$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Histone post-translational modifications (PTMs) and transcription factors (TFs) are central regulators of gene expression. Histone PTMs, such as acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, and ubiquitination, primarily on their N-terminal tails influence chromatin structure1,2. In cancer, histone PTMs are often dysregulated, leading to aberrant activation of oncogenes or silencing of tumor suppressor genes3. TFs bind specific DNA sequences at promoters or enhancers to activate or repress target genes, often recruiting histone-modifying enzymes that coordinate chromatin remodeling4. Enzymes that write, erase, or read histone marks, such as histone acetyltransferases (HATs), histone deacetylases (HDACs), and methyltransferases (HMTs), are frequently mutated or dysregulated in cancer, making them attractive therapeutic targets5.
In SCLC, epigenetic changes and lineage-defining transcription factors (LDTFs) are key drivers of tumor biology6. Unlike genetic mutations, epigenetic alterations, including DNA methylation and histone modifications, regulate gene expression without changing the underlying DNA sequence. These modifications can silence tumor suppressor genes or activate oncogenes, fueling SCLC's aggressive behavior. For example, the histone methyltransferase KMT2D is frequently mutated with an alteration frequency of 12.9% in a large real-world SCLC patient cohort7 and is responsible for histone H3 lysine 4 mono-methylation (H3K4me1), a mark associated with active enhancer regions in the genome. SCLC is a molecularly heterogeneous disease. SCLC are classified into molecular subtypes based on differential expression of four LDTFs: achaete-scute homologue 1 (ASCL1), neurogenic differentiation factor 1 (NEUROD1), yes-associated protein 1 (YAP1) and POU class 2 homeobox 3 (POU2F3). The neuroendocrine (NE) subtypes, including ASCL1 and NEUROD1, account for approximately 70-80% of SCLC cases8. Therefore, investigating the distribution and profiles of different histone PTMs and TF binding sites in the various SCLC subtypes may elucidate subtype-specific gene programs vulnerable to therapeutic intervention.
The traditional method for identifying histone PTMs and the binding sites of sequence-specific regulatory proteins at the genome-wide level is chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq)9. However, ChIP-seq requires a large number of input cells and often yields high background across the genome. As a result, ChIP-seq requires a high level of enrichment of target protein to distinguish true signal from noise and needs deep sequencing for effective data analysis. Additionally, formaldehyde crosslinking used in ChIP-seq can mask epitopes and generate false-positive binding sites10. Cleavage Under Targets and Release Using Nuclease followed by next-generation sequencing (CUT&RUN-seq) is a high-resolution alternative for mapping histone PTMs and TF binding sites in situ within intact cells. In this method, permeabilized cells are incubated with an antibody targeting the chromatin-associated protein of interest, followed by binding of a Protein A(G)-micrococcal nuclease (MNase) fusion protein. Targeted DNA digestion flanking the protein of interest is then induced under high-calcium/low-salt conditions, releasing specific DNA fragments for purification. The purified DNA fragments are used to construct barcoded sequencing libraries, which can be pooled for high-throughput sequencing11,12,13,14. Compared to ChIP-seq, CUT&RUN requires significantly fewer cells as input, produces lower background noise, avoids crosslinking artifacts, and requires fewer sequencing reads - making it particularly suitable for studying dynamic chromatin states in cancer in a cost-efficient manner.
CUT&RUN technology has been developed to investigate the genomic locations of the chromatin-interacting proteins, including histone modifications, TF binding sites, and chromatin-associated complexes, thereby revealing epigenetic regulatory landscapes11,12. This technique has enabled detailed analyses of enhancer-promoter architecture, transcriptional network regulation, and chromatin state dynamics during development and disease progression15. In cancer research, CUT&RUN allows precise mapping of histone marks16,17 and oncogenic transcription factor occupancy, helping to identify lineage-specific regulatory programs and potential therapeutic targets15,16. Furthermore, CUT&RUN can be performed in situ in cells, including CD8+ T cell17, as well as to tissue samples18,19.
To detect the genomic location of PTMs and transcription factor E2F7 binding sites in SCLC subtypes, we applied CUT&RUN-seq to four SCLC NE cell line models: H146 and DMS79 (ASCL1 subtype), as well as H446 and H82 (NEUROD1 subtype), with or without KMT2D mutations. We profiled the histone mark H3K4me1, an enhancer-associated modification primarily catalyzed by KMT2D, and E2F7, which has been shown to be a cofactor of ASCL120. The histone mark H3K4me3, which is associated with active promoters, served as positive control, while IgG served as negative control.
Here, we present a detailed CUT&RUN-seq protocol for SCLC NE cell lines, based on the following: a commercially available CUT&RUN kit (see Table of Materials), the original work of Skene and Henikoff11,12,13, and our own laboratory optimizations.