RESEARCH
Peer reviewed scientific video journal
Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods
Visualizing science through experiment videos
EDUCATION
Video textbooks for undergraduate courses
Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments
BUSINESS
Video textbooks for business education
OTHERS
Interactive video based quizzes for formative assessments
Products
RESEARCH
JoVE Journal
Peer reviewed scientific video journal
JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments
Video encyclopedia of advanced research methods
EDUCATION
JoVE Core
Video textbooks for undergraduates
JoVE Science Education
Visual demonstrations of key scientific experiments
JoVE Lab Manual
Videos of experiments for undergraduate lab courses
BUSINESS
JoVE Business
Video textbooks for business education
Solutions
Language
English
Menu
Menu
Menu
Menu
Research Article
Pia Grimpe*1,2, Lars Melcher*1,2, Lothar Gröbe3,4, Jochen Hühn4, Julia D. Boehme1,2, Dunja Bruder1,2
1Infection Immunology Research Group, Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hospital Hygiene, Health Campus Immunology, Infectiology and Inflammation,Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg, 2Immune Regulation Research Group,Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, 3Flow Cytometry and Cell Sorting Platform,Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research, 4Experimental Immunology Department,Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research
Erratum Notice
Important: There has been an erratum issued for this article. View Erratum Notice
Retraction Notice
The article Assisted Selection of Biomarkers by Linear Discriminant Analysis Effect Size (LEfSe) in Microbiome Data (10.3791/61715) has been retracted by the journal upon the authors' request due to a conflict regarding the data and methodology. View Retraction Notice
This protocol presents a flow cytometry-based method to isolate viable alveolar type II epithelial cells (AECII) from neonatal, juvenile, or adult murine lungs (infected or non-infected). This approach enables downstream molecular and/or functional studies of AECII to identify their roles during lung inflammation and infection.
Alveolar type II epithelial cells (AECII) critically contribute to immune regulation in the lung and thus are key elements orchestrating pulmonary homeostasis. These functions render AECII particularly relevant in the context of infection with respiratory viruses, which target the lower airway epithelium and disrupt alveolar integrity. Preclinical mouse models are vital tools to elucidate the roles of AECII in the context of lung inflammation and/or infection. This protocol presents a detailed and reproducible pipeline for isolating viable and highly purified AECII from murine lungs at neonatal, juvenile, and adult stages. The methodology combines mechanical dissociation, enzymatic digestion, and subsequent fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to yield highly enriched AECII populations proven to be suitable for downstream molecular and functional analyses. For applications involving pathogenic viruses, the protocol includes an optional paraformaldehyde (PFA) fixation step, enabling safe handling under lower biosafety conditions without compromising RNA integrity. With optimized cell recovery across developmental stages, yielding up to 1.0 × 106 AECII cells per adult lung, this protocol supports preclinical studies of, e.g., viral pathogenesis, epithelial function, and regenerative capacity.
Due to their multifaceted roles in lung development, physiology, immunity, and repair processes, alveolar type II epithelial cells (AECII) vitally contribute to the maintenance as well as to the re-establishment of homeostasis following lung injury. As AECII are primary cellular targets of pandemic viruses such as influenza A virus (IAV) or SARS-CoV-2, their fate and functions have been in the spotlight of infection biology research. In this context, previous studies reported that intrinsic (e.g., genetic status1, age2,3) as well as extrinsic (e.g., microbial stimuli4) cues have a major impact on AECII phenotypes and their responsiveness to environmental triggers such as airborne pathogens. Notably, pulmonary inflammation has been shown to leave sustained changes in transcriptomic, proteomic, and epigenetic status of AECII5,6. The complex cellular interactions of AECII within the lung, as well as the contribution of various biotic and abiotic factors to AECII biology, highlight the importance of suitable in vivo models that allow for examining these cells in more detail.
FACS represents the current gold standard technique for the enrichment and purification of primary cells from human and animal tissues, as it enables the simultaneous implementation of multiparametric selection (or exclusion) and represents the only method, in which cell-intrinsic properties like size, granularity, or autofluorescence can be reliably integrated in the selection/exclusion workflow. To date, a few published protocols provide methodologies for FACS-based isolation of primary murine AECII. Sinha and Lowell reported a method for AECII isolation from adult mice that features similar tissue processing and flow cytometry workflow and included enrichment of AECII prior to FACS by bead-based magnetic depletion on non-target cells7. Another protocol describes the use of magnetic-bead-based isolation of EpCAM-positive lung cells or the use of transgenic mice that allowed for FACS-based isolation of AECII based on identification of SPC-positive (GFP+) cells using a conditional reporter mouse model8. While SPC expression reliably identifies AECII in murine lungs, this methodology is only applicable in combination with a dedicated mouse reporter strain and thus precludes AECII isolation from, e.g., wild-type mice. Importantly, while similar yields and purity of AECII were reported, none of these protocols provided adaptations for the isolation of AECII from neonatal, juvenile, or infected hosts.
To this end, the present protocol includes a set of adapted workflows for the isolation of highly pure and viable AECII from mice using enzymatic digestion in combination with FACS. This state-of-the-art methodology is based on a previously developed FACS-based AECII isolation protocol9 and contains important refinements that improve AECII purity through the addition of further identification and exclusion markers. Importantly, this updated protocol features AECII retrieval via both "touched" and "untouched" sorting strategies. Moreover, as postnatal lung development is associated with major changes regarding cellular composition and structural reorganization, this protocol includes adaptations to optimize AECII retrieval from neonatal, juvenile, and adult lungs. This allows one to examine AECII biology during ontogeny, e.g., in the context of lung maturation or infection biology studies. This approach can be used to obtain viable AECII for subsequent ex vivo cultivation and infection with IAV. Additionally, this protocol includes a fixation procedure using the chemical fixative paraformaldehyde (PFA). This step warrants the inactivation of various respiratory pathogens (e.g., SARS-CoV-2, IAV) in lung cell suspensions, which in turn allows subsequent sample handling (including FACS-based AECII isolation) in facilities with lower biocontainment precautions. While the PFA-based fixation precludes subsequent AECII ex vivo cultivation for functional studies, it allows the retrieval of significant amounts of intact RNA for transcriptomic profiling of AECII to elucidate their biological roles in the context of respiratory infections.
All animals were bred and housed in the animal facility at the Helmholtz Centre for Infection Research under specific-pathogen-free (SPF) conditions and in accordance with national and institutional guidelines. Euthanasia of naïve mice for subsequent AECII isolation was performed in accordance with national guidelines from the Society of Laboratory Animal Science (GV-SOLAS, Gesellschaft für Versuchstierkunde). Male mice on a C57BL/6 genetic background at an age of 2 days (neonatal), 3 weeks (juvenile), or 8-12 weeks (adult) were used. The reagents and the equipment used are listed in the Table of Materials.
1. Preparation of the mouse lung
2. Enzymatic digestion of lung tissue
3. Preparation of the lung tissue
4. Antibody staining for fluorescence-activated cell sorting
5. Sorting of AECII
NOTE: Instrument preparation: install a 100 µm nozzle for sorting AECII using a FACS device.
6. RNA-Isolation from PFA-fixed AECII (Optional)
NOTE: In case AECII shall be isolated from mice that had been infected with, e.g., respiratory viral pathogens, AECII isolation needs to be carried out under BSL2 or BSL3 conditions, depending on the pathogen. If the experimenter does not have access to cell sorting under the appropriate safety conditions, AECII isolated using the protocol described above can be fixed with PFA after antibody staining. This step inactivates pathogens10,11 and thus subsequent flow cytometric AECII sorting can take place under BSL1 conditions. Although the cells can no longer be employed for functional assays due to the fixation process, they are suitable for molecular analyses.
The protocol outlined here represents an optimized and detailed method for isolating and analyzing AECII from mouse lung tissue at various developmental stages, ranging from neonatal to juvenile and adult mice. The methodology involves mechanical and enzymatic lung dissociation, combined with an optimized flow cytometric cell sorting workflow, utilizing custom protocols suitable for processing samples from infected animals for subsequent Flow Sorting under BSL1 conditions.
The experimental data revealed a high efficacy of this isolation procedure (summarized in Figure 1) in the production of viable and highly pure (>95%) AECII populations. Flow-sorting generated pure AECII populations, with post-sort analysis validating almost 100% specificity for established cellular markers (Figure 2). Quantification of post-sort cell samples indicated high yields between 0.15 × 106 viable AECII from neonatal lungs and 1.0 × 106 cells from adult samples per whole lung preparation (Figure 3A). Isolated AECII maintained typical morphology (Figure 3B) and cellular integrity throughout the isolation process (Figure 3C). Additionally, the applicability of the protocol for functional studies was confirmed through successful ex vivo infection using a mouse-adapted IAV (H1N1, strain A/Puerto Rico/8/34) expressing the mCherry reporter protein (IAV-mCherry12), with a demonstration of the ability of the cells to support viral replication (Figure 4).
To support experimental workflows that necessitate sample fixation, the protocol includes a specialized RNA extraction approach using PFA fixation. Thorough examination of RNA quality from PFA-fixed AECII at different processing time points indicated that high-quality RNA amenable to downstream molecular analyses can be reliably extracted from fixed samples (Table 1). The quality of extracted RNA showed a direct relationship with the duration of thermal treatment at 80 °C during the extraction procedure, offering clear optimization guidelines based on particular experimental needs (Table 1, Figure 5). Validation by quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) analysis showed successful amplification of both housekeeping genes (ribosomal protein S9, Rps9) and AECII-specific markers (surfactant protein C, Sftpc) with PFA-fixed samples and fresh control preparations (Figure 6).

Figure 1: Schematic workflow for AECII isolation from neonatal, juvenile and adult mouse lungs using enzymatic tissue digestion and flow cytometric cell sorting. The diagram illustrates the systematic processing of mouse lungs from different age groups. Euthanasia of mice and lung extraction is followed by multi-step enzymatic digestion with dispase for tissue disintegration. Following mechanical disruption, cells are purified through a series of filtration steps with decreasing pore sizes. Subsequently, erythrocytes are lysed. Specific enrichment of AECII is achieved through negative selection using antibody labeling against hematopoietic markers (CD45, CD11b, CD11c, F4/80, CD19, CD16/32), endothelial marker CD31, platelet marker CD93 and bronchial epithelial cell marker CD24, positive selection of epithelial cells using an antibody labeling against CD326 and subsequent flow cytometric sorting based on the characteristic SSChigh profile of granular AECII. This protocol enables the isolation of highly pure (≥ 95%), viable primary AECII for downstream functional and molecular analyses. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Representative gating strategy used for the isolation of AECII from adult mice. (A) Lung single cell suspensions were stained with antibodies against the following antigens: F4/80, CD93, CD11c (coupled to APC), and CD19, CD31, CD11b, CD16/32, CD45, CD24 (coupled to PE), and CD326 (coupled to BV785). (B) Re-analysis (A) for purity analysis. Sorted AECII were re-analyzed in order to confirm 97.2% purity of AECII. (C) Representative fluorescence microscopy images of AECII after sorting. Nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue). Intracellular staining was performed using a primary anti-SPC antibody (species: rabbit), and secondary staining was performed using goat anti-rabbit IgG coupled to Alexa 594 (red). AECII stained with DAPI and secondary antibody only, and splenocytes stained with primary and secondary antibodies served as relevant controls, indicating specific binding of anti-SPC as well as anti-rabbitAlexa 594. Scale bars: 20 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Yield, morphology and vitality of AECII after fluorescence-activated cell sorting. (A) Total number of viable AECII per lung obtained from neonatal, juvenile, and adult mice. (B) Light-microscopy image of sorted AECII post sorting. Scale bar: 75 µm. (C) AECII viability observed by trypan blue staining after sorting. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Ex vivo infection of sorted AECII with IAV-mCherry. AECII cells isolated from adult mice were cultivated ex vivo in Matrigel-coated tissue culture plates overnight to allow attachment. Subsequently, the cells were infected with IAV-mCherry (multiplicity of infection 2) for 8 h. A time-dependent increase in mCherry signal intensity was observed. Scale bar: 200 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 5: RNA integrity from 4% PFA fixed AECII. Representative RNA profiles of PFA fixed and sorted AECII after RNA isolation using the Qiagen FFPE RNeasy Kit with modifications. Specific peaks for 18S and 28S rRNA, together with the RNA quality number (RQN), represent the RNA integrity and quality for intact isolated RNA from PFA fixed AECII. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 6: Amplification curves of the Rps9 housekeeping gene and AECII-specific gene Sftpc from control (untreated) and 4% PFA fixed AECII. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Sample | Incubation time at 80 °C | 28S/18S | RQN | RNA conc. [ng/µ] |
| Control 0,5x106 | - | 2 | 10 | 5.8 |
| Control 1x106 | - | 1.9 | 10 | 12.3 |
| PFA fixed 0,5x106 | 5 | 2 | 6.4 | 5.5 |
| PFA fixed 0,5x106 | 10 | 1.9 | 8.1 | 3.7 |
| PFA fixed 0,5x106 | 15 | 1.8 | 8.2 | 2.76 |
| PFA fixed 1 x106 | 5 | 2 | 8.2 | 6.26 |
| PFA fixed 1 x106 | 10 | 1.1 | 8.4 | 5.12 |
| PFA fixed 1 x106 | 15 | 0.9 | 8.5 | 5 |
Table 1: Quality of RNA isolated from 4% PFA fixed AECII - impact of different fixation times. RNA from AECII was isolated according to the manufacturer's protocol (FFPE RNeasy Kit) with modifications described in step 6. The fixed cells were incubated at 80 °C for either 5 min, 10 min, or 15 min to elute the RNA from the sample. RNA integrity was determined using the Fragment Analyzer from Agilent
The optimized protocol outlined here provides a reliable and reproducible approach for the isolation and analysis of AECII from mouse lung tissue at neonatal, juvenile, and adult ages. Furthermore, it provides an optional PFA fixation step prior to sorting, which allows AECII to be sorted from mice under BSL1 conditions, even if they have previously been infected with respiratory pathogens. Through the combination of carefully carried out lung exposure and perfusion, followed by intratracheal instillation of enzymes and low-melting agarose into the lung, tissue structure is maintained, enabling recovery of high-quality single-cell suspensions for downstream analysis. The addition of flow cytometric sorting on side-scatter properties, lineage-negative gating, and positive selection for CD326-positive cells resulted in remarkably pure populations of AECII. Such purity is of particular importance in ensuring that molecular and functional assays downstream are representative of intrinsic AECII biology and not confounded by contaminating cell types, enhancing the interpretability of gene-expression and virus-host interaction studies.
The abovementioned protocol features exclusion of non-AECII using a wide array of fluorescently-labelled antibodies directed against leukocytic and non-leukocytic antigens and subsequent positive selection of AECII via side-scatter properties and expression of the epithelial-cell specific molecule CD326. While it was shown that this methodology resulted in highly pure AECII populations (using SPC, a hallmark AECII marker), the purity of the obtained populations could only be confirmed using post-sort intracellular staining, thus far. This protocol can be applied to isolate AECII from SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza virus-infected lungs, in which AECII are primarily targeted by the virus and display distinct cellular adaptations1. However, this method may not be appropriate to isolate murine AECII in the context of lung cancer biology studies, as EpCAM (CD326) is also expressed by pulmonary cancer cells in mice and humans13. For these studies, the use of transgenic mouse strains that express fluorescent proteins under the transcriptional control of the Spc promoter may provide a more suitable approach for the reliable isolation of primary AECII.
A yield of 0.15 × 106 viable AECII per neonatal lung and up to 1.0 × 106 cells per adult lung illustrates the efficiency and scalability of the protocol. A major obstacle to the successful isolation of large AECII quantities is inefficient enzymatic digestion and mechanical disintegration of the lung tissue. Thus, it is crucial to ensure complete filling of bronchoalveolar spaces with the enzyme in step 2.1.4 and to carefully perform mechanical tissue disintegration in step 3.1.3. Effective enzymatic digestion yields a turbid cell suspension with minimal contribution of visible aggregates that usually can be disintegrated using a plunger in the following filter steps. Larger aggregates that cannot be passed through the cell strainer usually arise as a consequence of insufficient enzymatic digestion. Note that it is not advised to prolong the enzymatic digestion times, as this may negatively affect subsequent immunostaining14 and thus the accuracy of FACS-based AECII isolation.
Next to the efficiency of enzymatic and mechanical tissue disintegration, the genetic background may impact AECII yield. For this protocol, mice on a C57BL/6 background were used. In line with reported developmental15, immunological16, and physiological17,18,19 strain-specific differences, it is conceivable that the use of other laboratory mouse strains (e.g., BALB/c, DBA) may result in different AECII yields. Moreover, AECII yield from inflamed lungs (infectious or non-infectious) can be significantly reduced. This can be the result of indirect (inflammatory) or direct (pathogen-mediated) cell death of AECII that represent major targets for e.g., IAV20,21 and SARS-CoV-222,23,24.
The preservation of cellular integrity during mechanical dissociation, enzymatic digestion, and flow sorting is further key for downstream molecular and/ or functional analyses. Therefore, AECII viability and cellular function were assessed post-sorting. AECII were capable of adhering to Matrigel and maintaining a characteristic lamellar body-rich morphology for at least 24 h, which indicates functional competence following isolation and suitability for ex vivo culture (including infection models).
The efficient infection of sorted AECII with IAV-mCherry reporter virus12 and the observation of strong viral replication validate this system as a robust platform for elucidating epithelial-intrinsic antiviral responses. Since AECII regulate key processes involved in surfactant biosynthesis, alveolar regeneration, and innate immunity25,26, the capacity to examine IAV replication kinetics and host transcriptional responses in purified AECII populations will provide insights not obtainable in mixed-cell preparations.
A key innovation of this protocol is the inclusion of a fixation procedure, allowing side-by-side analysis of fresh and inactivated samples. The PFA fixation and adapted FFPE RNA extraction processes maintain RNA integrity to a degree compatible with downstream transcriptomic analyses, as evidenced by successful quantitative reverse-transcription PCR (qPCR).
PFA fixation times may affect the quality of staining and thus the recovery of AECII by FACS. Moreover, the yield and quality of RNA are generally affected by fixation processes. Depending on the in vivo infection model utilized, these aspects need to be considered for experimental design. It is recommended to avoid extensive fixation time and instead optimize the duration of PFA treatment so that the minimum necessary time is used, which has been experimentally proven to ensure complete inactivation of the respective virus.
Assessment of the abundance of ribosomal RNA (rRNA) using a microfluidics instrument serves as a surrogate to estimate mRNA quality in biological samples. The outlined AECII fixation/RNA isolation protocol allows the isolation of intact RNA with sufficient quality for downstream transcriptomic analyses, as evidenced by 28S/18S rRNA ratios >1 and RNA quality number (RQN) values >8. It is important to note that the 80 °C incubation step critically reduces RNA yield and quality. Adaptation of thermal treatment times can optionally be applied to increase RNA yield and quality for downstream applications.
Collectively, these methodological improvements provide an extensive toolkit for the study of AECII biology in the context of health, infectious disease, and development (newborn to adult). The high yield and purity of AECII isolated by this approach allow for multi-omic profiling, encompassing transcriptomic, proteomic, and chromatin accessibility assays, as well as functional assays (e.g., ex vivo infection) to further dissect relevant mechanisms of AECII in vivo.
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
The authors would like to thank Tatjana Hirsch and Friederike Kruse for their expert technical assistance, Lisa Hönicke and Justine Smout for their helpful discussions, and Yoshihiro Kawaoka for providing the IAV-mCherry reporter virus. This study was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) - TRR 359 - Project number 491676693 (to D.B. and J.H.), the COVIPA initiative (KA1-Co-02, Helmholtz Association; to D.B.), and a grant from the German Research Foundation (BO 7036/1-1; to J.D.B.). We acknowledge support from the Open Access Publication Fund of the Medical Faculty of the Otto-von-Guericke-University Magdeburg.
| ACK buffer | - | - | 8.29 g NH4Cl, 1 g KHCO3, 200 µL of 0. 5 M EDTA, add 1000 mL Milli-Q, adjust pH to 7.2 to 7.4 |
| anti-mouse CD11b | eBioscience | 12-0112-83 | clone M1/70; PE coupled |
| anti-mouse CD11c | Biolegend | 117310 | clone N418; APC coupled |
| anti-mouse CD16/32 | BD Biosciences | 553141 | clone 93; purified |
| anti-mouse CD16/32 | BD Biosciences | 561727 | clone 2.4G2; PE coupled |
| anti-mouse CD19 | Biolegend | 115508 | clone 6D5; PE coupled |
| anti-mouse CD24 | Biolegend | 101808 | clone M1/69; PE coupled |
| anti-mouse CD31 | Biolegend | 102408 | clone 390; PE coupled |
| anti-mouse CD326 | Biolegend | 118245 | clone G8.8; BV785 coupled |
| anti-mouse CD45 | BD Biosciences | 553081 | clone 30-F11; PE coupled |
| anti-mouse CD93 | eBioscience | 17-5892-82 | clone AA4-1; APC coupled |
| anti-mouse F4/80 | Biolegend | 123116 | clone BM8; APC coupled |
| anti-mouse SPC | abcam | ab211326 | host species: rabbit; clone: EPR19839; purified |
| Aria-Fusion | BD Biosciences | Cell Sorter | |
| Aria-II SORP | BD Biosciences | Cell Sorter | |
| Biozym Plaque Agarose | Biozym | 840101 | 1 % (w/v) in H2O |
| Cell strainer (100 µm, 70 µm, 40 µm) | BD Falcon | 352360, 352350, 352340 | |
| CellTrics (50 µm) | Sysmex | 04-004-2327 | |
| Deoxyribonuclease I from bovine pancreas, 2000 Kunitz units/vial | Sigma-Aldrich | D4263 | freshly dissolve content of 1 vial in 330 µL DMEM |
| Dispase, 100 mL (5000 caseinolytic units) | Corning | 354235 | perform sterile filtration (pore size 0.22 µm), prepare 4 mL aliquots in 15 mL tubes, store at -20 °C |
| DMEM | Gibco | 31885-049 | low glucose, with pyruvate, add HEPES (final concentration of 25 mM) |
| FACS Diva | BD Biosciences | Sorting Software | |
| FlowJo | Evaluation Software for FACS data | ||
| goat anti-rabbit | Alexa 594 coupled | ||
| Indwelling cannula Introcan 22G | Braun | 4252098B | |
| RNeasy FFPE Kit | Qiagen | 73504 | |
| Symphony S6 SE | BD Biosciences | Cell Sorter |