoMI corpus, constituted of counselling session videos between therapist and client pairs, collected on streaming platforms, such as YouTube and Viméo, and annotated in dialogue acts (a classification of utterances that denotes the actions performed e.g., Question, Greeting…) and action units (a taxonomy of human facial expression). This data conditions the generation not only on the user's current facial expression but also on MI-specific dialogue acts identified during the interaction, linked to the conversational strategies adopted. These include MI-relevant users' dialogue acts, such as change talk, as well as the agent's own dialogue acts, such as reflection or providing information. By integrating these multimodal signals in real time, the system allows the virtual agent to express socially and contextually appropriate facial expressions. By aligning its non-verbal behavior (NVB) to the context of the interaction, this virtual agent is designed to foster social rapport and support the initiation of intrinsic motivation throughout the interview process15.
Additionally, the platform integrates a dialogue system specifically designed for MI, called DREAM16. DREAM comprises a dialogue manager that selects the agent's next dialogue act based on the current dialogue state and the user's profile. Indeed, our analyses of the AnnoMI corpus revealed three profiles of MI patients: Open to Change (when the patient is motivated to change and seeks support), Receptive (when the patient has not yet considered change), and Resistant (when the patient does not intend to change)13. Before interacting with the virtual agent, users are attributed one of these three profiles according to their answers to the Decision Balance Scale (DBS) questionnaire17. This dialogue system is complemented by a large language model (LLM) that generates the agent's verbal output, corresponding to the dialogue act selected by the dialogue manager. This component enables contextual adaptation of the dialogue, marking an improvement over more rigid, rule-based approaches6. While recent studies have explored the use of LLMs to generate MI-consistent dialogue, they do not account for user profiles18,19. In contrast, this module dynamically adapts to the user's profile, which enhances rapport compared to these baseline systems.
The integration of these models into the Greta 2.0 platform enables dynamic MI interventions. Its modular implementation allows for the independent evaluation of each model's impact. In this paper, we present the method used to conduct experiments that assess the contributions of the MODIFF-8 and DREAM models to the MI dialogue delivered by the platform used. This method can also be used to deliver tailored MI interventions between sessions with MI practitioners. It requires a Windows computer with a 16 GB GPU and the installation of open-source software. Using this method, we demonstrate that our adaptation models improve the perceived quality of the MI delivery agent and enhance rapport building. We also observe improvement in the motivation of patients to change their behaviors when the agent uses adapted behaviors at the verbal and nonverbal levels, and conversational strategies levels. The results presented in this paper demonstrate the positive impact of tailoring the agent's MI intervention to each patient.
To support the design of this system, an in-depth literature review was conducted to explore the theoretical and practical foundations of nutritional coaching, including motivational interviewing, behavior change models, and user typologies. This review led to the development of a qualitative knowledge base structured around the intersection of two key dimensions: 1) users' readiness for change following the Transtheoretical Model19 that identifies 5 stages: pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation, action, and maintenance, and 2) their eating behavior profiles20 based on diet and psychologically related factors. Three profiles were identified: the intuitive eater (i.e., listens to their hunger and fullness cues, maintains a varied and predominantly plant-based diet, prioritizes high-quality, often organic foods), the emotional eater (i.e., copes with stress, loneliness, and joy through frequent snacking on sweets or fatty foods, often feeling guilty afterward) and, the restrictive eater (i.e., obsessed with food control, they count calories, follow frequent diets with yo-yo effects, and may have an eating disorder).
For each combination of stage and profile, context-specific dialogue strategies were proposed, including tailored SMART goals, motivational formulations, and concrete behavioral suggestions. The aim was to enable the virtual agent to dynamically adapt its interventions based on both psychological readiness and personal tendencies. This groundwork ensures a higher degree of personalization and empathy in interaction, which are crucial to sustaining user engagement and long-term behavioral change.