$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
The epididymis is a mucosal male reproductive organ composed of a single, highly convoluted tubule that connects the efferent ducts to the vas deferens. The epididymis is essential for sperm maturation (acquisition of sperm motility and fertilizing ability), concentration, transport, storage, and protection until the ejaculation1,2. Classically, the rodent epididymis has four anatomical regions: the initial segment, caput, corpus, and cauda1 (Figure 1). Furthermore, each region of the epididymis can be subdivided into additional segments separated by interstitial connective septa, indicating the presence of 10 segments in the mouse epididymis3 (Figure 1).
The immunobiology of the epididymis is an expanding field of investigation due to the association between immune dysregulation and male infertility4. Studies in the last two decades have unraveled that the epididymis is populated by different components of the immune system, such as resident immune cell types (e.g., mononuclear phagocytes and lymphocytes) and pathogen-recognition receptors [PRRs, e.g., Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and NOD-like receptors] expressed on several non-immune and immune cell types, which together create dynamic region-specific epididymal microenvironments5,6,7,8,9. These epididymal immune components play a crucial role in the dual ability of the epididymis to coordinate immune tolerance towards immunogenic spermatozoa while rapidly triggering immune responses to ascending urethral infections and other harmful stimuli4,10. Factors affecting this intricate immune balance in the epididymis warrant further investigation since they can be detrimental to epididymal function and, thus, may negatively impact male fertility.
In this context, inflammatory diseases of the epididymis, collectively known as epididymitis, are highly prevalent in men of all ages and are important etiological factors in male subfertility and infertility4,11,12. Epididymitis is the fifth most common male urological diagnosis in men between 18 and 50 years old, with ~600,000 cases per year in the US alone4,13. Ascending canalicular infections with urogenital pathogens (e.g., Escherichia coli) or sexually transmitted diseases (e.g., Chlamydia trachomatis) are the most common cause of epididymitis4,14. Most epididymitis patients experience pain in the cauda epididymidis but less frequently in the caput region, underscoring the clinical implications associated with the ability of the epididymis to trigger region-specific responses to inflammatory stimuli10. Epididymitis can cause profound deterioration in seminal parameters (e.g., sperm concentration and motility), together with pronounced leukocytospermia in the acute phase of the disease4,12,15. Notably, a substantial cohort of epididymitis patients suffers from persistent oligozoospermia or azoospermia, despite successful pharmacological therapy and symptom remission16,17. The mechanisms underlying the long-term impact of epididymitis outcomes on sperm quality remain poorly understood.
Human acute epididymitis samples are rare, since epididymal biopsies are contraindicated due to the risk of uncontrolled dissemination of pathogens through the puncture, which can lead to sepsis and organ damage, and sperm leakage to the interstitial compartment due to duct rupture4. Thus, animal models of epididymitis represent relevant tools to investigate the disease mechanisms, allowing the evaluation of inflammatory responses and outcomes4,12. In this regard, rodents (rats and mice) represent the most common model organisms used to study epididymitis in a controlled experimental setting4,12. Different rodent models of bacterial epididymitis have been established based on the type of pathogen (e.g., uropathogenic E. coli and C. trachomatis), infection routes (e.g., retrograde canalicular injection and interstitial injection), local of infection (e.g., initial segment and cauda epididymidis), and temporal post-injection course (e.g., hours to days)4,12.
The use of pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) represents a valuable tool to study epididymitis, since it allows the investigation of pathophysiological mechanisms of the disease triggered by different molecules associated with distinct pathogens (e.g., bacteria, viruses, and fungi) through the activation of specific PRRs, such as TLRs and signaling pathways5,18,19,20,21. For instance, PAMPs derived from the cell wall of Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria, such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS; TLR4 agonist) and lipoteichoic acid (LTA; TLR2/TLR6 agonist), respectively, have been used to elicit epididymitis through multiple administration routes, including intravenous, intraperitoneal, or via direct injection into the epididymal regions10. Under these conditions, both LPS and LTA have been shown to induce inflammatory responses in the epididymis in rats and mice, associated with modulation of a distinct subset of inflammatory mediators and immune cell recruitment in a region- and temporal-specific manner19,20. In particular, the region-specific administration of PAMPs in the interstitial compartment of the initial segment or in the luminal compartment of the vas deferens toward the cauda epididymidis of mice recently emerged as relevant models to investigate the proximal and distal response of the epididymis to different inflammatory stimuli, thus providing a framework for the understanding of the different immune environments of the organ and their contributions to disease outcomes4,18,19.
Here, two different experimental protocols are presented for inducing direct inflammatory stimuli in distinct regions of the mouse epididymis, namely the initial segment and the cauda epididymidis, using interstitial and retrograde intravasal injection routes, respectively. Combined, these different approaches permit a regional delivery of PAMPs and the evaluation of opposite regions of the epididymis during inflammation.