Method Article

Rapid Magnetic-microbead Method for Efficient Purification of Low-density Neutrophils

DOI:

10.3791/69407

November 11th, 2025

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Low-density neutrophils (LDN) increase significantly in several diseases. LDN are usually isolated through cell sorting. We present a practical method to obtain pure and viable LDN. After density-gradient centrifugation of peripheral blood, cells are incubated with magnetic microbeads, and then LDN are separated through magnetic columns.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Neutrophils, important leukocytes of innate immunity, have traditionally been considered a homogeneous cell population. Nevertheless, recent evidence has shown that neutrophils exist in several subpopulations. One such subpopulation is low-density neutrophils (LDN). LDN are found in small numbers in the blood of healthy individuals, but their numbers increase significantly in diseases such as systemic lupus erythematosus, autoimmune disorders, cancer, and infections. In these cases, LDN may participate in the pathogenesis of the disease. The only way to isolate LDN is through density-gradient centrifugation of peripheral blood. However, after centrifugation, LDN co-purify with mononuclear cells. Thus, studying this neutrophil subpopulation is challenging. There is no standard methodology to separate LDN from mononuclear cells. Typically, LDN are separated by cell sorting in a flow cytometer. However, this method requires long sorting times (hours) to obtain enough pure cells for further functional studies. This seriously affects the viability and function of cells. Here, we propose a practical method to obtain large numbers of pure and viable LDN in a short time. After density-gradient centrifugation, the mononuclear cell fraction is incubated with anti-CD66b magnetic microbeads, and then LDN are separated through magnetic columns in < 30 min. Purified LDN (CD66b+ cells) are labelled with monoclonal antibodies against CD10, CD11b, CD14, CD15, CD16b, CD33, CD62L, CD66b, and CD98, and are analyzed by flow cytometry for confirmation. Purified LDN are completely functional as indicated by their capacity to produce reactive oxygen species, and to form neutrophil extracellular traps. This new purification method results in LDN with high purity (more than 90%) and viability (more than 96%) in a short time period. This method can easily be scaled up to obtain large numbers of pure LDN to evaluate LDN functions in different diseases through biochemical or other omics analysis.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Neutrophils, the predominant leukocytes in human blood1, are key participants of the innate immune system. They arrive in large numbers to tissues with inflammation or infection2. There, neutrophils activate several effector functions, such as phagocytosis3,4, degranulation5,6, and formation of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)7. Additionally, neutrophils also participate in the adaptive immune response8. The classical view of neutrophils considers them as homogeneous cells produced in the bone marrow with predetermined responses9,10. However, recent studies reveal that neutrophils are heterogeneous cells with multiple phenotypic and functional states under both healthy and disease states11,12,13,14,15.

Among several neutrophil subpopulations, the low-density neutrophils (LDN) have attracted much interest because of their intrinsic properties and because they increase in numbers in several diseases16,17,18. LDN were found in the blood of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients in 198619. They were detected following the process for separating leukocytes in a density gradient20,21. After centrifugation of blood or leukocyte-rich plasma on a density medium (e.g., Ficoll-Paque), monocytes and lymphocytes (known as peripheral blood mononuclear cells [PBMC]) form a band in the upper (low-density) part of the tube. Neutrophils sediment at the bottom of the tube. Among the PBMC, a few neutrophils were also found; these are LDN (Figure 1). Small numbers of LDN are in the blood of healthy individuals22. However, LDN numbers increase significantly in multiple immunosuppression and chronic inflammation conditions, including SLE23,24, sepsis25, psoriasis26, asthma27, juvenile idiopathic arthritis28, anti-neutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA)-associated vasculitis29, HIV infection30, malaria31 and tuberculosis32. Although LDN numbers increase in all the mentioned pathologies, LDN have been mostly studied in the context of SLE17. LDN from the blood of SLE patients seems to have a greater capacity to form NETs33, to secrete large amounts of proinflammatory mediators34, and to activate T cells24. However, in other conditions, such as cancer, LDN are reported to consist of mature and immature neutrophils35, with T-cell suppressive properties36,37,38. Similarly, in COVID-19 patients, LDN are also reported to suppress T cell proliferation39, but contrary to SLE, LDN seems to produce fewer NETs39. Therefore, the origin, composition, and functional properties of LDN are still controversial.

Because LDN are found together with PBMC, studying them is technically complicated. To fully explore LDN properties in different pathologies, it is necessary to purify them. A common procedure of LDN separation is fluorescent cell sorting22,40,41,42,43,44,45. However, cell sorting requires a long time for cell separation. This may lead to cell loss or low recovery if the sorting time is not sufficient. In addition, cells are subjected to excessive stress, causing variable results while studying the function of these cells. Long sorting time also increases the cost of experimental procedures and requires specialized personnel.

Here, we present a rapid and efficient method for obtaining large numbers of pure and viable human LDN in a very short time. After density-gradient centrifugation, LDN are separated by magnetic cell sorting (MACS; Figure 1). The main advantage of this purification method is that LDN are separated with high purity (more than 90%) and viability (more than 96%). Also, purified LDN are completely functional as indicated by their capacity to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) and to release NETs. This protocol can be easily implemented in any laboratory interested in neutrophil biology to quickly separate LDN from the blood of people with multiple diseases in order to further study these cells.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

All procedures in this protocol follow the guidelines of the Human Research Bioethics Committee at Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas - Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM). All participants provided informed consent.

1. Isolation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and neutrophils from human blood

  1. Obtain about 10 mL of blood from a healthy adult volunteer by venipuncture. Add 10 U/mL of heparin as an anticoagulant.
    ​CAUTION: Dispose of the needle into a biohazard needle disposal container. Syringes and other materials in touch with blood should be placed in a bag and autoclaved before disposal.
  2. In a 15 mL conical centrifuge tube, add 2 mL of 6% dextran T500 in PBS. Then add 10 mL of blood by draining it down the side of the tube. Invert the tube a couple of times to mix the blood and dextran.
  3. Let the tube rest for 45 min, while erythrocytes sediment. The leukocyte-rich plasma appears above the erythrocyte layer.
  4. In another 15 mL centrifuge tube, add 5 mL of density gradient medium. Carefully pipette the plasma, without touching the erythrocytes, and layer it on top of the medium. Two separate phases must be formed.
  5. Centrifuge the tube at 516 x g for 20 min at 4 °C. Mononuclear cells (PBMC) form a band between plasma and the medium layers. Neutrophils form a pellet at the bottom (Figure 1).
  6. Isolation of PBMC
    1. Eliminate by aspiration the plasma on top of the PBMC without touching the cells. Collect the cells from the band between the plasma and the medium. Make sure to aspirate as little medium as possible.
    2. Place cells into a 50 mL conical centrifuge tube. Add 20 mL of PBS. Centrifuge the tube at 400 x g for 5 min at 4 °C.
    3. Carefully aspirate the supernatant and scrape the tube to separate the cells. Add 10 mL of cold PBS to resuspend the cells. Count the PBMC using a Neubauer chamber.
      NOTE: Do not use a pipette to resuspend the cells, because this may damage the cells.
  7. Isolation of neutrophils
    1. Remove the density gradient medium. Separate the cells by scraping the tube and add 10 mL of cold PBS.
    2. Put the cells into a fresh 50 mL centrifuge tube and centrifuge at 400 x g for 5 min at 4 °C. Aspirate the supernatant and separate the cells as described in step 1.6.3.
  8. To eliminate residual erythrocytes, add 10 mL of cold hypotonic solution (0.2% NaCl, 1% BSA, 20 mM Hepes, pH = 7.4), and mix gently for exactly 1 min.
  9. Quickly add 10 mL of cold hypertonic solution (1.6% NaCl, 1% BSA, 20 mM HEPES, pH = 7.4) to make the solution isotonic.
  10. Count the neutrophils using a Neubauer chamber (purity > 95%). Pellet the cells by centrifuging as in step 1.6.2. and resuspend them in cold PBS. Maintain the tube on ice.
    NOTE: It is reported that the half-life of neutrophils in vitro is 8 - 12 h46,47,48. In our experience with this protocol, neutrophils maintain their functions for approximately 6 to 8 h.

2. Purification of low-density neutrophils (LDN)

  1. Centrifuge PBMC at 400 x g for 5 min at 4 °C. Remove supernatant and resuspend cells in 120 µL of cold wash buffer (1% BSA in PBS).
  2. Add 35 µL of CD66b magnetic microbeads. Incubate the mixture in the dark at 4 °C for 30 min. Mix gently every 10 min to prevent cell aggregation.
  3. Add 1 mL of cold wash buffer. Place cells in a microcentrifuge and spin at 400 x g for 3 min.
  4. Remove supernatant, separate the cell pellet by scraping the tube, and resuspend cells in 1 mL of wash buffer.
  5. Place a magnetic separation column onto a magnet. Add 0.5 mL of wash buffer to the column and let it pass through the column.
  6. Transfer cells (1 mL) onto the column. Let the buffer pass through the column drop by drop.
  7. Add 0.5 mL of wash buffer into the column and let it pass through. Add another 0.5 mL of wash buffer into the column.
  8. Remove the column from the magnet and put it in a microcentrifuge tube. Add 1 mL of wash buffer to the column.
  9. Insert the plunger on top of the column and gently apply pressure to elute the cells. Remove the plunger and put the column on top of a new microcentrifuge tube.
  10. Add another 1 mL of wash buffer. Insert the plunger on top of the column and gently apply pressure to elute the cells.
  11. Place both tubes in a microcentrifuge and spin them at 800 x g for 3 min. Finally, resuspend the cells (LDN) from both tubes into 1 mL of cold PBS. Keep on ice.
    NOTE: The first 2 mL of flow-through contains the rest of the PBMC. These cells can be used for other studies.

3. Multicolor flow cytometry

  1. Resuspend purified cells at 1 x 106 cell/mL in labeling buffer (1% FBS in PBS). Add 250 µL of cells into a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube.
  2. Add the corresponding antibodies against neutrophil membrane molecules (for details, see Table of Materials). Incubate the cells for 30 min at 4 °C, protecting them from light.
  3. Add 1 mL of PBS. Place tubes in a microcentrifuge and spin them at 800 x g for 3 min.
  4. Aspirate the supernatant, break the cell pellet by tapping the tube, and resuspend cells in 0.5 mL of 1% paraformaldehyde.
  5. Keep the cells at 4 °C protected from light, until analyzed by flow cytometry. Analyze cells by flow cytometry, capturing 10,000 events per sample. Perform cell sorting as previously described22.
    CAUTION: Paraformaldehyde is an irritant to the skin and the respiratory tract. Make sure you do not breathe the vapors.

4. Detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS)

  1. In a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube, add 2.5 x 105 cells. Place tubes in a microcentrifuge and spin at 800 x g for 3 min.
  2. Aspirate the supernatant, scrape the tube to separate the cells, and resuspend the cells in 100 µL of 15 µM dihydrorhodamine 123 in PBS.
  3. Incubate the cells protected from light at 37 °C for 20 min. Add 1 mL of PBS.
  4. Place tubes in a microcentrifuge and spin at 800 x g for 3 min. Aspirate the supernatant, scrape the tube to separate the cells, and resuspend them in 100 µL of 50 nM phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) in PBS.
  5. Incubate the cells protected from light at 37 °C for 45 min. Add 1 mL of PBS.
  6. Place tubes in a microcentrifuge and spin them at 800 x g for 3 min. Aspirate the supernatant, scrape the tube to separate the cells, and resuspend them in 0.5 mL of 1% paraformaldehyde in PBS.
  7. Keep the cells at 4 °C protected from light until analyzed by flow cytometry. Analyze cells by flow cytometry, capturing 10,000 events per sample.

5. Visualization of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)

  1. Place coverslips in wells of a 12-well plate and cover them with 10 µg/mL poly-L-Lysine. Incubate the plate overnight at 4 °C with gentle agitation.
  2. Remove the poly-L-Lysine, and wash the coverslips with PBS, incubating the plate for 5 min at room temperature with gentle agitation. Wash the coverslips with PBS two more times.
  3. Remove the PBS and let the coverslips dry by placing the plate inside a laminar-flow hood for 2 h.
  4. Resuspend LDN at 1 x 106 cell/mL in RPMI-1640 medium with 5% FBS. Take 350 µL (3.5 x 105 cells) of the cell suspension and put them into a well of the 12-well plate containing the coverslips.
  5. Keep the plate for 30 min in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. Add 3.5 µL of 5 µM PMA diluted in PBS to each well (final concentration of PMA is 50 nM).
  6. Keep the plate for 4 h in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. Add 350 µL of 8% paraformaldehyde in PBS, and keep the plate overnight in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C.
  7. Place a transparent film over a test tube stand as previously described49, so that wells are formed on the tube holes.
  8. Fill each well with the various solutions to wash or stain the coverslips, forming a big drop. Remove the coverslips and put them upside down on a drop of water for 5 min. In the same manner, wash the coverslips three more times with water.
  9. Place the coverslips upside down on a drop of blocking buffer (5% BSA in PBS) and incubate for 20 min at room temperature.
  10. Transfer the coverslips to a drop of the corresponding primary antibody (e.g., anti-elastase or anti-citrulline) in blocking buffer and incubate for 60 min at room temperature.
  11. Wash coverslips 2x in 0.01% Tween-20 in PBS. Transfer the coverslips to a drop of the corresponding secondary antibody in blocking buffer containing 150 nM DAPI, and incubate for 60 min at room temperature, protected from light.
  12. Wash coverslips 2x in 0.01% Tween-20 in PBS. Place a drop of antifade mounting medium onto a glass slide and put coverslips upside down.
  13. Seal coverslips around the perimeter with nail polish. Store mounted slides at 4 °C, protected from light. Visualize NETs using a fluorescence microscope.

6. Detection of neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs)

  1. Resuspend cells at 5 x 105 cell/mL in 500 nM Sytox Green, diluted in RPMI-1640 medium with 5% FBS.
  2. Take 100 µL (5 x 104 cells) of the cell suspension and put them into a well of a 96-well tissue culture plate.
  3. Keep the plate for 20 min in a 5% CO2 incubator at 37 °C. Add to each well 20 µL of 300 nM PMA diluted in RPMI-1640 medium (final concentration of PMA is 50 nM).
  4. Transfer the plate to a pre-warmed microplate reader. Incubate the plate at 35 °C for 4 h, taking fluorescence measurements from the bottom of the plate every 5 min (using the 485 nm excitation and 528 nm emission filters).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Low-density neutrophils (LDN) in healthy individuals represent around 5% of the PBMC (Figure 2A). The protocol described here typically delivers pure (> 90%) LDN. Cells are also efficiently recovered (yield around 98%) with high viability (> 95%; Figure 2B). For comparison, LDN were also purified by fluorescent-activated cell sorting as previously described22. Briefly, PBMC were labelled with anti-CD...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Generally, neutrophils were thought of as homogeneous cells. However, recent evidence has shown that neutrophils could exist as cells with different activation states and/or multiple phenotypes. Thus, various neutrophil subpopulations may exist13,14,15. One neutrophil subpopulation, the low-density neutrophils (LDN), has acquired great interest due to their particular intrinsic properties and also because they increase in multip...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors state that this study was carried out without any commercial or financial ties that might be perceived as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors thank César Díaz-Godínez (Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas-UNAM) for his help with fluorescent microscopy to visualize NETs. This research was supported by grant PAPIIT IN205523 from Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM), Mexico, and by grant CF-2023-I-610 from Secretaría de Ciencias, Humanidades, Tecnología e Inovación (Secihti), Mexico.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
 Anti-Citrulline rabbit polyclonal antibodyAbCamab1009321/50 dilution
96-well tissue culture plateCostar; Corning, Inc.3596
Alexa Fluor 488 anti-human CD11b mouse IgG1 antibodyBioLegend3013170.25 μg/mL
Alexa Fluor 647 anti-human CD66b mouse IgM antibodyBioLegend3051090.05 μg/mL
Anti-Mouse IgG (H+L) goat antibody, Alexa Fluor 488Invitrogen - Thermo Fisher ScientificA-110011/50 dilution
Anti-Neutrophil Elastase mouse monoclonal IgG1 antibodySanta Cruz Biotechnologysc-5554910 µg/mL
Anti-Rabbit IgG (H+L) donkey antibody, Alexa Fluor 555Invitrogen - Thermo Fisher ScientificA-315721/50 dilution
APC anti-human CD62L mouse IgG1 antibodyBioLegend3048090.03 μg/mL
APC/Cyanine7 anti-human CD14 mouse IgG1 antibodyBioLegend3671070.25 μg/mL
Attune NxT flow cytometer Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc.(blue/red lasers)
Bovine serum albumin (BSA) Fraction VMP Biomedicals810025
Brilliant Violet 510 anti-human CD33 mouse IgG1 antibodyBioLegend3666090.30 μg/mL
DAPICalbiochem/EMD Millipore268298
Dextran T500Pharmacosmos A/C5.51005E+11
Dihydrorhodamine-123Anaspec, Inc.AS-85711
FACS cell sorterBecton Dickinson Model FACSAria
Fetal bovine serum (FBS)Gibco16000-044
Ficoll-PaqueMerck KGGE 17-1440-03
FITC anti-human CD98 mouse IgG1 antibodyBioLegend3156030.30 μg/mL
FlowJo SoftwareBecton DickinsonVersion 10, 2019
Fluorescence inverted microscopeOlympusModel IX-70
HeparinInhepar - PiSA Farmaceutica36601495000 UI/mL
HepesSigma AldrichH7006
MACSprep Chimerism CD66b MicrobeadsMiltenyi Biotec130-111-552
MagnetMiltenyi Biotec130-042-102
Magnetic separation columnMiltenyi Biotec130-042-201
MicrocentrifugeEppendorfModel 5415C
Microplate readerBioTek InstrumentsModel Synergy HT
ParaformaldehydeSigma Aldrich158127
PE anti-human CD10 mouse IgG1 antibodyBioLegend3122030.05 μg/mL
PE anti-human CD16b mouse IgG2a antibodyBD Pharmingen5508681/40 dilution
PE/Cyanine5 anti-human CD15 mouse IgG1 antibodyBioLegend3230130.25 μg/mL
Phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA)Sigma AldrichP8139
poly-L-LysineSigma AldrichP2658
Refrigerated centrifugeEppendorfModel 5702R
RPMI-1640 tissue culture mediumGibco23400-021
SYTOX GreenMolecular Probes, Inc.S-7020
Tween-20 Sigma AldrichP2287
VectashieldVector LaboratoriesH-1000

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Yvan-Charvet, L., Ng, L. G. Granulopoiesis and neutrophil homeostasis: A metabolic, daily balancing act. Trends Immunol. 40 (7), 598-612 (2019).
  2. Liew, P. X., Kubes, P. The neutrophil's role during health and disease. Physiol. Rev. 99 (2), 1223-1248 (2019).
  3. Rosales, C., Uribe-Querol, E. Phagocytosis: A fundamental process in immunity. Biomed Res Int. 2017, 9042851(2017).
  4. Uribe-Querol, E., Rosales, C. Phagocytosis: Our current understanding of a universal biological process. Front Immunol. 11, 1066(2020).
  5. Faurschou, M., Borregaard, N. Neutrophil granules and secretory vesicles in inflammation. Microbes Infect. 5 (14), 1317-1327 (2003).
  6. Lacy, P., Eitzen, G. Control of granule exocytosis in neutrophils. Front Biosci. 13, 5559-5570 (2008).
  7. Papayannopoulos, V. Neutrophil extracellular traps in immunity and disease. Nat Rev Immunol. 18 (2), 134-147 (2018).
  8. Rosales, C. Neutrophils at the crossroads of innate and adaptive immunity. J Leukoc Biol. 108 (1), 377-396 (2020).
  9. Borregaard, N. Neutrophils, from marrow to microbes. Immunity. 33 (5), 657-670 (2010).
  10. Lawrence, S. M., Corriden, R., Nizet, V. The ontogeny of a neutrophil: Mechanisms of granulopoiesis and homeostasis. Microbiol Mol Biol. Rev. 82 (1), e00057-e00117 (2018).
  11. Aroca-Crevillén, A., Vicanolo, T., Ovadia, S., Hidalgo, A. Neutrophils in physiology and pathology. Annu Rev Pathol. 19, 227-259 (2024).
  12. Hellebrekers, P., Vrisekoop, N., Koenderman, L. Neutrophil phenotypes in health and disease. Eur J Clin Invest. 48 (Suppl 2), e12943(2018).
  13. Ng, L. G., Ostuni, R., Hidalgo, A. Heterogeneity of neutrophils. Nat Rev Immunol. 19 (4), 255-265 (2019).
  14. Qu, J., Jin, J., Zhang, M., Ng, L. G. Neutrophil diversity and plasticity: Implications for organ transplantation. Cell Mol Immunol. 20 (9), 993-1001 (2023).
  15. Rosales, C. Neutrophil: A cell with many roles in inflammation or several cell types. Front Physiol. 9, 113(2018).
  16. Silvestre-Roig, C., Fridlender, Z. G., Glogauer, M., Scapini, P. Neutrophil diversity in health and disease. Trends Immunol. 40 (7), 565-583 (2019).
  17. Carmona-Rivera, C., Kaplan, M. J. Low-density granulocytes in systemic autoimmunity and autoinflammation. Immunol Rev. 314 (1), 313-325 (2023).
  18. Ning, X., Wang, W. M., Jin, H. Z. Low-density granulocytes in immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. J Immunol. 2022, 1622160(2022).
  19. Hacbarth, E., Kajdacsy-Balla, A. Low density neutrophils in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and acute rheumatic fever. Arthritis Rheum. 29 (11), 1334-1342 (1986).
  20. Böyum, A. Isolation of mononuclear cells and granulocytes from human blood. Isolation of monuclear cells by one centrifugation, and of granulocytes by combining centrifugation and sedimentation at 1 g. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl. 97, 77-89 (1968).
  21. García-García, E., Uribe-Querol, E., Rosales, C. A simple and efficient method to detect nuclear factor activation in human neutrophils by flow cytometry. J Vis Exp. (74), e50410(2013).
  22. Blanco-Camarillo, C., Alemán, O. R., Rosales, C. Low-density neutrophils in healthy individuals display a mature primed phenotype. Front Immunol. 12, 672520(2021).
  23. Midgley, A., Beresford, M. W. Increased expression of low-density granulocytes in juvenile-onset systemic lupus erythematosus patients correlates with disease activity. Lupus. 25 (4), 407-411 (2016).
  24. Rahman, S., et al. Low-density granulocytes activate T cells and demonstrate a non-suppressive role in systemic lupus erythematosus. Ann Rheum Dis. 78 (7), 957-966 (2019).
  25. Morisaki, T., Goya, T., Ishimitsu, T., Torisu, M. The increase of low-density subpopulations and CD10 (calla) negative neutrophils in severely infected patients. Surg Today. 22, 322-327 (1992).
  26. Lin, A. M., et al. Mast cells and neutrophils release IL-17 through extracellular trap formation in psoriasis. J Immunol. 187 (1), 490-500 (2011).
  27. Fu, J., Tobin, M. C., Thomas, L. L. Neutrophil-like low-density granulocytes are elevated in patients with moderate to severe persistent asthma. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 113 (6), 635-640 (2014).
  28. Ramanathan, K., et al. Neutrophil activation signature in juvenile idiopathic arthritis indicates the presence of low-density granulocytes. Rheumatology (Oxford). 57 (3), 488-498 (2018).
  29. Grayson, P. C., et al. Neutrophil-related gene expression and low-density granulocytes associated with disease activity and response to treatment in antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 67 (7), 1922-1932 (2015).
  30. Cloke, T., Munder, M., Taylor, G., Müller, I., Kropf, P. Characterization of a novel population of low-density granulocytes associated with disease severity in HIV-1 infection. PLoS One. 7, e48939(2012).
  31. Rocha, B. C., et al. Type I interferon transcriptional signature in neutrophils and low-density granulocytes is associated with tissue damage in malaria. Cell Rep. 13 (12), 2829-2841 (2015).
  32. Deng, Y., et al. Low-density granulocytes are elevated in mycobacterial infection and associated with the severity of tuberculosis. PLoS One. 11 (4), e0153567(2016).
  33. Villanueva, E., et al. Netting neutrophils induce endothelial damage, infiltrate tissues, and expose immunostimulatory molecules in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Immunol. 187 (1), 538-552 (2011).
  34. Denny, M. F., et al. A distinct subset of proinflammatory neutrophils isolated from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus induces vascular damage and synthesizes type I IFNs. J Immunol. 184 (6), 3284-3297 (2010).
  35. Sagiv, J. Y., et al. Phenotypic diversity and plasticity in circulating neutrophil subpopulations in cancer. Cell Rep. 10 (4), 562-573 (2015).
  36. Sionov, R. V., Fridlender, Z. G., Granot, Z. The multifaceted roles neutrophils play in the tumor microenvironment. Cancer Microenviron. 8 (December), 125-158 (2015).
  37. Hassani, M., et al. On the origin of low-density neutrophils. J Leukoc Biol. 107 (5), 809-818 (2020).
  38. Vanhaver, C., et al. Immunosuppressive low-density neutrophils in the blood of cancer patients display a mature phenotype. Life Sci Alliance. 7 (1), e202302332(2023).
  39. Dwivedi, A., et al. Emergence of dysfunctional neutrophils with a defect in arginase-1 release in severe COVID-19. JCI Insight. 9 (17), e171659(2024).
  40. Cabrera, L. E., et al. Characterization of low-density granulocytes in COVID-19. PLoS Pathog. 17 (7), e1009721(2021).
  41. Dumont, B. L., et al. Low-density neutrophils and neutrophil extracellular traps (nets) are new inflammatory players in heart failure. Can J Cardiol. 40 (9), 1524-1535 (2024).
  42. Dumont, B. L., et al. Low-density neutrophils contribute to subclinical inflammation in patients with type 2 diabetes. Int J Mol Sci. 25 (3), 1674(2024).
  43. Jones, B. E., et al. Anca autoantigen gene expression highlights neutrophil heterogeneity, where expression in normal-density neutrophils correlates with anca-induced activation. Kidney Int. 98 (3), 744-757 (2020).
  44. Li, Y., et al. The proportion, origin, and pro-inflammation roles of low-density neutrophils in SFTS disease. BMC Infect. Dis. 19 (1), 109(2019).
  45. Martin, K. R., et al. Cd98 defines a metabolically flexible, proinflammatory subset of low-density neutrophils in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Transl Med. 13 (1), e1150(2023).
  46. Murphy, M. P., Caraher, E. Mcl-1 is vital for neutrophil survival. Immunol Res. 62 (2), 225-233 (2015).
  47. Nauseef, W. M. Neutrophils, from cradle to grave and beyond. Immunol Rev. 273 (1), 5-10 (2016).
  48. Pérez-Figueroa, E., Álvarez-Carrasco, P., Ortega, E., Maldonado-Bernal, C. Neutrophils: Many ways to die. Front Immunol. 12, 631821(2021).
  49. Brinkmann, V., Laube, B., Abu Abed, U., Goosmann, C., Zychlinsky, A. Neutrophil extracellular traps: How to generate and visualize them. J Vis Exp. (36), e1724(2010).
  50. Emmendörffer, A., Hecht, M., Lohmann-Matthes, M. L., Roesler, J. A fast and easy method to determine the production of reactive oxygen intermediates by human and murine phagocytes using dihydrorhodamine 123. J Immunol Methods. 131 (2), 269-227 (1990).
  51. Pioch, J., Blomgran, R. Optimized flow cytometry protocol for dihydrorhodamine 123-based detection of reactive oxygen species in leukocyte subpopulations in whole blood. J Immunol Methods. 507, 113308(2022).
  52. Liu, X., et al. Pad4 takes charge during neutrophil activation: Impact of pad4 mediated net formation on immune-mediated disease. J Thromb Haemost. 19 (7), 1607-1617 (2021).
  53. Wang, Y., et al. Histone hypercitrullination mediates chromatin decondensation and neutrophil extracellular trap formation. J Cell Biol. 184 (2), 205-213 (2009).
  54. Alemán, O. R., Mora, N., Cortes-Vieyra, R., Uribe-Querol, E., Rosales, C. Transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1 is required for human fcγriiib-induced neutrophil extracellular trap formation. Front Immunol. 7, 277(2016).
  55. Kraaij, T., et al. A novel method for high-throughput detection and quantification of neutrophil extracellular traps reveals ROS-independent net release with immune complexes. Autoimmun Rev. 15 (6), 577-584 (2016).
  56. Sanchez Gonzalez, A., Bardoel, B. W., Harbort, C. J., Zychlinsky, A. Neutrophil methods and protocols. , Humana Press - Springer Science+Business Media. New York. (2014).
  57. Mishalian, I., Granot, Z., Fridlender, Z. G. The diversity of circulating neutrophils in cancer. Immunobiology. 222 (1), 82-88 (2017).
  58. Wright, H. L., Makki, F. A., Moots, R. J., Edwards, S. W. Low-density granulocytes: Functionally distinct, immature neutrophils in rheumatoid arthritis with altered properties and defective TNF signalling. J Leukoc Biol. 101 (2), 599-611 (2017).
  59. Bruger, A. M., et al. How to measure the immunosuppressive activity of mdsc: Assays, problems and potential solutions. Cancer Immunol Immunother. 68 (4), 631-644 (2019).
  60. Kimberly, R. P., Ahlstrom, J. W., Click, M. E., Edberg, J. C. The glycosyl phosphatidylinositol-linked FCγRIII PMN mediates transmembrane signaling events distinct from FCγRII. J Exp Med. 171 (4), 1239-1255 (1990).
  61. Rosales, C., Uribe-Querol, E. Fc receptors: Cell activators of antibody functions. Adv Biosci Biotech. 4, 21-33 (2013).
  62. Unkeless, J. C., Shen, Z., Lin, C. W., Debeus, E. Function of human fcγriia and fcγriiib. Semin Immunol. 7 (1), 37-44 (1995).
  63. Ghaemdoust, F., Keshavarz-Fathi, M., Rezaei, N. Natural killer cells and cancer therapy, what we know and where we are going. Immunotherapy. 11 (14), 1231-1251 (2019).
  64. Lanier, L. L., Le, A. M., Civin, C. I., Loken, M. R., Phillips, J. H. The relationship of CD16 (leu-11) and leu-19 (NKH-1) antigen expression on human peripheral blood NK cells and cytotoxic T lymphocytes. J Immunol. 136 (12), 4480-4486 (1986).
  65. Huizinga, T. W., et al. The pi-linked receptor fcriii is released on stimulation of neutrophils. Nature. 333 (6174), 667-669 (1988).
  66. Jongstra-Bilen, J., Harrison, R., Grinstein, S. Fcγ-receptors induce mac-1 (cd11b/cd18) mobilization and accumulation in the phagocytic cup for optimal phagocytosis. J Biol Chem. 278 (46), 45720-45729 (2003).
  67. Tak, T., et al. Human CD62Ldim neutrophils identified as a separate subset by proteome profiling and in vivo pulse-chase labeling. Blood. 129 (26), 3476-3485 (2017).
  68. Lakschevitz, F. S., et al. Identification of neutrophil surface marker changes in health and inflammation using high-throughput screening flow cytometry. Exp Cell Res. 342 (2), 200-209 (2016).
  69. Schröder, A. K., Uciechowski, P., Fleischer, D., Rink, L. Crosslinking of CD66 b on peripheral blood neutrophils mediates the release of interleukin-8 from intracellular storage. Hum Immunol. 67 (9), 676-682 (2006).
  70. Skubitz, K. M., Campbell, K. D., Skubitz, A. P. Cd66a, cd66b, cd66c, and cd66d each independently stimulate neutrophils. J Leukoc Biol. 60 (1), 106-117 (1996).
  71. Basic principle of magnetic cell separation. , Miltenyi Biotec. https://www.miltenyibiotec.com/UN-en/products/macs-cell-separation/basic-principle-of-magnetic-cell-separation.html?query=:relevance:allCategoriesOR:10000089 (2025).
  72. Connelly, A. N., et al. Optimization of methods for the accurate characterization of whole blood neutrophils. Sci. Rep. 12 (1), 3667(2022).
  73. Hardisty, G. R., et al. High purity isolation of low density neutrophils casts doubt on their exceptionality in health and disease. Front Immunol. 12, 625922(2021).
  74. Sørensen, O. E., Borregaard, N. Neutrophil extracellular traps - the dark side of neutrophils. J Clin Invest. 126 (5), 1612-1620 (2016).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Low Density NeutrophilsMagnetic MicrobeadsNeutrophil PurificationDensity GradientPeripheral BloodFlow CytometryMononuclear CellsReactive Oxygen SpeciesNeutrophil Extracellular TrapsCD66b Marker

Related Articles